Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
INHIBITORS OF ABC DRUG TRANSPORTERS AT THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This,application claims priority of the following U.S. Patent Application
Nos. 601244,482, filed October 30, 2000 (provisional); 60/245,110, filed
November 1, 2000
(provisional); and 60/245,235, filed November 2, 2000 (provisional). The
applications cited
above are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety to provide
continuity of
disclosure.
INTRODUCTION
Back r~ ound
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) proteins play a central role in living cells
through their
role in nutrient uptake, protein, drug and antibiotic secretion,
osmoregulation, antigen
presentation, signal fransduction and others. The majority of ABC proteins
have a
translocation function either in import of substrates or secretion of cellular
products or
xenobiotics.
The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily is one of the largest superfamilies
known. With the multiplication of genome sequencing projects, new sequences
appear
every week in the GenBank database. Members of this family posses a highly
conserved
protein or module, the ABC module, that displays the WalkerA and WalkerB
motifs
separated by a short, highly conserved, sequence (consensus LSGGQ) called a
signature
sequence or linker peptide. Most ABC cassette proteins are primary
transporters for
unidirectional movement of molecules across biological membranes. The
substrates
handled by these transporters are extraordinarily varied ranging from small
molecules to
macromolecules.
ABC proteins of particular interest are the drug transporters associated with
multidrug resistance in humans. The structure and function of drug
transporters have been
extensively reviewed, including by Benet, et al., J. Control. Rel. 39:139-143
(1996) for the
gut barrier, by Chiou, et al., Pharm. Res. 17(8):903-905 (2000) for the liver
barrier (and
includes gut barrier references), and by Tduji, et al., in Adv. Drug Deliv.
Rev. 36:277-290
(1999) for the blood-brain barrier. The family of drug transporters includes
two different
subfamilies, the multidrug resistance (MDR) proteins, such as PGP, and the
multidrug
resistance-associate protein (MRP) family. The human multidrug resistance-
associated
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
protein family currently has seven members (Borst et al, J. Natl Cancer Inst.
92:1295--
(2000)). See also, Baxrand, et al., Gen. Pharmacol. 28:639-645 (1997).
Originally implicated in the resistance of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic
agents, the multi-
drug resistance protein MDRl, also known as P-glycoprotein (PGP), belongs to
the ATP-
binding cassette family of proteins. See, e.g., Schinkel, Adv. Drug Deliv.
Rev. 36:179-194
(1999). P-glycoprotein is an ATP-dependent drug transporter that is
predominantly found
in the apical membranes of a number of epithelial cell types in the body,
including the
luminal membrane of the brain capillary endothelial cells that make up the
blood-brain
barrier. Expression of PGP, localized to cell membranes may affect the
bioavailability of
drug molecules that are substrates for this transporter. Knockout mice lacking
the gene
encoding P-glycoprotein show elevated brain concentrations of multiple
systemically
administered drugs, including opioids as wells as chemotherapeutic agents.
Chen and
Pollack, J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 287:545-552 (1998) and Thompson, et al.,
Anesthesiology
92:1392-1299 (2000).
Differences exist between the MRP and P-glycoprotein transporters. For
example,
resistance modulators useful against P-glycoprotein are less effective in
reversing MRP-
mediated resistance. It is not fully understood how MRP brings about drug
efflux, but it is
clear that the underlying mechanisms are different from those responsible for
P-
glycoprotein mediated drug efflux. In particular, glutathione (GSH) is
required for the
effective expulsion of anticancer agents via MRP transporting. Unlike P-
glycoprotein,
MRP is able to transport metallic oxyanions and glutathione and other
conjugates, including
peptidyl leukotrienes. Agents that inhibit organic ion transport, such as
probenecid, can
block MRP activity.
The blood brain barrier is a capillary barrier comprising a continuous layer
of tightly
bound endothelial cells. The interendothelial junctions between the cells of
the blood brain
barrier act to lceep potentially noxious substances away from the brain. The
continuity
produced by the tight junctions between individual cells of the blood brain
barrier enables
the cerebrocapillary endothelium to act like a plasma membrane. Small
molecules (m.w.
<200 daltons) having a high degree of lipid solubility and low ionization at
physiological
pH are freely passed through the blood brain barrier. However, larger
substances are
substantially excluded. This protects the brain microenvironment from rapid
changes in the
composition of the blood.
2
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Numerous pharmaceutical substances have their pharmacological action in the
central nervous system. However, delivering these pharmaceutical substances to
their
active sites in the central nervous system (CNS), particularly the brain, can
be problematic
due to the very limited permeability of the blood brain barrier, which
discourages transport
S of many therapeutically active agents into the brain. Additionally, the
blood brain barrier
may actively export molecules that cross the barrier, e.g., by leakage through
the tight
junctions between the endothelial cells or by non-specific passive diffusion
across the
endothelial membrane. After the compounds enter the brain, active efflux of
these
compound from the apical surface of the endothelial cells would place the
compounds back
into the endothelial cells and thus back into the blood. Such a mechanism
would effectively
decrease the cerebral concentration of these compounds.
One important class of CNS-active agents is the class of opioid compounds.
Opioid
receptor agonists, including morphine sulfate (hereafter called morphine or
MS), have been
marketed for many years and are widely used for the relief of moderate to
severe acute and
chronic pain. An opioid receptor agonist, such as morphine, exerts its primary
effects on
the central nervous system and organs containing smooth muscle, and acts as an
agonist
interacting with stereospecific and saturable binding sites or receptors in
the brain, spinal
cord, and other tissues. The principal therapeutic actions are analgesia and
sedation.
Opioid receptor antagonists are generally accepted for use in the treatment of
human
conditions of ailments for reversing opioid toxicity and overdoses, and in
preventing abuse
of opioid receptor agonists, such as heroin or morphine. For these uses, the
antagonists
such as naloxone or naltrexone is used in relatively high concentrations in
order to
effectively block the activity and/or effects of the opioid receptor agonist
by antagonizing
the opioid receptor agonist at opioid receptors on nociceptive neurons.
The ability of the blood brain barrier to protect the nervous system from
exogenous
substances has impeded the development of therapies for a wide variety of
disorders and
conditions of the central nervous system. Thus, a continuing need exists for
methods to
increase the ability of clinicians administer bioactive substances across the
blood brain
barrier. The blood brain barrier presents a particularly difficult obstacle to
treating
conditions in which the therapeutic agents must act upon sites within the
central nervous
system, particularly the brain.
3
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to novel methods and compositions with drug
transporter inhibitors. Such inhibitors according to the invention modulate
the activity of
ABC transporter proteins and include inhibitors of MDR proteins, such as PGP,
as well as
MRP proteins. Such methods and compositions are designed to achieve, for
example,
enhanced efficacy of opioid and/or non-opioid CNS-active agents, prevention
and/or
reversal of tolerance to, dependence upon or withdrawal from opioid andlor non-
opioid
CNS-active agents, as well as improved treatment of chronic pain patients.
The present invention is based in part on surprising results from transport
studies of
drug agents across the blood brain barrier that demonstrate that compounds of
a defined
structure according to the invention, including naltrexone, nalmafene and
naloxone, are
inhibitors of ABC transporter proteins, such as PGP, and unexpectedly increase
the
concentration in the brain of CNS-active agents, including opioid receptor
agonists such as
morphine and oxycodone. Also unexpectedly demonstrated is the reduction of
efflux of
such CNS-active agents from the brain by inhibitors of ABC transporter
proteins according
to the invention. The present invention provides a novel class of drug
transporter inhibitors
that act by inhibiting ABC transporter proteins and further provides a
pharmacophore that
allows the identif cation of new drug targets that are inhibitors of ABC
transporter proteins.
Also provided are new methods of screening for andlor identifying compounds
that inhibit
the transport (e.g., efflux or influx) of CNS-active agents across the blood
brain barrier.
Further provided are new methods of screening for and/or identifying CNS-
active agents
that are substrates for ABC transporter proteins. ABC transporter inhibitors
identified
according to the invention increase brain concentrations of CNS-active agents.
Such
inhibitors increase the influx into the brain and/or or reduce the efflux from
the brain of
such CNS-active agents.
The present invention provides methods and compositions for enhancing the
efficacy of a non-opioid CNS-active agent by co-administering to a patient a
therapeutic or
sub-therapeutic dose of the non-opioid CNS-active agent and an amount of an
inhibitor of a
drug transporter effective to reduce efflux of the non-opioid CNS-active agent
from the
brain and/or to increase the concentration of the non-opioid CNS-active agent
in the brain,
where the drug transporter is an ABC drug transporter.
4
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
The present invention also methods and compositions for enhancing the efficacy
of
an opioid CNS-active agent by co-administering a therapeutic or sub-
therapeutic dose of the
opioid CNS-active agent with a non-opioid drug transporter inhibitor, such
that the amount
of non-opioid drug transporter inhibitor is effective to reduce efflux of the
opioid CNS-
active agent from the brain and/or to increase the concentration of the opioid
CNS-active
agent in the brain.
The present invention further provides methods and compositions for reversing
or
preventing tolerance to CNS-active agent, including an opioid CNS-active
agent, by
administering a drug transporter inhibitor to a patient, including a patient
who is tolerant to
the CNS-active agent, such that the amount of drug transporter inhibitor
administered is
sufficient to decrease efflux of the CNS-active agent form the brain and/or to
increase the
concentration of the CNS-active agent in the brain.
The present invention also provides methods of treating a patient experiencing
chronic pain by co-administering to a patient a therapeutic or sub-therapeutic
dose of an
CNS-active agent, including an opioid CNS-active agent, and an amount of a
drug
transporter inhibitor effective to increase the concentration of the CNS-
active agent in the
brain. The co-administration may be repeated over a period of time that is
greater than the
period of time in which the patient would develop tolerance to or develop a
dependence
upon the CNS-active agent administered in the absence of the drug transporter
inhibitor.
The invention also provides methods of controlling chronic pain without
tolerance,
dependence andlor withdrawal by co-administering a therapeutic or sub-
therapeutic dose of
a CNS-active agent, including an opioid CNS-active agent, and an amount of a
drug
transporter inhibitor effective to decrease efflux of the CNS-active agent
form the brain
and/or increase the concentration of CNS-active agent, including an opioid CNS-
active
agent, in the brain.
The present invention further provides methods and composition for enhancing
the
efficacy of a non-opioid CNS-active agent by co-administering non-opioid CNS-
active
agent with an opioid receptor antagonist, such that the amount of antagonist
is effective to
reduce efflux of the agent from the brain and/or increase the concentration of
the agent in
the brain.
______ _ _
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 illustrates the chemical structures of naltrexone, naloxone, nalmefene,
6-(3-
naltrexol and nalorphine.
Fig. 2 presents an overlay of the opioid analogues, naltrexone, naloxone,
nalmefene, 6-[3-
naltrexol and nalorphine.
Fig. 3A shows the molecular orbitals and electrostatic potential of nalmefene
as
calculated using Spartan (Wavefunction, Inc.).
Fig. 3B shows the molecular orbitals and electrostatic potential of naloxone
as
calculated using Spartan (Wavefunction, Inc.).
FIG. 4A-HH provide the 200 nearest neighbors of opioid analogues examined in
the
QSAR analysis.
FIG. 5 illustrates the effect of naltrexone on the concentration of morphine
in the
brain of male and female rats.
FIG. 6 illustrates that administration of naltrexone to morphine-tolerant mice
breaks
tolerance.
FIG. 7 illustrates that administration of naltrexone in combination with
morphine
prevents the mice from developing a tolerance to morphine
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present invention is based in part on surprising results from transport
studies of
drug agents across the blood brain barrier that demonstrates that compounds
previously
identified as opioid receptor antagonists are inhibitors of ABC drug
transporter proteins,
including of the P-glycoprotein found at the blood brain barrier, PGPla.
