Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2171508 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 2171508
(54) Titre français: METHODE DE FABRICATION DE PLANCHES MINCES, PARTICULIEREMENT DES LAMELLES STRATIFIEES DE PARQUET
(54) Titre anglais: METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THIN BOARDS, IN PARTICULAR PARQUET LAMINATES
Statut: Réputée abandonnée et au-delà du délai pour le rétablissement - en attente de la réponse à l’avis de communication rejetée
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • B27M 3/04 (2006.01)
  • B27L 5/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • GONNER, SIEGMAR (Allemagne)
(73) Titulaires :
  • GEBRUDER LINCK MASCHINEFABRIK "GATTERLINCK" GMBH & CO. KG
(71) Demandeurs :
  • GEBRUDER LINCK MASCHINEFABRIK "GATTERLINCK" GMBH & CO. KG (Allemagne)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré:
(22) Date de dépôt: 1996-03-11
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 1996-09-18
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
195 09 653.3-15 (Allemagne) 1995-03-17

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


Proposed herein is a method for manufacturing thin boards,
in particular parquet laminates, from a square timber by
repeated separation of a thin board from the square timber,
without the formation of chips, in a cutter machine or in a
series of cutter machines that are arranged one after the
other, and by repeated passage of the residual square timber
that is not yet completely divided into thin boards through
the cutter machine(s), in particular in a series of cutting
machines that are arranged one after the other, in which the
square timber is divided into thin boards in one pass, the
square timber being moved against a generally stationary
blade to separate a thin board, in each instance in the
longitudinal direction in which its fibers are oriented, and
in which at least one thickness measurement is effected
during the passage of the square timber through the cutting
machine(s). The method is characterized in that the
thickness of the thin boards produced in each individual
cutting machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) is determined
individually, the measured actual value of the thickness of
the boards from one cutting machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) is
compared with the nominal value of the thickness of the thin
boards that are to be produced from these cutter machines
(1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n), a signal being obtained from a deviation
from the nominal value of the thickness and used to correct
the blade settings of the particular cutter machine (1, 1.1,
1.i, 1.n) that are relevant to thickness for separation of
thin boards from the following square timbers.
Also proposed in an installation for the cutting type
separation of thin boards from a square timber in such
a way that no chips are generated.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


Claims
1. A method for manufacturing thin boards, in particular
parquet laminates, from a square timber by repeated
separation of a thin board from the square timber, without
the formation of chips, in a cutter machine or in a series
of cutter machines that are arranged one after the other,
and by repeated passage of the residual square timber that
is not yet completely divided into thin boards through the
cutter machine(s), in particular in a series of cutting
machines that are arranged one after the other, in which the
square timber is divided into thin boards in one pass, the
square timber being moved against a generally stationary
blade to separate a thin board, in each instance in the
longitudinal direction in which its fibers are oriented, and
in which at least one thickness measurement is effected
during the passage of the square timber through the cutting
machine(s), characterized in that the thickness of the thin
boards produced in each individual cutting machine (1, 1.1,
1.i, 1.n) is determined individually, the measured actual
value of the thickness of the boards from one cutting
machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) is compared with the nominal
value of the thickness of the thin boards that are to be
produced from these cutter machines (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n), a
signal being obtained from a deviation from the nominal
value of the thickness and used to correct the blade
settings of the particular cutter machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n)
that are relevant to thickness for separation of thin boards
from the following square timbers.
2. A method as defined in Claim 1, characterized in that the
determination of the actual thickness of the thin boards
produced in a cutter machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) is
12

