Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2114972 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 2114972
(54) Titre français: BOUCHAGE INVIOLABLE
(54) Titre anglais: TAMPER-EVIDENT CLOSURE
Statut: Réputée abandonnée et au-delà du délai pour le rétablissement - en attente de la réponse à l’avis de communication rejetée
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • B65D 55/06 (2006.01)
  • B65D 47/08 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • HERR, JAMES E. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • KERR GROUP, INC.
(71) Demandeurs :
  • KERR GROUP, INC. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré:
(22) Date de dépôt: 1994-02-04
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 1994-10-03
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
043,070 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 1993-04-02

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


ABSTRACT
container closure cap having a lid portion that is
connectable to a base cap is disclosed. The lid portion
includes a tongue portion that is connected to the
remainder of the lid by a living hinge and a pair of
fracturable tear lines. In order to access the container
through the lid, the tongue must be raised, which causes
the rupture of the tear lines and thus provides visual
proof that the underlying container has been tampered
with.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A tamper evident closure for sealing an open-topped
container having a neck, the closure comprising a lid,
said lid including:
an upper surface, said upper surface including a movable
tongue portion that is attached to the lid by a living
hinge and a plurality of regions that are fracturable,
wherein the thickness of the fracturable regions is less
than that of the adjacent portions of the lid:
an annular skirt depending from the top of the lid; and
means for attaching the lid to a container.
2. The closure of claim 1, wherein the lid further
comprises means for providing a secure connection between
the lid and an underlying base cap or a container.
3. The closure of claim 1, wherein the lid is made of
a polymer.
4. The closure of claim 1, wherein the tongue includes
means for selectively sealing the tongue to an underlying
base cap or container.
5. The closure of claim 1, wherein the tongue includes
a pull tab.
6. The closure of claim 1, further comprising a base
cap for attachment to a container and means for providing
a secure connection between the lid and the base cap.
7. The closure of claim 6, wherein the hinged tongue
includes a sealing plug, and the base cap includes:
a top surface that defines an orifice, said orifice being
configured to mate with the sealing plug on the hinged
tongue; and
an annular skirt that is dependant from the top surface
of the base cap.

8. The closure of claim 6, wherein the base cap is
equipped with a tamper evident feature that comprises a
series of tabs equally space about the periphery of the
annular skirt and a series of breakable connectors.
9. The closure of claim 6, wherein the base cap is made
of a polymer.
10. The closure of claim 6, wherein the base cap
includes an internal thread.
11. The closure of claim 6, wherein the base cap and lid
are formed via injection molding.
12. A method for providing a tamper evident closure, the
method comprising the steps of:
attaching a base cap to a container, said base cap being
equipped with a tamper evident feature; and
securely affixing a lid to the base cap, said lid having
an upper surface that includes a movable tongue portion
that is attached to the lid by a living hinge and a
plurality of regions that are fracturable, wherein the
thickness of the fracturable regions is less than that of
the adjacent portions of the lid so that the interior of
the container cannot be accessed through the lid without
rupturing the fracturable regions.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the tamper evident
feature about the base cap comprises a series of tabs
equally space about the periphery of the annular skirt
and a series of breakable connectors.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the base cap is
integral with the lid.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


TA~PBR-EVIDENT C~O~RE
Backqround of the Invention
This inv~ntion relate~ gen~rally to tamper-evident
dispensing closures and, more particularly, to a tamper~
evident closure that i~ simple to manu~acture and that
does not require any ~pec~alized equipment to b~ fitted
to a contai~er.
The importance o~ pro~riding tamper ~vident features on
bottles and other containers i well ~nown. Consumers
have increasingly come to expect bottles and conkainers
of all types that contain sub~tances for ingestion to be
equipped with a tamper evident feature. Although the use
o~ such closures is widespread, the expense involved in
producing such tamper evident containers has had a
limiting effect: on their use. If such closures could be
15 manufactured more inexpensively tha~ at presen~, they
would be more widely u~ed.
one approach to providing a tamper evident closure is to
use a shrink wrap about ~he container and closure~ This
approach ~oes not require the closure itself to have a
20 tamper evident feature. In order to access the con~ent~
of the container, the ~hrink wrap must be punctured or
I torn, which leaves a visible indi¢ation that the
I contain~r has ~een acce~ed and pexhaps tampered with.
A related approach is to apply a band o~ tamper-evident
~; 25 tape about the circumference ~f the junction between the
closure and the container. Un~or~unately, each o~ these

