Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2268645 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2268645
(54) Titre français: SIMULATEUR POUR ARMES A TUBE CHARGEES PAR DEVANT
(54) Titre anglais: SIMULATOR FOR FRONT-LOADED BARREL WEAPONS
Statut: Durée expirée - au-delà du délai suivant l'octroi
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • F41A 33/00 (2006.01)
  • F42B 8/20 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • LAZECKI, RENE (Suisse)
(73) Titulaires :
  • RUAG ELECTRONICS
(71) Demandeurs :
  • RUAG ELECTRONICS (Suisse)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 2008-07-22
(22) Date de dépôt: 1999-04-13
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 1999-10-20
Requête d'examen: 2003-12-22
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
98810345.3 (Office Européen des Brevets (OEB)) 1998-04-20

Abrégés

Abrégé français

Un simulateur d'armes à tube à chargement frontal, comme un simulateur de mortier (1), est doté d'une ouverture de sortie (7) située dans la partie inférieure du tube (3) par laquelle ressortent les projectiles, comme les grenades (8), de manière à créer des conditions d'entraînement réalistes. De préférence, aussi bien les projectiles (8) que le simulateur (1) sont dotés de capteurs (6, 10, 32, 37, 44) et de commandes (12, 41) qui recueillent les données transmises par les capteurs et effectuent une première évaluation. Les résultats sont transmis à l'ordinateur (16) du formateur, qui effectue l'évaluation définitive et calcule notamment le point d'impact.


Abrégé anglais

A simulator for front-loaded barrel weapons, e.g. a mine thrower simulator (1), is provided with an outlet opening (7) at the lower end of the launcher tube (3) through which the shots, e.g. grenades (8), re-exit the launcher tube (3), thus allowing realistic training conditions. Both the ammunition (8) and the simulator (1) preferably comprise sensors (6, 10; 32, 37, 44) and controls (12; 41) which collect the data from the sensors and perform a first evaluation. The results are transmitted to a computer (16) in the custody of the trainer, which delivers the final evaluation and the calculation of the point of impact, inter alia.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


14
CLAIMS:
1. Simulator for front-loaded barrel weapons,
preferably for mine or grenade launchers, wherein the lower
end of the launcher tube is provided with an outlet opening
allowing a respective projectile to drop out.
2. Simulator according to claim 1, wherein the outlet
opening is closed by a closure device at least to such a
degree that a grenade cannot fall through the outlet
opening, and in that the closure device is provided with a
release device which allows to open the closure device and
thus the outlet opening.
3. Simulator according to claim 2, wherein the
closure device in the open condition is pushed into the
closed position by pressure means, preferably by elastic
spring elements, and/or comprises means which exert a
braking action on the exiting grenade in order to ensure a
controlled drop out of the grenade from the outlet opening.
4. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
wherein at least one guiding means is provided, more
particularly in the form of a ramp extending to the lower
end of the outlet opening, in order to ensure a disturbance-
free drop out of the projectiles from the outlet opening.
5. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 4,
wherein braking means, more particularly at least one area
or several areas providing increased friction, or
restrictions are disposed in the launcher tube in order to
adapt the falling time of a projectile in the launcher tube
to realistic conditions.
6. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
wherein the launcher tube and/or the support of the mine

15
thrower are provided with measuring means, comprise at least
one of:
- a position measuring device, more particularly
one which operates according to the GPS method, in order to
determine the geographic position;
- an inclination measuring device in order to
determine the elevation of the launcher tube; and
- a direction measuring device, preferably one
that operates according to the compass principle;
in order to determine the actual alignment of the launcher
tube.
7. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 6,
wherein receiving means for data signals are provided at the
lower end of the launcher tube, particularly for
electromagnetic, acoustic, and/or optical radiation, in
order to receive a data signal transmitted by a projectile
in the launcher tube.
8. Simulator according to claim 7, wherein the
receiving means are capable of generating a signal at least
one parameter of which, particularly the amplitude, is a
function of the position of at least one of the projectile
in the tube and the presence of a projectile in the launcher
tube, in order to release a firing simulation by the
detection of a projectile descending in the launcher tube.
9. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 8,
wherein means for the detection of a projectile are
provided, preferably within the launcher tube at the lower
end thereof, in order to determine the presence and
preferably also the approximate position and/or movement of
a projectile in the tube.