determined as a difference in the thickness of the
(residual) timber (5) prior to and after the separation of a
thin board.
3. A method as defined in Claim 2, characterized in that a
residual timber (5), whose measured actual thickness is in
the range above the nominal thickness D of a board that is
to be produced and beneath a specific thickness Dx, which in
its turn lies beneath the total nominal thickness 2D of two
boards that are to be produced, are removed from the cutter
process and their thickness is reduced to the nominal
thickness D by a chip-removing process; and in that a
residual timber (5) whose measured actual thickness lies
between Dx and 2D is subjected to an additional cutting
process and the resulting residual board is rejected, the
thickness Dx or the difference between the thicknesses
(Dx-D) is used as an installation-dependent variable.
4. A method as defined in at least one of the Claims 1 to 3,
characterized in that in order to correct the blade settings
that are relevant to cut thickness, based on the thickness
deviation of the measured thin boards that are produced from
the nominal thickness D, use is made of a control and
regulating system in which a relationship of the blade
adjustment and the board thickness can calculated for a
specific wood type and/or a specific condition of the wood,
or which is capable of learning such that when correcting
the adjustment of the blade it takes the effect of earlier
corrections into account.
5. A method as defined in one of the Claims 1 to 4,
characterized in that the thickness of the thin boards or
13

residual timbers (5) is measured by means of laser
radiation.
6. A method as defined in Claim 5, characterized in that
measurements are taken for every thin board or residual
timber (5), in each instance in two areas that are at a
distance from the outer long edges of the thin boards or
residual timber (5).
7. An installation for cut-type separation, without the
generation of chips, of thin boards from a square timber
(5), with a cutter machine (1) or a series of cutter
machines (1.1, 1.i, 1.n), means to guide the square timber
to the cutter machine(s) (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n), optionally
with means to guide the square timber from one cutting
machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) to the following one, and means
to remove a residual board that cannot be further divided
after the cutter machine (1) or after a cutter machine in
the series of cutter machines (1.1, 1.i, 1.n), means (7.1,
7. i, 7.n) to withdraw a separated board from each cutter
machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) and, optionally, with means to
return a residual timber (5) from the output of one or of
the last of a series of cutter machines (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n)
ahead of the or one of the preceding cutter machine(s) (1,
1.1, 1.i, 1.n), when the number of cutter machines (1, 1.1,
1.i, 1.n) is smaller than the number of thin boards that are
to be produced from a square timber, and with at least one
thickness measuring system (4.0, 4,1, n, 1 (4n) after the
cutter machine (1) or after the last (1.n) of a series of
cutter machines (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) and for measuring the
thickness of the residual timber that leaves this cutter
machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n), and a control system for the
adjustment of the blade position(s) of the cutter machine(s)
14

(1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) as a function of the measurement results
from at least one of the thickness measuring systems (4.0,
4.1, 4.i, 4.n), characterized in that an additional
thickness measuring system (4.0, 4.1, 4.i, 4.n) is
associated with each cutting machine, this being arranged
either at its intake to measure a square timber that is
delivered to the cutter machine or on the means to withdraw
a separated board for measuring a separated board; and in
that the control system is configured so as to compare the
actual thickness of the thin board that is produced at each
customer machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n) with a nominal thickness
(D) of the thin boards that are to be produced in the
particular cutter machine (1, 1.1, 1.i, 1.n), in order that
in the event that the actual value differs from the nominal
value, the blade parameters that are relevant to thickness
and that apply to this particular cutter machine (1, 1.1,
1.i, 1.n) can be varied in an appropriate manner for the
following machine.
8. An installation has defined in Claim 7, characterized in
that a device for reducing the thickness of the residual
board by the removal of chips, in particular a thickness
planer (2), follows the means to remove a residual board
that can no longer be divided by cutting from one cutting
machine (1) or from the last in the series of cutting
machines (1.1, 1.i, 1.n).
9. An installation has defined in Claim 8, characterized in
that between the one cutting machine (1) or the last in the
series of cutting machines (1.1, 1.i, 1.n) and the thickness
planer (2) for secondary processing of the residual board by
the removal of chips there is a mechanical switch (8) to

