Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2248785 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2248785
(54) Titre français: ACIDES POLYORGANIQUES ET LEURS ANALOGUES, DESTINES A AMELIORER L'EFFICACITE D'HERBICIDES
(54) Titre anglais: POLYORGANIC ACIDS AND THEIR ANALOGUES TO ENHANCE HERBICIDE EFFECTIVENESS
Statut: Périmé et au-delà du délai pour l’annulation
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • A1N 25/00 (2006.01)
  • A1N 37/18 (2006.01)
  • A1N 37/46 (2006.01)
  • A1N 43/66 (2006.01)
  • A1N 47/10 (2006.01)
  • A1N 47/28 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • SANDERS, J. LARRY (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • DONLAR CORPORATION
(71) Demandeurs :
  • DONLAR CORPORATION (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 2002-10-08
(86) Date de dépôt PCT: 1997-03-21
(87) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 1997-09-25
Requête d'examen: 1998-09-11
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Oui
(86) Numéro de la demande PCT: PCT/US1997/004600
(87) Numéro de publication internationale PCT: US1997004600
(85) Entrée nationale: 1998-09-11

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
08/621.840 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 1996-03-22

Abrégés

Abrégé français

L'invention concerne une composition herbicide qui comprend un herbicide et un acide polyorganique non aromatique et soluble dans l'eau ou l'un de ses sels ou de ses copolymères, tel que l'acide polyaspartique, en quantité faible mais suffisant à améliorer l'absorption d'herbicides.


Abrégé anglais


A herbicide composition which comprises a herbicide and a small but herbicide
absorption enhancing effective amount of a water-soluble, non-aromatic
polyorganic acid or a salt or copolymer thereof such as polyaspartic acid.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CLAIMS:
1. A herbicide composition which comprises: a herbicide selected from the
group
consisting of substituted urea herbicides, carbamate herbicides,
chloroacetamides,
triazines, acetanilides, morpholine derivatives, toluidine derivatives, and
clomazone
derivatives, and a small but herbicide absorption enhancing effective amount
of water
soluble, polyaspartic acid, and its salts or copolymers.
2. A herbicide solution composition which comprises: a herbicide solution, of
a
herbicide selected from the group consisting of substituted urea herbicides,
carbamate
herbicides, chloroacetamides, triazines, acetanilides, morpholine derivatives,
toluidine
derivatives and clomazone derivatives and a small but herbicide absorption
enhancing
effective amount of water soluble, non-aromatic, polyorganic acid or salt
thereof which
is a polyamino acid or a copolymer of said acid, or salt thereof with the acid
being
polyaspartic acid, said polyaspartic acid having a molecular weight larger
than 1500.
3. The herbicide composition of claim 1 wherein the herbicide is a substituted
urea based herbicide.
4. The composition of claim 1 wherein the herbicide is a carbamate.
5. The composition of claim 1 wherein the herbicide is a choloracetamide.
6. The herbicide composition of claim 1 wherein the polyaspartic acid has a
molecular weight in the range of about 1500 to about 100,000.
7. The herbicide composition of claim 6 wherein the polyamino acid is
polyaspartic acid having a molecular weight of about 3000 to 40,000.

8. The herbicide composition of claim 1 wherein the amount of polyorganic acid
or salt form thereof is from a weight ratio of about 1:100 (polyaspartic acid
or
salt:herbicide) to about 100:1 (polyaspartic acid or salt: herbicide).
9. The herbicide composition of claim 1 wherein the amount of polyorganic acid
or salt form thereof is from about 1:100 (polyaspartic acid or salt:herbicide)
to about
20:1 (polyaspartic acid or salt:herbicide).
10. The herbicide composition of claim 1 wherein the herbicide is a urea
herbicide
and the polyorganic acid or salt form thereof is polyaspartic acid having a
molecular
weight of from 3000 to 40,000.
11. The herbicide composition of claim 1 wherein the herbicide is a
chloroacetamide and the polyorganic acid or salt form thereof is polyaspartic
acid
having a molecular weight of from 3000 to 40,000.
12. The herbicide composition of claim 2 wherein the herbicide is a
chloroacetamide and the polyorganic acid or salt form thereof is polyaspartic
acid
having a molecular weight of from 3000 to 40,000.
13. A method of enhancing the absorption effectiveness of herbicides, said
method
comprising: adding to a herbicide selected from the group consisting of
substituted
urea herbicides, carbamate herbicides, chloroacetamides, triazines,
acetanilides,
morpholine derivatives, toluidine derivatives, and clomazone derivatives, a
small but
herbicide absorption enhancing effective amount of a water soluble, non-
aromatic,
polyorganic acid or salt thereof which is a polyamino acid or a copolymer of
said acid,
or salt thereof, selected from the group consisting of polyaspartic acid,
polyglutamic
acid, polyglycine, polylysine, a copolymer of cysteine and glutamic acid and a