16
10. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 9,
wherein the launcher tube is provided with a displacing
device allowing to disadjust the launcher tube and thus to
simulate the effect of real fire with respect to the
alignment.
11. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 10,
wherein a control device monitors at least one of the
following operating conditions:
- the firing of a projectile;
- the alignment of the launcher tube, particularly
its elevation, tilting and/or direction;
- the geographic position;
- the type of ammunition used for each shot.
12. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 11,
wherein a sensor responding to the magnetic field of the
earth is coupled to the launcher tube in order to determine
the direction of the tube, and in that the metallic parts of
the simulator are at least preponderantly made of an
antimagnetic material, more particularly of aluminum or of
an aluminum alloy, in order to avoid a local perturbation of
the earth magnetic field.
13. Projectile for a simulator according to any one of
claims 1 to 12, comprising transmitting means as well as a
control unit, the control unit being capable of transmitting
data signals by means of the transmitting means whose
content indicates the type of ammunition simulated by the
projectile.
14. Projectile according to claim 13, wherein the
projectile is essentially composed of the tall surfaces, the

17
body, and of the fuse, of which at least the fuse is
detachably mounted, thus allowing to simulate at least one
of the function and the shape of different types of
ammunition for mine throwers by exchanging at least one of
the body and the fuse.
15. Projectile according to claim 13 or 14, wherein an
intensity of said emitted data signal decreases as a
distance of the projectile increases, thus allowing a
determination of a distance of the projectile from a
receiving means of the data.
16. Projectile according to any one of claims 13 to 15
or for a simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 12,
wherein the projectile includes at least one device capable
of receiving additional charge simulation units, the device
comprising detection means to determine the number of
attached additional charge simulation units.
17. Projectile according to claim 16, wherein the
additional charge simulation units comprise small plates
which are attachable to the tail surfaces of the projectile,
the projectile further comprising attachment provisions for
a certain maximum number of additional charge simulation
units, and in that a detector, each said attachment
provision including a detector for detecting a presence of
each said additional charge simulation unit in each
respective said attachment.
18. Projectile according to any one of claims 13 to
17, wherein the projectile comprises a projectile control
unit and detection means, the detection means allowing
detection of a simulated firing of the projectile and
transmission of corresponding information to the projectile
control unit, the projectile further comprising first
transmitting means for the transmission of a signal, the

18
projectile control unit being adapted to transmit a first
signal when the projectile is fired for the first time, and
a second signal which differs from the first signal, no
signal being transmitted when the projectile is fired for at
least a second time and a further time, thus allowing a
determination to be made whether the same projectile is
being used more than once.
19. Projectile according to claim 18 and container for
at least one projectile, wherein the condition of the
projectile control unit prior to being fired for the first
time is restored when the projectile is placed in the
container, the latter comprising second connecting means
that are capable of contacting complementary third
connecting means in the projectile, and in that the
resetting procedure is enabled by the contact and/or the
signals exchanged during the contact of the second and third
connecting means.
20. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 10,
wherein a control device monitors all of the following
operating conditions:
- the firing of a projectile;
- the alignment of the launcher tube, particularly
its elevation, tilting and/or direction;
- the geographic position;
- the type of ammunition used for each shot.
21. Simulator according to any one of claims 1 to 12,
wherein the projectile comprises a projectile control unit
and detection means, the detection means allowing detection
of a simulated firing of the projectile and transmission of
corresponding information to the projectile control unit,

