Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2550077 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2550077
(54) Titre français: MECANISME POUVANT ETRE REPLACE SUR UN INSTRUMENT POUR DISPOSITIFS HAPTIQUES
(54) Titre anglais: REPLACEABLE INSTRUMENT MECHANISM FOR HAPTIC DEVICES
Statut: Périmé et au-delà du délai pour l’annulation
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • B25J 13/02 (2006.01)
  • G5G 5/00 (2006.01)
  • G5G 5/03 (2008.04)
  • G6F 3/01 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • POWERS, MARILYN J. (Canada)
  • SINCLAIR, IAN (Canada)
(73) Titulaires :
  • MPB TECHNOLOGIES INC.
(71) Demandeurs :
  • MPB TECHNOLOGIES INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L., S.R.L.
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 2014-01-21
(22) Date de dépôt: 2006-06-09
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 2006-12-10
Requête d'examen: 2011-04-15
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
60/689,066 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 2005-06-10

Abrégés

Abrégé français

Un mécanisme pouvant être remplacé sur un instrument pour un dispositif haptique composé d'un coupleur ayant un corps de coupleur adapté pour être relié à une extrémité de sortie du dispositif haptique. Un mécanisme de transmission de force relié au corps de coupleur est muni d'un connecteur amovible pouvant être déplacé le long d'un degré de liberté relativement au corps de coupleur, et est relié à un système de retour d'effort du dispositif haptique pour recevoir un retour d'effort du dispositif haptique et impartir le retour d'effort au connecteur amovible. Un instrument est muni d'un corps d'instrument ayant une extrémité de connecteur fixée de manière détachable à la deuxième extrémité du corps de coupleur pour pouvoir être déplacée avec le coupleur. Une portion de poignée est activée manuellement dans un degré de liberté respectivement au corps de l'instrument pour simuler une opération effectuée avec l'instrument. Un élément est associé à la portion de poignée pour être déplacé par l'activation de la portion de poignée, et est relié de manière détachable au connecteur amovible du mécanisme de transmission d'effort afin de transmettre le retour d'effort du connecteur amovible à la portion de poignée en réponse à l'activation de la portion de poignée lors de la détection par le dispositif haptique.


Abrégé anglais

A replaceable instrument mechanism for a haptic device comprises a coupler having a coupler body adapted to be connected to an output end of the haptic device. A force transmission mechanism is connected to the coupler body, has a movable connector displaceable along one degree-of-freedom with respect to the coupler body, and is connected to a force feedback system of the haptic device so as to receive force feedback from the haptic device and impart the force feedback to the movable connector. An instrument has an instrument body having a connector end releasably secured to the second end of the coupler body so as to be displaceable with the coupler. A handle portion is manually actuatable in one degree-of-freedom with respect to the instrument body to simulate an operation performed with the instrument. A member is associated with the handle portion so as to move by actuation of the handle portion, and releasably connected to the movable connector of the force transmission mechanism so as to transmit force feedback from the movable connector to the handle portion in response to actuation of the handle portion as detected by the haptic device.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


-30-
CLAIMS
1. A replaceable instrument mechanism for a haptic
device, comprising:
a coupler having:
a coupler body with a first end and a second
end, the first end adapted to be connected to an
output end of the haptic device so as to be
displaceable along degrees-of-freedom of the haptic
device; and
a force transmission mechanism connected to the
coupler body, the force transmission mechanism
having a movable connector displaceable along at
least one rotational degree-of-freedom with respect
to the coupler body, the force transmission
mechanism adapted to be connected to a force
feedback system of the haptic device so as to
receive force feedback from the haptic device and
impart the force feedback to the movable connector;
at least one instrument having:
a fixed handle portion having a connector end
releasably secured to the second end of the coupler
body so as to be fixed to and displaceable with the
coupler;
a movable handle portion manually actuatable in
at least one rotational degree-of-freedom with
respect to the fixed handle portion to simulate a
scissor operation performed with the instrument; and
a pivot member connected to and different from
the movable handle portion about which the movable
handle portion rotates during the scissor operation,
and with the movable handle portion being connected

-31-
at the pivot member to the movable connector of the
force transmission mechanism and being different
from the movable connector so as to have the movable
handle portion rotate concurrently with the movable
connector about a singular common axis of scissor
movement to transmit force feedback from the movable
connector to the movable handle portion in response
to actuation of the movable handle portion as
detected by the haptic device.
2. The replaceable instrument mechanism according to
claim 1, wherein the movable connector is a pulley, and
the pulley and the movable handle portion are integrally
connected to concurrently rotate about said common axis.
3. The replaceable instrument mechanism according to
claim 1, wherein the movable connector is a pulley, and
the force transmission system has a drive pulley related
to the movable connector by a mechanism enabling
rotational degree-of-freedom transmission therebetween,
the drive pulley adapted to be connected to the force
feedback system of the haptic device by a tendon.
4. The replaceable instrument mechanism according to
claim 1, further comprising a rotational degree-of-
freedom joint between the coupler body and the output end
of the haptic device, with an axis of the rotational
degree-of-freedom joint being generally parallel to a
longitudinal axis of the fixed handle portion.
5. The replaceable instrument mechanism according to
claim 3, wherein the force feedback system of the haptic
device has a tendon guided by idlers to direct the tendon
across a rotational degree-of-freedom joint between the

