Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCT/US97/14007
- 1 -
TUNNELING SENSOR WrTH LINEAR FORCE REBALANCE
FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to tunneling
sensors and, more particularly, to a tunneling sensor with
linear force rebalance and a method for fabricating the same.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Some former force rebalance tunneling sensors used a
single capacitor with a square law volts-to-force
relationship. This yielded an output voltage proportional
to the square root of the quantity to be measured.
Alternative former force rebalance tunneling sensors used
piezoelectric layers to perform the rebalance function.
Sensors providing a non-linear output are generally
undesirable because they lead to harmonic distortion of the
quantity being measured. Sensitivity also varies with the
magnitude of input signals. Furthermore, the dynamic range
over which a sensor yields a faithful representation of an
input signal is reduced.
Piezoelectric rebalancing is generally inferior due to
hysteresis, poor temperature and time stability, and small
available displacements. The additional complexity of
fabricating piezoelectric layers on a micromachined device
is also undesirable.
On the other hand, linear force rebalancing increases
dynamic range and reduces non-linearity, harmonic distortion,
and intermodulation distortion. For many applications, such
as phased arrays, linear operation is absolutely essential.
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) has designed a
state of the art tunneling accelerometer device primarily for
use in phased arrays (see "Tunnel-Effect Displacement
Sensor", NASA Tech Briefs, Vol. 13, No. 9, September 1989),
but this device has several minor drawbacks that may act as
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCTIUS97/14007
- 2 -
barriers to practical use. For instance, the JPL device
requires a high bias voltage. Specifically, the JPL device
currently requires a 200 volt bias voltage to close the gap
between the tunnel-effect tip. This large voltage is
necessary because of a large capacitor gap (hundreds of
microns) in the rebalance capacitor. This is an uncommonly
high voltage for use in towed arrays, inasmuch as high
voltages create corrosion and safety hazards in handling and
testing. Furthermore, the circuitry required to generate
such a high voltage can generate noise for the rest of the
array.
Another drawback of the JPL device is that it employs
non-linear force rebalance. A single capacitor is used for
force rebalance in the JPL device, and the force across this
single capacitor is proportional to the square of the applied
voltage. This puts a non-linearity in the feedback loop
wherein the output voltage is proportional to the square root
of the incident acceleration. This, in turn, creates
harmonic distortion, intermodulation, and phase non-
linearity, which leads to reduced sensitivity and dynamic
range. For array applications, linearity, uniform phase, and
low distortion are essential to the combining of the numerous
transducers which make up the array.
Still another drawback of the JPL device is its size,
which is on the order of 8 mm. This is fairly large for a
micromachined sensor. For many applications, such as thin
line towed arrays, this is simply too large.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to overcome the
disadvantages of former force rebalance tunneling sensors and
thereby provide a tunneling sensor having a pair of force
rebalance capacitors that are used in a push-pull
relationship so as to provide a rebalance force that is a
linear function of applied rebalance voltages, which leads
to an output torque voltage that is linearly related to input
acceleration.
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCT/US97/14007
- 3 -
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention contemplates a tunneling sensor
having a pair of force rebalance capacitors that are used in
a push-pull relationship so as to provide a rebalance force
that is a linear function of applied rebalance voltages,
which leads to an output torque voltage that is linearly
related to input acceleration.
The present invention tunneling sensor, which is
constructed primarily as a rotational accelerometer,
comprises a plate electrode that is formed from and attached
to a silicon substrate by a pair of torsional flexures, which
provide an axis of rotation for the plate electrode. A
pendulous mass is formed on a first end of the plate
electrode, and a tunnel-effect contact is formed on a second
end of the plate electrode. A pair of torque rebalance
bridge electrodes are formed on the substrate so as to span
the plate electrode. A tunnel-effect tip is formed on the
substrate so as to be proximate the tunnel-effect contact and
in line with the rotational path that the tunnel-effect
contact takes when the plate electrode is rotated.
The plate electrode, and hence the tunnel-effect
contact, are typically grounded, while the pair of torque
rebalance bridge electrodes are complementarily driven with
rebalance voltages, having a constant bias voltage component
and a output torque voltage component, so as to generate an
electrostatic rebalance force that is a linear function of
the rebalance voltages. A small bias voltage is typically
applied to the tunnel-effect tip so as to induce the tunnel
current. The result is an output torque voltage that is
linearly related to input acceleration.
Accordingly, the primary object of the present invention
is to provide a tunneling sensor having a pair of force
rebalance capacitors that are used in a push-pull
relationship so as to provide a rebalance force that is a
linear function of applied rebalance voltages, which leads
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCT/US97114007
- 4 -
to an output torque voltage that is linearly related to input
acceleration.
