Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
2 i 85?_83
- 1 -
PRODUCTION OF METHYLAMINES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a process for
producing methylamines, utilizing the vapor phase catalytic
reaction between methanol and ammonia. More particularly,
the present invention relates to a process for producing
methylamines using a zeolite as a catalyst, by which
process it is made possible to more effectively utilize
high dimethylamine selectivity characteristic of zeolite
catalysts.
Dimethylamine is an important chemical intermediate
useful as the starting material of various solvents,
pharmaceuticals, rubber chemicals, surface active agents
and the like.
Related Art
Typically, dimethylamine is produced by allowing
methanol to react, in a gaseous phase, with ammonia at a
high temperature (approximately 400°C) in the presence of
a solid acid catalyst, such as alumina or silica alumina,
capable of causing dehydration and amination. In addition
to dimethylamine (hereinafter referred to as "DMA"),
monomethylamine (hereinafter referred to as "MMA") and
trimethylamine (hereinafter referred to as "TMA") are
produced as by-products by this reaction. The demand for
these by-product methyl amines is much smaller than that for
DMA. For this reason, after being separated from the
reaction product, these by-products are recirculated in the
reaction system and reused.
Separation of dimethylamine from the methylamines is
conducted by means of distillation. However, TMA forms a
complicated azeotropic system together with ammonia, MMA
and DMA, so that a very intricate large-scale distillation
process is needed. As a result, the cost for energy
consumed by the DMA-recovering process becomes extremely
high. Examples of the recovery process are shown in
2185283
- 2 -
detail, for instance, in "Manufacturing Process Charts,
Revised Edition" (published by Kabushiki Kaisha Kagaku
Kogyo-Sha on April 25, 1978).
In order to reduce the production cost of DMA and to
make the size of the equipment smaller, it is essential to
suppress, as much as possible, the formation of by-product
methylamines, especially the formation of TMA, and to
promote the formation of DMA. However, the selectivities
to the three methylamines are thermodynamically determined
on the above-described conventional amorphous solid acid
catalyst such as alumina or silica alumina. Under the
typical reaction conditions, the ratio of TMA formation is
considerably higher than that of DMA formation. For
instance, in the case where the reaction temperature is
400°C and the ratio of ammonia to methanol at the inlet of
a reactor is 1:1 (weight ratio), the equilibrium weight
ratio of the amines produced, calculated thermodynamically
is MMA : DMA : TMA = 0.284 . 0.280 . 0.436. In this case,
the DMA selectivity defined by the following equation (1)
is only 28.4%.
DMA selectivity (%) -
( 2 X WD~DMW ) ~ ( ~IM~fIMw + 2 X Wp~DMW + 3 X WT~TMS~I ) X 100 (1)
wherein WM, WD and WT are the proportions by weight of MMA,
DMA, and TMA produced, respectively, and MME." DMW and TMW
represent the molecular weights of MMA, DMA and TMA,
respectively.
For this reason, it is necessary to continually
separate a large amount of MMA and TMA, and to recirculate,
in the reaction system, these two methylamines along with
a large amount of excess ammonia which is allowed to exist
so that the reaction can proceed advantageously to DMA from
the viewpoint of equilibrium.
In recent years, a variety of zeolite catalysts have
been proposed aiming at solving the above problem. For
example, there can be mentioned those catalysts which are
described in the following patent publications: Japanese
z ~ s5zs3
- 3 -
Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 69846/1981 which relates
to zeolite A; Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publications Nos.
148708/1979 and 69846/1983 which relate to FU-1; U.S.
Patent No. 4,082,805 which relates to ZSM-5, ZSM-11 and
ZSM-21; Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No.
113747/1981 which relates to ferrierite and erionite;
Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publications Nos. 178951/1986 and
8358/1988 which relate to zeolite rho, ZK-5 and chabazite;
Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 254256/1986 which
relates to a catalyst having more improved DMA selectivity
obtained by treating a specific zeolite with
tetraethylorthosilicate or the like; Japanese Laid-Open
Patent Publication No. 002740/1995 which relates to
mordenite modified by a silylating agent; Japanese
Laid-Open Patent Publications Nos. 46846/1981, 210050/1984,
049340/1983 and 9510/1994 which relate to mordenite whose
DMA selectivity is improved by other various methods of
modification; and U.S. Patent No. 3,384,667 which relates
to zeolite X, Y and L, levynite, analcite, chabazite,
gmelinite, erionite, ptilolite, ferrierite, clinoptilolite
and the like.