-32-
coupler and the output end of the haptic device and onto
the drive pulley.
6. The replaceable instrument mechanism according to
claim 5, wherein the idlers direct the tendon generally
normal to the axis of the rotational degree-of-freedom
joint.
7. The replaceable instrument mechanism according to
claim 6, wherein the tendon crosses over itself at the
rotational degree-of-freedom joint.
8. The replaceable instrument mechanism according to
claim 7, wherein the tendon crossover is assisted by an
idler comprised of an inside idler and an outside idler,
the inside idler being positioned inside the outside
idler, the axes of rotation of the two idlers crossing at
a slight angle, the idlers on one side of the rotational
degree-of-freedom joint being displaced inwardly relative
to the idlers on the other side.
9. The replaceable instrument mechanism according to
claim 6, wherein the tendon is helically wound about the
rotational degree-of-freedom joint.
10. The replaceable instrument mechanism according
to claim 5, wherein the tendon is wrapped around a
capstan fixedly attached to a shaft of a rotary motor
fixedly connected to a fixed portion of the haptic
device, the rotary motor producing the force feedback in
the instrument.
11. The replaceable instrument mechanism according
to claim 3, further comprising a rotational sensor

-33-
coupled to the pulley of the movable connector of the
force transmission mechanism to transmit data
corresponding to a rotational displacement of the movable
handle portion with respect to the fixed handle portion
to the force feedback system to calculate a current
position and orientation of the movable handle portion.
12. The replaceable instrument mechanism according
to claim 11, wherein the data is an orientation of the
movable handle portion with respect to the fixed handle
portion.
13. The replaceable instrument mechanism according
to claim 1, wherein the movable handle portion has a
finger-handled portion that is removeably connected to a
remainder of the movable handle portion.
14. The replaceable instrument mechanism according
to claim 1, wherein the fixed handle portion has a
finger-handled portion that is removeably connected to a
remainder of the fixed handle portion.
15. The replaceable instrument mechanism according
to claim 1, further comprising spring material biasing
the movable handle portion and the fixed handle portion
away from one another.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02550077 2012-11-13
-1-
REPLACEABLE INSTRUMENT
MECHANISM FOR HAPTIC DEVICES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to force feedback
haptic devices (a.k.a., hand controllers), particularly to
six-degree-of-freedom hand controllers with interchangeable
instruments involving revolute or prismatic jointed handles.
2. Background Art
Force-reflecting master hand controllers have been
used to drive robotic systems, and to provide an interface
to a computer system that allows the user to input spatial
position and to feel forces in response to his or her
movement.
In U.S. Patent No. 6,593,907, issued on July 15,
2003 to Demers et al., a tendon-driven hand controller that
provides powered translation in three degrees of freedom,
and powered rotation in three degrees of freedom is
described.
The six-degree-of-freedom (6-D0F) hand controller
is especially useful in surgical simulation. A
virtual
force may be presented as if it were acting at any location
on a handle held by the operator. The force that is felt
can therefore mimic the feeling of surgical instruments as
they are used in an operation.
To this point, it has been possible to simulate
instruments with single handles, such as a scalpel, but many

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 2 -
instruments involve their own degree-of-freedom mechanisms,
such as two members connected by a revolute joint.
Scissors, forceps, clamps and rongeurs fall under this
category.
Moreover, the varieties of such instruments
s number in the tens of thousands, as they are created for
cutting and manipulating tissue in many different surgical
procedures.
In spite of the large variety of instruments, a
limited number of handles for hand controllers have been
io designed for these instruments, since the human hand has a
limited number of shapes and sizes.
There do exist surgical simulators with fixed
handles and a limited number of degrees of freedom.
Rosenberg, in U.S. Patent No. 5,731,804, issued on March 24,
15 1998, describes a 4-DOF hand controller with a gripper
handle. This device is intended to simulate an endoscopic
surgical instrument, in which the working surfaces are at
the end of long shafts inserted through holes in the
patient's body.
The simulated endoscopic surgical
20 instrument however appears to be permanently part of the
hand controller.
Likewise, U.S. Patent No. 6,684,129, issued to
Salisbury, Jr. et al. on January 27, 2004, discloses the
operation of the master controller of the robotic surgical
25 system from Intuitive Surgical Inc. The master controller
has six degrees of freedom, plus one degree for activation
of a gripper. The handle, however, is fixed to the device,
and designed to enable the operator to manipulate the
various tools of the surgical system.
30 SUMMARY OF INVENTION
It is therefore an aim of the present invention to
provide an haptic device addressing issues associated with
the prior art.
It is also an aim of the present invention to
35 provide a novel replaceable instrument mechanism.