The above primary object, as well as other objects,
features, and advantages, of the present invention will
become readily apparent from the following detailed
description which is to be read in conjunction with the
appended drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order to facilitate a fuller understanding of the
present invention, reference is now made to the appended
drawings. These drawings should not be construed as limiting
the present invention, but are intended to be exemplary only.
Figure 1 is a plan view of a tunneling sensor with
linear force rebalance according to the present invention;
Figure 2 is a schematic block diagram of a control
system for the tunneling sensor shown in Figure 1;
Figure 3 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure l, of a tunneling sensor
according to the present invention in its initial fabrication
stage;
Figure 4 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
shown in Figure 3 after the initial oxide layer has been
patterned on both its front and back sides;
Figure 5 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
shown in Figure 4 after a boron diffusion has been performed
on the silicon wafer through the patterned openings in the
initial oxide;
Figure 6 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
shown in Figure 5 after the initial oxide has been
photolithographicly removed from certain regions thereof;
Figure 7 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCT/US97/14007
- 5 -
shown in Figure 6 after a sacrificial (spacer) layer has been
deposited on selected patterned regions;
Figure 8 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
shown in Figure 7 after a thin metal (seed) layer has been
deposited thereon;
Figure 9 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
shown in Figure 8 after an electroplating mask has been
deposited and patterned thereon;
Figure 10 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
shown in Figure 9 after a pendulous weight, bridge
electrodes, and a tunnel tip have been electroplated in the
I5 open areas of the electroplating mask;
Figure 11 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
shown in Figure 10 after the electroplating mask, the
sacrificial (spacer) layer, and the exposed portions of the
thin metal (seed) layer have been removed by polymer
stripping;
Figure 12 is a cross-sectional side view, taken in
relation to line A-A of Figure 1, of the tunneling sensor
shown in Figure 11 after an anisotropic EDP etch (ethylene-
diamine, pyrocatechol, and water) is preformed to
substantially free up the plate electrode.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to Figure 1, there is shown a plan view of a
tunneling sensor 10 with linear force rebalance according to
the present invention. The present invention tunneling
sensor 10, which is constructed primarily as a rotational
accelerometer, comprises a plate electrode 12 that is formed
from and attached to a substrate 14 by a pair of torsional
flexures 16 that provide an axis of rotation about which the
plate electrode 12 is rotatable. The plate electrode 12 and
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98!05973 PCT/I1S97/14007
- 6 -
the pair of torsional flexures 16 are typically etched out
from the substrate 14, as indicated by the etch slot 32 shown
in Figure 1 (also see Figure 12) and as will be described in
detail below.
A pendulous mass 18 is formed on a first end of the
plate electrode 12, and a tunnel-effect contact 20 is formed
on a second end of the plate electrode 12. A pair of torque
rebalance bridge electrodes 22 are formed on the substrate
14 so as to span the plate electrode 12 (see Figure 12). A
tunnel-effect tip 24 is formed on the substrate 14 so as to
be proximate the tunnel-effect contact 20 and in line with
the rotational path that the tunnel-effect contact 20 takes
when the plate electrode 12 is rotated. It should be noted
that the pendulous mass 18 and the tunnel-effect contact 20
may be formed on the same end of the plate electrode 12 if
such is adjusted for in the applied rebalance voltages, as
described in detail below.
The plate electrode 12, through one of the pair of
torsional flexures 16, each of the pair of torque rebalance
bridge electrodes 22, and the tunnel-effect tip 24 all have
associated electrically conductive contacts 26, 28, and 30,
respectively, so as to allow for wire bonding during
packaging.
At this point it should be noted that the substrate 14
is typically bulk silicon and the plate electrode 12 is
typically a boron diffused portion thereof, as is described
in detail below. The pair of torsional flexures 16 are
included as part of the boron diffused area, as indicated by
the shaded area shown in Figure 1. The pendulous mass 18,
the pair of torque rebalance bridge electrodes 22, and the
tunnel-effect tip 24 are all typically electroplated gold,
or an electroplated gold layer covered by another
electroplated metal, as is also described in detail below.
The tunnel-effect contact 20 and all of the other
electrically conductive contacts 26, 28, and 30 are typically
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCT/US97/14007
formed of a bi-metal layer such as chrome-gold, as is further
described in detail below.
It should also be noted that the pair of torque
rebalance bridge electrodes 22 are preferably symmetrically
spaced and located over opposite ends of the plate electrode
12, equidistant from the rotational axis provided by the pair
of torsional flexures 16, so as to facilitate in the
rebalance force linearization. Otherwise, a compensation
voltage component must be added to the applied rebalance
voltages in order to achieve linearization.
