Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
BENDING ROLLS, AND PIPE FORMED THEREBY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a pipe forming
apparatus which uses bending rolls, as well as to a pipe
forming method and pipe formed by the apparatus or method.
More particularly, the present invention relates to a pipe
forming method which uses bending rolls including a pair of
lower rolls arranged at one side of a sheet material and an
upper roll arranged at the other side of the sheet material
intermediate the pair of lower rolls, as well as to a pipe
forming apparatus including the bending rolls and a pipe
formed by the pipe forming apparatus or method. The pipe
forming apparatus and method of the present invention are
suitable for production of high-strength, thick-walled
pipes.
2. Description of the Related. Art
Mass production of pipes is generally carried out by
using an electric welding mill when the pipe diameter is
comparatively small, whereas UOE mills are used for pipes
having comparatively large pipe diameters.
1
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
For small-lot production, however, a method as shown in
Fig. 1 is employed for pipes having large wall thicknesses.
2
More specifically, referring to Fig. 1, a blank sheet 10 is
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
pressed between a bending die 22 and a pressing die 24 of a
roll bender 20, and the pressing operation is repeated many
times, e.g., 50 times or more, so as to bend the blank sheet
into a pipe. In contrast, a method as illustrated in Fig. 2
is used when the wall thickness of the pipe is small. More
specifically, referring to Fig. 2, a pyramidal roll bender
30 employs three rolls: a pair of lower rolls 32 disposed
under a blank sheet 10 and driven by a motor (not shown) and
an upper roll 34 disposed on the upper side of the blank
sheet 10 at a position intermediate the pair of lower rolls
32. The tightening amount S, i.e., the extent to which the
upper roll 34 is lowered, is adjustable. In operation, the
blank sheet 10 is threaded between the upper roll 34 and the
lower rolls 32 so as to be continuously bent at a curvature
radius p.
A process of producing a pipe by the illustrated
bending rolls is shown in Fig. 3. As the first step,
cutting and groove work are conducted by means of a flame
planer 40 which cuts a blank sheet by using an oxygen or
other gas plasma. Then, an end bending operation is
performed by, for example, a hydraulic press for bending the
end of the blank sheet that cannot be bent by bending rolls.
Then, bending is effected by using, for example, a pyramidal
roll bender 30 having three rolls as shown in Fig. 2.
Subsequently, inner/outer surface welder 46 performs tack
welding and welding of inner and outer surfaces. Then, end
3
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
face milling is performed by an end face mill (not shown).
The pipe thus formed is then shot-blasted in a shot-blast
apparatus (not shown) and sent for testing and inspection.
In some cases, bend correction is performed subsequent to
roll bending or tack welding, in order to enhance the
circularity of the pipe. Such bend correction is conducted
substantially in the same way as the roll bending.
The production of pipes using bending rolls is suitable
for mufti-variety and small-quantity production, because it
is adaptable to a variety of pipe diameter through
adjustment of the amount S of tightening of the upper roll
34. In addition, this type of pipe forming method is
superior to methods using UOE mills, because of lower
installation cost, and so forth.
On the other hand, this pipe forming method tends to
allow an end gap 12A to occur in the center of the resulting
pipe 12 as shown in Fig. 4, due to the difficulty of
preventing deflection of the bending roll, especially the
upper roll 34. Therefore, this method is not suitable for
use in the production of high-strength, thick-walled
elongated pipe, which places a heavy load on the rolls
tending to cause deflection of the rolls.
This shortcoming arises because the upper roll 34 is
supported only at its opposite ends and the outside diameter
Dwu of the upper roll 34 is limited by the diameter of the
product pipe, such that the roll diameter must be smaller
4
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
than the pipe diameter due to a geometrical requirement. On
the other hand, deflection of the lower rolls is
controllable because backup rolls may be placed in support
of the lower rolls at suitable positions.
The pipe production method using a press bender is more
suitable for the production of thick-walled pipes than the
pipe-production method using a roll bender, but has a
drawback in that the production efficiency is low due to the
need for many pressing cycles, resulting in an elevated cost
of production.
Fig. 5 shows a pipe forming method which overcomes the
above-described shortcoming of roll benders and which is
disclosed in Japanese Kokai No. 53-128562. In this method,
pressure is applied during forming a pipe to the upper roll
34 from the upper side thereof by means of a backup beam 36
via backup rolls 35.
With this method, deflection of the upper roll 34 is
reduced so that the formation of the end gap is suppressed,
thereby to facilitate production of high-strength, thick-
walled elongated pipes.
As an alternative measure, it is possible to use an
upper roll of a greater diameter in accordance with an
increase in the diameter of the pipe to be produced, thereby
enabling production of high-strength, thick-walled elongated
pipes, by decreasing deflection of the upper roll.
These known methods, however, are not suitable for use
5
CA 02288421 2005-O1-17
in the production of relatively small-diameter pipes,
although they are effectively used in t:he production of
large-diameter pipes. This is because 'there is insufficient
space available between the upper roll 34 and the inner
surface of the pipe 12 for accommodating a backup beam 36
when the pipe diameter is relatively small, and a small-
diameter upper roll thus must be used alone, since, as
stated before, the outside diameter Dwu of the upper roll 34
is limited by the inside diameter of the pipe to be
produced. For these reasons, production of small-diameter
pipes tends to be accompanied by creation of an end gap, due
to lack of a technique for suppressing deflection of the
upper roll, such that the upper roll is often bent beyond an
allowable limit.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIION
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to overcome the
draw back described above by improving the product pipe configuration through
reducing end gap which tends to appear at a longitudinally central portion of
the
pipe, without causing the roll to be bent or deflected beyond an allowable
limit.
To this end, according to one aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a pipe forming apparatus of the
type using bending rolls including a plurality of rolls
arranged on one side of a sheet material, and a counter roll
6
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
arranged at the other side of the sheet material,
comprising: a roll spacing setting device that sets the roll
spacing of the pair of rolls to a range greater than the sum
of the diameter of the counter roll and the diameter of one
of the pair of rolls; and a device that sets the tightening
amount of the counter roll relative to the pair of rolls to
a range greater than the radius of one of the pair of rolls.
