Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2400552 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2400552
(54) Titre français: LOCALISATION D'UN SYSTEME GENERIQUE D'ENREGISTREMENT ELECTRONIQUE
(54) Titre anglais: LOCALIZATION OF GENERIC ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM
Statut: Durée expirée - au-delà du délai suivant l'octroi
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • G06F 17/40 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • HENNING, DONALD MICHAEL (Canada)
  • WING, ANDREW WILLIAM (Canada)
  • BRACKENBURY, STEVE (Canada)
  • ROBERTS, MARY CATHERINE (Canada)
(73) Titulaires :
  • TERANET INC.
(71) Demandeurs :
  • TERANET INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: DEETH WILLIAMS WALL LLP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 2011-01-25
(22) Date de dépôt: 2002-08-30
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 2004-02-29
Requête d'examen: 2006-11-23
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande: S.O.

Abrégés

Abrégé français

Cette invention permet de localiser un système d'enregistrement électronique au moyen d'un logiciel intégré d'enregistrement générique. La méthode fait appel à plusieurs interfaces (interface de saisie, interface de modèle, interface de flux de travaux, interface de règles) pour personnaliser les exigences d'enregistrement et traiter une application d'enregistrement particulière. La méthode permet d'obtenir une localisation géographiquement significative. Cette invention assure la protection et le respect de l'historique des données.


Abrégé anglais

The invention provides a method of localizing an electronic registration system provided through a generic registration framework, the method includes using several interfaces (capturing interface, template interface, workflow interface, rules interface) to customize the registration requirements and processing for a particular registration application. The method generates a geographically-meaningful localization of a registration system. The invention protects and respects the history of the data.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


19
CLAIMS
What is claimed is:
1. A method of localizing an electronic registration system provided through a
generic
registration framework, the registration system having register, instrument
and
geographic entities within a database in a computer memory, the method
comprising:
.cndot. by means of a capturing interface, defining register, instrument and
geographic entities to be stored in the database;
.cndot. by means of a template interface, defining input parameters to accept
input information through forms;
.cndot. by means of a workflow interface, selecting an order of registration
operations to be performed on the input information; and
.cndot. by means of a rules interface, defining rules for processing the input
information to be applied against an attribute of any one of the register,
instrument and geographic entities.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining register, instrument
and
geographic entities further includes defining data fields for the register,
instrument
and geographic entities.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining register, instrument
and
geographic entities further includes populating data fields for the register,
instrument
and geographic entities with existing data.
4. The method of claim 2 or claim 3, wherein the data fields are defined or
expressed in
XML.

20
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the geographic entity includes a
hierarchically-
expressed geographic indicator.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the geographic indicator has a dynamically
selected
number of levels.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining register, instrument
and
geographic entities further includes linking existing systems to the register,
instrument and geographic entities.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the capturing interface includes a
persistence layer
for permitting changes to be made to the database dynamically.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining input parameters
further includes
defining the presentation and grouping of the forms.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of selecting an order of
registration
operations further includes selecting from among predetermined business
objects.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining rules further includes
defining
business objects to serve as arguments for the rules.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining rules further includes
selecting
predefined business domain objects for use in defining rules.

21
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining rules further includes
defining
rules with an English grammar.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the rules are defined using an
"If...Then..." syntax.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further includes setting prices
and
collecting movies owed for a registration transaction by means of a
subscription
module.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further includes defining and
delivering
messaging events by means of a subscription module.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further includes defining
security
protocols to be applied to input information by means of a security module.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further includes authorizing
users or
groups to input, edit, or delete information by means of a customer care
module.
19. The method of claim 1, wherein each one of the register, instrument and
geographic
entities includes a component table and an attribute table to be stored in the
computer memory.
20. A method of localizing an electronic registration system provided through
a generic
registration framework, the registration system having register, instrument
and
geographic entities within a database in a computer memory, the method
comprising:

22
.cndot. by means of a capturing interface, defining register, instrument and
geographic entities for defining data entities to be stored in the database,
the entities including:
~ a register entity for storing registration data relating to an object;
~ an instrument entity for storing registration data relating to an
action done with respect to the object; and
~ a geographic entity for storing registration data relating to a
geographic attribute of an entity, or a geographic attribute of an
attribute of an entity;
.cndot. by means of a template interface, defining input parameters for
defining
input parameters to accept input information through forms;
.cndot. by means of a workflow interface, selecting an order of registration
operations for selecting an order of registration operations to be
performed on either the input information or on existing information; and
.cndot. by means of a rules interface, defining rules for defining rules for
processing the input information to be applied against an attribute of any
one of the register, instrument and geographic entities.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the step of defining register, instrument
and
geographic entities further includes defining data fields for the register,
instrument
and geographic entities.
22. The method of claim 20, wherein the step of defining register, instrument
and
geographic entities further includes populating data fields for the register,
instrument
and geographic entities with existing data.

23
23. The method of claim 21 or claim 22, wherein the data fields are defined or
expressed
in XML.
24. The method of claim 20, wherein the geographic entity includes a
hierarchically-
expressed geographic indicator.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the geographic indicator has a dynamically
selected number of levels.
26. The method of claim 20, wherein the step of defining register, instrument
and
geographic entities further includes linking existing systems to the register,
instrument and geographic entities.
27. The method of claim 20, wherein the capturing interface includes a
persistence layer
for permitting changes to be made to the database dynamically.
28. The method of claim 21, wherein the step of defining input parameters
further
includes defining the presentation and grouping of the forms.
29. The method of claim 20, wherein the step of selecting an order of
registration
operations further includes selecting from among predetermined business
objects.
30. The method of claim 20, wherein the step of defining rules further
includes defining
business objects to serve as arguments for the rules.

24
31. The method of claim 20, wherein the step of defining rules further
includes selecting
predefined business domain objects for use in defining rules.
32. The method of claim 20, wherein the step of defining rules further
includes defining
rules with an English grammar.
33. The method of claim 32, wherein the means for defining rules allows rules
to be
defined using an "If...Then..." syntax.
34. The method of claim 20, wherein the method further includes setting prices
and
collecting monies owed for a registration transaction by means of a
pricing/billing
module.
35. The method of claim 20, wherein the method further includes defining and
delivering
messaging events by means of a subscription module.
36. The method of claim 20, wherein the method further includes defining
security
protocols to be applied to input information by means of a security module.
37. The method of claim 20, wherein the method further includes authorizing
users or
groups to input, edit, or delete information by means of a customer care
module.
38. The method of claim 20, wherein each one of the register, instrument and
geographic entities includes a component table and an attribute table to be
stored in
the computer memory.

25
39. A generic electronic registration system database including register,
instrument and
geographic entities, each entity comprising:
.cndot. a component table; and
.cndot. an attribute table.
40. The database of claim 39, wherein the database includes XML data.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02400552 2002-08-30
LOCALIZATION OF GENERIC ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEM
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to registration methods and systems, and more
particularly, to
electronic registration methods and systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Registration systems have existed in some fashion since ancient times. In its
most basic
form, registration is a process by which individuals, items or transactions
are recorded in
a list (or register). Registration systems may be in electronic or paper form,
or some
combination thereof.
Two underlying actions can be said to distinguish a registration transaction
from mere
record-keeping. Registration includes:
1. Preparation, and lodgement I submission of a thing to be registered; and
2. Committal / acceptance of the thing to be registered (usually, acceptance
is done by
some type of registration authority).
Some types of registration systems presume official validation or
certification of contents
(such as, land, passport, guns, automobile registration, patents), while
others are mere
depository systems, placing the onus for accuracy of contents on the
individual user
(such as, product registrations, email registration, subscriptions). While
registration
systems are most common in official or government settings (such as, health
care,
firearms registration, vehicle registration, real or personal properly), there
are also many
types of private registration systems (such as, product registrations, domain
name