eject residual boards that are not of the thickness required
for a thin board that is to be produced.
10. An installation as defined in at least one of the Claims 7
to 9, characterized in that in a series of cutter machines
(1.1, 1.i, 1.n) one or a plurality of the cutter machines
(1.1, 1.i, 1.n) are configured so as to compare the actual
permit a residual timber (5) to pass without separation of a
thin board from it, or such that bypass means with which a
residual timber (5) can be moved past the particular cutting
machine (1.1, 1.i, 1.n) are associated with one or a
plurality of the cutting machines (1.1, 1.i, 1.n).
11. An installation as defined in at least one of the Claims 7
to 10, characterized in that the thickness measuring systems
(4.0, 4.1, 4.i, 4.n) are laser-type devices.
12. An installation as defined in a t least one of the Claims 7
to 11, characterized in that thickness measurement systems
(4.0, 4.1, 4.i, 4.n) are arranged on the means to guide the
(residual) timber (5).
13. An installation as defined in Claim 12, in which the
guidance means are conveyor belts (10), characterized in
that the conveyor belts (10) are narrower at the point where
thickness measurements are made than the residual timber (5)
or board that are carried by them, and the thickness
measurement probes (sender unit 4a, receiver unit 4b) are so
arranged that they measure the (residual) timber (5) or
board at a point at which this is not lying on the conveyor
belt (10).
16

14. An installation as defined in Claim 13, characterized in
that the thickness measuring probes (sender 4a, receiver
unit 4b) are arranged at a break point in the guidance
means.
15. An installation as defined in Claim 14, in which the
guidance means are conveyor belts, characterized in that the
break point is a point at which the conveyor belt (10) is
moved anyway from the material that is being conveyed
through a diversion system (11, 12, 13).
17

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


2171508
A Method for Manufacturing Thin Boards, in particular
Parquet Laminates
The present invention relates to a method and an installation as
set out in the preamble to Patent Claims 1 and 7, these being
used to produce thin boards from a square timber by cutting and
without the removal of any chips. A method of this kind is used
to produce thin boards for the surface layer of floor-covering
laminates.
The production of thin boards from a square timber by cutting and
without the removal of any chips is already known. It is also
known that when using this method, the thickness of the thin
boards that are produced cannot be predetermined relatively
precisely as compared to the case when such boards are sawn from
preferably dry wood, since when the cutting method is used, the
wood is processed when wet and preferably also when heated, so
that various parameters that apply to the wood as well as
parameters that apply to the machine can affect the thickness of
the board that is produced.
These facts mean that in the case of the complete division of
square timber of a specific thickness from which it is intended
to produce a number of thin boards, the total thickness of which
is equal to the thickness of the square timber, the thickness of
the final board that is left over may not be of the intended
thickness, with the result that it has to be discarded unless
additional steps are taken.
DE 40 26 346 A1 describes a method that solves this problem;
using this method, after the separation of one or a plurality of
thin boards, the thickness of the square timber that remains is
measured and an attempt is then made to so change the setting of

2171508
~,
those machine parameters that are relative to the cutting
thickness that the remaining square timber can be divided as
evenly as possible between the remaining number of thin boards
that are to be produced from it, so that no usable residual board
is left over. The philosophy that underlies this method has as
its objective the division of a square timber into usable thin
boards as completely as possible and without any loss, although
possible deviations in the thickness of the board that are
produced have to be accepted. Within certain limits, this is
acceptable in the case of methods in which, after the drying
process that follows the cutting process, the boards then have to
be reduced to equal thickness because of the dimensional changes
that the wood undergoes. In this method, it is important that the
result obtained from measuring the residual square timber is the
single factor that is considered with respect to the further
division of one or, in the best case, of a specific group from
square timbers, the processing of which was begun under identical
conditions. It is preferred that this method be used only with
cutter machines or a series of a small number of cutter machines,
for example, two machines, in which the thickness of the square
timber is measured once it has passed through one or a small
group of cutter machines, so that it can then be further divided
when it passes through the cutting system once again. When this
method is used, there is, as a rule, sufficient time to reset the
cutter machines as the square timber is returning to the start,
so that the square timber can be re-worked under these new
conditions.
The situation is somewhat different in the case of a longer
series of cutter machines in which the square timber is to be
completely divided into thin boards in one pass. In particular,
when processing relatively short square timbers, as is the case
when manufacturing parquet laminate, on the one hand, the