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 3 -
Therefore, in accordance with the present
invention, there is provided a replaceable instrument
mechanism for a haptic device, comprising: a coupler having:
a coupler body with a first end and a second end, the first
end adapted to be connected to an output end of the haptic
device so as to be displaceable along the degrees-of-freedom
of the haptic device; and a force transmission mechanism
connected to the coupler body, the force transmission
mechanism having a movable connector displaceable along at
lo least one degree-of-freedom with respect to the coupler
body, the force transmission mechanism adapted to be
connected to a force feedback system of the haptic device so
as to receive force feedback from the haptic device and
impart the force feedback to the movable connector; at least
one instrument having: an instrument body having a connector
end releasably secured to the second end of the coupler body
so as to be displaceable with the coupler; a handle portion
manually actuatable in at least one degree-of-freedom with
respect to the instrument body to simulate an operation
performed with the instrument; and a member associated with
the handle portion so as to move by actuation of the handle
portion, and releasably connected to the movable connector
of the force transmission mechanism so as to transmit force
feedback from the movable connector to the handle portion in
response to actuation of the handle portion as detected by
the haptic device.
Therefore, in accordance with the present
invention, there is provided a scissors mechanism comprising
a fixed shaft and a sliding shaft, the fixed shaft having a
coupler at one end and a fixed handle at the other end with
a loop or a bar for the part of the hand near or at the
thumb, the sliding shaft having a coupler at one end and a
revolute joint at the other end, the revolute joint
attaching a moving handle, the handle also being attached by
a revolute joint =to the end of the fixed shaft near the
fixed handle, so that moving the movable handle moves the
sliding shaft by a lever action.

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 4 -
Also in accordance with the present invention,
there is provided a mechanism for coupling the scissors
mechanism to a platform, comprising a coupler to attach the
fixed shaft fixedly to the platform, and a second coupler
for coupling the sliding shaft to a driven slider, the
driven slider being a member connected to the platform by a
prismatic joint, having a coupler at one end and a driving
means somewhere else along its length. In
a preferred
embodiment, the driving means is a revolute joint attached
to a scissors drive pulley at a radius r, the scissors drive
pulley being attached to the platform by a revolute joint at
the centre of the scissors drive pulley.
Also in accordance with the present invention,
there is provided a mechanism for uncoupling the fixed shaft
from the hand controller, and for uncoupling the sliding
shaft from the driven slider. In
a preferred embodiment,
the coupling/uncoupling mechanism of both the fixed shaft
and the sliding shafts each comprise a spring-loaded lever
that presses a latch member into a recess in the side of the
shaft, the lever being attached at its midpoint to the
moveable base by a revolute joint, having a button end and a
latch end, with a tension spring under the button end
pushing the button end away from the platform, such that the
latch end presses the latch member into the recess in the
shaft, and such that a user may press the button end to
release the latch mechanism, freeing the shaft so that it
may be withdrawn from the platform.
Also in accordance with the present invention,
there is provided a mechanism for actuating the driven
slider, comprising a tendon routed around a configuration of
idler pulleys that brings it from a capstan attached to the
shaft of a rotary actuator on a fixed base through six
joints of the 6-DOF hand controller (comprising two joints
in a shoulder, an elbow joint, and pitch, yaw and roll
joints in a spherical wrist) to the platform on the sixth
and last joint in the hand controller, consisting of a
shoulder pulley, an elbow pulley, a yaw idler pulley, and a

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 5 -
roll -routing configuration of pulleys, consisting of a pair
of inward idlers that accepts the tendon from the yaw pulley
and redirects the tendon tangentially to the roll of the
platform, a pair of cross over idlers that allows the tendon
halves to cross over at the roll joint, and a pair of
outward idlers that directs the tendon from a direction
tangential to the roll of the platform to the direction of
the scissors drive pulley.
Also in accordance with the present invention,
lo there is provided a mechanism for sensing the angle of the
scissors opening, consisting of either an angle sensor on
the scissors joint, Or an angle sensor on the scissors drive
pulley, or a linear sensor measuring the movement of the
slider shaft relative to the fixed shaft.
While the preferred embodiment of the platform and
the tendon routing is a 6-DOF device as just described, the
interchangeable handles and the platform may be mounted on a
hand controller having any number of degrees of freedom,
from a device attached to a fixed base to a multi-degree-of-
freedom device.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Reference will now be made to the accompanying
drawings, showing by way of illustration a preferred
embodiment of the present invention and in which:
Figs. la to lc are schematic views of handles of
an instrument known to surgeons as a rongeur, showing its
attachment to a coupler of a replaceable instrument
mechanism in accordance with an embodiment of the present
invention;
Figs. 2a to 2C are schematic views of handles of a
pair of scissors or forceps, showing its attachment to the
coupler of the replaceable instrument mechanism of Fig. la;
Figs. 3a to 3c are schematic views of handle of a
thumb forceps, showing its attachment to the coupler of the
replaceable instrument mechanism of Fig. la;