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
2
registration, educational institution registrations). Perhaps the most common
application
for registration systems is for ownership tracking of real, personal or
intellectual property.
However, there are countless other possible uses.
As registration systems exist in a temporal framework, they must permit not
only
insertion of new entries into the register, but also amendment or deletion of
existing
entries. Typically, registration systems also must be organized in some
logical sense to
permit searching of existing entries according to some criteria. Examples of
such
searchable criteria include:
a) item description/name, location, price, identifying number/name, time
b) model, make, serial number
Rules are inherent in the registration system to "process" a submission for
registration.
Acceptance criteria may be formal and/or content based. For instance, to
accept a
passport application, the applicant's photograph must be a certain size and
shape
(formal criterion). On the other hand, there are acceptance criteria that
involve
judgement about the content, which processing would ordinarily be carried out
by a
human checker. For instance, to register as a university student, one needs to
have
graduated from high school.
Increasingly, registration systems are being provided in some degree in
electronic form.
One or more aspects may be electronically provided. Typically, the register
itself may be
electronic (i.e. in database form). Searchable electronic databases are known
in the art.
The submission (or lodgement) process may also be electronic (i.e, e-mail or
fomrbased
submission).

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
3
Lodgement processes (that is, the preparation and submission of an instrument
for
registration) are known in electronic registration systems. For instance, in
Teranet's e-
reg~ product, lodgement provides users with a virtual work area allowing
parties to
collaborate amongst themselves prior to submitting the instrument (in this
case, a land
registration document) for validation and registration.
Gontent-based processing is the most difficult aspect to represent in
electronic form, as
it requires programming of the checklist of criteria that would be manually
completed by
a human checker. As these rules and criteria will be particular to each
application (and
to each registration authority), a significant amount of custom programming is
n3quired.
For registration systems where rules are changing on an evolutionary basis
(e.g. where
regulatory changes are frequent), the task of custom programming is an ongoing
one.
It would be advantageous to provide an electronic registration system that
allows a
registration system provider to configure and reconfigure detailed rules and
criteria as
necessary for ongoing operation, without significant "hard coding" at the
program level.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the invention to provide a middleware framework for
developing and
providing electronic registration services. Through this framework, it is a
further object of
the invention to allow localization of generic registration utilizing tools
within the
framework to allow electronic registration to be customized for particular
applications
and revised as needed. Finally, it is an object of the invention to provide a
geographically-meaningful localization of generic registration framework by
the use of a
geographic (location) entity in the configuration of the localized
registration database.

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
4
According to a first aspect of the invention, a method is provided for
localizing an
electronic registration system provided through a generic registration
framework. The
registration system has register, instrument and geographic entities within a
database in
a computer memory. The method comprises at least four steps:
~ by means of a capturing intertace, defining register, instrument and
geographic entities for defining register, instrument and geographic
entities to be stored in the database;
~ by means of a template intertace, defining input parameters for defining
input parameters to accept input information through forms;
~ by means of a workflow intertace, selecting an order of registration
operations for selecting an order of registration operations to be
pertormed on the input information; and
by means of a rules intertace, defining rules for processing the input
information to be applied against an attribute of any one of the register,
instrument and geographic entities.
The step of defining register, instrument and geographic entities may further
include
defining data fields for the register, instrument and geographic entities. In
addition, or in
the alternative, data fields may be populated with existing data. The data
fields are
preferably defined or expressed in XML.
The geographic entity is preferably a hierarchically-expressed geographic
indicator.
It may have a dynamically selected number of levels.

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
The step of defining register, instrument and geographic entities may further
include
linking existing systems to the register, instrument and geographic entities
to provide an
ongoing supply of fresh data.
5 The capturing interface preferably includes a persistence layer for
permitting changes to
be made to the database dynamically.
The step of defrning input parameters preferably further includes defining the
presentation and grouping of the forms.
The step of selecting an order of registration operations preferably further
includes
selecting from among predetermined business objects.
The step of defining rules preferably further includes defining business
objects to serve
as arguments for the rules. In addition, or in the alternative, predefined
business domain
objects may be selected for use in defining rules.
The step of defining rules preferably further includes defining rules with an
English
grammar. The rules may preferably be defined using an "If...Then..." syntax.
The method preferably further includes setting prices and collecting movies
owed for a
registration transaction by means of a pricing/billing module.
The method preferably further includes defining and delivering messaging
events by
means of a subscription module.