Administration of
opioid receptor antagonists, such as naloxone, nalmefene and naltrexone,
unexpectedly
resulted in increased brain concentrations of co-administered therapeutic
agents, such as
CNS-active agents. Such antagonists also unexpectedly reduced the efflux
and/or increased
the influx of the co-administered agents. The present invention provides a
novel class of
drug transporter inhibitors that act by inhibiting ABC transporter proteins
and their
associated ATPase as described herein and fiu-ther provides a pharmacophore
that identifies
new drug targets that are inhibitors of ABC transporter proteins. As used
herein, the terms
"transporter" and "drug transporter" refer to a protein for the carrier-
mediated influx and
efflux of drugs and endocytosis of biologically active molecules, including
across a gut,
liver, or blood-brain barrier. An inhibitor of a transporter is expected to
increase the
_~____ ._.
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
bioavailability of an active agent according to the invention, wherein the
transporter
inhibitor reduces efflux across the blood-brain barrier, or the cellular
membrane of a
cancerous or microbial cell, thereby enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness
of the active
agent. Preferably the drug transporter protein is a member of the ABC
superfamily. The
drug transporter may either be a multidrug resistance protein (MDR) or a
multidrug
resistance-associated protein (MRP). The predominant difference between MDR
proteins
and MRPs is that MRPs require glutathione, in addition to ATP, in order to
transport
compounds across a biological barrier. Further, the range of substrates may
vary from one
drug transporter protein to another. ABC transporter inhibitors identified
according to the
invention can increase brain concentrations of co-administered agents that are
substrates of
the transporters.
However, among the ABC superfamily of drug transporters, there are several
closely
conserved regions, the WalkerA region, the WalkerB region, and a short
consensus
sequence (leucine-serine-glycine-glycine-glutamine, or LSGGQ). In particular,
the short
consensus sequence LSGGQ is found in essentially every known ABC protein. The
QSAR
analysis of the present invention provides the very surprising result that the
opioid receptor
antagonists that act as PGP inhibitors bind to this LSGGQ consensus sequence.
Thus the
present invention defnes a strictly conserved inhibition site shared among all
ABC drug
transporter proteins. Therefore, the opioid receptor antagonists of the
present invention will
function as an inhibitor of every ABC drug transporter protein that shares the
LSGGQ
conserved sequence.
Thus, the present invention is based upon the identification of a new class of
drug
transporter inhibitors. The term "inhibitor of a drug transporter" or "drug
transporter
inhibitor" refers to a compound that binds to a drug transporter protein and
inhibits, i. e.,
either completely blocks or merely slows, transport of compounds across
biological barriers.
An "ABC drug transporter inhibitor" refers to an inhibitor of one or more of
the proteins in
the ABC superfamily of drug transporters. Drugs that inhibit drug transporters
can alter the
absorption, disposition and elimination of co-administered drugs and can
enhance
bioavailability or cause unwanted drug-drug interactions. Interaction with
drug transporters
can be studied using either direct assays of drug transport in polarized cell
systems or with
indirect assays such as drug-stimulated ATPase activity and inhibition of the
transport of
fluorescent substrates. Drugs affected by the drug transporter, P-
glycoprotein, at the blood-
7
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
brain barrier include ondasetron, dexamethasone, domperidone, loperamide,
doxorubicin,
neifinavir, indinevir, sugguinavir, erythromycin, digoxin, vinblastine,
paclitaxel,
invermectin and cyclosporin. Known inhibitors of P-glycoprotein include
ketoconazole,
verapamil, quinidine, cyclosporin, digoxin, erythromycin and loperamide. See,
e.g., Intl. J.
Clin. Pharrnacol. Ther. 38:69-74 (1999). The present invention unexpectedly
identifies
opioid receptor antagonists, such as naloxone, naltrexone and nalmefene, as
potent
inhibitors of ABC drug transporters, such as P-glycoprotein.
An "opioid receptor antagonist" is an opioid compound or composition including
any active metabolite of such compound or composition that in a sufFcient
amount
attenuates (e.g., blocks, inhibits, prevents or competes with) the action of
an opioid receptor
agonist. An opioid receptor antagonist binds to and blocks (e.g., inhibits)
opioid receptors
on nociceptive neurons. Opioid receptor antagonists include: naltrexone
(marketed in SOmg
dosage forms as ReVia~ or Trexan~), nalaxone (marketed as Narcan~), nalmefene,
methylnaltrexone, naloxone, methiodide, nalorphine, naloxonazine, nalide,
nalmexone,
nalbuphine, nalorphine dinicotinate, naltrindole (NTI), naltrindole
isothiocyanate (NTII),
naltriben (NTB), nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), b-funaltrexamine (b-FNA),
BNTX,
cyprodime, ICI-174,864, LY117413, MR2266, or an opioid receptor antagonist
having the
same pentacyclic nucleus as nelmefene, naltrexone, nalorphine, nalbuphine,
thebaine,
levallorphan, oxymorphone, butorphanol, buprenorphine, levorphanol meptazinol,
pentazocine, dezocine, or their pharmacologically effective esters or salts.
In some
preferred embodiments, the opioid receptor antagonist is naltrexone,
nalmefene, naloxone,
or mixtures thereof.
In particular, the present invention contemplates enhancing the efficacy of
non-
opioid CNS-active agents by co-administering the CNS-active agent with an ABC
drug
transporter inhibitor, including an opioid transporter inhibitor, such as an
opioid receptor
antagonist. The opioid receptor antagonists, naltrexone, naloxone and
nalmefene, are
particularly suited for the present invention. The present invention also
contemplates
enhancing the eff cacy of opioid CNS-active agents, such as an opioid receptor
agonist, by
co-administering the opioid CNS-active agent, with a non-opioid ABC drug
transporter
inhibitor. Although some inhibitors of PGP are known in the art, many of these
axe
extremely toxic, especially if used repeatedly over a period of time. For
example, when
used orally, ketoconazole has been associated with hepatic toxicity, including
some
8
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
fatalities. The opioid receptor antagonists, however, historically have
limited side effects,
particularly at the low concentrations administered in the present invention.
Each of the
antagonists naltrexone, naloxone and nalmefene have been approved by the FDA
for use in
antagonistically effect amounts for treatment of opioid overdose and
addiction.
As explained in detail in Example 3, below, a quantitative structure-activity
relationship (QSAR) analysis of several opioid drug transporter inhibitors of
the present
invention defines a pharmacophore consisting of two essential hydroxyls (at
positions 3 and
14), a nitrogen with an appended hydrophobic region, and electron density at
the 6-position
of the opioid compounds. According to this defined pharmacophore, drug
transporter
inhibitors of the invention have the following formula:
H
R2
R~
7
wherein Rl is CHa or O;
wherein RZ is a cycloalkyl, unsubstituted aromatic, alkyl or alkenyl; and
wherein R3 is O, CH2 or NH.
Most particularly preferred are the opioid receptor antagonists, nalmefene
(Rl=CHa,
Ra=cyclopropanyl and R3=O), naloxone (R1=0, R2=ethylene and R3=O) and
naltrexone
(R1=0, R2=cyclopropanyl and R3=O).
The ABC drug transporter inhibitors, including opioid receptor antagonists
according to the invention may be co-administered with any non-opioid CNS-
active agent.
In addition, opioid CNS-active agents, including opioid receptor agonists, may
be co-
administered with non-opioid ABC drug transporter inhibitors according to the
invention.
Opioid receptor agonists may be additionally administered with the co-
administered CNS-
active agents and the ABC drug transporter inhibitors. The terms "co-
administer," "co-
administration," "concurrent administration" and "co-treatment" refer to
administration of
9
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
an active agent and a drug transporter inhibitor, in conjunction or
combination, together, or
before or after each other. The active agent and the drug transporter
inhibitor may be
administered by different routes. For example, the active agent may be
administered orally
and the drug transporter inhibitor intravenously, or vice versa. The active
agent and the
drug transporter inhibitor are preferably both administered orally, as
immediate or sustained
release formulations. The active agent and drug transporter inhibitor may be
administered
simultaneously or sequentially, as long as they are given in a manner to allow
both agents to
achieve effective concentrations to yield their desired therapeutic effects.
As used herein, the term "CNS-active agent" means any therapeutic agent that
acts
at a site within the central nervous system (CNS), especially within the
brain. CNS-active
agents include (1) general CNS depressants, such as, anesthetic gases and
vapors, aliphatic
alcohols, and some hypnotic-sedative drugs; (2) general CNS stimulants, such
as
pentylenetetrazol, and the methylxanthines; and (3) drugs that selectively
modify CNS
function, such as anticonvulsants, antiparkinsonism drugs, opioid and non-
opioid
analgesics, appetite suppressants, antiemetics, analgesic-antipyretics,
certain stimulants,
antidepressants, antimanic agents, antipsychotic agents, sedatives and
hypnotics. The class
of CNS-active agents are not limited to agents that act solely within the
central nervous
system. Examples of CNS-active agents are opioid receptor agonists, such as
morphine or
oxycodone, which binds to opioid receptors on nociceptive neurons. Examples of
non-
opioid CNS-active agents include, but are not limited to, valium, lithium,
halcyon and
ambien.
The amount of an ABC drug transporter inhibitor, such as opioid receptor
antagonist, that is necessary to increase the concentration of a co-
administered CNS-active
agent in the brain will vary from individual to individual. To an extent, the
amount of the
inhibitor, for example, an opioid receptor antagonist, necessary to achieve
the desired effect
will also vary from one antagonist to the next. This amount is readily
determinable by one
skilled in the art according to the invention.
In accordance with the invention, the ABC drug transporter inhibitor,
including an
opioid inhibitor such as an the opioid receptor antagonist or a non-opioid
inhibitor, may be
administered with a therapeutically effective amount of the CNS-active agent.
"Therapeutic
effect" or "therapeutically effective" refers to an effect or effectiveness
that is desirable and
that is an intended effect associated with the administration of an active
agent according to
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
the invention. For example, the therapeutic effect of a CNS-active agent that
is an opioid
receptor agonist would include analgesia or pain relief or feeling good or
calming so as to
reduce heart rate, blood pressure or breathing rate. A "therapeutic amount" is
the amount of
an active agent sufFcient to provide a therapeutic effect.
Alternatively, the ABC drug transporter inhibitor, such as an opioid receptor
antagonist, may be administered with a sub-therapeutic amount of the CNS-
active agent. A
"sub-therapeutic amount" is an amount of the active agent that does not cause
a therapeutic
effect in a patient administered the active agent alone, but when used in
combination with
the opioid or non-opioid drug transporter inhibitor is therapeutically
effective. Co-
administering a sub-therapeutic dose of the active agent with the ABC drug
transporter
inhibitor, such as an opioid receptor antagonist, has many clinical
advantages. By
administering a smaller amount of the therapeutic agent, it will be possible
to obtain the
same brain concentration of the active agent while providing a much lower
total systemic
concentration. This effect will result in fewer system side effects. Further,
it is not
uncommon for patients to develop tolerance to, dependence upon and/or
withdrawal from
therapeutic agents over prolonged treatment periods. Administration of sub-
therapeutic
doses of these tolerance-inducing drugs may keep the level of therapeutic
agent below that
necessary to develop tolerance, dependence and/or withdrawal symptoms.
However, co-
administration of an ABC drug transporter inhibitor with a therapeutic or sub-
therapeutic
dose of a therapeutic agent such as a CNS-active agent, according to the
invention enhances
efficacy of the agent and/or prevents, attenuates or reverses tolerance to,
dependence upon
and/or withdrawal from the agent.
An "adverse side effect" of an opioid agonist is a side effect in humans,
typically
associated with opioid analgesics such as morphine, including nausea vomiting,
dizziness,
somnolence/sedation, pruritus, reduced gastrointestinal motility including
constipation,
difficulty in urination, peripheral vasodilation including leading to
orthostatic hypotension,
headache, dry mouth, sweating, asthenia, dependence, mood changes (e.g.,
dysphoria,
euphoria), or lightheadedness. An "adverse side effect" also includes a
serious adverse side
effect such as respiratory depression or also apnea, respiratory arrest,
circulatory depression,
hypotension or shock.