approaches require~ khat the ~hrink wrap or tape be
provided by an additional piece o~ machinery through a
secondary manufacturing operation after th~ container has
been filled. The capital machinery necessary to perform
these steps is often expensi~e, which has impeded the
acceptance of this approach.
In another approach, the closures themselves ar~ made to
be inherently tamper e~ident. Once manu~actured, such
closures need not require the additional assemhly steps
that the application of tape or shrink wrap require.For
example, ~.S. Patent No. 4,860,907 to Sondal describes a
tamper-evident disp~nsing snap-on dispensing closure.
The closure uses a living hinge to pivot the cap on the
ba~e. It also has tearable bridges on the cap which must
be torn to lift the cap from the base, thus rendering the
closure tamper-evident. It further has a tear-o~f part
which must be removed o~ of some length of the
circumference in order to li~t the cap. U.S. Patent No.
4,487,324 to Ostrowsky describes a tamper-evident
dispensing closure that uses a living hinge to pivot the
cap on the base. A tamper-~vident ~trip must be
partially removed to allow the cap of the closure to be
lifted. Un~ortunately, such caps are often di~icult to
manufacture, and therefore expensive to produce, This is
¦ 25 an impoxtant consideration, for the competitive pressures
;~ present in the ~ield of pac~aging often confer a market
advantage on those who use the leaæt expensive packaging
¦ scheme. Furthermore, approaches that use tear-away
pieces often generate sharp edge edges and additional
1 30 litter, with the attendant possibility that the portion
that is torn of~ may fall into the container. These
attributes are not acceptable to many consumers.
1 There remains a need ~or an inexpensive means o~
`1 providing a tamper evident ~eal on containeri, whlch
require6 neither intricate molding nor additional
machinery beyond that routinely used to attach
conventional closures to containers. There is a further
i
.,
!

r3 7 2
need for such a closure that does not generate additional
litter.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention satis~ies these needs by pxoviding
a tamper-evident cap that is easy to manu~acture and
simple to incorporate into existing product packaging
lines. The closure includes both a base and a lid; the
lid can be mounted on several different ba~e caps,
dependin~ on the manufacturer's preference. For example,
a manufacturer may choo~e ~o use bas~ caps that include
tamper-Pvident features of their own to protect tha
integrity of the base cap to container connection. In
each case the entire closure is then threaded or
otherwise attached (as by a simple press-fit) to the
container neck.
The lid portion of the closure includes connecting
6truc~ure ~o facilitate its connection to a base cap or,
alternatively, dir~ctly to a bottle or other container.
The lid iE provided with a tongue portion that is hinged
to the remainder of the lid along a living hinge, which
is used for this purpose b~cau~e o~ the ease with which
it can ~e manufactured. The tongue is attached to the
remainder of the lid along a pair of ~ractllrable tear
lines, along which the lid i~ of reduced thickness. In
¦ order to acces the contents o~ the bottle through the
I lid, the tongue portion must be rai~ed, which causes the
tear lines to rupture and thus provides visual indication
to subsequent users that the content~ of the bottle have
previously been acc~ssed. The tongue of the lid may
furthar be providsd with sealing structure, such as a
~ealing plu~, which makes with a corresponding hole in
the underlying base ~ap. Thi~ feature allows one to re-
~eal the container after ik has been opened, but does not
nega~e th~ tamper ~ndication provided by the lid~
The invention doe~ not rely on parts which must be torn
off to render it tamper-evid~n~, but rather relies on
!
"'"' '' ~ 'i~..-i ''

parts that tear along thPir length to alert the user to
the previouR opening o~ the closure. Thi~ further
simplifies the manufacturP of the device and (with
respect to tear away closures) reduce the amount o~
litter associated with the package~ Concomitantly, it
further rPduces the likelihood tha~ por~ions of the
closure itself will fall into the containerO Moreover,
the tamper evident closure o~ the invention can be
directly fitted onto containers with conventional capping
m~chinery, th~reby providing a tamper evident closure
without the need for additi~nal ~quipment such as would
be required by a sy~tem relying on the use of shrink wrap
or tape.
Brief Descri~tion of the Drawinqs
The above and other features and advantages of the
present invention will become apparent from the ~ollowing
di~cussion
of a specific~ illustrative embodiment presented in
conjunction wi~h the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1~ is a front elevational view of the base lid and
base c~p, partially in section, in which the closure is
in its closed and sealed position;
FIG. lB is a top plan view of the closure shown in FIG.
lA;
FIG. 2A iB a sectional view of the lid portlon of the
clo~ure taken along line A-A in FIG. lA;
FIG. 2B is a sectional view of the lid portion of the
closure taken along line B-B in FIG. lA; and
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view of the closure with the
position o~ the hinged tongue in the open position shown
I in phantom.
~ Detailed Descri~tion
I
Referring now specifically to the drawings, wherein like
numerals indicate like parts throughout, the tamper
evident closure is generally designat~d 1 in FIG. 3, and