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
6
The method preferably further includes defining security protocols to be
applied to input
information by means of a security module.
The method preferably further includes authorizing users or groups to input,
edit, or
delete information by means of a customer care module.
Preferably, each one of the register, instrument and geographic entities
includes a
component table and an attribute table to be stored in the computer memory.
According to a second aspect of the invention, a generic electronic
registration system
database is provided including register, instrument and geographic entities,
each entity
comprising:
~ a component table; and
20
~ an attribute table.
The database preferably includes XML data.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, the preferred
embodiment
thereof will now be described by way of example with reference to the
accompanying
drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a diagram of a preferred hardware arrangement used to carry out the
invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the middleware architecture of a preferred
embodiment
of the software used to carry out the invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the modular framework thereof;

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
7
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a preferred embodiment of the method;
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of process A according to the method;
FIG. 6 is a table diagram of a sample Instrument entity modelled within the
database;
FIG. 7 is a table diagram of a sample Register entity modelled within the
database;
FIG. 8 is a table diagram of a sample Geographic entity modelled within the
database;
FIG. 9 is a diagram of a sample hierarchical model of the Geographic entity;
FIG. 10 is an excerpt of a sample form generated from an XML Schema template
according to the method;
FIG. 11 is a sample workflow selected according to the method; and
FIG. 12 is a sample rule defined according to the method.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
According to the preferred embodiment, the invention provides a method of
providing a
localized electronic n~istration system within a generic registration
framework that
protects and respects the history of the data.
Several key entities form the backbone of the present generic electronic
registration
framework. Three entities are modelled in the database architecture of the
present
invention: Register, Instrument and Geographic. These entities are represented
in
tables in the databases.
Traditionally, a Register is a book where entries for a person, place or thing
are listed
(usually one abstract per page - each abstract containing multiple entries
that represent
alterations to the register, such as an addition, deletion, modification,
change of state,
etc.). In the present sense, a Register is not a physical book, but a virtual
book,

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
representing a type of object that is the subject of registration. The system
supports a
single Register setup, multiple Registers or multiple types of Registers.
The Instrument entity, in the present sense, is not a physical document, but
represents
an action taken with respect to the object and its corresponding data.
The "register" and "instrument' entities are chosen from the vocabulary of
land
registration. Likewise, many of the examples used within this description
apply to a land
registration application of the framework, however, they are meant simply to
illustrate
one particular complex application of the system. The present framework is
generic and
is applicable for any type of nrgistration application. Through the
localization process
described herein, a registration provider specifies the inputs and processing
requirements applicable for the particular registration application.
The third entity, a Geographic, does not have an analogous entity in
traditional
registration systems. A Geographic is a hierarchical description of a location
(such as,
address or lot, concession, Property Id Number) where any point/level in the
hierarchy
may be an attribute of a Register or Instrument or may have a Register or
attribute as an
attribute of itself. (As used herein, an "attribute" can be understood as a
conceptual
"child" class in relation to a "parent" entity. In the database tables,
attribute tables have
rows for each child instance of the parent entity. Sub-attributes of
attributes may also be
provided.) Each level of the hierarchy can be treated as a discrete component
representing one or more geographic locations.
A simple Geographic entity 901 is illustrated in Figure 9. At the top of the
hierarchy is
the "Province" 902, which has "City" attributes 903, which in tum has "Street"
attributes