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 6 -
Figs. 4a and 4b are enlarged views of the coupler
of the replaceable instrument mechanism, showing coupling
for fixed and sliding shafts;
Fig. 4c and 4d are enlarged views of coupling ends
of instruments connectable to the coupler, showing fixed and
sliding shafts;
Fig. 5a is a perspective schematic view of a
coupling mechanism, with a slider shaft contained inside a
fixed shaft;
lo Fig. 5b is a perspective schematic view of an
alternative coupling mechanism, with a slider shaft on top
of a fixed shaft;
Fig. 5c is a schematic assembly view of a latching
mechanism for securing the sliding shaft and the fixed shaft
into place;
Fig. 6a is a schematic view of a drive mechanism
of the replaceable instrument mechanism;
Fig. 6b is a schematic view of a four-bar
mechanism comparable to the drive mechanism of Fig. 6a,
showing links and revolute joints;
Fig. 6c is a schematic view of the four-bar
mechanism, showing symbolic designations for the links and
angles formed by the links;
Fig. 6d is a schematic view of the four-bar
mechanism, showing free body diagrams of each link and the
forces acting upon them;
Fig. 7 is an enlarged perspective view of a pulley
assembly for transferring power from a base to the platform
through a roll joint;
Fig. 8 is a front view of the pulley assembly of
Fig. 7;
Fig. 9a is a schematic view of the pulley assembly
of Fig. 7, showing the tendon path after a roll;
Fig. 9b is a schematic view of the pulley assembly
of Fig. 7, showing possible rotation of the drive pulley if
the tendon path is held at one end;

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 7 -
Fig. 10a is a bottom schematic view of the pulley
assembly of Fig. 7, showing the tendon path crossing over
between idler pulleys;
Fig. 10b is a schematic view of a mechanism of the
pulley assembly of Fig. 7 for allowing two tendons to cross
over;
Fig. 10c is a bottom schematic view of an
alternative embodiment of the pulley assembly, showing a
tendon path that avoids crossing over between idler pulleys;
Fig. 10d is a top schematic view of the pulley
assembly of Fig. 10c, showing a tendon path that avoids
crossing over between idler pulleys;
Fig. lla is a schematic view of a mechanism with
revolute jointed handles connected directly to the drive
pulley;
Fig. lib is a schematic view of a mechanism with a
fixed handle connected fixedly to the fixed coupler, and
another mechanism with a plunger;
Fig. 11c is a schematic view of a mechanism with a
plunger;
Fig. 12 is a schematic representation of a
processing system used with the manipulator of Fig. 1;
Fig. 13 is a perspective view of the distal stage
of a Freedom 6S hand controller with the replaceable
instrument mechanism of the present invention;
Fig. 14 is an overall perspective view the
Freedom 6S hand controller with the replaceable instrument
mechanism of Fig. 13;
Fig. 15 is a perspective view of the distal stage
of the Freedom 6S hand controller with an alternative
embodiment of the replaceable instrument mechanism; and
Fig. 16 is an exploded view of an instrument used
in the replaceable instrument mechanism.

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 8 -
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The illustrated embodiments show haptic devices in
the form of serial controllers, with a serial mechanism
supporting a replaceable instrument mechanism.
The
replaceable instrument mechanism may include motors which
are generally lightweight. The controller preferably has a
balanced design, which permits the motors to apply all their
power to the handle mechanism, rather than consuming energy
to overcome an unbalanced gravitational load. This leaves
lo the natural weight of the instrument itself, allowing a
realistic simulation of instruments that may include
surgical instruments.
The embodiments illustrate a
replaceable instrument mechanism, permitting the user to
change handles to maintain a feel for a variety of scissors
is and scissors-like instruments.
The hand controllers used in connection with
computers allow for a user to move the handle mechanism of
the instrument to activate, for example, a virtual forceps
in a synchronous motion.
The hand controllers preferably
20 produce a feedback force on the instrument to be reflected
to the user's hand when the virtual forceps comes into
contact with an obstacle.
Rongeur and Coupler. Referring to Figs. la to lc,
a replaceable instrument mechanism for haptic interface
25 according to an embodiment is generally shown at 10. The
mechanism 10 generally consists of an instrument with a
coupler 12, the coupler 12 being the interface between the
hand controller. A top view of a rongeur 14 is shown in
Fig. la, the rongeur 14 being one variety of the replaceable
30 instrument . In Figs. lb and lc, a side view of the rongeur
14 of the replaceable instrument mechanism is generally
shown, again in combination with a coupler 12.
The rongeur scissors 14 consists of a forward
handle 22, a back handle 24, a sliding shaft 26, and a fixed
35 shaft 28. The sliding shaft 26 is joined to the fixed shaft
28 by a prismatic joint, generally shown as 21 that binds