terpolymer of cysteine, glutamic acid and aspartic acids, and salt form
thereof, said
polyamino acid having a molecular weight larger than 1500.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein the polyamino acid is polyaspartic acid.
15. The method of claim 13 wherein the polyaspartic acid has a molecular
weight
in the range of about 1500 to 100,000.
16. The method of claim 13 wherein the polyamino acid is polyaspartic acid
having
a molecular weight in the range of about 3000 to 40,000.
17. The method of claim 13 wherein the amount of non-aromatic polyorganic acid
or salt form thereof is from a weight ratio of about 1:100 (polyaspartic acid
or
salt:herbicide) to about 100:1 (polyaspartic acid ar salt:herbicide).
18 The method of claim 13 wherein the amount of non-aromatic polyorganic acid
or salt form thereof is from about 1:100 (polyaspartic acid or salt:herbicide)
to about
20:1 (polyaspartic acid or salt:herbicide).
19. The method of claim 13 wherein the herbicide is a urea based herbicide and
the polyorganic acid or salt form thereof is polyaspartic acid having a
molecular
weight of from 3000 to 40,000.
20. The method of claim 13 wherein the herbicide is a carbamate and the
polyorganic acid or salt form thereof is polyaspartic acid having a molecular
weight of
from 3000 to 40,000.
21 The method of claim 13 wherein the herbicide is an acetanilide and the
polyorganic acid or salt form thereof is polyaspartic acid having a molecular
weight
of from 3000 to 40,000.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02248785 1998-09-11
.. ..
.. .. . . . , .. .. .. ..
. . . .. . ; ; ~ ~ . ..
. . . ..
. . . . . . ... .
.... .. ~..~.:.. ~~
TITLE: POLYORGA.1VIC ACIDS AND THEIR ANALOGUES TO
ENHANCE HERBICIDE EFFECTIVENESS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to herbicides. More particularly, in a preferred
aspect it relates to an improved method for enhancing effectiveness of
herbicide absorption by weeds to effect a kill.
Herbicides with which this invention may be used are well known
classes of herbicides. The precise herbicide itself forms no part of the
to invention. Suitable herbicides may be substituted urea herbicides,
carbamate
herbicides, chloro acetamides, triazines, acetanilides, morpholine
derivatives,
toluidines, clomazone derivatives and the like.
These classes of herbicides are known in the art and are sold under a
variety of trademarks such a~ H~ness~, Dual IIO, Frontier0, E~trazine~,
t5 Command~, Canopy, SencorC~, Lasso, Prowl~, Eradicane~, Atrazinec~,,
EYtrazine ~z , and Dual, to name a few. In the broad chemical sense, most of
these are classified as substituted urea herbicides, carbamate and
thiocarbamate herbicides, chlorohydrocarbons, triazines, toluidines, clomazone
derivatives, morpholines andlor acetanilides. -
;,
2o While the above have been shown to be effective herbicides, they also
are known to have some environmental risks, such as a pollution risk. In
order to minimize environmental risks such as pollution risks, effort always
continues towards increasing the effectiveness of known herbicides from the
standpoint of the ability to achieve the same level of effectiveness, but with
2s less herbicide active component.
WO 92/21452 discloses the use of a pesticidal composition which
includes a weed irradicating substance in combination with polymaleic acid
and a surfactant. Until now, however, the use of polyamino acids have not
been disclosed as a means of increasing the benefits of herbicides and,
further,
3o without the necessity of a surfactant.