Referring to Figure 2, there is shown a schematic block
diagram of a control system 40 for the present invention
tunneling sensor 10 shown in Figure 1. The control system
40 has a stiff feedback loop since the relative movement
between the tunnel-effect tip 24 and the tunnel-effect
contact 20 is preferably limited to 5 A in use. Because
of the high loop gain required, stability is an issue, and
compensation will be required to ensure phase margin near the
unity loop gain frequency. In accordance with the present
invention, the control system 40 is shown having an input
acceleration 42 and an output torque voltage 44 that is
linearly related to the input acceleration 42.
The control system 40 comprises an acceleration to
torque conversion block 46 wherein the input acceleration 42
is converted into torque as a result of the pendulous nature
of the plate electrode 12 and the pendulous mass 18. The
acceleration to torque conversion is essentially realized by
multiplying the weight of the pendulous mass 18 by the
distance between the center of gravity of the pendulous mass
18 and the axis of rotation running through the pair of
torsional flexures 16. The converted torque is summed with
torque that is produced as a result of the electrostatic
rebalance force between the pair of torque rebalance bridge
electrodes 22 and the plate electrode 12.
The control system 40 also comprises a plate rotation
block 50 representing the differential equation modeling the
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98105973 PCT/I1S97I14007
_ g _
mechanical motion of the tunneling sensor 10 in response to
an applied torque. The coefficients of M, kD, and ke are the
total moment of inertia of the plate electrode 12 and the
pendulous mass 18, a damping spring constant, and a
rotational spring constant, respectively. An angular to
linear displacement conversion is performed on the output of
the plate rotation block 50. a is the angle of rotation of
the plate electrode 12 in radians, and Rtip represents the
distance from the axis of rotation running through the pair
of torsional flexures 16 to the tunnel-effect tip 24.
A tip tunneling block 54 describes the current flow
across the gap between the tunnel-effect contact 20 and the
tunnel-effect tip 24. I represents the tunnel current, B
represents a bias voltage applied across the gap, a is a
constant related to the tunnel current, d is the linear
displacement across the gap (BRtip), and ~ represents the
potential barrier to the tunnel current. The tip tunneling
block 54 mathematically models the current-voltage
relationship at the tunneling tip.
The tunnel current, I, is converted into a
representative voltage, V, and a logarithmic amplifier 58
linearizes the exponential dependence of the tunnel current,
I, on the tip displacement, d. A reference voltage, Uref,
corresponding to a desired quiescent point for the control
loop (I = 1 nA, d ~ 5-10 A) is summed with the output of the
logarithmic amplifier 58 so as to determine if any difference
exists therebetween. The resultant difference signal, if any
exists, is passed through an integrator 64 and a phase
compensator 66 so as to provide the output torque voltage 44
which is linearly related to the input acceleration 42.
The force linearization block 68 utilizes the output
torque voltage 44 to generate the complementary rebalance
voltages for the pair of torque rebalance bridge electrodes
22. These complementary rebalance voltages are produced by
adding and subtracting a constant bias voltage (Vbias) to the
output torque voltage (vtorque) ~ These sum and difference
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCT/US97/14007
- g _
voltages are then applied to the pair of torque rebalance
bridge electrodes 22 so as to generate a rebalance torque
against the plate electrode 12 that is proportional to
4Vbiasvtorque~ Thus, the rebalance force is linearly related
to
the output torque voltage 44, and hence to the input
acceleration 42. It should be noted that the voltage level
for the constant bias voltage (Vbias) is typically 10 VDC.
At this point it should be noted that the plate
electrode 12, and hence the tunnel-effect contact 20, are
typically grounded, and a small bias voltage is typically
applied to the tunnel-effect tip 24. The voltage level for
the bias voltage is typically 0.2 VDC.
It should also be noted that the present invention
tunneling sensor 10 yields sensitivity on the order of 20
ng/1~Hz at 1 kHz. According to theoretical analyses, this is
substantially more sensitive than mere capacitive pickoffs
at this frequency.
The method for fabricating the present invention
tunneling sensor 10 is in itself novel. Figures 3-12 show
cross sections of the tunneling sensor 10 at sequential
stages of fabrication.
Referring to Figure 3, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
in its initial fabrication stage comprising the silicon wafer
substrate I4 that is coated on both its front and back sides
with front 70 and back 72 dielectric layers, which may be
silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, or silicon carbide. The
preferred material for the dielectric layers 70 and 72 is
thermally grown silicon dioxide.
Referring to Figure 4, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after the front 70 and back 72 dielectric layers (hereinafter
referred to as the initial oxidation, or initial oxide,
layers) have been patterned using conventional
photolithography and either wet or dry etching.
Referring to Figure 5, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after a boron diffusion has been performed on selected
regions 12, 76, and 78 of the silicon wafer 14 through the
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCT/US97/14007
- 10 -
patterned openings in the initial oxide layers 70 and 72.
