Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2282818 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 2282818
(54) Titre français: METHODE ET MACHINE POUR LA TRAITE ENTIEREMENT AUTOMATIQUE DES ANIMAUX
(54) Titre anglais: A METHOD OF AUTOMATICALLY MILKING ANIMALS AND A FULLY AUTOMATIC MILKING MACHINE SUITABLE FOR PERFORMING SAME
Statut: Réputée abandonnée et au-delà du délai pour le rétablissement - en attente de la réponse à l’avis de communication rejetée
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • A1J 5/007 (2006.01)
  • A1J 5/017 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • VAN DER LELY, ALEXANDER
  • VAN DEN BERG, KAREL
  • VAN OVERVELD, CORNELIS JOHANNES MARIA
(73) Titulaires :
  • MAASLAND N.V.
(71) Demandeurs :
  • MAASLAND N.V.
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré:
(22) Date de dépôt: 1999-09-20
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 2000-03-21
Requête d'examen: 2001-01-25
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
1010145 (Pays-Bas (Royaume des)) 1998-09-21

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


In a method of automatically milking animals which
are allowed to visit individually a milking parlour
comprising a milking robot and an animal identification
system, an animal visiting the milking parlour is milked when
since the previous milking of the relevant animal at least a
specific number of milkings (Q) of other animals has taken
place. On the basis of at least one animal parameter a
milking number (x) is allotted to each animal, which milking
number (x) indicates how often the relevant animal has to be
milked per unit of time. The specific number of milkings (Q)
for each animal is calculated as a function of the
corresponding milking number (x). As a result of the fact that
the threshold value of the milking criterion depends on an
individual target number for the number of milkings of the
relevant animal, a desired number of milkings per unit of
time can be achieved for each animal.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


5
CLAIMS
1. A method of automatically milking animals, such as
cows, which are allowed to move freely in an area intended
therefor and to visit individually a milking parlour
comprising a fully automatic milking machine or milking robot
and an animal identification system, in which method an
animal is milked during a visit to the milking parlour when
since the previous milking of the relevant animal at least a
specific number of milkings (Q) of other animals has taken
place, characterized in that, on the basis of at least one
animal parameter there is allotted to each animal a milking
number (x) indicating how often the relevant animal has to be
milked per unit of time, while the specific number of
milkings (Q) is calculated for each animal as a function of
the corresponding milking number (x).
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in
that the animal's milk yield per unit of time is used as an
animal parameter.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized
in that the stage of the lactation period in which the animal
is, is used as an animal parameter.
4. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 3,
characterized in that the animal's age is used as an animal
parameter.
5. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 4,
characterized in that the movement activity of the animal is
used as an animal parameter.
6. A method as claimed in claim 5, characterized in
that the movement activity is measured by means of a
pedometer.
7. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 6,
characterized in that the feed consumption of the animal is
used as an animal parameter.
8. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 7,
characterized in that the health of the animal's udder is
used as an animal parameter.
9. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 8,
characterized in that the choice of the animal parameters

6
used can be adjusted by the user.
10. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 9,
characterized in that in each animal parameter used each
animal is classified.
11. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 10,
characterized in that, when an animal passes to an other
class, the individual milking number (x) is adjusted
automatically.
12. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 11,
characterized in that the specific number of milkings (Q) is
calculated in such a manner that it is proportional to the
total number of milkings (M) of all the animals per unit of
time.
13. A method as claimed in claim 12, characterized in
that the specific number of milkings (Q) is calculated in
such a manner that it is proportional to the total number of
milkings (M) of all the animals per unit of time, divided by
the individual number of milkings (x).
14. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 13,
characterized in that the specific number of milkings (Q) is
calculated in such a manner that it is proportional to the
number of milkings (m) of the relevant animal per unit of
time in a recent period of time.
15. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 14,
characterized in that the specific number of milkings (Q) is
calculated in such a manner that it is proportional to the
number of milkings (M) of all the animals per unit of time,
divided by the individual number of milkings (x), multiplied
by the number of milkings (m) of the relevant animal per unit
of time in a recent period of time, divided by the individual
milking number (x).
16. A method as claimed in claim 13 or 15, characterized
in that as a proportionality factor there is used a
correction factor (C) ranging between 0.5 and 1Ø
17. A fully automatic milking machine or milking robot
comprising an animal identification system, characterized in
that said milking machine or milking robot is suitable for
performing the method as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 16.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