Unlike the conventional amorphous catalysts such as
silica alumina, all of the above zeolite catalysts give DMA
selectivities higher than the thermodynamical equilibrium
value. For instance, Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication
No. 210050/1984 discloses a process for selectively
producing DMA, using mordenite. According to this process,
when a 1:1 (weight ratio) mixture of ammonia and methanol
is subjected to reaction which is carried out, for
instance, by using mordenite catalysts having various
cation compositions at a reaction temperature of 270 to
360°C, DMA selectivities of approximately 50% to
approximately 60% are obtained. These selectivities
correspond to values of approx. 2.0 to approx. 3.0 when
converted to DMA equilibrium factors defined by the
following equation (2):
DMA equilibrium factor =
2185283
- 4 -
(DMA selectivity)/(thermodynamical equilibrium DMA
selectivity at the same reaction temperature) (2)
Further, almost all of the above-described zeolite
catalysts give DMA equilibrium factors of 1.2 to 4.0, and
many of these factors are in the range of 1.5 to 3.5.
When such a zeolite catalyst is used for a continuous
process for producing methylamines, the concentration of
DMA in the outlet gas of a reactor becomes high because the
DMA selectivity of the catalyst is high. As a result, the
amount of a recycle material to be returned from the
recovery process to the reactor is decreased. It becomes
thus possible to decrease the total amount of materials
which are fed from the reactor to the recovery process.
This effect can be shown by comparing flow rates per unit
process defined by the following equation (3):
flow rate per unit process =
( total flow rate of materials to be fed from reactor to
recovery process (kgmol/hr))/(amount of DMA
manufactured (kgmol/hr)) (3)
The flow rate per unit process can be adjusted by
controlling the amount of materials to be recycled from a
recovery system to a reactor, in particular, the amount of
ammonia. The degree of recycling of ammonia correlates
with the atomic ratio N/C (the ratio of the number of
nitrogen atoms to that of carbon atoms), that is, the
atomic ratio between N and C contained in all those
materials which are fed from the reactor to the recovery
process. In order to reduce the load on the recovery
process, it is necessary to decrease the flow rate per unit
process as much as possible, that is, to lower the N/C
ratio. However, it is unfavorable to drastically lower the
N/C ratio from the view points of impurities produced as
by-products, and the like.
The previously-mentioned zeolite catalysts are
characterized in that they can decrease the flow rate per
unit,process without drastically lowering the N/C ratio as
~1852~3
- 5 -
compared with the conventional catalysts of thermodynamical
equilibrium controled type. From this point of view, it is
necessary that the N/C ratio be generally 1.0 or more,
preferably 1.3 or more. For instance, in the case where
approx. 25 mol/hr, approx. 65 mol/hr and approx. 10 mol/hr
of MMA, DMA and TMA are produced, respectively, at the N/C
ratio of 2.0 by using zeolite catalysts having various DMA
equilibrium factors, the flow rates per unit process are as
follows:
Catalyst DMA Equilibrium Flow Rate per
Factor Unit Process
Silica Alumina 1.0 18
(Conventional)
Zeolite (1) 1.5 13
Zeolite (2) 2.2 10
In this ease, the essential purpose of the use of a
zeolite catalyst is to make the flow rate per unit process
lower, as much as possible, than at least the above-shown
value of 18, which is the most typical flow rate per unit
process when the conventional catalyst is used. However,
it was found that when the zeolite catalyst is placed in an
insulated reactor which has been used with the conventional
catalyst, and a reaction is initiated at a temperature
which is made low as much as possible (the inlet
temperature of the catalyst bed: 250 - 260°C) so as to
prevent the formation of coke materials, the catalyst is
rapidly deactivated as will be shown later in Comparative
Examples, giving rise to a very serious problem in
practical use. The catalyst deactivation can be indicated
by degeneration constant (p) according to the definitions
represented by the following equations (4) and (5):
kt = ko ~ exp(-pt) (4)
wherein p: degeneration constant,
kt: reaction rate constant when t days have passed,
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
k0: reaction rate constant when the reaction is initiated; and
Reaction rate constant k = FRTIP~'~ ~In(1/1-x) (5)
wherein F: feed rate of methanol,
R: gas constant,
T: reaction temperature,
P0: initial partial pressure of methanol,
V: volume of catalyst,
x: conversion rate of methanol.