In patients, opioid agonists have been documented to produce numerous adverse
side effects. Among the side effects that have been recognized for products
containing
11
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
morphine or other opioid agonists are: respiratory depression; depression of
the cough
reflex; miosis; reduced gastrointestinal motility including constipation;
peripheral
vasodilation which may result in orthostatic hypotension; and release of
histamine. Adverse
side effects that are of particular interest in human subjects include nausea,
vomiting,
dizziness, headache, somnolence (sedation), and pruritus. Some additional
adverse side
effects are listed in the Physician Desk Reference (PDR) for selected opioid
agonists as
follows: morphine: respiratory depression; apnea; circulatory depression;
shock respiratory
arrest, and cardiac arrest; oxycodone: light-headedness, euphoria, dysphoria,
constipation,
skin rash; hydrocodone: mental clouding, lethargy, impairment of mental and
physical
performance, anxiety, fear, dysphoria, dependence, mood changes; constipation;
ureteral
spasm; spasm of vesical sphincter and urinary retention; and tramadol:
seizures;
anaphylactoid reactions (lessened resistance to toxins); asthenia; sweating;
dyspepsia; dry
mouth; diarrhea; CNS stimulation ("CNS stimulation" is a composite that can
include
nervousness, anxiety, agitation, tremor, spasticity, euphoria, emotional
liability and
hallucinations); malaise; vasodilation; anxiety, confusion, coordination
disturbance,
euphoria, nervousness, sleep disorder; abdominal pain, anorexia, flatulence,
hypertonia,
rash, visual disturbance, menopausal symptoms, urinary frequency, urinary
retention.
The invention is based in part upon corresponding relationship between drug
transporter protein function and the concentration of the opioid agent in the
central nervous
system, particularly in the brain. Without being limited to a particular
theory, it is believed
that the increase in brain concentrations is mediated by inhibition of active
transport of the
CNS-active agents by, P-glycoprotein. The agents cross the blood brain barrier
according to
normal physiological paths, e.g., diffusion of lipophilic molecules across the
cell membrane
of the endothelial cells lining the cerebral capillaries. Once across the
blood brain barrier,
the agent is captured by the drug transporter protein and swept back to the
exterior side of
the blood brain barrier. Thus the active efflux of therapeutic agents results
in an artificially
low concentration of the agent within the central nervous system, particularly
in the brain.
As described in Example 3, some drug transporter inhibitors such as nalmefene
and
naltrexone additionally inhibit the ATPase activity of an ABC transporter
protein and
thereby may also increase influx of drugs through the ABC proteins
transmembrane
channel. Accordingly, increased brain concentrations of CNS-active agents that
are ABC
protein substrates may be achieved either through inhibiting active efflux by
the ABC
12
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
protein, or through increasing influx, for example, by inhibiting the
associated ATPase and
thus allowing passage through the ABC protein, or by a combination of both
decreasing
efflux and increasing influx.
As described in detail in the Examples below, co-administration of an opioid
CNS-
active agent, such as morphine, and a drug transporter inhibitor, such as
naltrexone, results
in a higher concentration of morphine in the brain as compared to that found
in a subject
who received morphine alone. Thus one aspect of the present invention provides
methods
of increasing the efficacy of opioid CNS-active agents by co-administering a
CNS-active
agent with an amount of a drug transporter inhibitor (e.g., a non-opioid
inhibitor) effective
to increase the concentration of the opioid agent in the brain.
Without being bound by a theory of the invention, it is believed that by
reducing
efflux and/or enhancing influx via modulation of an ABC drug transporter
and/or drug
transporter-associated ATPase activity, that it is possible to maintain
sufficient intracerebral
concentrations of the therapeutic agent to provide therapeutic benefit while
avoiding
adverse side effects. Specifically with regard to opioid CNS-active agents, it
is possible to
avoid depletion of the central store of endogenous opioids within the brain.
Thus the
adverse side effects of tolerance, dependence and/or withdrawal are avoided by
the present
invention and the beneficial effects of enhanced efficacy and/or reduced
toxicity is provided
by the present invention.
The term "opioid" refers to compounds or compositions including metabolites of
such compounds or compositions which bind to specific opioid receptors and
have agonist
(activation) or antagonist (inactivation) effects at these receptors, and thus
are "opioid
receptor agonists" or "opioid receptor antagonists." These include opioid
alkaloids, such as
the agonist morphine and its metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide and the
antagonist
naltrexone and its metabolite and opioid peptides, including enkephalins,
dynorphins and
endorphins. The opioid can be present as a member selected from an opioid base
and an
opioid pharmaceutically acceptable salt. The pharmaceutically acceptable salt
embraces an
inorganic or an organic salt. Representative salts include hydrobromide,
hydrochloride,
mutate, succinate, n-oxide, sulfate, malonate, acetate, phosphate dibasic,
phosphate
monobasic, acetate trihydrate, bi(heplafluorobutyrate), maleate,
bi(methylcarbamate),
bi(pentafluoropropionate), mesylate, bi(pyridine-3-carboxylate),
bi(trifluoroacetate),
bitartrate, chlorhydrate, fumarate and sulfate pentahydrate. The term "opiate"
refers to
13
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
drugs derived from opium or related analogs. A "non-opioid CNS-active agent"
is a CNS-
active agent, as defined above, that does not bind to specific opioid
receptors or if it binds
one that fails to activate or inactivate the receptor.
Many opioid CNS-active agents are opioid receptor agonists. An "opioid
receptor
agonist" is an opioid compound or composition including any active metabolite
of such
compound or composition that binds to and activates opioid receptors on
nociceptive
neurons, which mediate pain. Such opioid receptor agonists have analgesic
activity (with
measurable onset, peak, duration and/or total effect) and can product
analgesia. Opioid
receptor agonists according to the present invention include: alfentanil,
allylprodine,
alphaprodine, anileridine, apomorphine, apocodeine, benzylmorphine,
bezitramide,
buprenorphine, butorphanol, clonitazene, codeine, cyclazocine, cyclorphen,
cyprenorphine,
desomorphine, dextromoramide, dezocine, diampromide, dihydrocodeine,
dihyrdomorphine, dimenoxadol, dimepheptanol, dimethylthiambutene, dioxyaphetyl
butyrate, dipipanone, eptazocine, ethoheptazine, ethylmethylthiambutene,
ethylmorphine,
etonitazene, fentanyl, heroin, hydrocodone, hydroxymethylmorphinan,
hydromorphone,
hydroxypethidine, isomethadone, ketobemidone, levallorphan, levorphanol,
levophenacylmorphan, lofentanil, meperidine, meptazinol, metazocine,
methadone,
methylmorphine, metopon, morphine, myrophine, nalbuphine, narceine,
nicomorphine,
norlevorphanol, normethadone, nalorphine, normorphine, nozpipanone,
ohmefentanyl,
opium, oxycodone, oxymorphone, papaveretum, pentazocine, phenadoxone,
phenomorphan,
phenazocine, phenoperidine, pholcodine, piminodine, piritramide,
propheptazine, promedol,
profadol, properidine, propiram, propoxyphene, remifenanyl, sufentanyl,
tramadol, tilidine,
salts thereof, mixtures of any of the foregoing, mixed mu-
agonists/antagonists, mu-
antagonist combinations, or the like. Preferred opioid receptor agonists for
human use
include morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, codeine, fentanyl (and its
relatives),
hydromorphone, meperidine, methadone, oxymorphone, propoxyphene or tramadol,
or
mixtures thereof. Particularly preferred agonists include morphine, oxycodone,
hydrocodone or tramadol. Opioid receptor agonists include exogenous or
endogenous
opioids.
As a compound that activates opioid receptors on nociceptive neurons, opioid
receptor agonists are commonly used as analgesic agents. "Analgesia" refers to
the
attenuation, reduction or absence of sensibility to pain, including the
provision of pain
14
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
relief, the enhancement of pain relief, or the attenuation of pain intensity.
An "analgesic"
amount refers to an amount of the opioid receptor agonist which causes
analgesia in a
subject administered the opioid receptor agonist alone, and includes standard
doses of the
agonist which are typically administered to cause analgesia (i.e., mg doses).
An "analgesic"
amount refers to an amount that results in analgesic efficacy, for example, as
measured by a
subject with a pain relief score or a pain intensity difference score, at a
given timepoint, or
over time, or as compared to a baseline, and includes calculations based on
area under the
curve (AUC) such as TOTPAR or SPID from such pain relief scores or pain
intensity
difference scores. A "hypo-analgesic" amount is a less-than-analgesic amount,
including an
amount which is not analgesic or is weakly analgesic in a subject administered
the opioid
receptor agonist alone, and further includes an "anti-analgesic" or "algesic"
amount which
is an amount which increases pain. A "sub-analgesic" amount is an amount that
does not
cause analgesia in a subject administered the opioid receptor agonist alone,
but when used
in combination with the opioid receptor antagonist, results in analgesia.
For administration to human subjects or in the treatment of any clinical
conditions,
the pharmaceutical compositions or dosage forms of this invention may be
utilized in
compositions such as capsules, tablets or pills for oral administration,
suppositories for
rectal administration, liquid compositions for parenteral administration and
the like.
The pharmaceutical compositions or dosage forms of this invention may be used
in
the form of a pharmaceutical preparation, for example, in solid or semisolid
form, which
contains one or more of the drug transporter inhibitors, as an active
ingredient, alone, or in
combination with one or more therapeutic agents. Any drug transporter
inlubitor or
therapeutic agent may be in admixture with an organic or inorganic carrier or
excipient
suitable for external, enteral or parenteral applications. The drug
transporter inhibitor may
be compounded, for example, with the usual non-toxic, pharmaceutically
acceptable carriers
for capsules, tablets, pellets, suppositories, and any other form suitable for
use. The carriers
which can be used axe water, glucose, lactose, gum acacia, gelatin, mannitol,
starch paste,
magnesium, trisilicate, talc, corn starch, keratin, colloidal silica, potato
starch, urea and
other carriers suitable for use in manufacturing preparations, in solid or
semisolid form, and
in addition auxiliary, stabilizing, thickening and coloring agents and
perfumes may be used.
The drug transporter inhibitor, alone or in conjunction with a therapeutic
agent, is included
in the pharmaceutical composition or dosage form in an amount sufficient to
produce the
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
desired effect upon the process or condition, including a variety of
conditions and diseases
in humans.
For preparing solid compositions such as tablets, the drug transporter
inhibitor,
alone or in conjunction with therapeutic agent, is mixed with a pharmaceutical
carrier, e.g.,
conventional tableting ingredients such as corn starch, lactose, sucrose,
sorbitol, talc, stearic
acid, magnesium stearate, dicalcium phosphate or gums, and other
pharmaceutical diluents,
e.g., water, to form a solid preformulation composition containing a
homogeneous mixture
of a compound of the present invention, or a non-toxic pharmaceutically
acceptable salt
thereof. When referring to these preformulation compositions as homogeneous,
it is meant
that the drug transporter inhibitor, alone or in conjunction With therapeutic
agent, is
dispersed evenly throughout the composition so that the composition may be
readily
subdivided into equally effective unit dosage forms such as capsules, tablets,
caplets, or
pills. The capsules, tablets, caplets, or pills of the novel pharmaceutical
composition can be
coated or otherwise compounded to provide a dosage form affording the
advantage of
prolonged action. For example, the tablet or pill can comprise an inner dosage
and an outer
dosage component, the latter being in the form of an envelope over the former.
The two
components can be separated by an enteric layer which serves to resist
disintegration in the
stomach and permits the inner component to pass intact into the duodenum or to
be delayed
in release. A variety of materials can be used for such enteric layers or
coatings, such
materials including a number of polymeric acids and mixtures of polymeric
acids with such
materials as shellac, cetyl alcohol and cellulose acetate. Controlled release
(e.g., slow-
release or sustained-release) dosage forms, as well as immediate release
dosage forms are
specifically contemplated according to the present invention.