The above object of the invention is achieved by
forming the sheet material into a pipe with the pipe forming
apparatus while setting the roll spacing between the pair of
rolls to a value greater than the sum of the diameter of the
counter roll and the diameter of each of the pair of rolls,
and setting the amount of tightening to a value greater than
the radius of each of the pair of rolls.
In order to achieve the above object, the present
invention in its second aspect provides a pipe forming
method for forming a pipe using bending rolls including a
plurality of rolls arranged on one side of a sheet material,
and a counter roll arranged at the other side of the sheet
material, the pipe forming method comprising: effecting pipe
forming work on the sheet material such that the spacing L
of the pair of rolls satisfies the following expression:
(Dp + Dwl) > L Z 0.85 (Dp + Dwl) ...... (1)
where Dp represents the outside diameter of the product
pipe and Dwl represents the diameter of one of the pair of
rolls.
7
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
To achieve the foregoing object, the present invention
in its third aspect provides a pipe forming method for
forming a pipe using bending rolls including a plurality of
rolls arranged on one side of a sheet material, and a
counter roll arranged at the other side of the sheet
material, the pipe forming method comprising: preparing the
sheet material having leading and trailing bent end regions
bent beforehand over a length not smaller than 1/5 of the
entire circumference of the pipe to be produced; and
effecting roll bending such that the length of the regions
bent by the bending rolls is less than 3/5 the entire
circumference of the pipe to be produced.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the
present invention will become clear from the following
description of preferred embodiments when read in
conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a front elevational view of a conventional
arrangement for producing a steel pipe with a press bender;
Fig. 2 is a front elevational view of a known
arrangement for producing a steel pipe with a roll bender;
Fig. 3 is a perspective view of an arrangement for
producing a steel pipe with a roll bender;
Fig. 4 is a perspective view of a pipe produced by a
known roll bender, showing particularly an end gap left in
8
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
the pipe;
Fig. 5 is a front elevational view of an arrangement
which carries out a method proposed in Japanese Kokai No.
53-128562;
Fig. 6 is a diagram showing the relationship between
the extent of lowering of an upper roll and the load acting
on the upper roll, illustrating a principle of the present
invention;
Fig. 7A is a schematic illustration of an arrangement
in which the spacing of the lower rolls has been increased;
Fig. 7B is a schematic illustration of an arrangement
in which an upper roll has been lowered while a large
spacing is left between the lower rolls;
Fig. 8 is a diagram showing the relationship between
the pipe diameter at the product pipe outlet and the load
applied to the upper roll;
Fig. 9A is a schematic illustration of an arrangement
in which an upper roll has been lowered while a large
spacing is left between lower rolls;
Fig. 9B is a schematic illustration of a product which
is obtained when an excessively large spacing is left
between the lower rolls;
Fig. 10 is a diagram showing the relationship between L
- (Dp + Dwl) and a load ratio P/P0;
Fig. 11 is a diagram showing the relationship between
the spacing of lower rolls and the load;
9
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
Fig. 12 is a diagram showing the relationship between
the ratio of change in the curvature at the final pass and
the load;
Fig. 13 is a diagram showing the results of an
investigation conducted to find the variation in the
severity of end gaps created at a longitudinal central
portions of product pipes along curvatures;
Fig. 14 is a diagram showing the results of the same
investigation as that in Fig. 13, as obtained when the ratio
of the end bend has been changed;
Fig. 15 is a schematic illustration of an arrangement
having an increased lower roll spacing, explaining a
principle of the present invention;
Fig. 16 is a front elevational view of an embodiment of
the pipe forming apparatus in accordance with the present
invention;
Fig. 17 is a side view of the pipe forming apparatus
shown in Fig. 16;
Fig. 18 is a diagram showing an example of a procedure
for changing the extent of lowering the upper roll and the
spacing of lower rolls in the pipe forming apparatus
embodying the present invention;
Fig. 19 is a diagram showing another example of the
procedure;
Fig. 20 is a diagram showing still another example of
the procedure;
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
Fig. 21 is a diagram showing the amounts of end gaps of
pipes having a pipe diameter of 700 mm produced in
accordance with the method of the invention, in comparison
with those of pipes produced in accordance with Comparison
Examples;
Fig. 22 is a diagram showing the amounts of end gaps of
pipes having a pipe diameter of 500 mm produced in
accordance with the method of the invention, in comparison
with those of pipes produced in accordance with Comparison
Examples;
Fig. 23 is a diagram showing the relationship between
the pipe diameter at the product pipe outlet and the load
acting on the upper roll;
Fig. 24 is a chart showing another example of a process
for producing a steel pipe by using a roll bender;
Fig. 25 is a chart showing still another example of the
steel pipe production process;
Fig. 26 is a diagram showing the amounts of end gaps of
pipes having a pipe diameter of 500 mm produced in
accordance with Examples of the method of the invention, in
comparison with those of pipes produced in accordance with
Comparison Examples;
Fig. 27 is a diagram showing the amounts of end gaps of
pipes having a pipe diameter of 500 mm produced in
accordance with Examples of the method of the invention, in
comparison with those of pipes produced in accordance with
11
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
Comparison Examples;
Fig. 28 is an illustration of a curvature distribution
of a pipe formed in accordance with an embodiment of the
present invention, in comparison with that obtained with a
pipe formed by a conventional method; and
Fig. 29 is a chart showing the amounts of end gaps in
pipes of 500 mm diameter produced in accordance with the
method of the invention in comparison with those of pipes
produced in accordance with Comparative Examples.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
First aspect of the invention
Fig. 6 shows the results of an investigation conducted
on the apparatus of Fig. 2 having a pair of rolls serving as
lower rolls and an upper roll serving as a counter roll, for
the purpose of clarifying the relationship between the
amount S of tightening, i.e., the extent of lowering of the
upper roll and the load acting on the upper roll, as
observed when the spacing L between the lower rolls is held
constant. In this apparatus, the lower rolls 32 have a
diameter Dwl of 350 mm, while the upper roll 34 has a
diameter Dwu of 400 mm. A white circular mark o shows data
obtained when the spacing L of the lower rolls was set to a
value, specifically 600 mm, which is smaller than 750 mm as
the sum of the diameters of the upper and lower rolls as in
the conventional arrangements. When such a small spacing of
12
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
lower rolls is employed, high magnitudes of load are
observed constantly. In contrast, the solid circular mark
indicates data obtained when the spacing L of the lower
rolls was set to a value, specifically 800 mm, which is
greater than 750 mm as the sum of the diameters of the upper
and lower rolls. With such a large spacing of lower rolls,
the magnitude of the load is generally maintained low. A
further reduction in the load is achieved when the amount S
of tightening, i.e., the extent of lowering of the upper
roll, is increased beyond 175 mm which is the radius Rwl of
the lower roll while the lower roll spacing L is maintained
large.