When a fixed bed reactor is used as in the case of the above
process, it is necessary, from the commercial point of view, that a catalyst
can be
continuously used at least for one year, desirably for two years or longer. If
a
catalyst has initial catalytic activity reasonably high enough for commercial
use, it
can be used until the catalytic activity is lowered to approximately half of
the initial
activity. In this case, the degeneration constant corresponding to a catalyst
life of
one year is approximately 0.002 . However, in the case where a zeolite
catalyst
is used with a reactor of conventional type, any zeolite catalyst shows a
degeneration constant of 10 times or more the above-mentioned threshold value,
as will be shown later in Comparative Examples. It is thus extremely difficult
to
continuously use a zeolite catalyst far the commercial scale of production.
Thus, a principal object in this technical field is to develop a process
for producing methylamines, in which a zeolite catalyst can be continuously
used
for a prolonged period of time.
-6-
20375-808
,,:
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a process for
producing methylamines using a zeolite catalyst, in which process the
deactivation
of the zeolite catalyst is suppressed so that the zeolite catalyst can be
continuously used for a prolonged period of time.
We made earnest studies in order to develop the
.,. 5a _
20375-808
2185283
above-described process for producing methylamines, using
a zeolitic catalyst. As a result, it was found that when
a reaction is carried out in such a manner that a zeolite
catalyst bed is divided into two or more sections either in
series or in parallel and that the difference between the
inlet and outlet temperatures of each catalyst bed is kept
in a specific range while the reaction is carried out, the
life of the catalyst can be drastically improved, and the
above object can thus be attained. The present invention
has been accomplished on the basis of this finding.
Thus, the present invention relates to a process for
producing methylamines, comprising contacting methanol and
ammonia, or methanol, a mixture of methylamines and
ammonia, or a mixture of methylamines and ammonia, in a
gaseous phase, with a bed of a zeolite catalyst, wherein,
the catalyst bed is divided into two or more sub-beds
connected in series and/or parallel and the difference
between the inlet and outlet temperatures of each catalyst
sub-bed is kept in the range of approximately 5°C to
approximately 70°C while the reaction is carried out.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
In the drawings,
Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic flow sheet showing a process
for producing methylamines according to the present
invention; and
Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic flow sheet showing another
process for producing methylamines according to the present
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
The present invention will now be explained by
referring to the accompanying drawings. A process in which
a catalyst bed is divided into three sections or sub-beds
connected in series as shown in Fig. 1 can be mentioned as
one embodiment of the present invention.
Starting materials, methanol and ammonia (line ~), are
2185283
-8_
joined with recycle material (line ~; gas and/or liquid)
consisting essentially of unreacted ammonia, MMA and TMA,
coming from recovery process (P). These materials, which
are in the gaseous state, are fed (line ~) to the first
section (S1) of the catalyst bed at a predetermined
temperature via the steps of evaporation, heating, etc. A
zeolite catalyst having a DMA equilibrium factor of 1.2 or
more, preferably 1.5 or more is used as a catalyst.
Specific examples of such a zeolite catalyst include
mordenite, chabazite, levynite, zeolite rho, zeolite A,
~ FU-1, erionite, ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-21, ZK-5 and
montmorillonite, and zeolites obtained by modifying the
mentioned ones. Among these, mordenite, chabazite and
modified mordenite are most preferable. At the first
section (S1), the starting materials and the recycle
material react with each other. The outlet gas of the
first section (line ~-1) is fed to the second section (S2)
of the catalyst bed, and the outlet gas (line 0-2) of the
second section is fed to the next section (S3). The
unreacted starting materials and recycle material contained
in the outlet gas react with each other at each section of
the catalyst bed.