. CA 02282818 1999-09-20
A METHOD OF AUTOMATICALLY MILKING ANIMALS AND A FULLY
AUTOMATIC MILKING MACHINE SUITABLE FOR PERFORMING SAME
The invention relates to a method as described in
. the preamble of claim 1. The invention further relates to a
fully automatic milking machine which is suitable for per
forming said method.
Such a method is known. When an animal visits the
milking parlour, there is decided on the basis of a milking
criterion whether or not the animal will be milked. The
European patent EP-A-0 091 892 describes a system in which a
cow is milked in the milking parlour, when at least a
predetermined period of time has elapsed since her last
milking. This has inter alia the disadvantage that mutual
differences between the animals to be milked are not taken
into account. Moreover it is necessary to measure each time
for each animal the beginning and the end of the milking and
to record these data, which requires measuring equipment that
is sensitive to interference and occupies relatively much
memory capacity.
From the international patent WO-A-95/35028 it is
known to use as a milking criterion the number of milkings of
other animals since the previous milking of the relevant
animal; in this situation the animal is milked when this
number at least equals a specific minimum number, which may
differ per animal. This milking criterion can be realized
with the aid of simple and cheap means.
The invention aims at working out such a method in
further detail and to refine and improve same. According to
the invention this is achieved by means of the measures
described in the characterizing part of claim 1. As a result

CA 02282818 1999-09-20
2
of the fact that the threshold value of the milking criterion
depends on an individual target number for the number of
milkings of the relevant animal, a desired number of milkings
per unit of time can be achieved for each animal.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the
specific number of milkings is calculated in such a manner
that it is proportional to the total number of milkings of
all the animals per unit of time, divided by the individual
milking number, multiplied by the number of milkings of the
relevant animal per unit of time in a recent period of time,
divided by the individual milking number. In practice it has
appeared that in this manner for each animal the desired
number of milkings per unit of time can be realized to a
great degree of accuracy.
Figure 1 is a table for cows showing horizontally
as a first animal parameter P1 the anticipated milk yield per
24 hours and vertically as a second animal parameter P2 the
number of days in the lactation period. In parameter P1 the
cows are divided into four classes on the basis of their
anticipated milk yield: from 0 to 10 kg milk per day, from 10
to 20 kg, from 20 to 40 kg and above 40 kg. In parameter P2
there are three classes: 0 - 15 lactation days, 15 - 250
lactation days and more than 250 lactation days. For the
combination of the two parameters P1 and P2 there are thus
defined 12 classes.
The user himself can also apply other animal
parameters, such as the movement activity of the animal
(which can be measured inter alia by means of a pedometer
known per se) and/or the animal's age and/or the animal's
feed consumption and/or the health of the animals's udder
(which can be measured inter alia with the aid of means for
analyzing the milk). Also in this situation classes can be
def fined .
On the basis of the reference tables and/or on the
basis of empirical data, to each class a milking number x is
allotted, which milking number indicates how frequently each
animal in that class has to be milked. Of course the table
can also be refined in such a manner that each class only
comprises one cow. The table with the classes and their

