Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2174824 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2174824
(54) Titre français: FARCES AU PAIN EXEMPTES DE MATIERES GRASSES ET METHODE D'OBTENTION
(54) Titre anglais: FAT-FREE BREAD STUFFS AND PROCESS THEREFORE
Statut: Périmé et au-delà du délai pour l’annulation
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • A21D 13/068 (2017.01)
  • A21D 13/06 (2017.01)
  • A21D 13/42 (2017.01)
  • A23L 07/117 (2016.01)
  • A23L 29/212 (2016.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • SKARRA, LESLIE (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • AZTECA FOODS, INC.
  • AZTECA FOODS, INC.
(71) Demandeurs :
  • AZTECA FOODS, INC. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
  • AZTECA FOODS, INC. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 1998-10-20
(22) Date de dépôt: 1996-04-23
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 1996-10-25
Requête d'examen: 1996-04-23
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
08/427,446 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 1995-04-24

Abrégés

Abrégé français

Cette invention concerne des pâtes à pain, en particulier des pâtes à tortilla, où l'amidon remplace les graisses ou huiles pour donner un produit sans gras de haute qualité.


Abrégé anglais


This invention pertains to bread stuffs, particularly tortillas, wherein starch is utilized
in place of fats or oils, to obtain a high-quality fat-free product.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


-8-
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A fat-free bread stuff having at least 2% starch.
2. The fat-free bread stuff of claim 1, having at least 4% starch.
3. The fat-free bread stuff of claims 1 or 2, wherein the starch is selected from
the group consisting of: potato starch, wheat starch, rice starch, corn starch, oat starch, rye
starch and pea starch.
4. The fat-free bread stuff of claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein the dough of said breadstuff has a moisture content of less than 50%.
5. The fat-free bread stuff of claims 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein said bread stuff is a
tortilla.
6. A process for producing a fat-free bread stuff, wherein starch is utilized in said
bread stuff in an amount of at least 2%.
7. The process of claim 6, wherein the starch is selected from the group
consisting of: potato starch, wheat starch, rice starch, corn starch, oat starch, rye starch and
pea starch.
8. The process of claims 6 or 7, wherein the dough of said bread stuff has a
moisture content of less than 50%.
9. The process of claims 6, 7 or 8, wherein said bread stuff is a tortilla.

-9-
10. A low-fat bread stuff having at least 2% starch.
11. The low-fat bread stuff of claim 10, having at least 4% starch.
12. The low-fat bread stuff of claims 10 or 11, wherein the starch is selected from
the group consisting of: potato starch, wheat starch, rice starch, corn starch, oat starch, rye
starch and pea starch.
13. The low-fat bread stuff of claims 10, 11 or 12, wherein the dough of said bread
stuff has a moisture content less than 50%.
14. The low-fat bread stuff of claims 10, 11, 12 or 13, wherein said bread stuff is
a tortilla.
15. A process for producing a low-fat bread stuff, wherein starch is utilized in said
bread stuff in an amount of at least 2%.
16. The process of claim 15, wherein the starch is selected from the group
consisting of: potato starch, wheat starch, rice starch, corn starch, oat starch, rye starch and
pea starch.
17. The process of claims 15 or 16, wherein the dough of said bread stuff has a
moisture content of less than 50%.
18. The process of claims 15, 16 or 17, wherein said bread stuff is a tortilla.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


7~(~2k
S P E C I F I C A T I O N
(Case No. 93,962)
FAT-FREE BREAD STUFFS AND PROCESS THEREFORE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENIION
As health and fitness awareness increases, further scrutiny is given to
calories consumed. Resultantly, consumers continue to look for low-fat and fat-
free foods. However, consumers are often unwilling to sacrifice taste, quality,
texture and other organoleptic characteristics simply to obtain a low-fat or fat-free
product.
Food manufacturers have continually attempted to meet the consumer
demand for high quality, low-fat and fat-free products. Providing high quality, fat-
free products has been particularly difficult in the baking industry, because fat
plays an important role in the taste and texture of finished baked goods. Too
often, using fat replacers or fat mimetic compounds sacrifices some of the quality
characteristics of the baked good. To avoid quality problems, food manufacturerssometimes resort to complex formula manipulations. These complex formulas
may be more costly than conventional formulations and also may present
unanticipated problems. lherefore, the baking industry continues to search for
simple, viable formulations that yield high quality low-fat and fat-free products.
It is the object of this invention to provide a fat-free bread stuff and
process therefore, particularly directed toward a tortilla, that possesses taste,
quality and texture attributes similar to fat-containing bread stuffs, without
necessitating complex formulation changes.