The reason why the load is reduced when the lower roll
spacing 1 is increased will be explained with respect to
Fig. 7A. Namely, when the lower roll spacing L is
increased, the length of the bending moment M is
correspondingly increased, so that the load on the lower
rolls is reduced and, at the same time, the load on the
upper roll is reduced accordingly.
A description will now be given with specific reference
to Fig. 7B of the reason why the load is further reduced in
accordance with an increase in the amount S of tightening
while the lower roll spacing L is large. Namely, in this
case, the upper roll 34 is lowered further into the region
between the lower rolls 32, so that the direction of the
loads acting on the lower rolls 32 are changed. In other
13
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
words, although the magnitude of the load acting on the
lower rolls is not reduced, the angle 8 of action of the
load is reduced, so that the load acting on the upper roll
is reduced.
The angle B of action of the load on the lower rolls is
reduced, i.e., the upper roll is caused to penetrate more
deeply into the region between the lower rolls, when the
following conditions (1) and (2) are met.
(1) In order that the upper roll 34 is allowed to penetrate
deeper into the region between the lower rolls 32, it is
necessary that the lower roll spacing L be greater than the
sum of the diameter Dwu of the upper roll 34 and the
diameter Dwl of each lower roll 32.
(2) Considering the situation in which the upper roll 34
falls into the region between the lower rolls 32, it is
necessary that the amount S of tightening, i.e., the extent
of lowering of the upper roll 34 is greater than the radius
Rwl of each lower roll 32.
It is to be understood, however, that geometrical
relationships exist between the amount S of tightening,
i.e., the extent of lowering of the upper roll, the lower
roll spacing L, and the diameter Dp of the pipe 12 which is
formed in contact with the upper and lower rolls 34, 32.
Therefore, when the pipe diameter Dp is determined, the
values of the tightening amount S and the lower roll spacing
L are interrelated: namely, it is impossible to determine
14
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
the tightening amount S and the lower roll spacing L
independently of each other. In other words, in order that
the above-mentioned conditions (1) and (2) are
simultaneously met for a variety of given pipe diameters, it
is necessary that the lower roll spacing L be variable. It
is, however, not essential that the lower rolls be linearly
displaceable relative to one another . Any manner of change
in the lower roll spacing L falls within the scope of the
invention, provided that the above-described conditions (1)
and (2) are simultaneously met.
The load acting on the upper roll 34 is remarkably
reduced when the conditions (1) and (2) are satisfied
simultaneously, so that the deflection of the upper roll 34
is significantly reduced. Therefore, the tendency of
leaving an end gap is suppressed even for pipes whose
diameters are so small that the backup beam and large-
diameter upper rolls cannot be used. For instance, it
becomes possible to produce high-strength, thick-walled
elongated pipes such as 20 mm or greater in thickness, 40
kgf/mm2 or higher in strength and 5 m or longer in length.
In accordance with the present invention, it is
especially preferred that the apparatus is operated such
that not only is the spacing between adjacent rolls in a
pair always maintained greater than the sum of the diameter
of the counter roll and the diameter of one of the pair of
rolls, but also the roll spacing is progressively decreased
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
as the pass progresses, so that the final amount of
tightening is greater than the radius of the pair of rolls.
Further, in accordance with the present invention, it
is also especially preferred that the pipe forming apparatus
be operated such that the upper roll is lowered to a
predetermined level in excess of the radius of the pair of
rolls in earlier passes of the process, whereas, in later
passes, the roll spacing is reduced.
Fig. 8 shows the relationship between the pipe diameter
Dp and the load in each pass, as observed when a pipe is
formed by bending roll apparatus while maintaining a
constant spacing between lower rolls which serve as the pair
of rolls. It will be seen that, when the lower roll spacing
L is small, the load acting on the upper roll serving as the
counter roll is greater for pipes having smaller diameters.
In particular, the data marked by o, obtained when the lower
roll spacing L is 600 mm, indicates that the production of
pipe is impossible. The o marks indicate data obtained when
the lower roll spacing L has been increased to 800 mm. In
this case, the load is reduced as compared with the case
where the lower roll spacing is smaller. Further, in this
case, the load is drastically reduced when the pipe diameter
becomes smaller as a result of an increasing number of
passes. The 0 marks indicate data obtained when the lower
roll spacing is increased to 1000 mm. In this case, it is
impossible to form the pipe to the final diameter, although
16
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
the load is reduced as the number of passes increases.
In greater detail, during earlier passes in which the
pipe diameter is still large, the length of the bending
moment M for bending the sheet material is increased when
the lower roll spacing L is increased, so that the load on
the lower rolls and, hence, the load acting on the upper
roll are reduced, as explained before in connection with
Fig. 7A.