CA 02248785 1998-09-11
. .. ..
:. .. . .. . .".." ~~ ..
. . . , , . . ..
..
. . .
~ . ... .
..
.... .. .. .... '
accordingly, it is a primary objective of the present invention to prow de
a composition which enhances the effectiveness of certain classic types of
herbicides, particularly the preferred urea herbicides such <xs Diuronu.
carbamate and thio carbamate herbicides such as Sutan~n.
1/A

CA 02248785 1998-09-11
WO 97/34481 PCT/US97/04600
chloro acetamides such as Metolachlor~, acetanilides such as
Alachlor~, and morpholine derivatives such as dimethomorph.
Yet another objective of the present invention is to
achieve enhanced effectiveness of herbicides by enhancing the
ability of the herbicide to be absorbed by the exterior cell
membrane layers of weeds, thereby substantially increasing
the effectiveness, and thus allowing reduction of the
treatment level required in field application.
Still another objective of the present invention is to
provide a herbicide effectiveness enhancing composition which
uses as an additive a pollution- free additive that is
environmentally unobjectionable.
And, a further objective is to improve penetration of
the herbicide into the week tissue in adverse weather
conditions such as drought or extended periods of low
rainfall.
The method and means of accomplishing each of the above
objectives will become apparent from the detailed description
of the invention which follows.
~ItrrttvrARV OF THE INVENTION
A herbicide composition which comprises herbicides such
as urea herbicides, carbamate herbicides, chloro acetamide .
herbicides, acetanalides, and morpholine derivatives, in
combination with an absorption enhancing effective amount of
a water soluble non-aromatic polyorganic acid or salt form of
such an acid. Particularly preferred is polyaspartic acid.
The invention in a broader aspect also involves a method of
enhancing the dose effectiveness of certain classes of
herbicides by adding to those a cell membrane penetration
effectiveness aid, such as polyaspartic acid.
nFTATTFn DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is premised upon the fact that it
has been discovered that certain compounds, namely certain
polymeric organic amino acids, as set forth in earlier
commonly-owned United States Letters Patent 5,350,735, which,
2

CA 02248785 2001-12-12
WO 97!34481 PCT/US97/04600
along with related U.S. Patents 5,593,947; 5,580,840; and
5,661,103 can be used effectively in enhancing the penetration
of herbicides such as urea herbicides through the exterior
surface cells of a weed.
The invention, of course, is not limited to the
treatment of any specific weed, but can be used effectively
for treating any of the common weeds for any agricultural or
horticultural crop, including fruits, cereals, vegetables,
flowers and ornamentals. The invention is also useful for
any application in post emergence situations where herbicides
are used for control of weeds, such as in lawns and gardens,
around homes and farm buildings, grain elevators, in
greenhouses, etc. Examples of past emergence herbicides
useful in the combinations of the invention include Banvelm,
a salt of dicamba, paraquat dichloride, glyphosate, 2,4-
dichloro-phenoxyacetic: acid and conventionally used
herbicidal oils.
In general, the polymeric organic acid can be simply
added to the liquid form of the herbicide, generally within a
weight ratio of from 1:100 (polyaspartate:insecticide) to
100:1 (polyaspartate:insecticide).
The polymeric organic acids, suitable for the practice
of the present invention, must be water soluble, non-
aromatic, and must have a molecular weight sufficiently large
to preclude absorption into the system of plants. To that
end, the
non-aromatic polymeric organic acid units (residues), or
mers, in the linear polymer chain that constitutes the
polymeric acid organic acids having a molecular weight in
excess of about 100,000, usually exhibit poor solubility in
water for the present purposes. Thus, for present purposes,
a polymeric organic acid molecular weight not larger than
about 100,000 is preferred. Particularly, preferred
3