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 9 -
the two shafts together, but allows them to slide relative
to each other.
The fixed shaft 28 has a first end 30 (i.e.,
connector end)designed to fasten to a matching fixed shaft
coupler 66 (an end of the coupler body) in the coupler 12.
Its second end is fixedly attached to the back handle 24.
The sliding shaft 26 is a member relating the
handle portion of the instrument 14 to the coupler 12 to
transmit an actuation. The sliding shaft 26 has a first end
lo 20 and a second end. Its first end 20 is designed to fasten
to a matching sliding shaft coupler 16 in the coupler 12.
Its second end is attached by a revolute joint 34 to the
forward handle 22. A second revolute joint 32 attaches the
forward handle 22 to the second end of the fixed shaft 28,
in such a way that pulling the forward handle 22 toward the
back handle 24 results in the sliding shaft 26 sliding
forward relative to the fixed shaft 28.
Accordingly, a
scissors-like motion of the handles 22 and 24 will result in
a reciprocating translational motion of the shaft 26 with
respect to the shaft 28.
The coupler, generally shown at 12, and in a more
detailed view in Fig. 4a, has a coupler body secured to an
output end of the hand controller and a force transmission
mechanism to transmit forces between the hand controller and
the instrument 14. The
coupler body has the fixed shaft
coupler 66, whereas the force transmission mechanism has the
drive pulley 36, and the slider 18. The drive pulley 36 is
connected by a revolute joint 60 at its centre to a platform
120 of the coupler body.
The slider 18 is joined by a
prismatic joint to the platform 120.
Likewise, the fixed
shaft coupler 66 is fixedly attached to the platform 120.
The platform 120 is connected by a revolute roll joint 122
to a five-degree-of-freedom platform 121 representing the
output end of the hand controller.
Referring to Figs. la to lc and 4a to 4d, the
slider 18 has an end 16 and a side extension 64. The slider
end 16 has a sliding shaft coupler, into which the end 20 of

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 10 -
the sliding shaft 26 of the scissors can be inserted and
locked into place. The extension 64 has a first end and a
second end. Its first end is fixedly attached to the side
of the slider 18. Its second end is attached to the drive
pulley 36 by a prismatic-revolute joint 62, at a non-zero
distance from the centre revolute joint 60 of the drive
pulley 36.
The prismatic revolute joint 62 allows both
rotation and sliding in a radial slot 37 made along a radius
of the drive pulley 36. Thus, when the pulley 36 turns, the
lo slider 18 moves in its prismatic joint relative to the
platform 120. Likewise, when the slider 18 moves relative
to the platform 120, the pulley 36 turns. At the same time,
the extension 64 moves relative to the drive pulley 36, both
rotating about joint 62 and moving in slot 61, since the
distance of joint 62 from the revolute joint 60 at the
centre of the pulley 36 varies as the pulley 36 rotates
about its centre.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the
slot 61 would be unnecessary if the prismatic joint 21 on
the removable scissors 14 enabled the slider 26 to separate
from the fixed shaft 28, moving in this case laterally as
the drive pulley 36 rotates.
Then joint 62 would be a
purely revolute joint.
Referring to Figs. lb and 4b, the fixed shaft
coupler 66 has an end 67, into which the end 30 of the fixed
shaft 28 of the instrument can be inserted and locked into
place. Thus when both the slider shaft 26 is locked into
the slider 18 and the fixed shaft 28 is locked into the
fixed coupler 66, as in Fig. lc, the sliding motion of the
sliding shaft 26 relative to the fixed shaft 28 is conveyed
to the sliding motion of the slider 18 relative to the
platform 120. This in turn is conveyed to a rotation of the
drive pulley 36 about the revolute joint 60, as explained
previously. Additionally, the sliding motion of the sliding
shaft 26 relative to the fixed shaft 28 is activated by the
motion of the forward handle 22 relative to the back handle