In contrast, in later passes in which the pipe diameter
has been reduced, increase of the lower roll spacing L to a
suitable value causes the upper roll 34 to fall more deeply
into the region between the lower rolls 32, so that the
direction in which the load acts on the lower rolls is
changed to decrease the load remarkably. More specifically,
although the magnitude of the load acting on the lower rolls
is not decreased, the load acting on the roll is reduced
owing to a reduction in the angle 8 of action of the load.
However, when the lower roll spacing L is increased
excessively, the pipe 12 completely falls into the space
between the lower rolls 32, so that the bending can no
longer be effected.
The angle B of action of the load on the lower rolls in
the final stage of the process is decreased when the
tightening amount S of the upper roll reaches a final value
greater than the radius Rwl of the lower roll. Namely, a
geometrical relationship is established such that the upper
17
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
roll falls down into the region between the lower rolls,
thus making it possible to control the size of the end gap.
This measure alone, however, cannot eliminate the risk of
deflection of the upper roll beyond the allowable limit due
to heavy load that is applied in intermediate passes in
which the above-described mechanism for reducing the load
does not function.
However, until the number of the passes grows to such
intermediate passes, the falling down of the pipe completely
into the region between the lower rolls does not occur even
if the lower roll spacing L is set large, because the
diameter of the pipe is still large enough to prevent such
falling of the pipe. It is therefore possible to maintain
the load sufficiently low to avoid excessive deflection of
the upper roll, by operating such that, in earlier passes in
which the pipe diameter is still large, the lower roll
spacing L is set large so as to reduce the magnitude of the
load, whereas in later passes, the lower roll spacing L is
progressively reduced as the pipe forming work proceeds
towards the final pass to decrease the angle A of action of
the load on the lower rolls.
More specifically, the lower roll spacing L and the
amount S of tightening in each pass may be set as follows.
As the first step, the lower roll spacing L is set to
the maximum possible value. During earlier passes, the
upper roll 34 is progressively lowered to increase the
18
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
amount S of tightening in accordance with the increasing
number of passes, while maintaining the above-mentioned
maximum possible lower roll spacing L. Consequently, the
pipe diameter is progressively decreased until the
tightening amount S reaches the final value. This final
value is greater than the lower roll radius Rwl in order
that the upper roll enters the region between the lower
rolls. Then, in later passes, the work is performed by
progressively reducing the lower roll spacing L, while
maintaining the above-mentioned final value of tightening S,
thereby further decreasing the pipe diameter, thus
completing the forming of the pipe.
With this pipe forming method, it is possible to always
maintain the load at sufficiently low magnitudes, by a
combined load reducing effect offered by the large lower
roll spacing L in earlier passes and the reduction in the
angle 8 of action of the load offered in later passes of the
pipe forming work.
Thus, pipes can be formed without causing the load on
the upper roll to exceed the maximum allowable value, while
preventing creation of end gap, even when the pipe diameter
is so small as to preclude the use of a backup beam or a
large-diameter upper roll. It is thus possible to produce
high-strength, thick-walled elongated pipes.
Second aspect of the invention
19
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
As explained before in connection with Fig. 8 which
shows the relationship between the pipe diameter Dp and the
load in each pass, the production of a pipe is impossible
when the lower roll spacing L is 600 mm, as indicated by the
mark o. When the lower roll spacing L is increased to 800
mm, the load is reduced as compared with the case where the
lower roll spacing L is smaller, as indicated by the mark o.
A further increase of the lower roll spacing L to 1000 mm
makes it impossible to work the pipe to the final diameter,
although the magnitudes of load in intermediate passes are
lowered, as indicated by the mark D.
Figs. 9A and 9B show the roll arrangement for a given
final pipe diameter. As will be seen from Fig. 9A, when the
lower roll spacing L is increased to a suitable value, the
upper roll 34 is allowed to fall into the region between the
lower rolls 32, with the result that the direction of the
load on the lower rolls is changed to remarkably reduce the
load. More specifically, the angle B of action of the load
is decreased although the magnitude of the load acting on
the lower rolls 32 is not changed, so that the magnitude of
the load acting on the upper roll is reduced. When the
lower roll spacing L is increased excessively, the pipe 12
completely falls into the region between the lower rolls 32,
thus making it impossible to effect further work for forming
the pipe.
In other words, it is possible to significantly reduce
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
the load, on condition that the lower roll spacing L is set
to a value which is large but does not exceed a value that
allows the pipe to fully fall into the region between the
rolls. The size of the end gap depends on the final forming
condition. It suffices that the above-mentioned condition
concerning the lower roll spacing be met in the final stage.
Representing the product pipe diameter by Dp and the lower
roll diameter by Dwl, while representing the lower roll
spacing L, the geometrical threshold condition for
preventing the pipe from fully falling down into the region
between the lower rolls is given by the following
expression.
L = (Dp + Dwl) ..... (2)
It is therefore understood that the lower roll spacing
L has to be smaller than the sum (Dp + Dwl) of the product
pipe outside diameter Dp and the lower roll diameter Dwl, in
order to avoid completely falling of the pipe into the space
between the lower rolls. However, the lower limit of the
lower roll spacing L is still a question. An investigation
was therefore made to find the relationship between the
ratio L/(Dp + Dwl) of the lower roll spacing L to the sum
(Dp + Dwl) of the product pipe outside diameter Dp and the
lower roll diameter Dwl and the load (P/Po), the result of
which is shown in Fig. 10. The symbol Po represents the
magnitude of the load as obtained when the lower roll
21
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
spacing L is set to L = 0.5(Dp + Dwl). As will be seen from
this Figure, the load drastically decreases when the ratio
L/(Dp + Dwl) exceeds 0.85 and is reduced to zero when the
ratio L/(Dp + Dwl) reaches 1Ø This shows the threshold
condition. It is thus understood that the range specified
by the foregoing expression (1) is the effective range.
Therefore, the load can be maintained sufficiently low,
when the pipe forming work is executed by progressively
increasing the amount S of tightening while setting the
lower roll spacing L to fall within the range specified by
the expression (1). Consequently, it is possible to form a
high-strength, thick-walled elongated pipe with reduced end
gap, even when the pipe diameter is so small as to exclude
the use of a backup beam or a large-diameter upper roll.