CA 02248785 1998-09-11
WO 97/34481 PCT/US97/04600
molecular weight is in the range of about 1,500 to about
100,000.
Illustrative are polymeric organic acids, with or
without carboxylic acid, thiocarboxylic acid, imidocarboxy,
and/or amino side chains such as, for example, polyacrylic
acid, polyiticonic acid, polyepoxysuccinic acid,
polymethylacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, polyfumaric acid,
polylysine, polyglutamic acid, polyaspartic acid,
polyglycine, polycysteine, polycysteine/glutamic acid,
mixtures of the foregoing or their salts, copolymers of the
above, and the like. Thus, block or random copolymers or
terpolymers of several organic acids are also within the
purview of the present invention as the polymeric acid
component thereof. For example, the utilized polymeric acid
component can be a block copolymer of aspartic acid residues
and L-lactic acid residues, a random copolymer of aspartic
acid residues and glycolic acid residues, a conjugated
protein constituted by amino acid residue chains
interconnected by one or more polycarboxylic acid residues, a
copolymer of acrylic acid and acrylamide, and the like.
Polymers of organic acids are commercially available.
In addition, such polymeric acids, especially poly(amino
acids), can be made inter alia, by thermal condensation
methods. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,057,597 to
Koskan, Little et al., American Chemical Society 97:263-279
(1991), and U.S. Patent No. 4,696,981 to Harada et al.
While the above description has been presented with
particular mention of classic herbicides such as Atrazine~,
Lasso~ and Dual II~, other well known herbicides can be used
with the same observed enhanced effectiveness, as shown in
the specific working examples below.
The herbicide, in combination with the polyorganic acid
or salt, such as polyaspartic acid, may be applied by direct
spray, dusting, drenching, may be applied in granular form,
as a wet powder, an aerosol, by soil application or leaf
application. It may be used as a preemergent or postemergent
4

CA 02248785 1998-09-11
WO 97/34481 PCT/US97/04600
application, depending on the herbicide chosen. In short,
the application method is not critical.
The crop plants for which the herbicides may be used are
not critical, and generally include any of the commonly used
domesticated grain, row crops, and as well, fruit and
vegetables. Such crops may be corn, soybeans, alfalfa,
wheat, oats, potatoes, apples, oranges, tomatoes, green
beans, and in general include monocotyledons and
dicotyledons.
The following examples are offered to further
illustrate, but not necessarily limit the process and to
demonstrate the compositions of the present invention as
showing enhanced herbicide effectiveness in comparison with
herbicide alone. It will be apparent to those of ordinary
skill in the art that certain modifications can be made to
the process and composition without departing from the spirit
and scope of the invention here described.
EXAMPLES 1-7. Table I
In the following examples, classic herbicides were
demonstrated as more effective in combination with the
polyorganic acids, and particularly polyaspartic acid of the
present invention, in potted plant experiments. In these
experiments, 25 ppm of polyaspartic acid, molecular weight
5,000, were mixed on a weight-by-weight basis with the
potting soil. Wheat was planted into the pot, and herbicide
applied to the pot as a spray at the level 0.05 pounds per
acre to 0.1 pounds per acre, and each pot was watered to
activate the herbicide within the pot. Weed counts were
takr:~ over time at two week intervals to determine the amount
of biomass reduction.
As demonstrated in Table I below, the herbicides were
shown to be effective against broadleaf weeds, grasses,
annual grasses, in both preemergence and early emergence
environments.
5

CA 02248785 1998-09-11
WO 97/34481 PCTlUS97/04600
TABLE I
herbicide Weed Aoolication Biomass ~iomaes
~vel ~duction Reduction
Lb ai/A Alone With PA
Harness~ Giant
Foxtail .03 45 90
Dual II~ Giant
Foxtail .07 61 89
Frontier~ Giant
Foxtail .04 78 92
Extrazine~Giant
Foxtail .25 62 97
Harness~ Velvet Leaf 1.0 70 90
Atrazine~ Velvet Leaf .25 46 95
Extrazine~Velvet Leaf .3 29 99
,ALES 8-11. Table II
For effectiveness, actual field data was checked to
confirm the greenhouse pot experiments of examples 1-7. In
particular, polyaspartic acid, molecular weight 5,000, was
applied at a level of 2 quarts per acre to soybeans and
lightly disked into the soil. The herbicide was applied at
the conventional labeled recommended rate. The results are
reported in Table II.
TABLE II
gield Data So3rb eans
Herbicide yj.eld Alone (Per Acre)ield Plus
2 0 Y asnartic
Poly Acid
Command~ 47 bu/acre 58 bu/acre
/ Canopy~
Command~ 51 bu/acre 56 bu/acre
/Sencor~
Lasso~ 58 bu/acre 63 bu/acre
Prowl~ 38 bu/acre 51 bu/acre
A similar procedure, to Table II experiments 8-11 was
conducted in the State of Illinois with corn. Table III
reports the results. Again, the recommended dosage rate of
the particular herbicides was followed in terms of rate of
application per acre, and the amount of polyaspartic acid
used was as reported in the Table II experiments.
6