The initial oxide layers 70 and 72 are used as a diffusion
mask to selectively diffuse boron through the patterned
openings. The boron diffusion is preferably carried out
using a solid source boron diffusion at a temperature between
1100C and 1200C, although gas sources can also be used.
Referring to Figure 6, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after the initial oxide layers 70 and 72 have been
photolithographicly removed from certain regions, such as
etch slot regions 80, and from the back side of the silicon
wafer 14. Also, a first bi-metal layer has been deposited
by sputtering or evaporating on selected patterned regions
so as to form a tunnel-effect contact 20 and various wire
bond contacts, including those for the plate electrode 26,
the bridge electrodes 28, and the tunnel-effect tip 30. This
first bi-metal layer is preferably chrome-gold, titanium-
gold, or titanium/tungsten-gold.
Referring to Figure 7, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after a sacrificial (spacer) layer 74 has been deposited on
selected patterned regions. This spacer layer 74 may be
photoresist, polyimide, silicon dioxide, polysilicon, or
other sacrificial layers known to those skilled in the art.
The preferred spacer layer material is positive photoresist.
Referring to Figure 8, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after a thin metal (seed) layer 82 has been deposited (by
sputtering) over the entire front side of the wafer structure
so as to serve as a plating base for subsequent
electroplating which will form the bridge electrodes 22.
This seed layer 82 must have good adhesion to the various
materials exposed on the front side of the wafer structure,
in addition to allowing easy electroplating. Typically this
seed layer 82 is formed of a bi-metal deposit, with the first
metal layer being chosen for good adhesion to silicon dioxide
and the second metal layer being chosen for easy
electroplating. The first metal (adhesion) layer is
typically titanium, chromium, titanium-tungsten alloy, or
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98/05973 PCT/U597/14007
- 11 -
aluminum. The second metal (electroplating) layer is
typically gold, chromium, copper, silver, nickel, palladium,
or platinum. A preferred embodiment uses a titanium-gold bi-
layer as the plating base (seed) layer 82.
~5 Referring to Figure 9, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after an electroplating mask 84 has been deposited and
patterned. This mask 84 may be photoresist, e-beam resist,
x-ray resist, or polyimide. A preferred implementation uses
a photoresist as the plating mask 84.
Referring to Figure 10, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after the pendulous weight 18, the bridge electrodes 22, and
the tunnel-effect tip 24 have been electroplated in the open
areas of the electroplating mask 84. Gold is the preferred
metal for the electroplating, since gold is the preferred
tunnel contact metal. Alternatively, a thin gold layer may
be electroplated first, and a thicker layer of some other
metal, such as nickel, silver, or copper, may be
electroplated thereon. It should be noted that the bridge
electrodes 22 have perforations formed therein so as to
reduce the damping spring coefficient, kD.
Referring to Figure 11, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after the electroplating mask 84, the sacrificial (spacer)
layer 74, and the exposed portions of the thin metal (seed)
layer 82 have been removed by polymer stripping . The polymer
stripping is typically done in photoresist stripper, acetone,
or by an oxygen plasma. The portion of the seed Layer 82
that is not protected by the electroplated material 18 and
24 is stripped by an appropriate wet or dry etch, such as are
well known in the industry.
Referring to Figure 12, the tunneling sensor 10 is shown
after an anisotropic EDP etch (ethylene-diamine,
pyrocatechol, and water) is preformed to substantially free
up the plate electrode 12. At this point, the tunneling
sensor 10, which is typically fabricated in an array of like
sensors on the silicon wafer 14, is ready for separation and
packaging. Also shown is the axis of rotation 86 of the
CA 02262684 1999-02-OS
WO 98!05973 PCT/I1S97114007
- 12 -
plate electrode 12 running through the pair of torsional
flexures 16.
In view of the foregoing, it can be easily understood
that the present invention tunneling sensor 10 is smaller and
easier to use in common applications than the JPL device or
similar sensor devices. For example, the present invention
tunneling sensor 10 can easily fit on a 3 mm chip and can be
used as an accelerometer, a vibration sensor, a magnetic
field sensor, a pressure sensor, a hydrophone, and a
microphone.
Also, the present invention tunneling sensor 10 requires
only moderate voltage levels (typically 20 volts) to achieve
rebalance and tip contact due to the small capacitor gaps
(typically 2 microns) used in surface micromachining.
The present invention is not to be limited in scope by
the specific embodiment described herein. Indeed, various
modifications of the present invention, in addition to those
described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the
art from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings.
Thus, such modifications are intended to fall within the
scope of the appended claims. Additionally, various
references are cited throughout the specification, the
disclosures of which are each incorporated herein by
reference in their entirety.