The reaction is carried out by controlling the inlet
and outlet temperatures of each catalyst bed so that the
difference between them will be kept in the range of
approx. 5°C to approx. 70°C, preferably approx. 10°C to
approx . 50 ° C, more preferably approx . 20 ° C to approx . 40
° C .
Temperature differences larger than 70°C would lead to
shorter catalyst life, and temperature differences smaller
than 5°C would result in difficulty in obtaining desired
methanol conversion.
In order to prevent the formation of impurities such as
coke, it is desirable that the inlet temperature of the
catalyst bed be approximated to the minimum temperature for
initiating the reaction at a reasonable rate. It is
desirable to control the inlet temperature to generally
approx . 200 ° C to approx . 350 ° C, preferably approx . 220
° C to
CA 02185283 2005-09-28
20375-808
- 9 -
approx. 330°C, more preferably approx. 230°C to approx.
310°C.
It is preferable that the outlet gas of the
catalyst bed be fed to the next catalyst bed after cooled.
By this, the inlet temperature of the catalyst bed can be
readily adjusted, and the operation for keeping the
temperature of the catalyst bed can also be easily conducted.
The outlet gas can be cooled either by a condenser (C)
using a refrigeration medium such as air, nitrogen gas or
steam, or by a heat exchanger. Alternatively, the cooling
of the outlet gas can be conducted by directly feeding the
recycle material and/or a part of the starting materials
(Q1, Q2 and/or Q3) to the outlet gas. The cooling of the
outlet gas in the latter manner is particularly useful from
the viewpoints of heat recovery and reduction in the cost of
equipment.
The outlet gas (line ~3) of the last section (S3)
is heat-exchanged with the line for feeding the starting
materials and the like, and then fed to the recovery process (P).
At the recovery process, methylamines are respectively
separated, by a plurality of distillation columns, from
unreacted ammonia, water produced by the reaction, etc., and
recovered on lines ~5, ~ and ~ with the waste products
being discarded via line ~. Unreacted ammonia, MMA and TMA
are returned to the reactor as the recycle material (line ~).
It is preferable that the catalyst bed be divided
into 2 to 10 sections, preferably 2 to 7 sections. When the
effects of the present invention, the cost of equipment, and
operating characteristics are taken into consideration, it
is particularly preferable to divide the catalyst bed into 3
to 5 sections/sub-beds.
CA 02185283 2005-09-28
20375-808
- 9a -
Further, with respect to the reaction at each
catalyst sub-bed, it is preferable to control the reaction
so that the difference between the conversion rates of
methanol at the outlet and at the inlet of each sub-bed
based on the conversion rate of methanol at the inlet of the
first sub-bed will be in the range of 10% to 60%, preferably
to
2185283
- 10 -
500. When the methanol conversion is lower than 10% the
total number of catalyst sub-beds would be likely to be
excessively higher, resulting in complexity in apparatuses,
while, when the methanol conversion is higher than 60 0 , the
catalyst life would be likely to be shorter.
The N/C ratio, viz. the ratio of the number of nitrogen
atoms to that of carbon atoms, in the catalyst bed is from
0.8 to 3.0, preferably from 1.0 to 2.5, more preferably
from 1.2 to 2.2. The N/C ratio lower than 0.8 would lead
to production of by-products in higher amount, and the N/C
ratio higher than 3.0 would result in increase in the
amount of recycling and in the size of an apparatus used.
The reaction pressure is, in general, from normal
pressure to 200 atom.
Further, a process shown in Fig. 2 can be mentioned as
another embodiment of the present invention. In this
process is used a multiple-tube reactor ( R ) , in which a
plurality.of~reaction tubes are provided in parallel, and
gas is made to flow outside the tubes. Starting materials,
methanol and ammonia (line ~), are joined with recycle
material consisting essentially of unreacted ammonia, MMA
and TMA (line ~), coming from recovery process (P). These
materials, which are in the gaseous state, are fed (line
at a predetermined temperature to the multiple-tube
reactor from the lower part of the external shell thereof,
via the steps of evaporation, heating, and the like. This
gas is heat-exchanged, through the tube walls, with gas
passing through the catalyst beds placed in the reaction
tubes, flowing in the counterdirection thereto.