CA 02248785 1998-09-11
WO 97/34481 PCT/US97/04600
EXAMPLES 12-16. Table III
FIELD DATA CORN
Herbicide Yield w/o Yield With
Polvaspartic Acid Po~,yaspartic Acid
Eradicane~/ 178 bu/acre 184 bu/acre
Atrazine~
Extrazine~ 188 bu/acre 199 bu/acre
Dual~/Atrazine~ ~ 168 bu/acre 180 bu/acre
Frontier~/Atrazine~ 136 bu/acre 146 bu/acre
As seen from the above examples, the polyaspartic acid
significantly enhances the absorption, and therefore the
effectiveness of the herbicide. Generally, the polyaspartic
acid should be dosed in combination with the herbicide at a
rate of from about .O1 gallons per acre to 5.0 gallons per
acre, with the most desirable being approximately 0.5 gallons
per acre. The amount of solids of the polyacid in solution
should generally be within the range of from 20% solids to
60% solids, generally from 40% solids to 42% solids. The
preferred polyaspartic acid is that having an average
molecular weight of 5,000.
7

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2248785 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-12
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 2004-03-22
Lettre envoyée 2003-03-21
Accordé par délivrance 2002-10-08
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2002-10-07
Inactive : Taxe finale reçue 2002-07-26
Préoctroi 2002-07-26
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2002-03-14
Lettre envoyée 2002-03-14
month 2002-03-14
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2002-03-14
Inactive : Approuvée aux fins d'acceptation (AFA) 2002-02-22
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2001-12-12
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2001-09-19
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2001-08-16
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2001-05-17
Inactive : CIB attribuée 1998-12-08
Inactive : CIB attribuée 1998-12-08
Inactive : CIB attribuée 1998-12-08
Inactive : CIB attribuée 1998-12-08
Inactive : CIB attribuée 1998-12-08
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 1998-12-08
Symbole de classement modifié 1998-12-08
Inactive : Acc. récept. de l'entrée phase nat. - RE 1998-11-12
Demande reçue - PCT 1998-11-09
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 1998-09-11
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 1998-09-11
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1997-09-25

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2002-02-20

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Les taxes sur les brevets sont ajustées au 1er janvier de chaque année. Les montants ci-dessus sont les montants actuels s'ils sont reçus au plus tard le 31 décembre de l'année en cours.
Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Taxe nationale de base - générale 1998-09-11
Requête d'examen - générale 1998-09-11
Enregistrement d'un document 1998-09-11
TM (demande, 2e anniv.) - générale 02 1999-03-22 1999-03-04
TM (demande, 3e anniv.) - générale 03 2000-03-21 2000-03-02
TM (demande, 4e anniv.) - générale 04 2001-03-21 2001-03-05
TM (demande, 5e anniv.) - générale 05 2002-03-21 2002-02-20
Taxe finale - générale 2002-07-26
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
DONLAR CORPORATION
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
J. LARRY SANDERS
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Abrégé 1998-09-10 1 44
Description 1998-09-10 8 328
Revendications 1998-09-10 3 121
Page couverture 1998-12-09 1 26
Revendications 2001-08-15 4 120
Description 2001-12-11 8 324
Revendications 2001-12-11 3 115
Page couverture 2002-09-03 1 27
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 1998-11-23 1 110
Avis d'entree dans la phase nationale 1998-11-11 1 201
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 1998-11-11 1 114
Avis du commissaire - Demande jugée acceptable 2002-03-13 1 166
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2003-04-21 1 174
Taxes 2002-02-19 1 32
PCT 1998-09-10 14 506
Taxes 2001-03-04 1 32
Correspondance 2002-07-25 1 39