Compositions in liquid forms in which a therapeutic agent may be incorporated
for
administration orally or by injection include aqueous solution, suitable
flavored syrups,
aqueous or oil suspensions, and emulsions with acceptable oils such as
cottonseed oil,
sesame oil, coconut oil or peanut oil, or with a solubilizing or emulsifying
agent suitable for
intravenous use, as well as elixirs and similar pharmaceutical vehicles.
Suitable dispersing
or suspending agents for aqueous suspensions include synthetic and natural
gums such as
tragacanth, acacia, alginate, dextran, sodium carboxymethylcellulose,
methylcellulose,
polyvinylpyrrolidone or gelatin.
16
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Compositions for inhalation or insufflation include solutions and suspensions
in
pharmaceutically acceptable, aqueous or organic solvents, or mixtures thereof,
and powders.
The liquid or solid compositions may contain suitable pharmaceutical 1v
acceptable
excipients as set out above. Preferably the compositions are administered by
the oral or
nasal respiratory route for local or systemic effect. Compositions in
preferably sterile
pharmaceutically acceptable solvents may be nebulized by use of inert gases.
Nebulized
solutions may be breathed directly from the nebulizing device or the
nebulizing device may
be attached to a face mask, tent or intermittent positive pressure breathing
machine.
Solution, suspension or powder compositions may be administered, preferably
orally or
nasally, from devices which deliver the formulation in an appropriate manner.
A drug transporter inhibitor alone, or in combination with a therapeutic
agent, may
be administered to the human subject by known procedures including but not
limited to oral,
sublingual, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intravenous, intratracheal,
transmucosal, or
transdermal modes of administration. When a combination of these compounds are
administered, they may be administered together in the same composition, or
may be
administered in separate compositions. If the therapeutic agent and the drug
transporter
inhibitor are administered in separate compositions, they may be administered
by similar or
different modes of administration, or may be administered simultaneously with
one another,
or shortly before or after the other.
The drug transporter inhibitors alone, or in combination with therapeutic
agents are
formulated in compositions with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier
("pharmaceutical
compositions"). The carrier must be "acceptable" in the sense of being
compatible with the
other ingredients of the formulation and not deleterious to the recipient
thereof. Examples
of suitable pharmaceutical carriers include lactose, sucrose, starch, talc,
magnesium stearate,
crystalline cellulose, methyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, glycerin,
sodium alginate,
gum arabic, powders, saline, water, among others. The formulations may
conveniently be
presented in unit dosage and may be prepared by methods well-known in the
pharmaceutical art, by bringing the active compound into association with a
carrier or
diluent, or optionally with one or more accessory ingredients, e.g., buffers,
flavoring agents,
surface active agents, or the like. The choice of carrier will depend upon the
route of
administration. The pharmaceutical compositions may be administered as solid
or
semisolid formulations, including as capsules, tablets, caplets, pills or
patches.
17
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Formulations may be presented as an immediate-release or as a controlled-
release
(e.g., slow-release or sustained-release) formulation, including, for example,
methadone
hydrochloride, Dolophine (Roxane); lVIethadose (Mallinkrodt); hydrocodone
bitartrate and
acetaminophen (Vicodin, Knoll Labs); Lortab (LJCB); oxycodone hydrochloride,
OxyContin, sustained release (Purdue); tramadol (IJItram, Johnson 8~ Johnson);
meperidine
hydrochloride (Demerol, Sanofi); hydromorphone hydrochloride (Dilaudid, Knoll
Labs);
codeine sulfate (Roxane); or propoxyphene hydrochloride (Darvon, Lilly).
For oral or sublingual administration, the formulation may be presented as
capsules,
tablets, caplets, powders, granules or a suspension, with conventional
additives such as
lactose, mannitol, corn starch or potato starch; with binders such as
crystalline cellulose,
cellulose derivatives, acacia, corn starch, gelatins, natural sugars such as
glucose or beta-
lactose, corn sweeteners, natural and synthetic gums such as acacia,
tragacanth, or sodium
alginate, carboxymethylcellulose, polyethylene glycol, waxes, or the like;
with
disintegrators such as corn starch, potato starch, methyl cellulose, agar,
bentonite, xanthan
gums, sodium carboxymethyl-cellulose or the like; or with lubricants such as
talc, sodium
oleate,. sodium stearate, magnesium stearate, sodium benzoate, sodium acetate,
sodium
chloride or the like.
For transdermal administration, the compounds may be combined with skin
penetration enhancers such as propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol,
isopropanol, ethanol,
oleic acid, N-methylpyrrolidone, or the like, which increase the permeability
of the skin to
the compounds, and permit the compounds to penetrate through the skin and into
the
bloodstream. The compound/enhancer compositions also may be combined
additionally
with a polymeric substance such as ethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose,
ethylene/
vinylacetate, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, or the like, to provide the composition
in gel form,
which can be dissolved in solvent such as methylene chloride, evaporated to
the desired
viscosity, and then applied to backing material to provide a patch.
For intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous administration, the compounds
may
combined with a sterile aqueous solution which is preferably isotonic with the
blood of the
recipient. Such formulations may be prepared by dissolving solid active
ingredient in water
containing physiologically compatible substances such as sodium chloride,
glycine, or the
Like, and/or having a buffered pH compatible with physiological conditions to
produce an
18
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
aqueous solution, and/or rendering said solution sterile. The formulations may
be present in
unit or mufti-dose containers such as sealed ampoules or vials.
When the drug transporter inhibitor is used in combination with the
therapeutic
agent, the amount of the therapeutic agent administered may be a therapeutic
or sub-
s therapeutic amount. As used herein, a "therapeutic" amount is the amount of
the
therapeutic agent which causes a therapeutic effect in a subject administered
the therapeutic
agent alone. The amount of the drug transporter inhibitor may be an amount
effective to
enhance the therapeutic potency of and/or attenuate the adverse side effects
of the
therapeutic agent. The optimum amounts of the drug transporter inhibitor
administered
alone or in combination with a therapeutic agent will of course depend upon
the particular
drug transporter inhibitor and therapeutic agent used, the carrier chosen, the
route of
administration, and/or the pharmacokinetic properties of the subject being
treated.
When the drug transporter inhibitor is administered alone, the amount of the
drug
transporter inhibitor administered is an amount effective to enhance or
maintain the
therapeutic potency of the therapeutic agent and/or attenuate or maintain the
adverse side
effects of the therapeutic agent. This amount is readily determinable by one
skilled in the
art according to the invention.
Compounds can be tested in vitro for their ability to serve as inhibitors of
drug
transporter proteins. Cells expressing a drug transporter, such as P-
glycoprotein, are
suitable for use in in vitro, screens. Details of an appropriate protocol for
testing compounds
for their ability to inhibit PGP-associated drug transport are given in the
Examples. The
method described involves growing a monolayer of PGP-expressing cells in such
a manner
~as to present PGP on only one face of the monolayer, then applying a known
PGP substrate
and the test substance to the PGP-presenting side of the monolayer. After a
period of
incubation, the level of PGP substrate is measured on the non-PGP-presenting
side of the
monolayer. Inhibition of the drug transporter protein is characterized by a
decreased
concentration of PGP substrate on the non-PGP-presenting side of the monolayer
as
compared to the concentration found if the experiment is performed in the
absence of test
substrate.
Alternatively, inhibitors of drug transporter proteins can be identified by
assaying
for ATPase activity. In this type of assay, the ability of the test substrate
to inhibit the
ATPase activity of a drug transporter activated by a known substrate is.
examined. The test
19
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
substances are incubated with ABC drug transporter containing-membranes and
supplemented with MgATP, with and without sodium orthovanadate present.
Orthovanadate
inhibits PGP by trapping MgADP in the nucleotide binding site. Thus, the
ATPase activity
measured in the presence of orthovanadate represents non-PGP ATPase activity
and was
subtracted from the activity generated without orthovanadate to yield vanadate-
sensitive
ATPase activity.
Use of these screening protocols would result in identification of compounds
that
can modulate the activity of drug transporter proteins at the blood brain
barrier.
Accordingly, these compound would also be expected to decrease the efflux of
therapeutic
agents from the brain.
The present invention is described in the following examples which are set
forth to
aid in the understanding of the invention, and should not be construed to
limit in any way
the invention as defined in the claims which follow thereafter.
EXAMPLES
Example 1- Opioid Receptor Antagonists Inhibit Human PGP-Mediated Transport
Porcine kidney-derived, LLC-PKI, cells expressing human PGP cDNA (designated
15B-J) were cultured in 24 well TranswellTM culture inserts at 37° C on
an orbital shaker.
Transport assays were conducted in 24 well TranswellTM culture inserts with
Hanks
Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffered with the addition of 10 mM HEPES (pH
7.2).
The test substances, naloxone, naltrexone and nalmefene, were purchased from
Sigma-
Aldrich. Stock solutions of the compounds were made in DMSO, and dilutions of
these in
transport buffer were prepared for assay in the manolayers. The DMSO
concentration
(0.55%) was constant for all conditions within the experiment. All test
substance and
control drug solutions prepared in HBSS/HEPES buffer contained 0.55% DMSO.
The test substance was added to the donor and receiver chambers. Duplicate
monolayers and thirteen test substance concentrations of 0.0001, 0.0003,
0.001, 0.003, 0.01,
0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10, 30 and 100 ~,M were used. PGP substrate [3H]-
digoxin, at 5 p,M
was added to the donor chamber (either the apical or basolateral chamber
depending on the
direction of transport). After an incubation time of 90 minutes, a sample from
the receiver
chamber was analyzed for the amount of digoxin present. The positive control
for
inhibition was 25 ~,M ketoconazole added to donor and receiver chambers with 5
~,M [3H]-
digoxin added to the donor chamber. The negative control for inhibition was 5
~,M [3H]-
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
digoxin added to the donor chamber (either the apical or basolateral chamber
depending on
the direction of transport) with Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffered
with the
addition of 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) and DMSO at 0.55% in the receiver chamber.
The rate of digoxin transported from the apical chamber to the basolateral
chamber
(A to B) and from the basolateral chamber to the apical chamber (B to A) was
measured and
apparent permeability Papp constants calculated. The polarization ratio Papp s
to A~'app a was
calculated. A lower polarization ratio in the 15B-J cells with test substance
relative to that
without test substance provides evidence for inhibition of PGP-mediated
digoxin transport
by the test substance. Transport of 5 ~,M [3H]-digoxin was measured following
coincubation with the test substances at nominal concentrations in the range
of 0 to 100 ~.M.
Inhibition of digoxin transport was calculated by comparison of the digoxin
polarization
ratio in the presence of the test substance, to the ratio in the absence of
test substance. The
positive control for inhibition was 25 ~,M ketoconazole coincubated with
digoxin. The
inhibition of PGP-mediated transport in human PGP-expressing porcine kidney
cell
monolayers by naloxone is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Natoxone inhibition of PGP-mediated transport
Digoxin I~etoconazole
Naloxone Polarization% InhibitionNormalized
Concentr<~tion Ratio of Digoxin % Inhibition
( M) of
nominal measured (B-A/A-B) Transport Digoxin Transport
0 - 3.7 - -
0.0001 0.000021 3.5 4.4 6.2
0.0003 0.000138 3.5 6.0 8.4
0.001 0.00085 3.4 7.3 10
0.03 0.0021 3.6 4.0 5.7
0.01 0.0083 3.8 -3.2 -4.5
0.03 0.021 3.5 4.1 5.7
0.1 0.074 3.8 -1.9 -2.7
0.3 0.264 3.3 11.9 17
1 1.04 3.5 5.5 7.8
The inhibition of PGP-mediated transport in human PGP-expressing porcine
kidney
cell monolayers by naltrexone is summarized in Table 2.