In order that the lower roll spacing is set to fall
within the range specified by the expression (1), it is
advantageous that the lower roll spacing 1 is linearly
variable. This, however, is not essential and the change in
the lower roll spacing may be effected in a stepped manner
over several stages by changing the roll combination. It is
also to be understood that the pipe forming apparatus of the
present invention may employ lower rolls that are set at a
fixed spacing L. In other words, the condition of the
expression (1) is met for pipes of certain ranges of pipe
diameter, and the production of such pipes while satisfying
the condition of the expression (1) falls within the scope
22
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
of the present invention.
In accordance with the present invention, the aforesaid
problem or shortcoming is overcome by working a material
while setting the ratio of change of the curvature to a
value not greater than 10 ~ of the final curvature and
setting the roll spacing to fall within the range specified
by the aforesaid expression (1).
This forming method may be applied to the final pass in
the roll bending, when no bend correcting work is executed.
Alternatively, when bend correction is effected prior
to the tack welding, the bend correcting work may be
executed in accordance with the method described above.
Another alternative is that, when the bend correcting
work is executed subsequent to the tack welding, the above-
described method is applied both to the final pass of the
roll bending and the bend correcting work.
Fig. 11 shows the results of a bend correcting work
executed on a pipe blank of 500 mm diameter and having an
end gap of about 50 mm, in which roll bending was effected
after changing again the spacing L of the lower rolls as the
pair of rolls for the purpose of correcting the curvature to
achiever higher circularity. It will be seen that the load
is reduced in two stages in accordance with the increase in
the lower roll spacing. As a result, the size of the end
gap also is changed drastically. The lower limit of the
lower roll spacing is drawn at a point where the load is
23
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
reduced to zero, which corresponds to the pipe passing
completely through the space between the lower rolls, as
explained before in connection with Fig. 9B. It is therefore
understood that the lower roll spacing L falling within the
range specified by the expression (1) is effective. More
specifically, it is possible to maintain the load
sufficiently low, when the pipe forming work is executed by
progressively increasing the tightening amount of the upper
roll while maintaining the lower roll spacing L within the
range specified by the expression (1). This indicates that
the size of the end gap is determined solely by the final
pass, regardless of the intermediate passes.
The above-described results, however; are obtained when
a pipe blank that has already been formed into the shape of
a pipe is again worked for correction of curvature. An
experiment was therefore executed in which the magnitude of
the load and the size of the end gap were examined with
various curvatures in the final pass while setting the lower
roll spacing of the final pass to fall within the above-
described range. The results of the experiment are shown in
Fig. 12. It will be seen from Fig. 12 that the load
drastically drops when the bending curvature is not greater
than 10 ~ of the pipe curvature. It is therefore understood
that the final pass should be executed to effect a bending
as small as that for a bend correcting pass. As described
above, a pipe blank which has already been shaped into the
24
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
form of a pipe may be subjected again to roll bending which
is executed with the lower roll spacing described above. In
such a case, the work process down to the completion of the
blank pipe corresponds to intermediate passes in the pipe
forming method of the invention, and the roll bending
effected on the shaped pipe blank corresponds to the final
pass of the pipe forming method of the invention. The use
of the specified lower roll spacing during the roll bending
on the completed pipe blank, therefore, falls within the
scope of the present invention.
When the above-described conditions are satisfied, the
load applied to the upper roll can be greatly reduced, so
that the deflection of the upper roll is suppressed
correspondingly. This serves to suppress creation of the
end gap even for pipes having diameters which are so small
as to prevent the use of a backup beam or a large-diameter
upper roll. It is thus possible to produce high-strength,
thick-walled elongated pipes of small diameters.
Third aspect of the invention
The inventors have made an investigation to find
curvature distribution of the end gap created in the
longitudinally central region of the pipe. As will be
understood from Fig. 13 which shows the results of the
investigation, the leading and trailing end regions of the
pipe that are not worked by the bending rolls, i.e., that
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
are bent in advance of the process by means of a press or
the like, are finished to have a curvature of 0.004 which
corresponds to the diameter of the product pipe, whereas the
intermediate portions that have been bent by means of the
bending rolls have smaller curvatures. This indicates that
the creation of the end gap is attributable to insufficient
roll bending of the intermediate portions.
Fig. 14 shows the results of an investigation in which
the ratio of the end regions bent in advance by other
techniques, e.g., by a press, than the bending rolls was
varied to investigate how the size of the end gap varies in
accordance with the ratio of the size of the end regions to
the overall circumference of the pipe. The right-hand side
of the diagram of Fig. 14, indicated by a value 50 %, means
that the circumferential length of each of the leading and
trailing end regions bent in advance by, for example, a
press, reaches 50 % of the entire circumference of the pipe,
i.e., the entirety of the pipe has been finished by bending
in advance the end bending method employing, for example,
the press. Obviously, almost no end gap is formed in this
state. This state, however, is an extreme one and a
significant decrease in the size of the end gap is achieved
when the circumferential length of each end region bent in
advance of the roll bending is 20 %, i.e., one fifth, of the
entire circumference of the pipe. This owes to the fact
that the tendency for the roll bending to become
26
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
insufficient is suppressed by the effect produced by the
rigidity of the end regions which have been bent in advance
of the bending by the bending rolls.
In order that the end bent region is enlarged to reach
1/5 the entire circumference of the pipe, it is necessary
that each of the leading and trailing end regions of the
sheet material be bent over a length which is at least 1/5
the entire circumference of the pipe. Such an end bending
may be effected by a press as described above, or by rolls
or other devices which can produce an effect to decrease the
amount of the end gap to a level smaller than that produced
by the bending rolls.
Furthermore, it is necessary that the circumferential
length of the regions to be bent by the bending rolls be
restricted to be less than 3/5 the entire circumference of
the pipe, in order that the end bent regions are not
deformed or reduced in the course of the subsequent bending
by the bending rolls. In order to avoid the undesirable
deformation of the end bent regions, the operation of the
bending rolls may be suspended to prevent the bent end
regions from being affected by the bending rolls.