Thereafter, the gas is circulated in the upper part of the
reactor, and introduced, from the top of the tubes, to the
catalyst beds ( S1 . . Sn ) , thereby causing a reaction. After
the gas thus fed is heat-exchanged with gas in the external
shell of the reactor, it is fed as reaction product gas
(line ~) to the next step, the recovery step (P), from the
lower part of the reactor. At the recovery process,
CA 02185283 2005-09-28
20375-808
- 11 -
methylamines are respectively separated from unreacted
ammonia, water produced by the reaction, etc. by a plurality
of distillation columns, and recovered on lines ~5, ~ and 07
with the waste products being discarded via line ~.
Unreacted ammonia, MMA and TMA are returned as the recycle
material (line ~) to the reactor.
Operational conditions for this embodiment with
the catalyst sub-beds connected in parallel may be the same
or similar to those for the previously mentioned embodiment
with the catalyst sub-beds connected in series unless the
former conditions interfere with the latter conditions.
One of the above-described zeolites can be used as
the catalyst for the reaction. It is desirable that the
difference between the inlet and outlet temperatures of the
catalyst bed be small. It is therefore preferable to carry
out the reaction by keeping the above difference in the
range of approx. 5°C to approx. 70°C, preferably approx.
5°C
to approx. 30°C, more preferably approx. 5°C to approx.
20°C.
In order to prevent the formation of impurities
such as coke, it is desirable that the inlet temperature of
the catalyst bed be approximated to the minimum temperature
for initiating the reaction at a reasonable rate. It is
desirable to adjust the inlet temperature to generally from
approx. 200°C to approx. 350°C, preferably from approx.
220°C
to approx. 330°C, more preferably from approx. 230°C to
approx . 310°C .
The number of the reaction tubes is 2 or more,
preferably 10 or more, more preferably 50 or more. In the
case where this process is industrially employed, the number
of the reaction tubes is from several hundreds to
CA 02185283 2005-09-28
20375-808
- lla -
approximately 2,000, although it depends on the scale of
production.
The total conversion rate of methanol at the
catalyst layers is 80% or more, more preferably 85% or more.
The N/C ratio (the ratio of the number of nitrogen
atoms to that of carbon atoms) in the catalyst bed is from
0.8 to 3.0, preferably from 1.0 to 2.5, more preferably
2185283
- 12 -
from 1.2 to 2.2.
The reaction pressure is, in general, from normal
pressure to 200 atom.
The present invention will now be specifically
explained by referring to the following examples. However,
the present invention is not limited by the following
examples.
FX~MDT.FC
<Catalysts used>
Z1: H-form mordenite treated by steaming at 300°C
' for 30 hours in granules of a diameter of approximately 5
mm.
Z2: Cation-form mordenite containing 0.7o by weight
of K and 0.7% by weight of Ca in granules of a diameter of
approximately 5 mm.
Z3: Mixture of Chabazite and erionite in granules
of a diameter of approximately 5 mm.
A: Amorphous silica~alumina containing
approximately 70% of silica in granules of a diameter of
approximately 5 mm.
Examples 1 to 5
Two or three reaction tubes provided in series as shown
in Fig. 1 (an insulated reactor having a total capacity of
approximately 20 m3) were filled with a zeolite catalyst.
Gas between sections/sub-beds S1 and S2 was cooled by
recycle material (liquid and gas) from recovery process
( P ) , and gas between sections/sub-beds S2 and S3 was cooled
by both the recycle material (liquid and gas) and air.
Methanol and ammonia were fed at rates of 161 kgmol/hour
and 87 kgmol/hour, respectively. Thus, a continuous
reaction (for 2 weeks to one month) was carried out to
obtain MMA, DMA and TMA at production rates of 20
kgmol/hour, 60 kgmol/hour and 7 kgmol/hour, respectively.