21
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Table 2: Naltrexone inhibition of PGP-mediated transport
ConcentrationPolarization% InhibitionKetoconazole
Naltrexone ratio (B-A/A-B)of Normalized
(~,M) Digoxin Inhibition
Transport of
Digoxin
Transport
0 4.0 - -
0.0001 3.6 10
0.0003 3.5 14
0.001 3.6 10
0.003 3.7 8
0.01 3.5 11
0.03 3.8 5
0.1 3.5 14
0.3 3.3 18
1.0 3.4 14
The inhibition of PGP-mediated transport in human PGP-expressing porcine
kidney
cell monolayers by nalmefene is summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Nalmefene inhibition of PGP-mediated transport
ConcentrationPolarization% Inhibition Ketoconazole
Nalmefene Ratio of Normalized
(p,M) (B-A/A-B) Digoxin TransportInhibition of
Digoxin
Trans ort
0 4.5 - -
0.0001 4.3 5.2
0.0003 4.2 7.2
0.001 4.4 2.8
0.003 4.3 5.1
0.01 4.3 3.9
0.03 4.8 -7.2
0.1 4.5 -0.3
0.3 4.8 -5.6
1.0 4.6 -2.6
22
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Naloxone and naltrexone exhibited inhibitory behavior at the 30 and 100 ~.M
concentrations. Digoxin transport appears to have been slightly inhibited at
naloxone and
naltrexone concentrations below 30 ~M, however the inhibition was not
concentration-
dependent. Digoxin transport was increasingly inhibited in response to
increasing
concentration of nalmefene at concentrations between 3 and 100 ~,M. The
positive control,
25 ~,M ketoconazole, inhibited digoxin transport within the accepted range,
indicating that
the cell model performed as expected.
Example 2: 6-~6-Naltrexol Does Not Inhibit Human PGP-Mediated Transport
Porcine kidney-derived, LLC-PKI, cells expressing human PGP cDNA (designated
15B-J) were cultured in 24 well TranswellTM culture inserts at 37° C on
an orbital shaker.
Transport assays were conducted in 24 well TranswellTM culture inserts with
Hanks
Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffered with the addition of 10 mM HEPES (pH
7.2).
The test substance, 6-(3-naltrexol, was provided by LC Resources, Inc. Stock
solutions of the compounds were made in DMSO, and dilutions of these in
transport buffer
were prepared for assay in the monolayers. The DMSO concentration (0.55%) was
constant
for all conditions within the experiment. All test substance and control drug
solutions
prepared in HBSS/HEPES buffer contained 0.55% DMSO.
The test substance was added to the donor and receiver chambers. Duplicate
monolayers and thirteen test substance concentrations of 0.0001, 0.0003,
0.001, 0.003, 0.01,
0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 ~M, were used. PGP substrate [3H]-
digoxin, at 5 ~.M
was added to the donor chamber (either the apical or basolateral chamber
depending on the
direction of transport). After an incubation time of 90 minutes, a sample from
the receiver
chamber was analyzed fox the amount of digoxin present. The positive control
for
inhibition was 25 ~,M ketoconazole added to donor and receiver chambers with 5
~M [3H]-
digoxin added to the donor chamber. The negative control for inhibition was 5
~M [3H]-
digoxin added to the donor chamber (either the apical or basolateral chamber
depending on
the direction of transport) and Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffered
with the
addition of 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) and DMSO at 0.55% in the receiver chamber.
Transport of 5 ~,M [3H]-digoxin was measured following coincubation with test
substance 6-[3-naltrexol, at nominal concentrations in the range of 0 to 100
~,M. Inhibition
of digoxin transport was calculated by comparison of the digoxin polarization
ratio in the
23
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
presence of the test substance, to the ratio in the absence of test substance.
The positive
control for inhibition was 25 pM ketoconazole coincubated with digoxin.
Digoxin efflux in the human PGP-expressing cell monolayers was slightly
inhibited
(mean of 8.5 +/- 7.1%) by 6-(3-naltrexol in the concentration range of 0.0001
to 30 ~.M
(Table 4 The inhibition did not appear to be concentration-dependent. At 100
~,M 6-(3-
naltrexol, however, digoxin transport was more strongly inhibited (28%). The
positive
control, 25 ~,M ketoconazole, inhibited digoxin transport within the accepted
range,
indicating that the cell model performed as expected.
Table 4: 6-(3-naltrexol inhibition of PGP-mediated transport
Nominal Polarization
concentration Ratio Tnhibition
of
of 6-(3-naltrexol(B-A/A-B) Digoxin
Transport
0 4.7 -
0.0001 4.4 6.4
0.0003 4.7 0
0.001 4.8 -2.1
0.003 4.7 0
0.01 4.6 2.1
0.03 4.2 11
0.1 3.8 19
0.3 4.3 9
1.0 4.0 15
3.0 4.2 11
4.0 15
30 4.0 15
100 3.4 28
25~,M Ketoconazole1.0 79
The test substance 6-~3-naltrexol was not a potent inhibitor of PGP-mediated
digoxin
transport, in the concentration range tested.
24
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Example 3 - Opioid Receptor Antagonists Inhibit PGP ATPase Activity
The test substances, naloxone, naltrexone and nalmefene, were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich. Stock solutions of the compounds were made in DMSO, and
dilutions of
these in transport buffer were prepared for assay in the monolayers. The DMSO
concentration (0.55%) was constant for all conditions within the experiment.
All test
substance and control drug solutions prepared in HBSS/HEPES buffer contained
0.55%
DMSO.
The test substances were incubated in the membranes and supplemented with
MgATP, with and without sodium orthovanadate present. Orthovanadate inhibits
PGP by
trapping MgADP in the nucleotide binding site. Thus, the ATPase activity
measured in the
presence of orthovanadate represents non-PGP ATPase activity and was
subtracted from the
activity generated without orthovanadate to yield vanadate-sensitive ATPase
activity.
ATPase assays were conducted in 96-well microtiter plates. A 0.06 ml reaction
mixture containing 40 ~g PGP membranes, test substance, and 4 mM MgATP, in
buffer
containing 50 mM Tris-MES, 2 mM EGTA, 50 mM K.CI, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 5
mM
sodium azide, plus organic solvent was incubated at 37°C for 20
minutes. Triplicate
incubations of ten test substance concentrations (of 0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1,
0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10,
30 and 100 ~,M) and the test vehicle without drug, were used. Identical
reaction mixtures
containing 100 ~M sodium orthovanadate were assayed in parallel. The reactions
were
stopped by the addition of 30 p,1 of 10% SDS + Antifoam A. The incubations
were
followed with addition of 200 p,1 of 35 mM Ammonium Molybdate in 15 mM Zinc
Acetate:
10% Ascorbic Acid (1:4) and incubated for an additional 20 minutes at
37°C. Additionally,
0.06 ml aliquots of potassium phosphate standards prepared in the buffer
described above,
were incubated in the plates containing the test and control substances, with
SDS and
detection reagent added. The liberation of inorganic phosphate was detected by
its
absorbance at 800 nm and quantitated by comparing the absorbance to a
phosphate standard
curve. The concentration dependence of the PGP was analyzed for evidence of
saturation of
PGP-ATPase activity, and apparent kinetic parameters were calculated by non-
lineax
regression. The positive control for stimulation of ATPase activity was 20 ~,M
verapamil,
and the positive control for inhibition of basal ATPase activity was 25 mM
ketoconazole.
In a semi-quantitative assay for ATPase inhibition, Naltrexone, Naloxone and
Nalmefene were shown to inhibit the ATPase associated with PGP 1 a as shown in
Table 5.
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Table 5: Vanadate-sensitive ATPase Activity
ConcentrationActivity
(nmol/mg
min)
(~,M) Naloxone Naltrexone Nalmefene
100 1.8 4.6 3.2
30 1.9 - 2.3
2 - -
3 1.7 - -
1 0.4 - -
The order of inhibition of the PgP 1 a associated ATPase was nalmefene,
naltrexone
and naloxone. Naloxone only weakly inhibited the PGPla associated ATPase. None
of the
compounds were stimulators of ATPase.
Example 4 - Molecular Modeling of ABC Transporter Inhibitors
A molecular modeling analysis was performed on a series of compounds,
including
opioid analogues, to elucidate their mode of interaction with PGP-la, and to
determine, if
possible, a pharmacophore for drug transporter inhibitors useful according to
the present
10 invention. Exemplary compounds in this study were naltrexone, naloxone,
nalmefene, 6-(3-
naltrexol and nalorphine. The structures of compounds are illustrated in Fig.
1. The
compounds are structurally very similar, and exhibit two measured activities.
"Activity 1"
is characterized by a low capacity, high affinity binding site with activity
ranging from 0.3
nM to greater than 200 ~M. On the other hand, "activity 2" is characterized by
a high
capacity, low affinity binding site with activity ranging from 10 ~,M to
greater than 100 ~M.
Table 6 provides the biological activities for each of the exemplary
compounds.
Table 6: Biological Activity of Exemplary Compounds
Compound Activity Activity
1 2
Nalmefene 0.3 nM 100 ~.M
Naltrexone 0.3 nM 100 ~,M
Naloxone 1.0 nM 30 p,M
6-[3-Naltrexol 0.1 nM 100 ~M
Nalorphine N/A N/A
26
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
In performing the calculations for the molecular modeling analysis, two
assumptions
were made. First, nalorphine exhibits no measurable activity. Second, the
structures of the
compounds as represented in the Merck Index represent the active form of the
compound.
An important difference in these compounds is that nalorphine lacks the
hydroxyl
group in the central ring at position 14 (see, e.g., Figure 1), indicating
that this hydroxyl
group is a requirement for activity. The most active compounds (nalmefene and
naltrexone) each have a hydrophobic group (cyclopropyl) tethered to the
nitrogen,
indicating that a hydrophobic moiety is partially responsible for the higher
activity in these
compounds. This moiety may be viewed as a necessary, but not sufficient
condition, since
several of the inactive compounds also possess this hydrophobic region.
Initial activity data
suggest that the electron density present at this location in naloxone (due to
the ethylene
substituent [C=C]) is contributory to its lower activity. The observation that
6-(3-Naltrexol
is even less active is attributed to the hydroxyl substituent at the 6
position being oriented (3
to the ring system, perhaps penetrating a sterically limited region in the
receptor.
In summary, the analysis indicates that the presence of the hydroxyl group at
the 14-
position may be required for activity, since nalorphine, with no measured
activity, lacks this
moiety. In addition, the two most active compounds (nalmefene and naltrexone)
possess an
ethylene group and a carbonyl group respectively at the 6-position. This may
represent a
requirement for electron density at this position, rather than a hydrogen-bond
acceptor site,
as there is only a one order of magnitude difference in activity (0.3nM vs.
3nM) between
the ethylene group (nalmefene) and the carbonyl group (naltrexone). There is a
potential
steric limit for substituent size or directionality at the 6-position. 6-(3
Naltrexol places its
hydroxyl group in a direction that penetrates into this region. Finally, a
hydrophobic group
is required as the N-substituent for highest activity, as naloxone, with a
double bond rather
than the cyclopropyl group, exhibits significantly lower activity.
When the novel analysis described above is now considered in conjunction with
a
recent scientific article investigated the ability of a variety of
peptidomimetic thrombin
inhibitors to inhibit intestinal transport [Kamm et al., "Transport of
peptidomimetic
thrombin inhibitors with a 3-amino-phenylalanine structure: permeability and
efflux
mechanism in monolayers of a human intestinal cell line (Caco-2)." Pharm. Res.
18:1110-8
(2001)], it is possible to utilize additional structural information from Kamm
to perform
additional analyses and modeling. Kamm et al. proposed that basic and acidic
residues of
27
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
amidino-phenylalanine-derived thrombin inhibitors mediate affinity to
intestinal efflux
pumps, presumably PGP and MRP. Structural information from Kamm et al. useful
in the
novel QSAR analysis of the present invention is summarized below.
4R
S Table 7: R-groups of compounds Kamm et al.