19
the projectile further comprising first transmitting means
for the transmission of a signal, and the projectile control
unit being adapted to transmit a first signal when the
projectile is fired for the first time, and a second signal
which differs from the first signal, no signal being
transmitted when the projectile is fired for at least a
second time and a further time, thus allowing a
determination to be made whether the same projectile is
being used more than once.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREAS STEINER)
- 1 -
SIMULATOR FOR FRONT-LOADED BARREL WEAPONS
The present invention refers to a simulator for front-loaded
barrel weapons according to the preamble of claim 1, as well
as to suitable ammunition therefor.
Simulation systems for the training of the operation of
military weapons systems offer different advantages and are
therefore of increasing interest. Amongst other things,
fewer security precautions or none at all are required while
in the training with real large-range weapons systems, in
addition to the severe security precautions for the
trainees, large areas, which in some cases can be difficult
to find, have to be closed in order to avoid personal and
material damages. Ultimately, the training on simulators
generally involves lower costs and may therefore be
performed more intensely. Also, simulators allow the
practice of situations which can only be trained in reality
with great complications or not at all, such as the
influence of the weather, or shooting in developed areas.
In the case of weapons systems requiring relatively
expensive ammunition, e.g. front-loaded barrel weapons such
as mine throwers, shell throwers, and rocket launchers,
reusable ammunition is particularly advantageous.
Inter alia, known mine thrower simulator projects suffer
from the fact that decisive aspects of the simulation do not
correspond to reality, thereby inducing dangerous errors in
the operation of real systems. In known constructions,
after firing, the shot, i.e. the mine, grenade, illuminating
grenade etc. is still in the barrel, from where it must be
removed. To this end, it is suggested to pull out the shot
from the barrel by means of a suitable tool. On one hand,

CA 02268645 2006-11-29
23444-388
- 2 -
in reality, this manipulation is extremely dangerous, and on
the other hand, such a mine thrower simulator does not allow
to practice serial fire where the shots are fired in the
fastest possible succession.
Another suggestion consists in the automatic ejection of the
grenades. One possibility is to use a very weak propelling
charge, while another possibility is to provide a spring or
pneumatic or hydraulic cylinders or the like. The first
possibility is noisy and involves the consumption of
propelling charges, and the latter one requires the manual
or motorised bending of the spring or the generation of the
pneumatic or hydraulic pressure, respectively. However, a
power driven bending or respective generation of the pressure in
turn requires a relatively strong energy source, which is
generally not available in a realistic training in the
terrain. In any case, all these ejection techniques again
require security precautions as the grenades are ejected to
a distance of some meters. Also, in the case of a bad
landing e.g. on the tail fin, the expensive simulation
grenade may be damaged or destroyed, and the fuse in the
point may be damaged even in a regular landing. Ultimately,
it will be noted that the practice mines or grenades must be
laboriously located and collected after the training.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a
simulator for front-loaded barrel weapons which allows a
realistic training of the operation while avoiding at least
one of the above-mentioned drawbacks.

CA 02268645 2006-11-29
23444-388
2a
This object is attained by a simulator for front-
loaded barrel weapons, preferably for mine or grenade
launchers, wherein the lower end of the launcher tube is
provided with an outlet opening allowing a respective
projectile to drop out.
In one embodiment the launcher tube and/or the
support of the mine thrower are provided with measuring
means, comprise at least one of: a position measuring
device, more particularly one which operates according to
the GPS method, in order to determine the geographic
position; an inclination measuring device in order to
determine the elevation of the launcher tube; and a
direction measuring device, preferably one that operates
according to the compass principle; in order to determine
the actual alignment of the launcher tube.

CA 02268645 2006-11-29
23444-388
- 3 -
The invention will be explained by means of an exemplary
embodiment with reference to the figures.
FIG. 1 schematically shows a side elevation of a mine
thrower simulator;
FIG. 2 shows the evaluating unit;
FIG. 3 schematically shows a partial cross-section of a
mine thrower simulator;
FIG. 4 shows a side elevation of a shot for the mine
thrower simulator;
FIG. 5 shows a bottom view of the mine thrower simulator
of FIG. 4;
FIG. 6 shows the block diagram of the electronics of a
simulation shot; and
FIG. 7 shows the block diagram of the electronics of the
mine thrower simulator.
With respect to its appearance, mine thrower simulator 1 of
the invention resembles a "real" mine thrower: launcher tube
3 is pivotably mounted on base plate 2. The upper portion
of launcher tube 3 is movably connected to post 5 by a
sighting and adjusting unit 4. Since for the purpose of the
simulation, the alignment of launcher tube 3 is measured by
an electronic compass, inter alia, the simulator is largely

CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREAS STEINER)
- 4 -
made of an antimagnetic material in the area of the compass,
especially base plate 2 and launcher tube 3, in order not to
disturb the magnetic field of the earth. This material may
e.g. be aluminium, an aluminium alloy, or brass.
The lower end of launcher tube 3 is provided with outlet
opening 7 from which grenade 8 drops out at the lower end of
launcher tube after having been inserted by the trainee.
The small falling height largely prevents damages of grenade
8. Additionally, a padding such as e.g. a mat may be
provided under opening 7 in order to further reduce the risk
with respect to grenades 8.
Previously mentioned alignment measuring unit 6 comprises an
electronic magnet compass for the direction (azimuth) and an
angular measuring system (inclinometer) for the
determination of the elevation and the tilting angle of
launcher tube 3. The alignment measuring unit is mounted
along with a radio data transmitting unit 9 and a GPS unit
10 for the determination of the position of the simulator on
a support 11 which is attached to launcher tube 3.
The determination of the geographic position and of the
elevation and the tilting angle is easily possible with
sufficient precision with currently available components.
The determination of the direction, however, is problematic.
Up to now, in numerous tests, a sufficient precision could
only be achieved by the mentioned magnetic compass sensor.
However, it is not excluded that different sensor types are
used in the future while the requirements are possibly
reduced, as the case may be. The assumed limit with respect
to the angular precision is 10 artillery oo, equivalent to a

CA 02268645 2006-11-29
23444-388
- 5 -
ciispersion of <_ 10 m at a range of 1 km, or to an angular
resolution of 1/20 at the launcher tube. As it is well known in
Switzerland, the term "artillery %o" refers to a system of
measurement where a fuli circle is divided into 6400 %o. Thus, 10
artillery %o refers to 10/6400 of angular rotation.
The inside of launcher tube 3 accommodates evaluating unit
12 including a disadjusting device, and a battery 13 serving
for the power supply of the mine thrower simulator. All
these measuring and control modules 6, 9, 10, 12, 13 are
mutually connected by power supply, signalling and data
lines 2.1.
The disadjusting device, e.g. in the form of an eccentric
drive, simultaneously represents the connection between
launcher tube 3 and bearing ball 14 resting on base plate 2.
After each shot, the disadjusting device is activated by
evaluating unit 12 in order to alter the alignment of the
launcher tube. In this manner, the disadjustment is
simulated, i.e. the effect of the concussion of a real mine
thrower at the time of the shot.
The data obtained by thrower evaluating unit 12 are radio
transmitted at every shot by transmitter unit 15 to an
evaluating device 16 (FIG. 2). Evaluating device 16 is
generally in the custody of the trainer and serves for the
supervision of the correct operation of the mine thrower
simulator, on one hand, and performs a calculation of the
trajectory and of the virtual point of impact of the shot,
on the other hand. Device 16 may e.g. be a portable
computer ("laptop") provided with a corresponding receiver.
FIG. 3 shows a section of mine thrower simulator 1 in an
enlarged illustration. A grenade 8 is in the process of
sliding down within launcher tube 3. Its lower end carries
an optical transmitter 17 which allows the transmission of

CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREAS STEINER)
- 6 -
data from the firing control within grenade 8 in the form of
light signals 18. These light signals 18 are detected by
optical receiver 19 and supplied to launcher control 12 for
evaluation. Since transmitter 17 transmits a light cone of
a suitably selected opening angle, the intensity of the
light signal detected by receiver 19 increases as grenade 8
is approaching. This dependence of the intensity in
function of the distance is used in order to detect a
grenade sliding down within tube 3 (as opposed to a grenade
which is introduced into the tube end prior to firing and
which is still being held). The disappearance of the light
signal when grenade 8 falls from outlet opening 7 may serve
to trigger the simulation of the shot, i.e. as an equivalent
to the ignition of the propelling charge of a real grenade.
Guiding plates 20 are provided in the area of outlet opening
7 which guide grenade 8 out of the tube even if launcher
tube 3 is in an almost vertical position. Guiding plates 20
comprise a passage or a window for light signal 18.
FIGs. 4 and 5 show a grenade 8 in an enlarged view. It is
essentially composed of body 31, fuse 32 and tail unit 33
with additional charges in the form of plates 34. As in a
real grenade, fuse 32 is screwed into body 31. By a mark at
the end of the fuse which is screwed into body 31, firing
control 35 (FIG. 7) is capable of recognising the actual
type of fuse (contact, retarded, time fuse, etc.). In this
manner, the usual types of ammunition and applications can
be represented by one and the same grenade model, while
illegal combinations may be recognised by firing control 35
or in evaluating device 16, as the case may be, e.g. a
contact fuse in an illuminating grenade.

CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREAS STEINER)
- 7 -
Additional charge plates 34, in the case of the simulation
shot in the form of simple plates which preferably resemble
additional charges, are inserted in respective seats between
two fins 36. In order to allow firing control 35 to
recognise how many additional charge plates have been
attached, which allows to calculate the length of the
trajectory, respective sensors 37 for the additional charge
plates are disposed between each pair of fins 36. Sensors
37 may e.g. be optical (reflection light barrier) or
inductive sensors. In the case of inductive sensors, plates
34 are made of metal or of a metallised support material.
Transmitter 17 is disposed at the lower end of tail surfaces
33.
The description of this exemplary simulation shot also shows
that an ejection by a reduced propelling charge involves
additional difficulties: even a reduced propelling charge
would produce high temperatures in the tail surfaces, the
propelling gases resulting from the combustion of the
propellant are very hot and under high pressure, and firing
control 35 within the grenade is subject to a high
acceleration, thus exposing firing control 35, sensors 37,
and transmitter 17 to the risk of being damaged and
correspondingly requiring an expensive temperature-,
pressure-, and acceleration-resistant design of these
components.
FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of firing control 35. It
includes a central unit 41 which essentially consists of a
microcontroller. As an energy source 43, a capacitor of an
extremely high capacity is used, e.g. a gold-cap capacitor
known per se. On account of the nevertheless small

CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREAS STEINER)
- 8 -
available energy, the firing control is switched on by an
inclination sensor 42 only when the angle of the grenade
with respect to the horizontal direction is in the range of
the elevation of the mine thrower simulator (e.g. 45 to
90 ) .
The energy source is preferably charged while the grenade is
stored in a special transport container (not shown). For
this purpose, the transport container is provided with a
battery, inter alia. The energy may be transmitted by
electric contacts on grenade 8 and in the container or in a
wireless manner e.g. by inductive means.
As energy source 43 is so dimensioned that its energy is
essentially used up after a shot, the unrealistic immediate
reuse of the grenade after its "firing" is excluded.
Rather, after firing, the grenade must be returned to the
transport container and left therein until the energy source
is recharged.
In the case of energy sources having a greater capacity, it
is necessary for a realistic simulation that the grenade is
deactivated after firing or generates a special signal which
indicates that the grenade has been reused.
Central unit 41 actuates transmitter 17 which generates
light signals 18 for the transmission of data.
Further, optional sensors 44 may be provided in addition.
For example, a luminosity sensor responding to the absence
of light in tube 3 could be used in combination with
inclination sensor 42 in order to detect a shot, or an
acceleration sensor which detects the shot by the impact of

CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREAS STEINER)
- 9 -
grenade 8 on the bottom of the launcher tube, on the
deflecting device or on the base plate individually or in
combination with inclinometer 42. Furthermore, it is
possible to use other sensors incorporated in the grenade,
e.g. switches, optical, inductive or capacitive sensors,
individually or in combination in order to determine whether
the grenade is in the launcher tube.
The control system 51 (FIG. 7) of the thrower consists of
evaluating unit 12 and of position sensor 10 (GPS unit),
elevation/tilting sensor 52 (inclinometer) and direction
sensor 53 (compass) connected thereto. The light signals
transmitted by a grenade 8 in launcher tube 3 are received
by light detector 19 whose output signals both represent a
measure of the distance of grenade 8, i.e. of its position
in launcher tube 8, and provide information with respect to
the grenade which is transmitted by the firing control.
The firing data, i.e. all data which are necessary in order
to calculate the shot, are transmitted to evaluating unit 16
by transmitting unit 15. Energy source 54 is a battery or
an accumulator.
Furthermore, by means of control unit 55, the mine thrower
simulator can be set to represent different real thrower
types which are e.g. characterised by different calibre.
Hereinafter, a typical training sequence will be described.
The mine thrower simulator is set up and directed to a
target. The trainer continuously surveys the operations by
means of the data indicated by the evaluating unit.
According to the aimed (virtual) target and the firing
parameters, the mine thrower simulator is aligned and the

CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREAS STEINER)
- 10 -
required number of grenades is prepared by the gunner. As
the grenades are lifted up and tilted according to the
inclination of the tube, firing control 35 is activated,
provided that a fuse is screwed in and (virtually) armed.
While the grenade slides down in launcher tube 3, the
characteristic data of the grenade are transmitted to
thrower control 51, which delivers them to evaluating device
16 along with the data concerning the orientation of the
launcher tube. The evaluating device calculates the
trajectory and the point of impact on the base of these data
and/or delivers a message in the case of illegal operating
conditions.
When the grenade drops out through outlet opening 7, it is
deactivated either by lack of energy or by the fact that the
firing control is automatically blocked after the simulation
of a shot. It is also possible that data are transmitted
from the mine thrower simulator to the grenade in the
launcher tube for this particular purpose.
Since the described mine thrower simulator neither produces
a firing noise -- although it could be generated, as the
case may be, by a noise generator, however at a
substantially lower level, in view of a realistic simulation
-- nor are the grenades ejected, the device allows to
practice almost anywhere, e.g. also in developed areas or in
halls.
In a real mine thrower, the grenades in the launcher tube
are slowed down by an air cushion formed under them on
account of the necessary, relatively tight contact with
respect to the tube wall. Due to the outlet opening, such
an air cushion cannot form in the simulator. In view of a

CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREPS STEINER)
- 11 -
more realistic sliding time of the grenades in the tube, in
particular for the training of serial fire, the friction of
the grenades on the tube wall may be increased by suitable
measures such as a tighter fit at least locally, special
material combinations, or the attachment or insertion e.g.
of felt surfaces or similar materials on or in surface
sections of the grenades which are in contact with the tube
wall, and/or in the tube wall. In addition, it is possible
to keep outlet opening 7 closed by a cover, to drop the
grenade on the bottom of the launcher tube in the free fall
or in a retarded manner, and to open the cover preferably
after the typical delay between the insertion and the
ignition of the grenade. The cover may e.g. by opened by
the action of the own weight of the grenade, by an auxiliary
drive (motor), or by the stored energy of the descending
grenade. If it is suitably shaped, the cover may
additionally serve to remove the grenade from the launcher
tube in a relatively gentle and defined manner.
The cover may also be kept closed by an electromagnet, so
that the control system of the mine thrower simulator can
release the cover by an electric signal. Under the weight
of the grenade, possibly reinforced by its kinetic energy,
the cover is forcibly opened and the grenade slides out.
Subsequently, the cover is automatically closed by a return
spring.
A possible alternative of the controlled opening could be to
dimension the closing spring in such a manner that the cover
is automatically opened by the own weight of the grenade.
Besides, it is sufficient if the cover only closes the
outlet opening in such a manner that the grenades can no
longer fall out of the tube.

CA 02268645 1999-04-13
(26093E.DOC Prt: 25.03.1999 ANDREAS STEINER)
- 12 -
In simulators for mine throwers which do not fire
automatically but where a grenade within the launcher tube
is externally fired, e.g. by means of a release line, a
cover of this kind or an equivalent closure device must be
provided. Only when the release is actuated, the simulation
is triggered, on one hand, and the cover opened, on the
other hand, so that the grenade can drop out.
In order to slow down the grenade while it is falling out,
the return spring element can be made so strong that an
effective braking of the grenade results from a squeezing
action between the launcher tube and the cover. In
addition, the cover may be provided with a kind of guide,
e.g. in the form of a short tube section, and/or with a
lining for an increased friction (felt or spring strips) in
order to reduce the falling velocity of the grenades.
Alternatives of the exemplary embodiment are accessible to
those skilled in the art from the description without
leaving the scope of the invention as claimed.
It is possible, for example, to provide an additional
detection unit operating according to the echo method, e.g.
an ultrasonic detector in the tube which allows to detect
the presence and movement of a grenade in the launcher tube
independently, and/or inductive sensors for this purpose on
the launcher tube.
With respect to the distinct external shape of different
types of ammunition, particularly of illuminating and
explosive ammunition, it may also be advantageous to make
the body variable, e.g. by an interchangeable envelope.