The deterioration constant of the catalyst, shown in Table
l, was obtained from the change in the conversion rate of
methanol, in accordance with the previously-mentioned
2185283
- 13 -
equations (4) and (5).
Examples 6 to 8
By the use of a production process in which three or
four reaction tubes, each having a diameter of
approximately 1 inch, were connected in series, and gas in
the space between the tubes was made to be cooled, a
continuous reaction experiment (for 2 weeks to one month)
was carried out. Since this process has no recovery and
recycling processes, the following composition was prepared
and used as the starting material on the supposition that
both recovery and recycling had been done in advance.
Further, in order to make the heat dissipation per unit gas
quantity in this process equal to that in the above
examples, the surface of the reactor was kept heated. It
was confirmed by Examples 3 and 6 that the processes in
these examples were similar to each other.
Composition
of Starting
Material
(mol%)
Ammonia Methanol MMA TMA
Exam les 6 & 7 60 30 8 2
Exam 1e 8 59 31 7 3
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
The results obtained in the above Examples 1 to 8 are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1
ExampleCatalystNo. of Inlet Temp. N Flow *Degen.DMA
Temp.
Cat. of *1 Difference/ Rate Const.pEq.
*2
Sub-beds(~;) ('t,a C *3 (X10'3)Factor
1 Z1 2 250 40 2.0 11 1.4 2.2
2 Z1 2 250 50 1.7 9 1.9 2.2
3 Z1 3 250 35 1.7 9 1.0 2.2
4 Z2 2 250 60 1.7 8 1.9 2.3
Z2 3 250 40 1.7 8 0.9 2.3
6 Z1 3 250 35 1.7 9 1.0 2.2
7 Z3 3 260 30 1.7 11 1.2 2.0
8 Z2 4 260 25 1.5 7 0.8 2.3
*1 Each Catalyst Sub-bed
*2 between Inlet and Outlet of Each Catalyst Sub-bed
*3 Per Unit Process
* Degen. stands for degeneration
Comparative Examples 1 and 2
An adiabatic reactor having a capacity of approximately 10 m3 was
filled with the silica alumina catalyst (A). To this were fed methanol and
ammonia
at rates of 120 kgmol/hour and 65 kgmol/hour, respectively. Thus, a cantinuous
reaction was carried out to produce MMA, DMA and TMA at production rates of 15
-14-
20375-808
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
kgmol/hour, 45 kgmol/hour and 5 kgmol/hour, respectively. The degeneration
constant of the catalyst in this case is shown in Table 2.
Comparative Examples 3 and 4
A continuous reaction was carried out in the same manner as in
Example 1, except for the change that the gases between the catalyst sub-beds
were not cooled. This run may thus carrespond to one where an adiabatic
reactor
as in Comparative Example 1, the number of catalyst sub-beds being one, is
used.
The degeneration constant of the catalyst in this case is shown in Table 2.
Comparative Examples 5 to 7
A continuous reaction was carried out in the same manner as in
Example 6, except for the change that the gases between the catalyst sub-beds
were not cooled. Further, in order to make the heat dissipation per unit gas
quantity in this process equal to that in the above Comparative Examples, the
surface of the reactor was heated. It was confirmed by Comparative Examples 4
and 5 that the processes in these examples were similar to each other. These
runs correspond to one where an adiabatic reactor as in Comparative Example 1,
the number of catalyst sub-beds being one, is used. The degeneration constant
of
the catalyst in this case is show in Table 2.
-15-
20375-808
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
Composition
of Starting
Material
(~nol%~)
Ammonia Methanol MMA TMA
Comparative 6Q 30 8 2
Examples 5
- 7
The results obtained in the above Comparative Examples 1 to 7 are
shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Compa- CatalystNo. of Inlet Temp. N Flow *Degen,DMA
rative Cat. Temp. Difference/ Rate Const.pEq.