Structure Rl R2 R3 X R4
NH2
1 Me H H C ~
'" N H
NH2
2 H COOH H C
~NH
NH2
3 H COO-Me H C
'" NH
NH2
4 H H COOH C
~NH
NH2
S H H COO-Me C
'" N H
NH2
6 COOH H H C '" NH
NH2
7 COO-Me H H C ~
'" NH
OH
8 COON H H C HN
J 'NH
28
R1
R't Y
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Structure RI R2 R3 X R4
Me
,
9 COON H H C HN
~NH
NH2
H H H N
NH
11 ~ H H N NH2
Me ~NH
- NHZ
( 12) Me H H C
~NH
13 Me H H C NHZ
14 Me H H C -CH2NH2
OH
Me H H C HN
/ 'NH
Me
16 Me H H C HN
The intestinal permeability coefficients of the Kamm compounds were studied
using
Caco-2 monolayers and reverse-phase HPLC method for quantitation. Further the
efflux
ratios (transport from B to Aaransport from A to B) were calculated. The
efflux ratios for a
selection of the Kamm compounds measured at 250 ~M are provided in Table 8.
29
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Table 8; Efflux Ratios at 250 ~,M
Efflux Ratio
Structure B~~A~B
1 45.0
2 2.8
3 10.5
4 2.7
11.1
6 1.9
7 6.0
8 22.1
9 1.1
0.8
11 2.4
The efflux ratios the remaining Kamm compounds measured at 100 ~,M are
provided in Table 9.
Table 9: Efflux Ratios at 100 ~,M
Efflux Ratio
Structure
B-~A/A-~B
1 16.3
12 24.9
13 1.14
14 3.43
1S 1.31
16 13.0
Comparable measurements for the opioid analogues are provided in Table 10. The
data of Table 10 was obtained from the experiments described in Example 1.
Efflux ratios
normalized to 25 p.M ketoconazole (Keto) are presented in parentheses after
the measured
10 ratios.
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Table 10: Efflux Ratios of Opioid Analogues
Keto Activity Activity
Structure 1 2
--
@25~M [C] pM B~A/A~B ~C~ !~M B-~A/A--~B
Nalmefene 1.4 0.0003 4.2 (3.0) 100 2.6 ( 1.9)
Naltrexone 1.0 0.0003 3.5 (3.5) 100 2.7 (2.7)
Naloxone 1.1 0.001 3.4 (3.1) 30 2.6 (2.4)
Naloxone 100 2.7 (2.5)
6-(3-Naltrexol1.0 0.0001 4.4 (4.4) 100 3.4 (3.4)
An overlay of the opioid analogue structures is presented in Fig. 2. All
active
("Activity 1") compounds share the following features: two hydroxyl groups (a)
at positions
3 and 14, a furan ring system, a hydrophobic region in ring system, a region
of electron
density at position 6 (b), and a cyclic tertiary nitrogen (c) with an appended
hydrophobic
group (d).
Molecular Orbital calculations were performed on the compounds using Spartan
(Wavefunction, Inc.). There were no appreciable differences among the active
compounds
with respect to their electrostatic potentials. The electrostatic potential of
nalmefene and
naloxone are illustrated in FIGS. 3A and B respectively. The arrows indicate
the hydroxyl
group hydrogen-bond donor sites noted above.
Two views of an overlay of nalmefene and the low energy conformer of Kamm
Compound 1 was prepared. The ring stacking structure predicted by Confort for
the Kamm
compounds embodies a conserved hydrophobic region shared by the both the Kamm
compounds and the exemplary opioid compounds. The hydrogen-bond donor sites
noted in
the FIG. 3 are overlap the predicted hydrogen bonding sites of the Kamm
compound. The
nalmefene furan ring oxygen overlays on an aromatic ring in Kamm Compound l,
suggesting that the oxygen atom is not necessary for this activity.
1~ silico analyses of chemical compounds were conducted as follows. Diversity
estimations were made on nalmefene, naloxone, naltrexone, 6-(3-naltrexol, and
the 16
Kamm et al structures using DiverseSolutions software from Tripos (R.S.
Pearlman, UT-
Austin). A chemistry space defined by approximately 900,000 chemical entities
(several
commercially available databases of compounds) was used as a reference. The
commercial
databases used as sources of the 900,000 chemical entities were MDL
Information Systems
31
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
(http://www.mdli.com), ACD Database
(htt~://www.mdli.com/c~i/dynamic/product.html?uid=$uid&ke~$key&id=17), NCI
(http://dtp.nci.nih.~ov/docs/3d database/structural information/smiles
strin~s.html),
Aldrich (http://www.sigma-aldrich.com/saws.nsf/home?openframeset), ASINEx Ltd.
(http://www.asinex.com), and Chemstar (http:l/www.chemstar.ru). A transporter-
relevant
subspace was determined based on the former chemistry space, using the "B-~A l
A-jB"
efflux ratios to represent the activities. In order to have sufFcient data,
the Kamm et al data
was combined with the high affinity/low capacity data provided for the
exemplary opioid
compounds. The 200 "nearest neighbors" are listed in Table 11 below. Note that
in the
Receptor-Relevant Subspace, the active compounds are focused in a small region
of the
overall chemistry space.
Table 11: 200 Nearest Neighbors
Rank Database LD. # Distance
to Exemplary
compound
1 70413 0.0096 to Naloxone
2 MFCD00133650 0.0184 to Nalmefene
3 349115 0.4061 to Nalmefene
4 BAS 3387173 0.5101 to Naloxone
5 BAS 1002455 0.5195 to Naloxone
6 BAS 3387155 0.5243 to Naloxone
7 BAS 1268016 0.5345 to Naloxone
8 BAS 3387156 0.5412 to Naloxone
9 BAS 3387130 0.5462 to Naloxone
10 MFCD01935543 0.5507 to Naloxone
11 688277 0.5913 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
12 BAS 1002441 0.6179 to Naloxone
13 BAS 3386059 0.6369 to Naloxone
14 BAS 1003176 0.6370 to Naloxone
BAS 1004848 0.6434 to Naloxone
16 MFCD00273259 0.6436 to Nalmefene
17 MFCD00273270 0.6458 to Naloxone
18 MFCD00273266 0.6482 to Naloxone
32
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Rank Database LD. # Distance
to Exemplary
compound
19 BAS 3386023 0.6526 to Naloxone
20 BAS 2026128 0.6569 to Naloxone
21 617005 0.6581 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
22 MFCD00079194 0.6622 to 6-[3-Naltrexol
23 19045 0.6665 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
24 76021 0.6733 to Nalmefene
25 BAS 1002442 0.6770 to Naloxone
26 MFCD00271723 0.6822 to Naloxone
27 MFCD00273273 0.6884 to Nalmefene
28 MFCD00273264 0.6968 to Nalmefene
29 BAS 2026145 0.6977 to Naloxone
30 BAS 3387114 0.7036 to Naloxone
31 376679 0.7051 to Naltrexone
32 379963 0.7051 to Naltrexone
33 157870 0.7144 to Nalmefene
34 MFCD00273274 0.7198 to Naloxone
35 MFCD00273260 0.7228 to Nalmefene
36 BAS 1003163 0.7272 to Naloxone
37 BAS 1003182 0.7388 to Naltrexone
38 BAS 0510629 0.7564 to Naltrexone
39 BAS 1002419 0.7571 to Naloxone
40 18579 0.7600 to Nalmefene
41 58796 0.7600 to Nalmefene
42 BAS 1004835 0.7634 to Naloxone
43 BAS 2004373 0.7646 to Naloxone
44 693856 0.7680 to Nalmefene
45 MFCD01764789 0.7687 to Naloxone
46 MFCD00271738 0.7719 to Nalmefene
47 BAS 2025996 0.7741 to Naloxone
48 BAS 2282169 0.7798 to Nalmefene
33
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Rank Database LD. # Distance
to Exemplary
compound
49 MFCD00273268 0.7895 to Naloxone
50 MFCD00179880 0.7997 to Naloxone
51 BAS 1507170 0.8014 to Nalmefene
52 BAS 3386088 0.8017 to Naloxone
53 MFCD00272082 0.8183 to Nalmefene
54 MFCD00271113 0.8289 to 6-[3-Naltrexol
55 116054 0.8308 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
56 BAS 1004837 0.8352 to Naloxone
57 134536 0.8364 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
58 615801 0.8556 to Naltrexone
59 404374 0.8695 to Nalmefene
60 MFCD00273318 0.8697 to Nalmefene
61 MFCD00271094 0.8774 to Nalmefene
62 202587 0.8895 to Nalmefene
63 693862 0.8919 to Nalmefene
64 MFCD00467140 0.9049 to Nalmefene
65 693863 0.9093 to Naltrexone
66 MFCD00271196 0.9123 to Nalmefene
67 BAS 3386092 0.9195 to Naloxone
68 693855 0.9235 to Nalmefene
69 BAS 3386091 0.9278 to Naloxone
70 MFCD00665833 0.9291 to Naltrexone
71 404368 0.9412 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
72 BAS 0606820 0.9478 to Naloxone
73 693859 0.9485 to Nalmefene
74 BAS 0436353 0.9653 to Naloxone
75 MFCD00167445 0.9681 to Naltrexone
76 MFCD00667402 0.9742 to Nalmefene
77 MFCD002258126 0.9767 to Naloxone
78 MFCD00143186 0.9850 to Naltrexone
34
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Rank Database LD. # Distance
~ to Exemplary
compound
79 119887 0.9932 to Naloxone
80 404365 1.0016 to Nalmefene
81 MFCD01871411 1.0116 to Naloxone
82 152720 1.0147 to 6-[3-Naltrexol
83 117581 1.0164 to Naloxone
84 669466 1.0171 to Naloxone
85 MFCD00271129 1.0287 to Nalmefene
86 689431 1.0350 to 6-/3-Naltrexol
87 MFCD00056772 1.0390 to Nalmefene
88 aMFCD00199295 1.0449 to Nalmefene
89 8191469 1.0457 to Nalmefene
90 375504 1.0503 to Naloxone
91 692397 1.0656 to Naloxone
92 MFCD00433684 1.0691 to Naloxone
93 693 860 1.0709 to Nalmefene
94 MFCD01764791 - 1.0725 to Naloxone
95 BAS 1519270 1.0776 to Naloxone
96 BAS 3385849 1.0828 to Naloxone
97 MFCD00673308 1.0866 to Nalmefene
98 404356 1.0990 to Nalmefene
99 43938 1.1067 to Nalmefene
100 117181 1.1092 to Naltrexone
101 MFCD00094379 1.1109 to Nalmefene
102 404369 1.1109 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
103 381577 1.1111 to Naloxone
104 S 842214 1.1117 to Nalmefene
105 134602 1.1123 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
108 CHS 0316796 1.1130 to Naloxone
107 134604 1.1147 to Nalmefene
108 8171697 1.1334 to Nalmefene
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Rank Database LD. # Distance
to Exemplary
compound
109 MFCD00667401 1.1343 to Nalmefene
110 5959863 1.1367 to 6-~3-Naltrexol
II1 35545 1.1369 to 6-[3-Naltrexol
112 134598 1.1369 to 6-[3-Naltrexol
113 5310778 1.1403 to Naloxone
I14 669800 1.1408 to Naloxone
I15 BAS 0083962 1.1413 to Naltrexone
116 MFCD01765597 1.1424 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
117 682334 1.1427 to Naloxone
118 BAS 0631739 1.1428 to Nalmefene
119 MFCD00144882 1.1486 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
120 MFCD00229975 1.1497 to Naloxone
121 8171700 1.1568 to Nalmefene
I22 134592 1.1633 to 6-~i-Naltrexol
123 401210 1.1662 to Nalmefene
124 BAS 2026074 1.1715 to Naltrexone
125 BAS 3050727 1.1767 to Nalmefene
126 BAS 0341630 1.1851 to Naloxone
127 97817 1.1901 to Naloxone
128 ASN 3185453 1.1958 to Naloxone
129 21257 1.1962 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
130 134601 1.2005 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
131 BAS 2026075 1.2027 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
132 BAS 1996620 1.2114 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
133 MFCD01314356 1.2147 to Naloxone
134 BAS 2026097 1.2207 to Naltrexone
135 BAS 1914007 1.2210 to Naloxone
136 CHS 0003221 1.2266 to Naloxone
137 667258 1.2274 to Naloxone
138 37625 1.2351 to Nalmefene
36
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Rank Database LD. # Distance
to Exemplary
compound
139 BAS 1003093 1.2362 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
140 16468 1.2380 to Naloxone
141 CHS 0227049 1.2409 to Naloxone
142 BAS 0315050 1.2410 to Nalmefene
143 BAS 1289763 1.2421 to Naloxone
144 349127 1.2429 to Naloxone
145 635928 1.2496 to Nalmefene
146 BAS 2377555 1.2507 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
147 MFCD00665835 1.2508 to Naltrexone
148 47931 1.2547 to 6-[3-Naltrexol
149 76435 1.2572 to Nalmefene
150 90558 1.2581 to Naloxone
151 MFCD00206273 1.2608 to Naloxone
152 159208 1.2670 to Nalmefene
1 BAS 0341580 1.2672 to Naltrexone
S3
154 BAS 2377575 1.2678 to Naltrexone
155 MFCD01765638 1.2681 to Nalmefene
156 8171484 1.2684 to Nalmefene
157 700350 1.2716 to Naloxone
158 16907 1.2740 to Nalmefene
159 8170623 1.2754 to Nalmefene
160 598907 1.2776 to Naloxone
161 10464 1.2777 to Naloxone
162 215214 1.2777 to Naloxone
163 8171425 1.2802 to Nalmefene
164 MFCD00153032 1.2831 to 6-J3-Naltrexol
165 S 196991 1.2850 to Naltrexone
166 8170291 1.2863 to Naloxone
167 682335 1.2867 to Naloxone
168 UFCD00667377 1.2889 to Nalmefene
37
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Rank Database LD. # Distance
to Exemplary
compound
169 106242 12944 to Naloxone
170 8170410 1.2989 to Naloxone
171 MFCD0005912 1.2996 to Naloxone
172 MFCD01765637 1.3018 to Nalmefene
173 376678 1.3028 to Naltrexone
174 MFCD01314431 1.3031 to Naloxone
175 370278 1.3040 to Nalmefene
176 MFCD00242635 1.3054 to 6-[3-Naltrexol
177 5602965 1.3058 to Naltrexone
178 370279 1.3063 to Nalmefene
179 157877 1.3099 to Nalmefene
180 19046 1.3103 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
181 117862 1.3103 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
182 MFCD00667305 1.3134 to Nalmefene
183 MFCD00667382 1.3161 to Nalmefene
184 611276 1.3178 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
185 BAS 1099232 1.3197 to Naltrexone
186 BAS 0313319 1.3206 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
187 401211 1.3254 to Nalmefene
188 409635 1.3263 to Nalmefene
189 106231 1.3271 to Naloxone
190 375505 1.3289 to Naloxone
191 BAS 1053035 1.3309 to Naloxone
192 ASN 3160807 1.3316 to Naloxone
193 324633 1.3331 to Naloxone
194 370277 1.3392 to Naloxone
195 MFCD00375811 1.3428 to 6-[3-Naltrexol
196 CHS 0305736 1.3435 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
197 BAS 0659522 1.3435 to 6-(3-Naltrexol
198 381576 1.3461 to Naloxone
38
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Rank Database LD. Distance
# to Exemplary
compound
199 CHS 0120289 1.3484 to Naloxone
200 351159 1.3490 to Nalmefene
A pharmacophore for a drug transporter inhibitor useful according to the
present
invention contains the hydroxyl groups at the 14-position and 3-position as
discussed above,
the nitrogen, the hydrophobic region (tethered to the nitrogen), and the
region of electron
density at the 6-position. Other combinations of features are also possible as
discussed
below.