2171508
_
processing speed is so high that it is no longer possible to use
the results obtained from measuring the thickness of the residual
square timber at the output of a cutter machine to correct the
settings of the following cutter machines. For this reason, one
follows a different route in the case of such installations, and
this is described in DE 42 44 310 C1.
In order to avoid a residual board that is too small remaining at
the end of the division process, given that the cut thickness
cannot be precisely predicted, and which can lead to handling
difficulties in the plant, it has been proposed that square
starting timber that is of a greater thickness than the combined
thickness of the boards that are to be produced from it be used.
In this way, after a square timber has passed through the
sequence of cutter machines, as a rule a residual board that is
greater than the nominal thickness will be left over. In order to
ensure that this board can also be used, the invention that is
described in DE 42 44 310 C1 makes provision such that a machine
to reduce the thickness of the residual board by removing
material from it is installed after the series of cutter
machines. This processing of the residual board, which does not
conform to the method, is provided to avoid the control problems
that are occasioned by the short throughput time and which are
insoluble in such an installation for the division of a square
timber without any loss.
It has now been shown that, in particular when manufacturing
parquet laminate, that the variations in thickness, brought about
by the product as well as by the machinery, that occur when
dividing square timbers by cutting can lead to difficulties
during subsequent processing if-- as in the case of cut
laminates--thickness processing of the laminates after drying is
as far as possible to be avoided only in the top layer of the

2171508
-
product, so that this secondary processing alone is used as the
concluding surface processing of the product that is already
glued up.
For this reason, it is the task of the present invention to
ensure that in a method of this kind the laminates or thin boards
that leave the cutter machines are of a highly consistent
thickness.
Proceeding from a prior art as described in DE 40 26 346 A1, this
problem has been solved according to the present invention by the
distinguishing features set out in Patent Claim 1, insofar as a
method is concerned, and by the distinguishing features set out
in Patent Claim 7 for a corresponding installation.
The present invention varies from the former objective, namely,
to convert the residual thickness measured with respect to a
square timber into steps to further divide this square timber.
The principal objective is to determine the exact thickness of
the thin boards that are produced in each cutter machine. Should
the thickness of the boards produced in one cutter machine vary
from the nominal thickness, then, assuming that wood having
identical parameters is processed in one production run, the
parameters that are relevant to thickness and that apply to this
cutter machine--as a rule the distance of the blade from the
supporting surface for the square timber--are so corrected that
when thin boards are separated off from the next square timber,
as far as possible boards that are of the nominal thickness or of
a thickness that is within given tolerances are produced.
Such a method is particularly advantageous if, following a series
of cutter machines that are intended to it divide a square timber
completely in one pass, there is an apparatus, in particular a

2171S08
.~
thickness planer, to reduce the thickness of the residual board
that leaves the last machine, and which does this by removing
material from said board. In this case, too, every effort should
be made to obtain a residual board that is thicker than the
nominal thickness of a board that is to be produced so that it is
still possible to process this board in a thickness planer that
removes material from it.
Actually, however, the manner in which this residual square
timber is to be further processed is to be decided by determining
the thickness of the residual square timber prior to the last
cutting process that is incorporated. Should a residual board
that is of a thickness that is less than a specific critical
value be left over from the last cutting process that is used,
there is a danger that such a residual square timber can no
longer be adequately guided and advanced by the cutter machine
during the operation that separates the last board. If, for this
reason, there is at the output of a specific cutter machine a
residual board whose thickness lies between the nominal thickness
of one board and the nominal thickness of a second board, this
board can only be subjected to an additional cutting process if
the thickness of the residual square timber is greater than a
thickness Dx that is governed by the machine. If the thickness of
the residual square timber or residual board is less than Dx,
this residual board must be passed directly to the thickness
planer that is incorporated down the line. If the thickness of
the residual square timber is greater than Dx, but as a rule less
than the thickness D2 of two boards, the residual square timber
will be subjected to an additional cutting process, in which
instance the residual board that results is to be rejected
through an out-gate because its thickness is less than the
nominal thickness of a board that is to be produced. The
occurrence of such a situation should be avoided as far as