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
9
804. The invention is not limited to the present Geographic illustration
however. The
framework has no bias as to the components of the Geographic hierarchy. The
components are adaptable to the provider's requirements and will represent
whatever
hierarchy and degree of granularity is meaningful to the subject-matter of the
registration
system.
Registers, Instruments and Geographics may stand in entity-entity or entity-
attribute
relation to each other. The relationships between the entities are all
potentially n-to-n.
To illustrate how these abstract entities might be represented in real
situations, consider
the following examples:
a) Gun control:
Register = gun serial number and type;
Instrument = registered owner;
Geographic = residence of owner.
b) Vehicle control:
Register = vehicle VIN, make, model;
Instrument = registered owner;
Geographic = residence of owner OR real time location of vehicle.
The method relates to a method of providing a localized electronic
registration system
within a generic registration framework. With reference to Figure 2, the
generic
registration framework is a middleware software framework 203. By implication,
there is
no programmed front-end application for end-users of the registration system.
Rather,
the framework provides generic access for any type of client application to
utilize the

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
framework. A provider of electronic registration services will use the present
method to
create a front-end application (referred to as a "localization" 202) which is
then capable
of processing registration transactions through the middleware 203.
5 The framework 203 is preferably developed using an object-oriented program
architecture. The currently preferred architecture is Sun Corporation's Java 2
Enterprise
Edition (J2EET"'), however, it is not intended to limit the architecture to
this language,
and any modular development platform would be useful.
10 The framework may be run on various types of standard hardware. With
reference to
Figure 1, a sample topology of the preferred hardware configuration is
provided. The
registration system is preferably installed in a typical client-server
nefinrork. A single
server or server duster 104 will run the system components in communication
with at
least one database 105. Registration services provided through the localized
application
are preferably accessible to a thick or thin client system 101 over the
Internet 102. In
this embodiment, a web server 103 mediat~s client requests for registration
services to
be carried out on the application server 104.
Turning to Figure 3, the preferred framework 301 inGudes at least the
following program
modules, all of which are in communicative relationship to a core module 318
interfacing
with at least one database 312:
~ Template & forms management 302
~ Flow of execution (workflow) 305
~ Rules engine 306

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
11
The Core module 316, in addition to its root functions 315, contains the
components of
the persistence layer 308, input forms 308, workflow entities 310 and new
listeners 311,
all as more particularly described elsewhere in this document.
Further functions or modules may include:
~ Desktop & user presentation (Presentation 8~ grouping) 303
~ Customer care 304
~ Subscription 307
~ Security 314
~ Billing/pricing (not shown)
~ Data conversion (not shown)
The functions or modules may be provided either in the form of a discrete
program
module, or as an API (application program interface) interfacing with a third
party
application performing the desired function. For instance, the security module
314 may
be provided by means of an API interfacing with a conventionally known
encryption
and/or digital signature application. The API passes the appropriate
information to the
third party application and returns appropriate information to the framework
core 318 and
its database 312.
The modules 301 enable the configuration of the localized registration
application
according to the custom requirements of the registration service provider.
Once the
registration system is localized for the provider's particular application, it
may also be
amended as necessary to meet changing requin:ments (e.g. regulatory or form
changes)
or to create new applications.

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
12
The method is set out generally in flow charts provided in Figures 4 and 5. To
localize a
registration system through the generic framework, the provider must first
install and
configure the framework 402. The registration "system" is the localized
application
which runs through the "framework." In the installation, the persistence layer
205 within
the framework 203 will create the database Instrument, Register and Geographic
schema required. The persistence layer 205 will then use the schema for
storage and
retrieval. These database tables do not change in structure after the
installation,
however attributes may be added.
The database 312 once configured can be populated with legacy data 313 through
a
conversion utility (not shown) or left blank until the system is ready to be
populated by
new entries through the localized front-end system.
Once the framework is installed, templates are used to carry out the process
of creating
the forms required for registration 403. The templates are preferably defined
or
developed using XML Schema as prescribed by the W3C. Templates are used to
define
the forms required to input data into the Instrument, Register and Geographic
data
entities. Form field validation is defined as part of the template development
phase. In
the preferred embodiment, XML Schema allows field validation to be written
into the
form code.
Once a template is submitted, the framework automatically generates a
resultant input
form 403. Optionally, the form can be visually customized by associating a
Presentation
& Grouping file with the template 404, which allows the provider to select the
precise