The distance between the hydroxuyl groups in the pharmacophore ("H" of OH to
"H" of OH) is approximately 7.4 A. The equivalent distance in "Kamm 1" is ~7.7
~.
These distances are to the Hydrogen atoms, rather than the H-bond acceptors in
the binding
site. The N-substituent lengths of nalmefene (from N to terminal Carbons) are
~3.9 ~ and
~3.5 A. N-substituent length of naloxone (from N to terminal Carbon) is ~3.4
A.
The three-dimensional coordinates of naltrexone are provided in Table 12.
Table 12: Three-dimensional coordinates
ATOM X Y Z Type Charge
C1 -0.0352 -0.1951 0.0725 C.ar 0.1489
C2 2.0834 -0.0915 0.6474 C.3 0.1387
C3 2.3288 1.3986 0.5409 C.2 0.1298
C4 2.7343 2.1393 1.7840 C.3 0.0249
C5 1.6213 1.9380 2.8395 C.3 -0.0154
C6 1.5391 0.4338 3.2099 C.3 0.0664
C7 1.2934 -0.4401 1.9514 C.3 0.0294
C8 0.3791 0.1181 4.2040 C.3 0.0429
C9 -1.038 _ 3.6641 C.3 0.0052
3 0.5073
C10 _ 0_.2284 2.1659 C.ar -0.0334
-1.2030
C11 -0.0782 -0.1163 1.4337 C.ar -0.0151
C12 -2.4171 0.3074 1.4505 C.ar -0.0499
C13 -2.4130 0.2019 0.0328 C.ar -0.0203
C14 -1.2074 0.0000 -0.6793 C.ar 0.1404
015 1.2170 -0.4755 -0.4637 0.3 -0.2867
C16 1.3253 -1.9545 2.2801 C.3 -0.0592
Nl7 0.4895 -1.3246 4.5611 N.3 -0.2960
C18 0.3363 -2.2765 3.4315 C.3 -0.0091
019 2.8028 0.1380 3.8337 0.3 -0.3969
020 -1.1968 0.0000 -2.0760 0.3 0.3351
021 2.1919 2.0008 -0.5126 0.2 -0.3894
C22 -0.1632 -1.7771 5.8169 C.3 0.0022
C23 0.2667 -0.9142 7.0296 C.3 -0.0282
C24 -0.5945 -1.0908 8.2998 C.3 -0.0488
C25 -0.7018 0.2063 7.4700 C.3 -0.0488
H26 -3.3439 0.2757 -0.5190 H 0.0719
H27 -3.3515 0.4481 1.9839 H 0.0519
39
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
ATOM X Y Z Type Charge
H28 -0.7033 -2.2458 3.0686 H _
0.0417
H29 0.5379 -3.3100 3.7583 H 0.0427
H30 1.0537 -2.5464 1.3901 H 0.0165
H31 2.3491 -2.2448 2.5610 H 0.0165
H32 3.7066 1.7640 2.1382 H 0.0495
H33 2.8430 3.2119 1.5551 H 0.0495
H34 0.6739 2.3152 2.4251 H 0.0308
H35 1.8585 2.5217 3.7437 H 0.0308
H36 -1.2074 1.5867 3.7999 H 0.0488
H37 -1.8236 -0.0234 4.2195 H 0.0488
H38 3.0581 -0.5987 0.5948 H 0.0780
H39 0.5866 0.7227 5.1003 H 0.0510
H40 -0.3069 0.0000 -2.4176 H 0.2424
H41 2.8163 -0.7158 4.2555 H 0.2089
H42 0.1871 -2.7925 6.0602 H 0.0429
H43 -1.2569 -1.8218 5.7021 H 0.0429
H44 1.3391 -0.7446 7.2194 H 0.0313
H45 -1.6257 0.3467 6.8884 H 0.0268
H46 -0.2477 1.1098 7.9059 H 0.0268
H47 -1.4559 -1.7752 8.2529 H 0.0268
H48 -0.0805 -1.0045 9.2699 H 0.0268
Through the use of these coordinates a pharmacophore may be defined by: (1) a
hydrogen bonding moiety at a three-dimensional location corresponding to the
hydroxyl at
position 3 of naltrexone; (2) a hydrogen bonding moiety at a three-dimensional
location
corresponding to the hydroxyl at position 14 of naltrexone; (3) a hydrophobic
moiety at a
three-dimensional location corresponding to the cyclopropyl moiety appended to
the
nitrogen of naltrexone; and (4) a region of electron density at a three-
dimensional location
corresponding to the ethylene moiety at 6-position of naltrexone.
Example 5 - Morphine pharmacokinetics in blood and brain of rats studied with
microdialysis
A study of the brain pharmacokinetics of morphine was performed in a three day
study in each rat. A total of 9 successful rats per group were required (70 %
success rate =
13 rats per group). Each group was divided into two parts; 4 animals received
an morphine
dose for three days, and 5 animals received an morphine dose the first day and
combined
morphine -naltrexone doses on Days 2 and 3
Of the rats, 3 individuals of each gender were decapitated at the end of the
first day
(1 from M1 and F1 and 2 from M2 and F2, respectively). 3 rats of each gender
(M2 and F2)
were decapitated right after the infusion on day 4 for collection of whole
brain (necessary
for brain volume of distribution measurements).
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
In a first experiment, after a stabilization period of at least five days in
the animal
house, the animals were anaesthetized by inhalation of Enfluran~. Two
indwelling
cannulae, PE-10 connected to PE-50, were implanted into the femoral artery for
blood
sampling and into the femoral vein for drug infusion. A heparinized saline
solution (100
IU/ml) was maintained in the arterial cannulae to prevent clotting. All ends
of the catheters
were passed subcutaneously to a plastic cup placed on the surface of the neck
out of reach
from the rat. Two stainless steel sutures are placed in the tail of the rat l
and 3 cm from the
root of the tail for the analgesic measurements. The rat is placed in a
CMA1120 system for
freely moving animals with free access to water and food, and the experiment
started
approximately 24 hours later. All experiments started at the same time of the
day.
Each rat was weighed (range 270 - 330g). The baseline for antinociception was
measured three times with 15-minute intervals before the start of the
experiment. During the
procedure all rats were held gently in a towel. The duration of the stimuli
was 1 sec, using a
frequency of electrical square waves of 125 pulses/sec and a pulse width of
1.6 msec. The
voltage was increased in logarithmic steps. A vocalization response was
recorded as the
endpoint, the pain threshold. The maximal voltage accepted was 11.5 V.
Morphine was administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes at an
infusion rate of 1.8 mg/kg/h (0.1 mg/kg) and 18 mg/kg/h (1 mg/kg). 200 ~l
blood samples
were collected at 5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 60, 120, 240 and 300 min from the start
of the 10-minute
infusion. All blood samples were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 minutes, and
the plasma
harvested and stored at -20°C until analyzed. Antinociception was
measured 5, 10, 15, 20,
30, 45, 60 min after the start of the infusion and thereafter every 30 minutes
up to 240 min.
The ratio of brain concentration of morphine to blood concentration of
morphine is shown
the Fig. 5.
In a second experiment, after a stabilization period of at least five days in
the animal
house, the animals are anaesthetized by inhalation of Enfluran~. Two
indwelling cannulae,
PE-10 connected to PE-50, were implanted into the femoral artery for blood
sampling and
into the femoral vein for drug infusion. A heparinised saline solution (100
IU/mI) was
maintained in the arterial cannulae to prevent clotting. The blood probe
(CMA/20) was
inserted into the right jugular vein through a guide cannulae and fixed to the
pectoralis
muscle with two sutures. The rat was placed in a stereotaxic instrument for
the implantation
of the striatal probe. A midline incision was made to expose the skull and the
CMA/12
41
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
guide cannulae was implanted into the striatum with the co-ordinates 2.7 mm
lateral and 0.8
mm anterior to the bregma, and 3.8 mm ventral to the surface of the brain. The
brain probe
was inserted into the hole and fixed with a screw and dental cement. A 15 cm
PE-50 tubing
was looped subcutaneously on the back of the rat to the surface of the neck in
order to let
the perfusion solution adjust to body temperature before entering the brain
probe. All ends
of the catheters were passed subcutaneously to a plastic cup placed on the
surface of the
neck out of reach from the rat. Two stainless steel sutures were placed in the
tail of the rat 1
and 3 cm from the root of the tail for the analgesic measurements. The rat was
placed in a
CMA/120 system for freely moving animals with free access to water and food,
and the
experiment started approximately 24 hours latex. All experiments started at
the same time of
the day.