2171508
possible although in such a case, it is preferred that a
thickness planer be preceded by a mechanical switch that can
remove residual boards that are not acceptable from the line
process.
While the number of cutter machines in an installation in which a
square timber is meant to be divided completely into thin boards
in one pass does not necessarily have to be equal to the number
of boards that are to be produced from a square timber, it is
preferred that the installation be so configured that at least
one or a plurality of the cutter machines be configured to permit
the passage of a square timber without the separation of a board,
or such that a residual square timber can move past one or a
plurality of cutter machines along a bypass feed path.
The sequence of the cutting process described herein is
preferably incorporated into an overall process sequence in
which, after the cutting process, the cut thin boards are dried
to a specific terminal moisture content and then used as the top
layer for a laminated product, in particular a floor covering, in
which a top layer made up of the laminates is glued under
pressure to sub-layers of a specific thickness, for example, sawn
wood bars, chipboard, or the like. After drying, the side edges
of the laminates can, if necessary, be finished, although it is
preferred that their thickness remain as produced. This
eliminates the need for a thickness processing stage. As
discussed heretofore, the surface of the laminate top layer is
finished on the product that has already been glued up. The
possibility of adjusting the thickness of the laminates by
grinding once they have dried but before any further processing
saves both material and grinding resources.

2171508
-
It should be remembered that boards of equal thickness do not
always have to be produced in a series of cutter machines. The
method according to the present invention makes provision such
that, in particular when dividing a square timber in one pass
through a series of cutter machines thin boards of different
thickness can be produced in the individual cutter machines. In
this case, it is preferred that the thickest board that is
desired be produced in the last cutter machine or cutter machines
of a series, since this reduces the difficulties associated with
handling the residual square timber in the cutter machine.
It is preferred that the thickness of the laminates produced in
each cutter machine be determined by forming a differential from
thickness measurements of the (residual) square timbers as they
enter and as they leave a cutter machine. Since, in a preferred
embodiment of the process, it is expedient to measure the
residual square timbers in the area of the last of a series of
cutter machine in each instance so as to arrive at a
determination with respect to the way in which they are to be
further processed, it is practical to provide for differential
measurement at least in this area. It can be both problematic and
costly to effect such thickness measurements on the separated
boards themselves since newly produced boards may be considered
for rejection because they are curved and or twisted, with the
result that it cannot always be ensured that the surface of the
board is oriented so as to be precisely perpendicular to the
direction in which the measurement probe acts at the point of
measurement. Orientation machines for the boards are not always
used. In addition, as a rule it is best not to hinder the boards
with respect to their ability to move laterally during separation
and thereafter, so that measuring devices that are intended to
measure the boards at a specific short distance from their outer
edge will not always pick up certain boards. Precise guidance

2171508
-
devices for the separated boards would require additional
investment, which is not necessary for other reasons.
It is preferred that thickness measurements be made in the area
of the conveyors that are provided for guiding the (residual)
square timbers. It is preferred that thickness measurement
systems that are based on the laser principle be used. It is also
preferred that thickness measurements be made at locations where
the thickness of the container, for example a conveyor belt, is
not included in such measurements. In the case of conveyor belts,
for example, the belt can be made narrower than the width of the
square timber, so that these timbers preferably project beyond
each side of the conveyor belt and that the measurements be made
at such locations; it is preferred that in each instance two
measurements be made at a distance from both side edges of the
material on the conveyor. The measurement point can also be
arranged at a point where the conveyor is interrupted. When a
conveyor belt is used, such a break point can be made in that the
conveyor belt moves away from the material on the belt over
deflector rollers for a short time, and is subsequently reunited
with the material. The transition point from one conveyor to
another can also be used for this purpose.
Additional features of the present invention are described in
greater detail on the basis of the embodiments that are shown
diagrammatically in Figures 1 to 4. These drawings show the
following:
Figure 1: An installation with one cutter machine and square
timber that is circulated through it;
Figure 2: An installation with cutter machines arranged in
series, based on a single pass;