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
13
layout of the form fields and to inGude any creative touches desired (such as
custom
background appearance, provider logo, etc.). This ~P & G" file is preferably
in XSLT.
A sample form is shown at Figures 10A and 10B. According to fields defined in
the
template 403, the form will allow entry of various descriptive information
1003 in relation
to the Instrument (in this case, a property transfer) for the particular
Register (in this
case, the property) and in relation to the Geographic. In this case, there are
Geographic
attributes of the property itself, the transferor 1005 and the transfen~e
1006. In this case,
the form also permits an attachment file to be added (such as a survey of the
property).
Note that the sample screen shot of the form also shows form-related options
1002
defined to be available to the user (for saving an unfinished work to come
back to,
validating the contents, committing the input information for registration, or
cancelling the
transaction). The localized application also includes user-related options
1001 to
engage other processes available to the user (such as, checking the status of
other
registration transactions, setting subscription preferences, and searching the
database).
At the same time 404, the provider can include its own static pages to be
called by the
application when it is presented to the user. Static pages are not generated
by the
framework via a template. However, these pages may access and present data
stored
within the database or from another data source. Static pages may be used to
govern
any process or information that is domain specific. For instance, logging-in,
displaying
data, reports, organization of submissions, folders, instruments, or user
navigation
functions may be provided by static pages.
Once the databases and forms are configured, the provider then configures the
workflow
module (Flow of Execution module 305) to establish the high-level order of
operations

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
14
for the registration process to be carried out 405. Certain standard
registration
operations can preferably be selected from among a pre-programmed set (such
as,
saving data, retrieving data, validating, searching, checking permissions), or
the provider
can define and include custom operations.
An example flow of execution 1101 is shown in Figure 11. In the example, the
selected
registration process begins by validating the Instrument fields 1102 (i.e. the
fields
entered by user through the defined form). Then the targets fields 1103 are
validated.
The defined business rules will be executed 1104. Subscription options will be
generated 1105. Finally, the information will be sent to be certified in queue
order 1106.
At a detail level, each step in the workflow can be configured to apply rules
defined by
the provider using the Rules Engine 406. In order to set rules, the provider
will
preferably program Java objects that execute fine grained business logic which
support
the rules. These Java objects 310 vrrill preferably reside in the Core 316
when defined.
Some predefined objects 310 will preferably be available in the framework as
installed.
The objects are included in rules of preferably "If...Then..." syntax.
Preferably, the
syntax will be close to English syntax to permit ease of human comprehension.
An example of such a rule is provided in Figure 12. The sample rule 1201
checks for
active mortgages on a property title before registering a discharge. If there
is an Active
Charge in the history (having a value greater than 0), the registration
transaction will be
refused and the user will be sent a message. A "Subscription Event" is also
triggered to
notify other °listeners" 311 subscribed to receive messages for this
particular Register
(as set in the subscription module 30T) that there was an attempted
registration against
this Register.

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
Code entities may also be developed to support specific complex operations
(such as,
pricing or fee calculation, data manipulation, business logic execution). The
provider
5 can also specify whether submitted forms are to be processed immediately, or
hatched
for processing (such as, at the end of each business day).
These are the core requirements for localization of a registration system
according to the
preferred embodiment of the present method. However, there are several other
possible
10 localization steps 407 to generate a more sophisticated application.
Referring now to Figure 5, optional steps 407 in the method are shown (these
steps in
any order). A subscription module 307 may preferably be employed 502 to define
notice
events for any person or process that may need to be aware of such events.
System
15 events (such as, start-up, shutdown, exception or any system logged
events), or
business events (such as, edit of instrument, change to register, payment on
bill,
execution of specific transaction or business process) may be selected as
subscribable.
Various modes of electronic communication are supported for dissemination of
such
notices. Other modes can also be defined as framework plug-ins.
A customer care module 304 may preferably be employed 503 to define groups and
users authorized to transact with given information in the databases.
Definition of
groups or users involves setting a customer profile and customer permissions.
"Users"
in the present sense refers to users of the registration system, as opposed to
the
individuals who may be related to the entities within the databases (e.g.
owners). When
configured to permit multi-user access to a lodgement, several users may
collaborate on
information to be submitted for registration (e.g. lawyers on opposite sides
of a