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 11 -
24.
Thus relative motion of these handles 22 and 24 is
matched to a rotation of the drive pulley 36.
Referring to Fig. lc, rotation of the drive shaft
pulley 36 is measured by an angular sensor 68.
In the
exemplary embodiment, the angle sensors are contactless
magneto-restrictive sensors that offer a minimum of
rotational friction. By sensing near the handle, the hand
controller has maximum stability when the computer program
simulates contact with a virtual rigid body.
lo Mosquito Forceps and Coupler. Other types of
instruments may be connected by similar means to the coupler
12 of Figs. 4a and 4b.
Figs. 2a to 2c show a pair of
mosquito forceps 46. Like the rongeur 14, the forceps 46
have a fixed shaft 28, a sliding shaft 26, a fixed handle 24
and a moveable handle 22.
Unlike the rongeur 14, the
forceps 46 are shown oriented horizontally in the top view
of Fig. 2a, whereas the rongeur 14 is oriented vertically in
this view (Fig. la). Therefore, the sliding shaft 26 is on
the same horizontal level as the fixed shaft 28, rather than
being vertically above it, as in the rongeur 14. The
forceps are therefore connected to the coupler 12 at right
angles to the orientation of the rongeur 14.
The force transmission mechanism of the coupler 12
in Figs. 2a to 2c has the drive pulley 36, the slider 18,
and the vertical fixed shaft coupler 66, whereas the coupler
body has a horizontal fixed shaft coupler 70. The vertical
fixed shaft coupler 66 accepts the fixed shaft 28 of
vertically oriented instruments such as the rongeur 14
(Figs. la to lc), while the horizontal fixed shaft coupler
70 is additionally provided to accept the fixed shaft 28 of
horizontally oriented instruments such as the forceps 46.
The sliding shaft coupler 16 therefore accepts the sliding
shaft 26 of either vertically or horizontally aligned
instruments.
The sliding shaft 26 is joined to the fixed shaft
28 by a prismatic joint, generally shown as a bracket 21
that binds the two shafts together, but allows them to slide

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 12 -
relative to each other. The fixed shaft 28 has a first end
42 and a second end. Its first end 42 is designed to fasten
to the matching fixed shaft coupler 70 in the coupler 12.
Its second end is fixedly attached to the fixed handle 24.
The sliding shaft 26 has a first end 40 and a second end.
Its first end 40 is designed to fasten to a matching sliding
shaft coupler 16 in the coupler 12 (Figs. 4a and 4b). Its
second end is attached by a revolute joint 84 to one end of
link 82.
The other end of the link 82 is attached by a
lo revolute joint 86 to an extension 80 of the moveable handle
22. A second revolute joint 32 attaches the moveable handle
22 to the second end of the fixed shaft 28, in such a way
that pulling the moveable handle 22 toward the fixed handle
24 results in the sliding shaft 26 sliding forward relative
to the fixed shaft 28.
Referring to Figs. 2a to 2c, in the case of the
forceps shown at 46, a latch 44 is optionally provided that
will latch the handles at one position, so that the handles
may be squeezed more tightly together but cannot be pushed
apart without releasing the latch.
Thumb Forceps and Coupler. Figs. 3a to 3c show a
third exemplary instrument handle modified to allow
attachment to the hand controller via the coupler 12
(Figs. 4a and 4b). This is a thumb forceps, shown generally
at 50. Like the rongeur 14 (Figs. la to 1c), this device 50
has a fixed shaft 28, a sliding shaft 26, a fixed handle
stub 90 and a moveable handle stub 91. The thumb forceps 50
is therefore connected to the coupler 12 in the same
orientation as the rongeur 14, with end 20 of sliding shaft
26 mating with coupler 16, and end 30 of fixed shaft 28
mating with coupler 66 (Figs. 4a and 4b).
The thumb forceps 50 consists of a top leaf 94 and
a bottom leaf 95.
The two leaves are made of spring
material, so that if they are bent they tend to return to
their original shape in elastic fashion. The
top leaf 94
has a first end and a second end. Likewise, the bottom leaf
95 has a first end and a second end. The first ends of both

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 13 -
pieces are bent to the outside, so the first end of the top
leaf 94 is bent upward, while the first end of the bottom
leaf 95 is bent downward. The first end of the top leaf 94
is fixedly attached to the first end of the bottom leaf 95
at junction 96, so that if a user squeezes the second ends
together using the thumb and forefinger, they will offer
some resistance and push back on the user's thumb and
forefinger.
The second end of the top leaf 94 is attached by a
lo rotary joint 92 to the fixed handle stub 90.
The fixed
handle stub 90 is fixedly attached to one end of the fixed
shaft 28. The second end of the bottom leaf 95 is attached
by a rotary joint 93 to the moveable handle stub 91.
The sliding shaft 26 has the first end 40 and a
second end. Its
first end 40 is designed to fasten to a
matching sliding shaft coupler 16 in the coupler 12, as has
been described previously (Figs. 4a and 4b). Its second end
is attached by a revolute joint 84 to one end of link 82.
The other end of the link 82 is attached by a revolute joint
86 to an extension 80 of the moveable handle stub 91. A
second revolute joint 32 attaches the moveable handle stub
91 to the second end of the fixed shaft 28 via link 82, in
such a way that moving the moveable handle stub 91 toward
the fixed handle stub 90 results in the sliding shaft 26
sliding forward relative to the fixed shaft 28.
Because of the attachment of the second end of the
bottom and top leaves 94 and 95 to the fixed and moveable
handle stubs 90 and 91, respectively, then squeezing the
second ends of the leaves 94 and 95 together will result in
the moveable handle stub 91 being pulled toward the fixed
handle stub 90, and thus the slider shaft 26 moving relative
to the fixed slider shaft 28. When the thumb forceps 50 is
docked into the coupler 12, then squeezing the leaves 94 and
95 of the thumb forceps 50 will result in rotation of the
drive wheel 36. Likewise, rotation of the drive wheel 36
will result in the first ends of the leaves 94 and 95 of the
thumb forceps 50 being moved apart or toward one another.