Example Sub-bedsof *1 *~? C *3 (X10-3)Factor
(C:;) {C)
1 A 1 350 60 2.018 0.8 1.0
2 A 1 340 70 1.716 0.8 1.0
3 Z1 1 250 100 2.011 17 2.2
4 Z1 1 250 110 1.79 22 2.2
5 Z1 1 250 110 1.79 22 2.2
6 Z2 1 250 120 1.78 24 2.3
7 Z3 1 260 105 1.711 23 2.0
*1 Each Catalyst Sub-bed
*2 between Inlet and Outlet of Each Catalyst Sub-bed
*3 Per Unit Process
* Degen. stands for degeneration
-16-
20375-808
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
[Consideration - the case where a catalyst bed is divided into sections/sub-
beds
connected in series]
Comparative Examples 1 and 2 are the case where a reaction was
carried out by a conventional adiabatic reactor, using silica alumina, a
conventional catalyst of thermodynamical equilibrium regulation type. The
deterioration constant of the catalyst in this case was 0.8, which corresponds
to a
catalyst life of 2 years or longer. Comparative Examples 3 to 7 are the case
where a reaction was carried out by the same equipment as in Comparative
Examples 1 and 2, using various zeolitic catalysts. Although the inlet
temperature
of the catalyst layer was kept at as low as 250 °C to 260 °C,
which was
approximately the minimum, temperature for initiating the reaction at a
reasonable
rate, so as to prevent side reactions such as the formation of coke, the
degeneration constant of the catalyst was surprisingly found to be at an
extraordinary high level of 17 to 24. Such a high value means that the life of
the
catalyst is only one or two months. This is a very unsatisfactory result from
the
practical point of view. In general, zeolite catalysts have extremely small
pores as
compared with amorphous catalysts, so that their catalytic activities are
readily
affected by coke materials deposited on the surface thereof. This is
considered to
be the reason why such an unsatisfactory result was obtained.
On the contrary, Examples 1 to 8 are the case where a reaction was
carried out under the same conditions as in Comparative Examples except that
the
following were conducted in accordance with the process of the present
invention:
the zeolite catalyst bed was divided into 2 to 4 sections/sub-beds connected
in
-17-
20375-808
s
CA 02185283 2005-09-28
20375-808
following were conducted in accordance with the process of the present
invention:
the zeolite catalyst bed was divided into 2 to 4 sectionslsub-beds connected
in
series, and the difference between the inlet and the outlet temperatures of
each
catalyst bed was kept in the range of 25°C to 60°C while the
reaction was carried
out. As a result, it was surprisingly found that the degeneration constant of
the
catalyst was lowered to 0.8 to 1.9. Such a value corresponds to a catalyst
life of 1-
2 years or longer. It can thus be confirmed that the life of the catalyst is
dramatically improved to a period long enough to employ the present process
for
the industrial scale of production.
Examples 9 to 11
A multiple-tube reactor of heat-exchanger type (Fig. 2) in which 6
reaction tubes, each having a diameter of 1/2 inches, were provided in
parallel
was used. Each reaction tube in the reactor was filled with 25 ml of a zeolite
catalyst to form catalyst sub-beds. To this was fed a starting material
composition
consisting of 61 mol% of ammonia, 29 mol% of methanol, 8 mol% of MMA and 2
mol% of TMA through the external shell of the reactor at a feed rate of 300
g/hour
in the counterdirection to the flow of gas entering into the sub-beds through
line
and passing through the catalyst sub-beds (S, .. Ss), thereby carrying out a
reaction for two weeks. The difference between the inlet and the outlet
temperatures of the catalyst sub-beds was 15°C on the average. The
results are
shown in Table 3.
-18-
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
Table 3
Example CatalystNo. Inlet MeOH N Flow *Degen.DMA
of Temp.
Cat. of *1 Conversion/ Rate Const.pEq.
Sub-beds(C) 010;1 C *2 (X10-3)Factor
9 Z1 6 270 x:16 1.7 9 1.7 2.2
Z2 6 270 95 1.7 8 1.0 2.3
11 Z3 6 280 04 1.7 9 2.0 2.2
I I I I I I
I
*1 Each Catalyst Sub-bed
*2 Per Unit Process
* Degen. stands for degeneration
Comaarative Examales 8 and 9
An adiabatic reactor having a diameter of one inch was filled with
100 ml of a zeolite catalyst. To this was fed a starting material composition
consisting of 61 mol% of ammonia, 29 mol% of methanol, 8 mol% of MMA and 2
mol% of TMA from the lower part of the reactor at a rate of 200 g/hour,
thereby
carrying out a reaction for two weeks. The difference between the inlet and
outlet
temperatures of the catalyst bed was 90°C on the average.