- ~ ~ 7 ~
DETAILED DESCRIPIION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a formulation to provide low-fat or
fat-free bread stuffs, particularly tortillas, with acceptable organoleptic attributes.
In the search for fat-free bread stuffs, especially tortillas, it has typically been
found that using a normal formulation for fat-cont~ining bread stuffs and simplysubstituting particular ingredients to reduce the fat content has not produced
products with acceptable taste, quality and texture characteristics. Thus, complex
formulation changes were often attempted.
This invention provides high quality bread stuffs, especially tortillas,
without any complex formulation changes. The unexpected results of this
invention are demonstrated by its sheer simp]icity, in light of the complex
formulations prevalent in the field.
Specifically, this invention comprises simply utilizing starch in lieu of oils
or other fats. Replacing the fat and oil containing ingredients with starch
significantly reduces the fat content of the finished product such that the product
meets the standardized definition for fat-free products. That is, the products have
no more than 0.5 grams of fat per serving size or per reference amount,
whichever is larger. The following are some illustrative reference amounts:
tortillas, 55 grams; breads, rolls, mllffln~ and English muffins, 50 grams; and
biscuits, croissants and bagels, 55 grams.
Tortillas and other bread stuffs made pursuant to this invention possess
comparable organoleptic characteristics of like fat containing products, including
opacity, flexibility, lubricity, mouth feel, taste, tenderness and shelf life. The
added starch component of this invention tenderizes the dough and provides the
perception of fat. In many instances, the added starch may impart a creamy, fat-like quality to the bread stuff, which is often lacking in fat-free products. Further,
the physical characteristics of the starch may help in reducing the stickiness of the

~17~
dough, a role usually filled by fat cont~ining components; thus yielding a doughthat is suitable for handling in commercial applications.
Most starches, obtained from a wide variety of sources, will be suitable for
use in this invention. ~or example, starches such as potato, wheat, rice, corn, oat,
rye and pea may be used in this invention. Further, various types of starches may
be used including treated, untreated, modified, unmodified and hydrolyzed. It iscontemplated that the above starches are only illustrative, and not exhaustive, of
the starches that may be utilized in this invention. The use of other starches may
be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art, upon reading this speclfication,
depending upon the specific formula used, and any other nutritional or quality
objectives
It has been found that, pursuant to this invention, formulas utilizing as
little as 2% starch will be effective in providing a fat-free product. However,
formulas containing at least 4~o starch appear to be the most effective. That is,
products having at least 4% starch are the easiest to handle in industrial
applications and may have somewhat better organoleptic properties than those
having lesser amounts of starch. The effective maximum starch content appears
to be approximately 70~o. The precise amount of starch required for each
product (between the parameters of 25~ and 70~) will depend upon a variety of
factors including, but not limited to, the particular products, the product quality
sought and varying economic factors. In light of this specification, the amount of
starch needed for each application (between the parameters of 2~o and ?~~) will
be obvious to those skilled in the art.
Some other fat-free formulations that have attempted to avoid complex
formulation changes utilize significant amounts of water and fiber. Typically,
those formulas yield a dough with a moisture content greater than 50~.
However, those formulations are only able to obtain a fat-free product by
sacrificing quality characteristics such as mouth feel and shelf life.

2~748~4
When bread stuffs are prepared wherein starch is simply substituted for
fats and oils, the finished product is unlike anything currently available in that it
is a low-fat or fat-free product with organoleptic characteristics that are similar
to fat-containing products, and are obtained without any complex formulation
changes. Thus, the tortillas and other bread stuffs of this invention are highlydesired by consumers and food manufacturers alike.

~ ~ 7 ~
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the preferred embodiment, this invention is applied to m~king a fat-free
tortilla, having quality characteristics that are as good or better than fat
containing tortillas. The typical fat content of a commercially available tortilla
is 4 grams per 55 gram serving. In order to be classified as low-fat, a tortilla may
contain no more than 3 grams of fat per 55 gram serving. To be classified as no
fat, a tortilla may contain no more than 0.5 grams of fat per 55 gram serving. In
accordance with the above standards, tortillas prepared utilizing this inventioncontain less than 0.5 grams of fat per 55 gram serving.
The examples below show how, pursuant to this invention, a typical fat-
containing tortilla formu]a is modified to yield a fat-free tortilla. The formula
modification involves simply substituting starch for vegetable oil.
EXAMPLES
In example A below, tortillas were prepared using a control formula.
Then, in example B, the test formula, unmodified potato starch was substituted
into the control formula for vegetable oil. All other ingredients and conditionsremained constant. The tortillas produced in the test formula were compared
against those produced in the control formula.
The quality of the control formula tortillas was as expected for a normally
formulated tortilla. Surprisingly, the quality of the test formula tortilla was
actually superior to the control formula. Particularly important was that, unlike
other fat-free formulations, the test formula tortillas were as tender and as moist
as the control formula tortillas.