2171508
igure 3: A detail of the conveyor belt in the vicinity of a
thickness measuring device;
Figure 4: An alternative to Figure 3.
The principal component of the system shown in Figure 1, which is
used to produce parquet panels, is the cutter machine 1, through
which a square timber or parquet molding or the residual timber 5
is processed until it has been completely divided. When this is
done, the conveyor path 6 is followed. In addition, the
installation includes a thickness planer 2, a heating tunnel 3,
and two thickness measuring devices 4.0 and 4.1. The thickness of
the parquet molding or of the residual timber 5 is measured prior
to and after the separation of a parquet panel. The actual
thickness of the parquet panels is calculated from the difference
between these measured values; the panels are removed from the
installation at the point numbered 7. The cut thickness setting
of the cutter machine is corrected should the actual thickness
deviate from the nominal thickness D
Should measurements made after the cutter machine 1 show that the
thickness S of the residual timber is greater than or equal to
twice the nominal thickness D of the parquet panel, a further
pass or cutting process is completed. Should the thickness S of
the residual timber be less than 2D but greater than Dx, with Dx
greater than D, the residual timber 5 is returned once again to
the cutter machine 1 and the resulting residual board of
thickness (Dx-D) is rejected. If the thickness S of the residual
timber is smaller than Dx, the residual timber 5 is delivered to
the thickness planer 2 and material is removed from it until it
is of nominal thickness D. The value Dx is selected as a function
of the machine parameters and the type of wood, such that a
residual board of thickness (Dx-D) can still be handled and
processed by the cutting machine 1 without any problems. The

2171508
-
finished parquet panel leaves the installation at the point
numbered 7.2, and the chips are removed from it at the location
numbered 9. In the event that the thickness S of the residual
timber is exactly equal to D, then one has a parquet panel that
is of the correct dimensions, and this is removed from the
installation at the location numbered 7.1. If measurement reveals
that the thickness S of the residual timber is less than D, the
residual timber is removed at 8 as scrap. Once a parquet molding
has been completely processed, a new piece ls taken from the
heating tunnel 3 into the cutter machine 1, when the required
control signals are also based on the thickness measurement at
4.2. More expediently, there are always several residual timbers
5 in circulation in order that optimal use can be made of the
cutter machine 1.
In the installation that is shown at Figure 2, the parquet panels
are manufactured in a single pass of the parquet molding or
residual timber 5, when n cutter machines and a thickness planer
2 are required to manufacture n + 1 parquet panels from a parquet
molding. Only three cutter machines are shown, the first 1.1, one
optional intermediate stage l.i and the last l.n. The associated
thickness measurement devices are accordingly shown as 4.1, 4.i
and 4.n. An additional thickness measuring devices 4.0 is also
provided, and this is used to determine the thickness of the
parquet molding before it enters the first cutter machine 1.1.
The parquet panels are removed from the installation at 7.1, 7.i,
and 7.n. The last parquet panel 5a is removed from the thickness
planer 2, and this is done regardless of whether the last
thickness S of the residual timber is greater than or of equal
size to D. In the latter case, the thickness is not reduced by
the removal of material. The removal of the chips takes place at
9 and the removal of the residual timbers that are of a thickness
of less than D takes place at 8, in the form of waste. Fresh

2171508
._
parquet molding is taken from the heating tunnel 3 and moved to
the first cutter machine 1.1. For the remainder, the additional
processing of the residual timbers 5 is effected as a function of
the thickness measurement, and this is done, in principle, as has
already been described in connection with the installation shown
in Figure 1.
Figure 3 shows a cross section perpendicular to the direction of
movement. The parquet molding or residual timber 5 is wider than
the conveyor belt 10, so that thickness measurement can be
effected by the thickness measuring system 4.0, 4.1 that consists
of the sender unit 4a and the receiver unit 4b, at the side of
the conveyor belt 10. The conveyor belt 10, on which parquet
molding or residual timber 5 is moved from right to left (as
indicated by the arrow), is guided over the rollers 11, 12, 13 in
such a way that an area is left in which the receiver unit 4b can
be installed and in which interference-free measurements can be
made.

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2171508 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-12
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 1999-03-11
Demande non rétablie avant l'échéance 1999-03-11
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 1998-03-11
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1996-09-18

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
1998-03-11
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
GEBRUDER LINCK MASCHINEFABRIK "GATTERLINCK" GMBH & CO. KG
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
SIEGMAR GONNER
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Revendications 1996-06-16 6 211
Dessins 1996-06-16 3 29
Abrégé 1996-06-16 1 45
Page couverture 1996-06-16 1 19
Description 1996-06-16 11 493
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 1997-11-12 1 111
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 1998-04-13 1 186