CA 02282818 1999-09-20
3
milking numbers is recorded in a computer which is connected
to the animal identification system. The computer is adapted
to adjust automatically the individual milking number x when
an animal passes to an other class.
When a cow comes to the milkbox of the milking
robot in order to be milked, the animal is recognized by the
animal identification system. The computer calculates the
milking criterion, on the basis of which there is decided
whether or not the cow will be milked. She is milked when
since her previous milking at least a specific number of
milkings Q of other animals (a threshold value) has taken
place. The specific number of milkings Q is now determined
for each animal as a function of the corresponding milking
' number x, so that a desired number of milkings per unit of
time can be achieved for the animal.
For example, the threshold value Q can be cal-
culated as follows. The total number of milkings M of all the
animals per unit of time is divided by the individual milking
number x and multiplied by a correction factor C:
Q = C * M / x
For example, a group of cows was milked totally 161
times in the past 24 hours. A specific cow has an average
daily milk yield of 28 kg over the last seven days and has
been in lactation for 155 days. From the table (see Figure 1)
results for this cow a milking number of 2~.8 milkings per 24
hours. 161 milkings divided by 2.8 is (rounded down) 57.
Consequently, from a statistical point of view, this cow
would have to be milked again after 57 milkings of other
cows. When applying such a strict milking criterion, in order
to be milked at a sufficient frequency, the cows would have
to present themselves rather often at the milking robot.
However, as a result of the fact that the milking behaviour
of the cows is not very regular, the number 57 is still
multiplied by a correction factor C ranging between 0.5 and
1.0 and amounting e.g. to 0.75. Then Q will have the value
43. In this manner it is achieved that the target number x is
realized for all the cows to a lesser or greater extent.

CA 02282818 1999-09-20
4
In a preferred embodiment, Q is determined as
follows. The total number of milkings M of all the animals
per unit of time is divided by the individual milking number
x, multiplied by the number of milkings m of the relevant
animal per unit of time in a recent period of time, divided
by the individual milking number x, and finally multiplied by
a correction factor C:
Q = C * M * m / x2
The factor m/x is thus added as an extra variable
to the equation. This factor still gives a further correc-
tion, in case in a recent period of time, e.g. in the last 12
hours, a cow was milked more or less often than would have
been the case on the basis of the target number x.
For example, the number m can be determined by
measuring the period of time that has elapsed since the last
but one milking of the relevant cow and by deducing from this
period of time the (fictitious) number of milkings of this
cow in the last 24 hours. When the last but one milking of
the relevant cow took place 11.65 hours ago, this means a
fictitious number of milkings of 4.1 in the last 24 hours.
This is more than the target number 2.8, so that Q is cor-
rected by being rounded up. At a total of again 161 milkings
in the last 24 hours, an individual milking number of 2.8
milkings per 24 hours and a correction factor of 0.75, Q now
obtains the value 63. Hence, the cow is milked again,
provided that 63 milkings of other cows have taken place
since her last milking.

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2282818 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Demande non rétablie avant l'échéance 2004-09-20
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 2004-09-20
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 2003-09-22
Lettre envoyée 2001-02-26
Inactive : Grandeur de l'entité changée 2001-02-26
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2001-02-22
Requête d'examen reçue 2001-01-25
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 2001-01-25
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 2001-01-25
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 2000-03-21
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2000-03-20
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 1999-10-21
Inactive : CIB attribuée 1999-10-21
Inactive : Certificat de dépôt - Sans RE (Anglais) 1999-10-07
Lettre envoyée 1999-10-07
Inactive : Inventeur supprimé 1999-10-05
Demande reçue - nationale ordinaire 1999-10-05

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
2003-09-22

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2002-09-04

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Les taxes sur les brevets sont ajustées au 1er janvier de chaque année. Les montants ci-dessus sont les montants actuels s'ils sont reçus au plus tard le 31 décembre de l'année en cours.
Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Taxe pour le dépôt - petite 1999-09-20
Enregistrement d'un document 1999-09-20
Requête d'examen - générale 2001-01-25
TM (demande, 2e anniv.) - générale 02 2001-09-20 2001-09-04
TM (demande, 3e anniv.) - générale 03 2002-09-20 2002-09-04
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
MAASLAND N.V.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
ALEXANDER VAN DER LELY
CORNELIS JOHANNES MARIA VAN OVERVELD
KAREL VAN DEN BERG
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Page couverture 2000-02-22 1 35
Abrégé 1999-09-19 1 28
Description 1999-09-19 4 190
Dessins 1999-09-19 1 8
Revendications 1999-09-19 2 99
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 1999-10-06 1 115
Certificat de dépôt (anglais) 1999-10-06 1 164
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 2001-02-25 1 179
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 2001-05-22 1 111
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 2003-11-16 1 176