An increase in the spacing L of the lower rolls serving
as the pair of rolls (see Fig. 2) not only increases the
circumferential length of the zone in each bent end region
not affected by the bending rolls but also serves to reduce
the deflection of the rolls. More specifically, an increase
27
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
in the lower roll spacing L naturally increases the distance
between each lower roll 32 and the upper roll 34 serving as
the counter roll, so that the circumferential length of the
zone not affected by the bending rolls is increased.
Further, as will be seen from Fig. 15, the increase in the
distance between the upper roll 34 and the lower roll 32
leads to an increase in the length of arm of the bending
moment M, so that the load is reduced correspondingly to
suppress the bending of the rolls. Thus, when the
circumferential length of the region to be bent by the rolls
is set below 3/5 of the entire circumference of the pipe
while the lower roll spacing L is increased, a greater
effect of suppressing creation of end gap is achieved
because the bending by the rolls themselves contributes to
prevent formation of the end gap, by virtue of the reduced
deflection of the rolls. It is also possible to
simultaneously use both the suspension of the bending roll
operation and the increase of the lower roll spacing L, when
setting the circumferential length of the region to be bent
by the rolls to less than 3/5 the entire circumference of
the pipe.
According to this aspect of the present invention, it
is possible to produce high-strength, thick-walled elongated
pipes, even when the pipe diameters are so small as to
prevent the use of a backup beam or a large-diameter upper
roll.
28
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
It will be clear to those skilled in the art that the
pipe forming method in accordance with the first to third
aspects can be used not only for small-diameter pipes but
also for production of large-diameter pipes. The pipe
forming method of the present invention, when used in the
production of large-diameter pipes, eliminates the necessity
for any backup beam and alteration of the upper roll, thus
contributing to simplification of the production equipment
and also to improvement in the efficiency of the pipe
forming work.
A symmetrical pyramidal three-roll-type roll bender,
having a pair of power-driven lower rolls and one tightening
upper roll, has been specifically mentioned in the foregoing
description. The use of this type of roll bender, however,
is not essential. For instance, the pipe forming method in
accordance with the present invention may also be applied to
a variety of types of roll benders, such as an asymmetrical
roll bender in which the upper roll is offset, a roll bender
including more than 3 lower rolls, e.g., a four-roll type
roll bender that has an additional lower roll arranged at a
position spaced apart from the lower rolls 32 shown in Fig.
2, a pyramidal roll bender which is implemented by turning
upside down the roll arrangement of Fig. 2, and a roll
bender in which the pair of rolls and the counter roll are
arranged laterally along the sheet material rather than
opposing each other across the sheet material.
29
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
It is also to be noted that the pair of rolls may have
different diameters, in which case for example the parameter
Dwl used in the above expressions would be the sum of their
radii Rwll and Rwl2.
The embodiment of each aspect of the invention will now
be illustrated through Examples.
First aspect
Figs. 16 and 17 are a front elevational view and a side
elevational view of a pipe forming apparatus embodying the
present invention. The apparatus has a pair of lower rolls
32 and an upper roll 34 disposed above the lower rolls 32 at
a position intermediate between the lower rolls. The pipe
forming apparatus further has a driving motor 50 for setting
the lower roll spacing. The driving motor 50 is capable of
setting the spacing L of the lower rolls 32 to a value
greater than the sum of the diameter Dwu of the upper roll
34 and the diameter Dwl of the lower roll 32. The pipe
forming apparatus also has a hydraulic drafting device 52
which can set the amount S of tightening of the upper roll
34 with respect to the lower roll 32 to a value which is
greater than the radius Rwl of the lower roll 32. In these
Figures, numeral 54 denotes a load cell for sensing the
magnitude of the load acting on the upper roll 34, while 56
designates a lower-roll driving motor which drives the lower
rolls 32 through a spindle 58.
Figs. 18 to 20 show the relationships between the
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
amount of tightening of the upper roll and the lower roll
spacing, as observed when the tightening amount and roll
spacing are varied in accordance with the progress of the
passes in accordance with the invention. More specifically,
Fig. 18 shows the relationship as observed when the
tightening by the upper roll is effected in earlier passes,
while the lower roll spacing was varied in later passes.
Fig. 19 shows the relationship as observed when the
tightening by the upper roll and the change of the lower
roll spacing were executed alternately. Fig. 20 shows the
relationship as observed when the operation was executed in
accordance with the schedule shown in Fig. 11, in which the
working condition was changed in a stepped manner by
releasing the upper roll, altering the lower roll spacing
and then resetting the upper roll to the original position.
Embodiment l:
A high-tension steel sheet 30 mm thick and 6000 mm wide
was cut into blank sheets of a length corresponding to the
diameter of a pipe to be produced. The leading and trailing
end regions of the blank sheets were pre-formed into arcuate
form by a hydraulic press 42 of the type shown in Fig. 3.
The thus-pre-worked steel sheets were then subjected to
bending with a roll bender 30 in accordance with the present
invention, so as to be formed into pipes of 500 mm diameter
and 700 mm diameter. The diameter Dwu of the upper roll and
31
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
the diameter Dwl of the lower rolls were 400 mm and 350 mm,
respectively.
The pipe forming work using the roll bender 30 was
executed in each of the following three conditions (1) to
(3)
(1) Comparative Example l:
The lower roll spacing L was set to 600 mm.
(2) Comparative Example 2:
The lower roll spacing was set to 800 mm, while the
amount S of tightening was less than 160 mm.
(3) Inventive Example 1:
Pipe forming work was conducted by employing tightening
amounts S not smaller than 180 mm, while the lower roll
spacing L was varied within the range of from 800 to 1200
mm. The sizes of the end gaps observed after the pipe
forming work under these three different conditions are
shown in Fig. 21 for the pipes of 700 mm diameter and in
Fig. 22 for the pipes of 500 mm diameter.