7 ~
Example A
Doughl'ortilla
Batch (g)~ormula % % fat
flour 294.540 58.712 0.968
ambient water167.725 33.433 0.000
salt 5.993 1.195 0.000
double-acting baking powder5.0000.997 0 000
vegetable oil26.636 5.309 5.379
Potassium 60rbate1.1990.239 0.000
~umaric acid 0.580 0.116 0.000
500.000 10~.000 6.348
Procedl.l e:
Dry mix ingredients for 1 minute.
Add water and oil; mix to optimum.
21.49 gram dough ball.
Sheet or press to 6 inches.
Bake as normal.

3 7 i~
Example B
DoughTortilla
Ing.~ l 'sBatch (g)Pormula % % fat
flour 294.540 58.712 0.968
ambient water 167.725 33.433 0.000
S L ~ potato starch26.636 5.309 0.001
salt 5.993 1.195 0.000
double-acting baking powder5.000 0.997 0.000
Potassium sorbale1.199 0.239 0.000
Fumaric acid 0.580 0.116 0.000
S00.000 100.000 0.969
Procedure:
Dry rnix ingredients for 1 minute.
Add water; mix to optimum.
21.49 gram dough ball.
Sheet or press to 6 inches.
Bake as normal.

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2174824 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : CIB désactivée 2017-09-16
Inactive : CIB enlevée 2017-01-24
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2017-01-24
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2017-01-24
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2017-01-24
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2017-01-24
Inactive : CIB expirée 2017-01-01
Inactive : CIB désactivée 2016-03-12
Inactive : CIB désactivée 2016-03-12
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2016-01-28
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2016-01-28
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2016-01-28
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2016-01-28
Inactive : CIB expirée 2016-01-01
Inactive : CIB expirée 2016-01-01
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 2004-04-23
Lettre envoyée 2003-04-23
Accordé par délivrance 1998-10-20
Inactive : Taxe finale reçue 1998-06-03
Préoctroi 1998-06-03
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 1998-04-22
Lettre envoyée 1998-04-22
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 1998-04-22
Inactive : Renseign. sur l'état - Complets dès date d'ent. journ. 1998-04-16
Inactive : Dem. traitée sur TS dès date d'ent. journal 1998-04-16
Inactive : Approuvée aux fins d'acceptation (AFA) 1998-03-12
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1996-10-25
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 1996-04-23
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 1996-04-23

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 1998-03-24

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Les taxes sur les brevets sont ajustées au 1er janvier de chaque année. Les montants ci-dessus sont les montants actuels s'ils sont reçus au plus tard le 31 décembre de l'année en cours.
Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Enregistrement d'un document 1997-04-17
TM (demande, 2e anniv.) - petite 02 1998-04-23 1998-03-24
Pages excédentaires (taxe finale) 1998-06-03
Taxe finale - petite 1998-06-03
TM (brevet, 3e anniv.) - petite 1999-04-23 1999-03-17
TM (brevet, 4e anniv.) - petite 2000-04-24 2000-03-16
TM (brevet, 5e anniv.) - petite 2001-04-23 2001-03-21
TM (brevet, 6e anniv.) - petite 2002-04-23 2002-03-19
Annulation de la péremption réputée 2002-04-23 2002-03-19
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
AZTECA FOODS, INC.
AZTECA FOODS, INC.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
LESLIE SKARRA
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.

({010=Tous les documents, 020=Au moment du dépôt, 030=Au moment de la mise à la disponibilité du public, 040=À la délivrance, 050=Examen, 060=Correspondance reçue, 070=Divers, 080=Correspondance envoyée, 090=Paiement})


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Abrégé 1996-07-30 1 9
Description 1996-07-30 7 230
Revendications 1996-07-30 2 57
Abrégé 1998-02-10 1 5
Description 1998-02-10 7 225
Revendications 1998-02-10 2 51
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 1997-12-28 1 111
Avis du commissaire - Demande jugée acceptable 1998-04-21 1 164
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2003-05-20 1 174
Correspondance 1998-06-02 1 41
Correspondance de la poursuite 1996-04-22 10 395
Correspondance de la poursuite 1997-07-02 10 504
Correspondance de la poursuite 1997-02-27 1 44
Correspondance de la poursuite 1997-04-06 1 47
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 1997-05-29 1 42
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 1997-08-28 1 33
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 1996-05-08 1 27
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 1997-03-31 1 21
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 1996-04-22 1 26
Correspondance taxe de maintien 1998-06-02 1 43