comprlses
a base cap 10 and a lid 50, the latter being mounted onto
the former by several equivalent friction fit locking
elements. The structure o~ the base cap and lld shall
now be discussed in turn.
The base cap 10 has a generally flat top 12 and a
dependant annular skirt 14. In this embodiment, the
dependant annular skirt 14 has internal threads 16 which
mate with complamentary external threads (not shown~ on
the neck of a corresponding bottle or other container.
The base cap 10 has a dispensing ori~ice 1~ formed on
flat top 12 through which the contents of the container
are normally dispensed. Although the dispensing orifice
is ~hown to be circular in the figures, other shapes
could be used as well. The base cap 10 has three
generally cylindrical friction fit locking cavities 20
formed projecting above the flat ~op 12. The base cap 10
has a tamper-evident band 22 extending from the bottom of
the dependant annular skirt 14. The tamper-evidsnt band
comprises a plurality (e.gO, 16 - depending on the size
of the container neck) of equally spaced re~ilient tabs
1 24. These tabs are internally folded to slide over th~
¦ container's external threads and annular shoulder as the
cap is applied on the container. The tabs lock against
the lower surface of the container's annular ~houlder to
, retain the tamper-in~icating band on the container as the
il base cap is removed. The ~eparation of the tamper-
indicating band and the baæe cap is the result of the
forces generated through the breakable connectors. The
breakable connector~ are either formed in the molding
process or are formed in a post molding cutting
operation. (This tamper-evident band is further
illustrated and discus~ed in applicant's U.S. Patent No.
4,506,795, the contents of which are herein incorporated
by reference.)
The lid 50 has a generally flat top 52 and a depending
incomplete annular ~kirt 54. The lid ~0 has three
i

~ `
~ ~ l l i '~ 7 2
friction fit locking plugs 56 d~pending from the flat top
52 (see FIG. lB~. The plugs 56 engage the three friction
~it locking cavitie~ 20 on flat top 12 oX the base cap so
as to lockingly attach the lid 50 onto the base cap 10.
The lid 50 has a hinged tongue portion 58, which i.
hinged to lid 50 by living hinge ~6. Tongue 58 is
yenerally rectangular in shape except at the tongue skirt
62, where it ~orm8 the remainder of the annular skirt 54
(see FIGS. lA and 2A)o Depending from the tongue 58 is
an annular orifice-sealing plug 600 Sealing plug ~0
mates with dispensing orifice lB 60 as to close the
orifice 18, thus preventing further di~pensingO Thi~
feature allows one to re-seal the container after the
container has been accessed, but does not compromise the
visual indication provided by the tamper evident tear
lines that the container has been accessed (as is further
discussed below).
Depending ~xom tongue ~kirt 62 is pull tab 64. Pull tab
64 is used ~or pulling the tongue 58 upward ~rom a
condition wh~re plug 60 is sealingly closing orifice 18,
to a condition where plug 60 is not sealingly closing
orifice 18 ~see FIG~ 3), thus allowing the dispensing of
the contents of the container~ Tamper-evident tear lines
68 connect both sides o~ tongue 58 to ~lat top 52.
¦ ~5 Tamper-evident tear lines 6~ also connect both side~ of
¦ tongue skirt 62 to annular skirt 54 (see FIGS. lB and
1 2B). These tear lines 68 are weakened portions of lid 50
that allow the tongue 58 to be separated from the lid 50
everywhere but at the living hinge 66. The tear lines
are sufficiently thin that th~y can be torn by those who
need to access the container, while still being thick and
strong enough so as not to be inadvertently torn. Tear
lines 68, if torn, thus alert subsequsnt users that the
tongue has been lifted fro~ the lid at least once and the
integrity of the container violat~d through the lid.
The closure is ~1mpl~ and inexpensive to manufacture,
being mass-producible using ~imple conventional mold~

1 ~ ~ ?J 7 v
reguiring no ~pecial tooling. The base cap will
typically be manufactured o~ polypropylene (mainly to
accommodatei threads); the lid is preferably made of a
high density polyethylene.
The base cap and lid collectiYely provide a dual tamper
evident device, in which the bas~ portion provides a
tamper evident closure between the bottle and the base
cap, and the lid provides a tamper evident closure
between the lid and the base capO ~lthough illustrated
as separate components, the two may be provided as an
integral as~embly for even easier attachment to the
bottle. Alternatively, the lid portion can be fitted to
other formis of ba~e cap, the only requirement being that
the base cap have a means for securely locking the base
cap to the lid to ~uch an extent that the separation of
the lid from the base cap results in the rupture of the
tamper evident linei~ on the lid.
: . ' i' " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' : .''' . . ' ' ' ' . .

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 1996-08-04
Demande non rétablie avant l'échéance 1996-08-04
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 1996-02-05
Inactive : Demande ad hoc documentée 1996-02-05
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1994-10-03

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
1996-02-05
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
KERR GROUP, INC.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
JAMES E. HERR
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.

({010=Tous les documents, 020=Au moment du dépôt, 030=Au moment de la mise à la disponibilité du public, 040=À la délivrance, 050=Examen, 060=Correspondance reçue, 070=Divers, 080=Correspondance envoyée, 090=Paiement})


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Dessins 1994-10-02 2 104
Revendications 1994-10-02 2 118
Abrégé 1994-10-02 1 26
Description 1994-10-02 7 440
Dessin représentatif 1998-08-24 1 8