CA 02268645 2006-11-29
23444-388
- 13 -
The measuring and evaluating units provided on the simulator
may be arranged differently. It is e.g. possible that all
parts are disposed inside the launcher tube, so that only
the antenna of transmitting unit 15 is possibly mounted on
the outside. It is also conceivable to dispose the compass
at another suitable location, e.g. on base plate 2, in which
case, however, the angular difference between base plate 2
and bearing ball 14 of the launcher tube must be measured by
a suitable measuring device, e.g. an optical angular
transmitter, and taken into account in the evaluation.
Also, in the reactivation or respective recharging of
the grenades, e.g., as suggested, in the transport container, a
possibility of reprogramming the grenades e.g. as explosive
or illuminating ammunition could be provided. In this
manner, only one kind of programmable ammunition would be
sufficient for the simulation of a large number of real
ammunition types. The programming, and maybe even the
connection of a fresh energy source, could also be effected
by the exchange of the envelope (see above).

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : Périmé (brevet - nouvelle loi) 2019-04-13
Accordé par délivrance 2008-07-22
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2008-07-21
Inactive : Taxe finale reçue 2008-05-05
Préoctroi 2008-05-05
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2007-12-07
Lettre envoyée 2007-12-07
month 2007-12-07
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2007-12-07
Inactive : Approuvée aux fins d'acceptation (AFA) 2007-10-23
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2007-07-16
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2007-01-16
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2006-12-12
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2006-11-29
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2006-05-29
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-12
Lettre envoyée 2004-01-27
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 2003-12-22
Requête d'examen reçue 2003-12-22
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2003-12-22
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 2003-12-22
Lettre envoyée 2002-11-08
Inactive : Transfert individuel 2002-11-08
Lettre envoyée 2002-11-08
Inactive : Transferts multiples 2002-09-20
Lettre envoyée 2002-01-21
Inactive : Correspondance - Transfert 2001-12-13
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2001-11-22
Inactive : Transfert individuel 2001-10-05
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1999-10-20
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 1999-10-19
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 1999-05-27
Inactive : Certificat de dépôt - Sans RE (Anglais) 1999-05-13
Lettre envoyée 1999-05-13
Demande reçue - nationale ordinaire 1999-05-12

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2008-03-12

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Les taxes sur les brevets sont ajustées au 1er janvier de chaque année. Les montants ci-dessus sont les montants actuels s'ils sont reçus au plus tard le 31 décembre de l'année en cours.
Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
RUAG ELECTRONICS
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
RENE LAZECKI
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Dessin représentatif 1999-10-06 1 5
Revendications 2003-12-21 5 186
Description 1999-04-12 13 541
Revendications 1999-04-12 6 210
Dessins 1999-04-12 4 61
Abrégé 1999-04-12 1 19
Page couverture 1999-10-06 1 31
Description 2006-11-28 14 556
Revendications 2006-11-28 5 182
Revendications 2006-12-11 5 182
Revendications 2007-07-15 6 204
Dessin représentatif 2008-06-25 1 6
Page couverture 2008-06-25 2 37
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 1999-05-12 1 116
Certificat de dépôt (anglais) 1999-05-12 1 165
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 2000-12-13 1 112
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 2002-01-20 1 113
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 2002-11-07 1 109
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 2002-11-07 1 109
Rappel - requête d'examen 2003-12-15 1 123
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 2004-01-26 1 174
Avis du commissaire - Demande jugée acceptable 2007-12-06 1 163
Correspondance 2001-11-21 1 9
Correspondance 2008-05-04 1 39