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 14 -
Alternative Coupling Mechanisms.
The coupling
between the instruments, shown generally at 14/46/50 in
Figs. 4c and 4d, may be made in different ways.
Fig. 5a
shows a central slider 76 inside a fixed outer casing 74.
The alternative coupling is symmetric in rotation, including
the latch notch 72. The fixed couplers 66 and 70 of the
coupler 12 (Figs. 4a and 4h) would then be replaced by a
single coupler arranged around the slider coupler 16 (which
receives the slider 76) and designed to accept the fixed
outer casing 74.
Fig. 5b shows the end 20 of the sliding shaft 26
and the end 30 of the fixed shaft 28.
The shape of the
prismatic joint 21 between the shafts 26 and 28 ensures that
they will not easily pry apart, while moving with respect to
is the joint 21.
In both Fig. 5a and Fig. 5b, the notch 72 may be
seen in the sliding shaft 26 and in the fixed shaft.
Fig. 5c shows an exemplary mechanism for latching the shaft
ends 20 and 30 into place in the coupler 12. Sliding shaft
end 20 is inserted into sliding coupler 18, and fixed shaft
end 30 is inserted into fixed coupler 66.
As mentioned
previously, both the sliding shaft end 20 and the fixed
shaft end 30 have the notches 72.
Exemplary details are given for the sliding shaft
coupling. A
plunger 140 fits into the notch 72 of the
sliding shaft end 20. The plunger has a first end and a
second end. The first end of the plunger passes through a
hole 141 in the wall of the coupler 18.
It is shaped so
that it will not fall completely through the hole 141. When
the sliding shaft end 20 is removed, the first end of the
plunger 140 goes into the cavity left by the shaft. When
the sliding shaft end 20 is reinserted, its slanted shape
pushes the plunger 140 upward.
A similar mechanism would hold for the inside
slider 76/outside shell 74 mechanism. In
this case, the
inside slider 76 would project further into the receiving
coupler 12, so that the latch could be set onto the inside

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 15 -
slider 76 and outside slider 74 at different locations in
the receiving coupler 12. Alternately, an elongated hole
could be provided in the outside case 74 by which a narrower
plunger 140 could penetrate through the outside shell and
latch onto the inside slider 76, but still permit the slider
to move linearly in its prismatic joint 21.
A flat plate 142, seen from the side in Fig. 5c,
is joined at its centre to a support 145 by a revolute joint
144.
The support 145 is fixedly attached to the sliding
coupler 18. The flat plate 142 has a first end and a second
end. The first end is attached by a revolute joint 143 to
the second end of the plunger 140. The second end of the
plate 142 is pushed upward by a spring 146. Thus the flat
plate 142 acts as a lever, pushing the plunger 140 into the
hole 141 and securing the sliding shaft end 20 in place by
pressing into the notch 72.
A similar device secures the fixed shaft end 30.
When a user wants to remove the removable scissors or like
instrument, pressure is applied manually on the second ends
of both plates 142, thereby pulling the plungers out of
their positions and releasing the shaft ends 20 and 30.
Means for Imparting Force to the Scissors.
An
example of means for imparting force to the removable
scissors is shown in Fig. 6a. A
rotary motor 101 has a
capstan 100 attached to its output shaft. A
tendon 102
connects the capstan 100 to the drive pulley 36. The tendon
102 may pass over numerous idlers, although not shown. The
capstan 100 has a radius rl, and the drive pulley 36 has a
radius r2.
If the motor exerts a torque Tl, then the tendon
102 has a tension Fl = Ti/r1. The outside of the pulley 36
at radius r2 is therefore pulled with a force Fl, giving a
torque T2 = r2 x Fl.
The torque T2 is different from the
original motor torque Tl by a factor r2/r1, since
T2 = (r2/r1) x T1 by substitution of the first equation for
Fl into the second equation for T2. In an exemplary case,
the capstan 100 has a radius of 5 mm, and the drive pulley