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
16
transaction). In the lodgement process, information is stored for use in the
collaboration
without affecting the state of the registration database. One or multiple
users may be
required to commit the information to be registered. An identifier is
preferably
associated with the lodgement to allow users to return to unfinished work.
A security module 314 may preferably be provided 504 to provide encryption
technology
and/or digital signature technology to secure and authenticate communications
on the
system. The rules engine 306 is preferably employed to define what specific
communications are to be encrypted, digitally signed, etc. The workflow module
305 is
preferably employed to define at what point in the operations encryption will
occur.
Encryption can apply to all communications or specific parts of communications
(i.e. one
field or the entire document can be encrypted).
Optionally, a pricing/billing interface is provided for setting prices and
~Ilecting movies
owed for a registration transaction.
The database of the preferred embodiment is preferably comprised of tables
representing each of the Register, Instrument and Geographic entities. It has
been
found useful to represent each entity with a non-standard recursive table
structure
having preferably two tables: a component table and an attribute table. As
each
component is made up of a set of standard columns and rows, the database will
contain
a set of tables to represent each type of component and a table to represent
the
attributes. The number of attributes is therefore potentially unlimited, and
the level of
granularity can be modified to suit the application.

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
17
For searchability, there is preferably a join between component table and
attribute table,
and a recursive join on the attribute table.
Sample tables are shown in Figures 6 through 8 to illustrate a possible schema
for a
land registration application. With reference to the sample Instrument tables
in Figure 6,
two tables are provided - a component table 801 and an attribute table 620.
There are
multiple entries in each table 602-619, 821-845. The component entries
represent
actions taken against an object in the Register. As a sample Instrument entry
in the
component table 601, 802 is identified as a "ChargeorMortgage" type having
name
"123". This entry relates to a number of entries in the corresponding
attribute table 820
identified at entries 621-625. That is, the "ChargeorMortgage" component has
five
attributes. Among these, for instance, the change has an attribute "principal
Amount'
625 which has a value of "645" in this case. The attribute types correspond to
standard
variable types (e.g. "string" type or "double" numeric type).
Similarly, Fig. 7 shows component 701 and attribute T10 tables for a sample
Register.
The Register in this case lists properties 702, 703. "Property B" (ID "102")
in the
component table 701 has a number of attributes 711-718, including owner's name
T13
and spouse's name 712, as well as, address attributes 714-718.
Fig. 8 shows component 801 and attribute 820 tables for a sample Geographic.
The
Geographic in this case contains a number of descriptors 802-811. Each
descriptor type
is defined with a Geotype which represents its level in the hierarchy.
Although five levels
are provided in the example, any number of levels may be defined to suit the
particular
application. Component "street" 805 has four attributes 821-824 relating in
this case to
the number and location of wells on that street.

CA 02400552 2002-08-30
18
Preferably, the database 312 is configured to automatically log and effective
date all
entries (even where the attributes have changed). This helps to preserve the
record-
keeping integrity of the system and allows historical querying and reporting.
The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the
invention. Further,
since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled
in the art, it
is not desired to limit the invention to the exact steps and systems shown and
described,
and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted
to, falling
within the scope of the invention and the appended claims and their
equivalents.