In Comparative Example l, a large difference of 80 mm
was observed between the end gap at the longitudinally
central portion of the pipe and the end gap at both
longitudinal ends of the pipe, due to excessive load applied
during the pipe forming work, in each of the pipes of 700 mm
diameter and 500 mm diameter. Pipes having such large end
gaps are not acceptable as commercial products.
In Comparative Example 2, the pipe of 700 mm diameter
32
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
showed a reduced difference of 40 mm between the end gap at
the longitudinal center and the longitudinal end of the
pipe, owing to the reduction in the load magnitude offered
by the spacing L between the lower rolls being greater than
that in Comparative Example 1. The pipe thus formed,
however, is still unsatisfactory due to inferior final pipe
configuration. In case of the pipe of 500 mm diameter, a
large end gap in excess of 100 mm was formed both at the
longitudinal center and end portions of the pipe and,
therefore, this pipe was completely useless as a commercial
product. This is attributable to an insufficient tightening
amount S of 160 mm.
Referring now to Inventive Example 1, sufficiently
large amounts S of tightening were afforded by virtue of
appropriate setting of the lower roll spacing Z, so that the
pipe forming work could be conducted under remarkably
reduced load both for the pipes of 500 mm diameter and 700
mm diameter. Consequently, the sizes of the end gaps at the
longitudinal centers of the pipes were as small as under 10
mm, so that pipes having configurations acceptable as
commercial products could be obtained.
Then, a high-tension steel sheet 40 mm thick and 6000
mm wide was cut into blank sheets of a length corresponding
to the diameter of a pipe to be produced. The leading and
trailing end regions of the blank sheets were pre-formed
into arcuate form by a press. The thus-pre-worked steel
33
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
sheets were then subjected to bending conducted under three
different conditions (1) to (3) shown below with a roll
bender, so as to be formed into pipes of 500 mm diameter.
The diameter Dwu of the upper roll and the diameter Dwl of
the lower rolls were 400 mm and 350 mm, respectively.
(1) Comparative Example 3:
The lower roll spacing L was set to 600 mm.
(2) Comparative Example 4:
The lower roll spacing was set to 1000 mm.
(3) Inventive Example 2:
Pipe forming work was conducted by employing tightening
amounts S not less than 180 mm, while the lower roll spacing
L was initially set to 1000 mm and then progressively
decreased.
Load magnitudes for the respective passes are shown in
Fig. 23.
In Comparative Example 3, as shown by a mark o, the
first pass could not provide a desired amount of bend, so
that subsequent passes could not be executed and the pipe
production failed. In Comparative Example 4, as shown by a
mark D, the desired amount of bend could be obtained in each
pass, by virtue of the reduction in the load offered by the
lower roll spacing L being greater than that in Comparative
Example 3. However, when the lower roll spacing is not
greater than 850 mm, pipe formation could not be executed
because the pipe passed completely through the space between
34
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
the lower rolls. In contrast, in Example 2 of the
invention, as indicated by a mark ~, the desired amount of
bend could be achieved in each of the earlier passes,
because the load magnitude was sufficiently low as in
Comparative Example 4. In later passes, the pipe did not
fully drop into the space between the lower rolls, because
the lower roll spacing L was reduced, so that the pipe
forming work could be continued down to the final diameter
while maintaining the load magnitude sufficiently low.
Since the pipe forming work could be completed under small
load, the size of the end gap at the longitudinal center of
the pipe was less than 10 mm, whereby a pipe having
configuration acceptable as a commercial product could be
obtained.
In the foregoing description, steel pipes are
specifically mentioned as the pipes to which the invention
is applied. This, however, is only illustrative and the
invention may be applied equally well to the production of
pipes of materials other than steel, e.g., copper, aluminum,
titanium, brass and so forth.
The mentioned hydraulic drafting device and driving
motor also are illustrative, and various other actuators may
be used for the purpose of tightening the upper roll and for
changing the lower roll spacing. Further, although the
lower rolls are power-driven while the upper roll is used as
a tightening roll, this is not exclusive and other
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
arrangements that produce an equivalent effect can also be
adopted.
According to the present invention, it is possible to
suppress the deflection of the counter roll by reducing the
magnitude of the load applied to the upper roll during the
bending work performed by the roll bender. Consequently,
the bending work is performed without causing the deflection
of the upper roll to exceed the allowable limit, so that
creation of the end gap at the longitudinally central region
of the pipe is sufficiently suppressed. It is therefore
possible to produce high-strength, thick-walled elongated
pipes having excellent pipe configuration and a high degree
of dimensional precision.
Second ash
Embodiment 2:
A high-tension steel sheet 30 mm thick and 6000 mm wide
was cut into blank sheets of a length corresponding to the
diameter of a pipe to be produced. The leading and trailing
end regions of the blank sheets were pre-formed into arcuate
form by a hydraulic press 42 of the type shown in Fig. 3.
The thus-pre-worked steel sheets were then subjected to
bending with a roll bender 30, so as to be formed into pipes
of 500 mm, in accordance with the following two conditions
(1) and (2). The diameter Dwu of the upper roll and the
diameter Dwl of the lower rolls were 400 mm and 350 mm,
respectively.
36
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
(1) Comparative Example 1:
The lower roll spacing L was set to 600 mm.
(2) Inventive Example 1:
All the passes were executed while setting the lower
roll spacing L to 800 mm. The amounts of end gaps obtained
under these two different conditions are shown in Fig. 26.
In Comparative Example 1, the difference in the size of
the end gap between the longitudinally central region and
end regions was as large as 80 mm and, hence, the pipe was
unacceptable as a commercial product. This is attributable
to a too large load applied in the course of the bending.
In contrast, in Inventive Example 1, the magnitude of the
load could be significantly reduced by virtue of the large
amount S of tightening. Consequently, the pipe had only a
small end gap of 10 mm at the longitudinal center. It was
thus possible to obtain a product pipe having excellent pipe
configuration.