Each rat was weighed (range 270 - 330g). The probes were perfused with blank
Ringer's solution at a flow rate of 1 p.l/min. Microdialysate fractions were
collected every
I5 minutes for 1 hour. After a 60 min stabilization period the microdialysis
probes were
perfused with an morphine solution containing 100 ng/ml (blood) or 200 ng/ml
(striatum).
Unbound concentrations of morphine were calculated from the dialysate
concentration of
morphine adjusted for the in vivo recovery value. After the retrodialysis
period, the probes
were perfused fox one hour with blank perfusion solution.
The rats were xandomly assigned into two groups receiving an i.v. infusion of
morphine hydrochloride over 10 min. Groups MI and Fl (n=8) were administered 2
mglkg
morphine given With buffer to achieve the same volume as groups M2 and F2.
Groups M2
and F2 (n=10) which receive the same dose MS as groups Ml and FI plus a chosen
dose of
NTX.
After the infusion was stopped at Day 1, one rat from M1 and Fl and two rats
from
M2 and F2 were decapitated. The brain was divided into two parts and each part
put in a
plastic cup and stored at -70°C until analyzed. The remaining animals
proceeded with the
study.
Microdialysates were collected over a period of 240 min into pre-weighed
vials.
Samples were taken at 5 min intervals during the infusion, at 10 min intervals
over the
following hour and at 15 min intervals over the remaining 3 hours. Dialysates
were
collected, weighed and stored at -20°C until analyzed. Arterial blood
samples (200 u1) were
collected in heparinised vials at 0, 8, 20, 70, I30, 190 and 240 min. After
collection,
42
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, and plasma was harvested and
frozen at -
20°C until analysis.
Antinociception was measured according to the electrical stimulation
vocalization
method. An electrical stimulus was applied to the two electrodes implanted in
the tail of the
rat. During the procedure all rats were held gently in a towel. The duration
of the stimuli
was 1 sec, using a frequency of electrical square waves of 125 pulses/sec and
a pulse width
of 1.6 msec. The voltage was increased in logarithmic steps. A vocalization
response was
recorded as the endpoint, the pain threshold. The maximal voltage accepted was
11.5 V.
The baseline value of the pain threshold was estimated three times at 15 min
intervals
before the start of the experiment. Antinociception was recorded at the end of
the blank,
retrodialysis and washout periods and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 min after
the start of the
infusion and thereafter every 30 minutes up to 240 min.
The blood gas status of the rats was monitored by injection of a 50 p,1
arterial blood
sample into a blood gas analyzer to determine the arterial p02, pC02, 02
saturation and pH.
During the experiment the blood gas status was monitored just before
antinociception
measurement.
On Day 4, each rat was weighed (range 270 - 330g). The probes were perfused
with blank Ringer's solution at a flow rate of 1 ~,l/min. Microdialysate
fractions were
collected every 15 minutes for 1 hour. After a 60 min stabilization period the
microdialysis
probes were perfused with an morphine solution containing 100 ng/ml (blood) or
200 ng/ml
(striatum). Unbound concentrations of morphine were calculated from the
dialysate
concentration of morphine adjusted for the in vivo recovery value. After the
retrodialysis
period, the probes were perfused for one hour with blank perfusion solution.
The rats received an i.v. infusion over 10 minutes of morphine hydrochloride
or
morphine and naltrexone as determined above. After the infusion was stopped at
Day 4, the
remaining three rats of groups M2 and F2 were decapitated, directly after
directly after
morphine and NTX administration. The brain was divided into two parts and each
part put
in a plastic cup and stored at -70°C until analyzed.
Example 6 - Tolerance and Withdrawal in Mice
40 male mice were randomized into 5 groups of eight. All mice were
administered
single 3mg/kg morphine daily (b.i.d.), beginning on Day 1. The anti-
nociceptive effect was
assayed by standard tail flick procedures for mice in Group 1 on Days 1, 3, 5,
8, 10 and 12.
43
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
The mice in Groups 2-5 were assayed on Days 5, 8, 10 and 12. Groups 2, 3, 4
and 5
received daily doses of 3 ng/kg, 30 ng/kg, 300 ng/kg and 3000 ng/kg naltrexone
(b.i.d.),
respectively, beginning at day 6. Anti-nociceptive effect was assayed by tail
flick on Days
(prior to naltrexone dosing), 6, 8, and 10.
5 The mice in Group 1 showed adaptation to the repeated dosing of morphine.
The
data were subjected to two types of analyses; cross sectional time series
analysis using
generalized estimating equations (GEE) and survival analysis using Cox
regression. The
Cox and GEE analyses of Group lwere consistent and showed that the latency
(time to tail
flick) was shorter after day 1. The Cox analysis showed that although Day was
the major
factor influencing latency, Time periods after 60 minutes also significantly
influenced
latency. Note it could be argued that reduced latency after day 1 is an
adaptation to the
morphine or an adaptation by the mice to having repeated tail flick
experiments conducted
on them. However, since all groups of mice had similar tail flick responses on
day 5 and
this is despite the fact that four groups (groups 2-5) experienced the tail
flick experiment for
first time, this can be interpreted as evidence that reduced latency after day
1 is due to
adaptation to morphine.
The change in latency within a day (dayl) of group 1 mice was analyzed. At all
times after time zero, the latency was significantly different from that
measured at time
zero.
The variability between groups of mice were compared at Day 5. Very little
difference existed between groups in terms of their latency. This is as would
be expected
since there was no difference in the treatment (Morphine) applied to these
groups. However,
surprisingly, GEE analysis indicates group 3 was significantly (P=0.024)
different to the
other groups.
The naltrexone effect at Days 6, 8, and 10 was analyzed. All concentrations
(above
zero) of naltrexone were significantly different from zero naltrexone (group 1
). All
concentrations of naltrexone had a similar effect in increasing the latency
period. Although
300 ng appeared to be most effective at enhancing latency, it was not
significantly different
from 30 or 3000 ng.
Group B
In a second series of experiments, 40 female mice were randomized into 5
groups of
eight. All mice were administered single 3mg/lcg morphine daily (b.i.d.),
beginning on Day
44
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
1. The anti-nociceptive effect was assayed by standard tail flick procedures
for mice in
Group 1 on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 and 12. The mice in Groups 2-5 were assayed on
Days 5, 8,
and 12. Groups 2, 3, 4 and 5 received daily doses of 3 ng/kg, 30 ng/kg, 300
ng/kg and
3000 ng/kg naltrexone (b.i.d.), respectively, beginning at day 6. Anti-
nociceptive effect
5 was assayed by tail flick on Days 5 (prior to naltrexone dosing), 6, 8, and
10.
The adaptation of mice in group 1 to the repeated daily dosing with morphine
was
analyzed. As with male mice, female mice show an adaptation to morphine
especially from
day five onwards. The change in latency within a day (dayl) of group 1 mice
was analyzed.
At all times after time zero latency was significantly longer than for time
zero.
10 The variability between groups of mice were compared at Day 5. There were
little
differences between groups of female mice on day 5.
The naltrexone effect at Days 6, 8, and 10 was analyzed. All concentrations
(above
zero) of naltrexone were significantly different from zero in enhancing
latency. In females,
30 ng appears to be significantly better than other concentrations at
enhancing latency.
Group C
In a third series of experiments, 40 male mice were randomized into 5 groups
of
eight. All mice were administered single 3mg/kg morphine daily (b.i.d.),
beginning on Day
1. In addition, Groups 2, 3, 4 and 5 received daily doses of 3 ng/kg, 30
ng/kg, 300 ng/kg
and 3000 ng/kg naltrexone (b.i.d.), respectively, beginning at day 1. The anti-
nociceptive
effect was assayed by standard tail flick procedures for all mice in on Days
l, 3, 5, 8, and
10. On Day 12, every mouse received a single bolus dose of 10 ~,g/kg
naltrexone.
The naltrexone effect was measured at Days 1,3,5, 8 and 10. The enhancement of
latency by naltrexone at 300 ng was significantly greater than other at
concentrations (Table
14).
Table 14: Enhancement of Latency by Naltrexone in Male Mice
Day Group Group Group Group Group
1 2 3 4 5
1 9.3 13.3 12.4 16.3 13.5
3 6.2 7.5 9.3 17.1 13.0
5 1.6 4.5 7.5 11.8 12.0
8 -2.3 5.5 7.1 9.4 10.4
10 -3.3 2.7 3.2 6.1 7.4
12 -4.3 1.1 -0.8 -0.2 -0.7
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
Group D
In a final series of experiments, 40 female mice were randomized into 5 groups
of
eight. All mice were administered single 3mg/kg morphine daily (b.i.d.),
beginning on Day
1. In addition Groups 2, 3, 4 and 5 received daily doses of 3 ng/kg, 30 ng/kg,
300 ng/kg and
3000 nglkg naltrexone (b.i.d.), respectively, beginning at day 1. The anti-
nociceptive effect
was assayed by standard tail flick procedures for all mice in on Days 1, 3, 5,
7, and 10. On
Day 1 I, every mouse received a single bolus dose of 10 ~,g/kg naltrexone in
addition to the
existing morphine/naltrexone regimen.
The response to small doses of naltrexone was measured. Although a dose 0.3
ng/kg
of naltrexone gave the longest latency, this was not significantly different
from 0.03 or to 3
ng/kg of naltrexone (Table 13).
Table 13: Enhancement of Latency by Naltrexone in Female Mice
Day Group Group Group Group Group
1 2 3 4 5
1 5.4 12.2 12.4 15.0 12.3
3 -0.1 11.0 10.7 10.3 9.6
5 -4.1 4.3 6.9 1.9 3.4
7 -5.0 6.1 2.4 0.2 1.9
10 -3.3 4.4 9.3 5.9 6.7
11 -5.2 -1.0 -0.7 0.8 -0.7
Combined analysis
In an analysis of males and females combined (Groups A and B, on days
1,3,5,6,8
and 10), naltrexone at concentrations of 30 ng/kg and 300 ng/kg gave
significantly longer
latency than other concentrations of naltrexone (FIG. 6 and Table 15). In a
combined
analysis naltrexone administered to male mice (Groups A and C, on days 8 and
10),
naltrexone at 300 ng gave the greatest latency and was significantly different
to other
concentrations of naltrexone.
Table 15: Enhancement of Latency by Naltrexone in Female Mice
Day Group Group Group Group Group
1 2 3 4 5
1 7.4 12.8 12.4 15.6 12.9
3 3.0 9.3 10.0 12.7 11.3
46
CA 02427330 2003-04-29
WO 02/41884 PCT/USO1/45367
-1.2 5.9 7.2 6.8 7.7
8 -3.7 5.8 4.9 4.8 6.2
-3.3 3.5 6.6 6.0 7.0
3 mg/kg of morphine was administered as a single bolus dose to each mouse on
group 1 on a daily basis. Mice in Group 2 were also administered 3 mg/kg
morphine daily.
In addition to the morphine, mice in Group 2 also received 3 nglkg naltrexone
daily
beginning on Day 6. At Day 15, the dose of naltrexone was lowered to 0.1
ng/kg. By Day
5, the mice showed distinct tolerance to the morphine. However, administration
of the
naltrexone broke the tolerance (FIG. 7).
Results of parallel experiments using oxycodone in the place of morphine were
comparable. For these experiments, male mice were administered 0.1 mg/kg
oxycodone
10 plus either 1 ng/kg naltrexone, 1 ng/kg nalmefene or 1 pg/kg of nor-BNI. In
all cases the
mice did not develop tolerance to the oxycodone. Similarly, female mice were
administered
either 1 mg/kg or 5 mglkg oxycodone in combination with 1 pg/kg, 1 ng/kg or 1
~,g/kg
naltrexone or 1 pg/kg nor-BNI. None of the mice developed tolerance to the
oxycodone.
Additionally, the male and female mice who had developed a tolerance to
oxycodone were
administered a single 10 p,g/kg dose of naloxone.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are
herein
incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication
of patent
application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by
reference.
The invention now being fully described, it will be apparent to one of
ordinary skill
in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without
departing from
the spirit or scope of the appended claims.
47