Comparative Examples 10 to 12
An adiabatic reactor of a diameter of one inch having an outer shell
was used. The inner tube of the reactor was filled with 100 ml of zeolite
catalyst.
To this was fed a starting material composition consisting of 61 mol% of
ammonia,
-19-
20375-808
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
29 mol% of methanol, 8 mol% of MMA and 2 mol% of TMA through the external
shell of the reactor at a rate of 200 g/hour in the counterdirection to the
flow of
gas passing through the catalyst bed, thereby carrying out a reaction for two
weeks. The difference between the inlet and outlet temperatures of the
catalyst
bed was 70°C on the average.
The results obtained in the Comparative Examples 8 to 12 are shown
in Table 4.
Table 4
Compa- CatalystNo. of Inlet MeCH N Flow *Degen.DMA
Temp.
rative Cat. of *1 Conversion/ Rate Const.pEq.
Example Sub-beds(C) ("~o) C *2 (X10'3)Factor
8 Z1 1 240 ~7 1.7 11 22 2.0
9 Z3 1 260 '~5 1.7 12 20 1.9
10 Z1 1 2~0 X36 1.7 10 12 2.1
11 Z2 1 250 96 1.7 9 9 2.2
12 Z3 1 260 94 1.7 11 10 2.0
*1 Each Catalyst Sub-bed
*2 Per Unit Process
* Degen. stands for degeneration
[Consideration - the case where a catalyst bed is divided into sections/sub-
beds
connected in parallel]
Comparative Examples 8 and 9 are the case where methylamines
were synthesized on a single bed of a zeolite catalyst by using a small-size
-20-
20375-808
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
equipment which was of the same type as a conventional adiabatic reactor used
for the production of methylamines. Although the inlet temperature of the
catalyst
bed was kept at as low as 240°C to 260°C, which was
approximately the minimum
temperature for initiating the reaction at a reasonable rate, so as to prevent
side
reactions such as the formation of coke, the degeneration constant of the
catalyst
was found to be at an extraordinary high level of 20 or more. Such a level
corresponds to a catalyst life of only about one month, and is far from the
level
suitable for practical use.
Comparative Examples 10 and 11 are the case where a single bed of
a zeolite catalyst was provided in the inner tube of a double-tube reactor,
and a
reaction was allowed to proceed with heat-exchange of feed gas with gas
passing
through the catalyst bed, flowing in the counterdirection to the feed gas. In
this
case, the degeneration constant of the catalyst is approximately 10. Although
this
value is slightly improved as compared with Comparative Examples 8 and 9, it
is
still far from the level useful for practical use.
On the contrary, Examples 9 to 11 are the case where a reaction
was carried out, in accordance with the process of the present invention, by a
multiple-tube heat-exchanger-type reactor using a zeoiite catalyst which had
been
divided into 6 sectionslsub-beds connected in parallel, with feed gas being
heat-
exchanged with gas passing through the catalyst bed, flowing in the
counterdirection to the feed gas. As a result, it was surprisingly found that
the
degeneration constant of the catalyst was improved to 1 to 2, which was almost
1/10 of that in Comparative Examples, although the inlet temperature of the
- 20a -
20375-808
CA 02185283 1998-04-28
catalyst bed was higher than that in Comparative Examples. Such a value
corresponds to a catalyst life of 1 to 2 years. The present process can thus
be
adequately employed for the industrial scale of production.
According to the process of the present invention, the life of a zeolite
catalyst for use in the production of methylamines can be remarkably improved,
and the catalyst can be continuously used in the production for a long period
of
time at a low reaction temperature of 300°C ar lower. The production of
methylamines can thus be advantageously conducted in the industrial scale.
-20b-
20375-808