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2400552 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : CIB expirée 2023-01-01
Inactive : Périmé (brevet - nouvelle loi) 2022-08-30
Lettre envoyée 2020-06-10
Représentant commun nommé 2020-06-10
Inactive : Transfert individuel 2020-05-15
Requête pour le changement d'adresse ou de mode de correspondance reçue 2020-05-15
Requête pour le changement d'adresse ou de mode de correspondance reçue 2020-04-28
Représentant commun nommé 2019-10-30
Représentant commun nommé 2019-10-30
Requête visant le maintien en état reçue 2019-07-18
Requête visant le maintien en état reçue 2018-06-29
Requête visant le maintien en état reçue 2017-07-07
Requête visant le maintien en état reçue 2016-08-22
Requête visant le maintien en état reçue 2015-07-14
Requête visant le maintien en état reçue 2014-07-07
Requête visant le maintien en état reçue 2013-07-12
Inactive : CIB désactivée 2012-01-07
Inactive : CIB du SCB 2012-01-01
Inactive : CIB expirée 2012-01-01
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2011-09-14
Inactive : CIB enlevée 2011-09-14
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2011-09-14
Accordé par délivrance 2011-01-25
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2011-01-24
Préoctroi 2010-11-09
Inactive : Taxe finale reçue 2010-11-09
Lettre envoyée 2010-08-12
Lettre envoyée 2010-08-12
Inactive : Transferts multiples 2010-07-21
Lettre envoyée 2010-05-12
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2010-05-12
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2010-05-12
Inactive : Approuvée aux fins d'acceptation (AFA) 2010-05-03
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2009-08-05
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur art.29 Règles 2009-02-09
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2009-02-09
Lettre envoyée 2006-12-12
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 2006-11-23
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 2006-11-23
Requête d'examen reçue 2006-11-23
Lettre envoyée 2006-11-06
Inactive : Correspondance - Transfert 2006-10-04
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2006-09-15
Lettre envoyée 2006-09-15
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2006-09-15
Lettre envoyée 2006-09-15
Inactive : Transferts multiples 2006-06-30
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2004-02-29
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 2004-02-29
Lettre envoyée 2003-05-15
Lettre envoyée 2003-05-15
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2002-11-28
Inactive : Certificat de dépôt - Sans RE (Anglais) 2002-10-09
Exigences de dépôt - jugé conforme 2002-10-09
Lettre envoyée 2002-10-09
Demande reçue - nationale ordinaire 2002-10-08

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2010-08-23

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
TERANET INC.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
ANDREW WILLIAM WING
DONALD MICHAEL HENNING
MARY CATHERINE ROBERTS
STEVE BRACKENBURY
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Revendications 2002-08-30 7 196
Description 2002-08-30 18 686
Abrégé 2002-08-30 1 14
Page couverture 2004-02-03 1 28
Revendications 2009-08-05 3 101
Abrégé 2010-11-17 1 14
Page couverture 2010-12-29 1 28
Dessins 2002-08-30 10 4 574
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 2002-10-09 1 109
Certificat de dépôt (anglais) 2002-10-09 1 161
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 2004-05-03 1 109
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 2006-12-12 1 178
Avis du commissaire - Demande jugée acceptable 2010-05-12 1 164
Courtoisie - Certificat d'inscription (changement de nom) 2020-06-10 1 395
Taxes 2004-06-10 1 34
Taxes 2005-06-23 1 32
Taxes 2006-06-21 1 31
Correspondance 2006-09-15 1 14
Correspondance 2006-09-15 1 16
Correspondance 2006-11-06 1 11
Taxes 2007-06-08 1 33
Taxes 2008-06-13 1 34
Taxes 2009-06-23 1 35
Taxes 2010-08-23 1 40
Correspondance 2010-11-09 1 37
Taxes 2011-07-06 1 37
Taxes 2012-06-28 1 37
Taxes 2013-07-12 1 38
Taxes 2014-07-07 1 40
Paiement de taxe périodique 2015-07-14 1 38
Paiement de taxe périodique 2016-08-22 1 40
Paiement de taxe périodique 2017-07-07 1 39
Paiement de taxe périodique 2018-06-29 1 39
Paiement de taxe périodique 2019-07-18 1 38
Changement à la méthode de correspondance 2020-05-15 3 63
Paiement de taxe périodique 2020-08-20 1 26
Paiement de taxe périodique 2021-08-23 1 26