Then, a high-tension steel sheet 30 mm thick and 6000
mm wide was cut into blank sheets of a length corresponding
to the diameter of a pipe to be produced. The leading and
trailing end regions of the blank sheets were pre-formed
into arcuate form by a press. The thus-pre-worked steel
sheets were then subjected to bending with a roll bender, so
as to be formed into pipes of 500 mm, under the following
three conditions (1) to (3). The diameter Dwu of the upper
roll and the diameter Dwl of the lower rolls were 400 mm and
37
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
350 mm, respectively.
(1) Comparative Example 2:
All the passes were executed while the lower roll
spacing L was set to 600 mm.
(2) Inventive Example 2:
The final pass was executed to effect a curvature
change of 3 x 10'9 (this amounts to reduction of diameter
from 540 mm to 500 mm) while setting the lower roll spacing
L to 800 mm.
(3) Inventive Example 3:
A pipe which was formed in accordance with Comparative
Example 1 was again subjected to bending executed with the
lower roll spacing L set to L = 800 mm.
The amounts of the end gaps in the pipes produced under
these conditions are shown in Fig. 27 for comparison.
In Comparative Example 2, the difference in the size of
the end gap between the longitudinally central region and
end regions was as large as 80 mm and, hence, the pipe was
unacceptable as a commercial product. This is attributable
to a too large load applied in the course of the bending.
In contrast, in each of Inventive Examples 2 and 3, the
magnitude of the load could be significantly reduced by
virtue of the large amount S of tightening. Consequently,
the pipe had only a small end gap of 10 mm at the
longitudinal center. It was thus possible to obtain a
product pipe having excellent pipe configuration.
38
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
In the foregoing description, steel pipes are
specifically mentioned as the pipes to which the invention
is applied. This, however, is only illustrative and the
invention may be applied equally well to the production of
pipes of materials other than steel, e.g., copper, aluminum,
titanium, brass and so forth.
The mentioned hydraulic drafting device and driving
motor also are illustrative, and various other actuators may
be used for the purpose of tightening the upper roll and for
changing the lower roll spacing. Further, although the
lower rolls are power-driven while the upper roll is used as
a tightening roll, this is not exclusive and other
arrangements that produce an equivalent effect can also be
adopted.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, it is
possible to reduce the load applied to the counter roll
during pipe forming work performed by bending rolls, thus
suppressing deflection of the counter roll in a pass which
may be the final pass. It is therefore possible to suppress
creation of end gap at the longitudinally central region of
the pipe, thus enabling production of high-strength, thick-
walled elongated pipes having excellent pipe configurations.
Third aspect
Embodiment 3:
The curvature distribution of the pipe formed in
39
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
accordance with the invention is shown in Fig. 28, together
with that obtained with a conventional method, for the
purpose of comparison.
A high-tension steel sheet 30 mm thick and 6000 mm wide
was cut into blank sheets of a length corresponding to the
diameter of a pipe to be produced. The leading and trailing
end regions of the blank sheets were pre-formed into arcuate
form by a hydraulic press 42 of the type shown in Fig. 3.
The thus-pre-worked steel sheets were then subjected to
bending with a roll bender 30 in accordance with the
invention, so as to be formed into pipes of 500 mm. The
diameter Dwu of the upper roll and the diameter Dwl of the
lower rolls were 400 mm and 350 mm, respectively. The pipe
forming work was executed under the following three
different conditions.
(1) Comparative Example:
The length of each end region bent by the press was set
to be 1/6 the entire circumference of the pipe, and the pipe
forming bending work was conducted while setting the lower
roll spacing to 600 mm.
(2) Inventive Example l:
The length of each end region bent by the press was set
to be 1/4 the entire circumference of the pipe, and the pipe
forming bending work was conducted while setting the lower
roll spacing to 600 mm and suspending the operation of the
rolls such that the circumferential length of the region
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
bent by the rolls is ~ the entire circumference of the pipe.
(3) Inventive Example 2:
The length of each end region bent by the press was set
to be 1/4 the entire circumference of the pipe, and the pipe
forming bending work was conducted while setting the lower
roll spacing to 800 mm and suspending the operation of the
rolls such that the circumferential length of the region
bent by the rolls is ~ the entire circumference of the pipe.
The amounts of end gaps in the pipes produced under these
different conditions are shown in Fig. 29 for comparison.
In the Comparative Example, the difference in the size
of the end gap between the longitudinally central region and
end regions was as large as 80 mm and, hence, the pipe was
unacceptable as a commercial product. This is attributable
to a too large load applied in the course of the bending.
In Inventive Example 1, the difference in the size of the
end gap between the longitudinal center and both
longitudinal ends of the pipe was reduced to 20 mm, so that
the pipe could be used as a product, although the load
applied during the pipe forming work was not so small. In
Inventive Example 2, the load applied during the pipe
forming work was also reduced significantly, so that the
difference in the size of the end opening between the
longitudinal center and both longitudinal ends of the pipe
was further reduced to 10 mm, thus providing an excellent
pipe configuration.
41
CA 02288421 1999-11-03
In the foregoing description, steel pipes are
specifically mentioned as the pipes to which the invention
is applied. This, however, is only illustrative and the
invention may be applied equally well to the production of
pipes of materials other than steel, e.g., copper, aluminum,
titanium, brass and so forth.
The mentioned hydraulic drafting device and driving
motor also are illustrative, and various other actuators may
be used for the purpose of tightening the upper roll and for
changing the lower roll spacing. Further, although the
lower rolls are power-driven while the upper roll is used as
a tightening roll, this is not exclusive and other
arrangements that produce an equivalent effect can also be
adopted.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, it is
possible to reduce the load applied to the rolls during pipe
forming work, by virtue of the rigidity exhibited by the
bent end regions that have been bent by, for example, the
press. It is therefore possible to suppress creation of end
gap at the longitudinally central region of the pipe, thus
enabling production of high-strength, thick-walled elongated
pipes having excellent pipe configurations.
42