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 16 -
36 has a radius of 20 mm, so the torque at the drive pulley
36 is four times the torque at the motor capstan 100.
The relation between the instrument (e.g., rongeur
14, forceps 46/50) and the coupler 12 is for all these
instruments, but will be described with respect to the
rongeur 14 by way of an example to simplify the description.
Referring to Figs. 6a and 6b, the drive pulley 36 is
connected to the moveable scissors handle 22 by the sliding
shaft 26. The fixed shaft 28 supports the fixed scissors
handle 24. The handles are joined at a revolute joint 32,
represented symbolically at the center of a solid disk 104
in Fig. 6a. In this representation, the moveable handle 22
is fixedly attached to the solid disk 104, so that when the
handle 22 moves, the disk 104 rotates about its center 32.
As described above, the first end of the sliding shaft 26 is
connected to the drive pulley 36 by the revolute joint 60,
and the second end of the sliding shaft 26 is connected to
the solid disk 104 by a revolute joint 34.
The distance
between joint 34 and the disk centre joint 32 is a radius
r4. The
distance between the centre of the ring of the
handle 22 and the disk centre joint 32 is a radius r5.
The distance between the revolute joint 60 and the
drive pulley 36 centre is a radius r3. The drive pulley 36
has a radius r2.
The shafts 26 and 28, the drive pulley 36 and the
solid disk 104 form a four-bar mechanism. It is redrawn in
Fig. 6b to emphasize its four-bar design, and again in
Fig. 6c to mark the corresponding links with symbols. The
four-bar is shown as a parallelogram with corners A, B, C
and D, but the equations can be generalized to unequal link
lengths.
The radii r2, r3, r4 and r5 are marked on the
diagram.
Radius r5 is shown going upward from joint 32
through joint 34, as if the moveable handle 22 were on the
other side of the device from its location in Fig. 6a. The
two positions are equivalent, since the handle is fixedly
attached to the assumed disk 104, and the angle of

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 17 -
attachment is of no consequence as far as the kinematics are
concerned.
The parallel four-bar has four links. Link al is
the frame link, and is assumed to be grounded, or fixedly
attached to the earth. This corresponds to the fixed shaft
28 of the replaceable instrument.
Link a2 is the input
link, with the length r3 between joints 60 and 62. link a4
is the output link, with length r4 between joints 32 and 34.
Link a3 is the connecting link, corresponding to the sliding
lo shaft 26. Angle y between link al and link a2 is the input
angle.
Angle a between link a2 and link a3 is the
connecting angle. Angle 13 between link a3 and link a4 is
the transmission angle. Angle 0 between link a4 and link al
is the output angle.
The analysis is made by considering each moveable
link as a free body. Fig. 6d shows the forces acting on the
input link a2, the connecting link a3 and the output link
a4.
Force F is at right angles to link a2, since it
originates in a tendon wrapped around the pulley and
emerging tangentially to its circumference. To
emphasize
this, it is marked F1 on the diagram.
In addition, any
force component parallel to the link would not cause a
movement, since such movement is constrained by the revolute
joint 60 at end A of the link a2.
Similarly, the output
force is taken as component F1' normal to the output link
a4. The force F1' is shown acting on the link, as required
by free body analysis.
Connecting link a3 has two forces acting on it,
+Fe at the left end, and -Fc at the right end (taking the
right direction to be positive, and the left direction to be
negative).
The forces are equal, because the link is in
static equilibrium, moving neither to the right nor to the
left. There are no force components normal to the link,
because the link is in static equilibrium, and does not
rotate clockwise or anti-clockwise. So the two forces, +Fc
and -Fc, are equal and directed along the link.

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 18 -
Consider the input link a2 as a free body. Force
F1 pushes from the left at a distance r2 from point A (the
revolute joint between the input link a2 and the frame link
al). Force F, from the link pushes from the right, and a
reaction force FA pushes from point A. The torque around
point A must add to zero, so taking a sum of torque about A,
r2 F1 - r3 F, sin a = 0
The term r3 sin a takes into account the lever arm of the
force Fc from the connecting rod.
In the same way, the
lo torque about point D on the output link a4 must add up to
zero. The external force F' pushes back on the link, giving
it a negative direction, while force Fc pushes from the
left.
- r5 F1' + r4 F, sin p = 0
Combining the equations to eliminate the connecting link
force Fc, we find
F1' = F1 = r2 = r4 = sin 0
r3 = r5 = sin a
This may be related to the motor torque by inserting
F1 = T/r1 from an earlier analysis of the pulley system, to
give,
F1' = T1 = r2 = r4 = sin p
rl = r3 = r5 = sin a
In the special case of a parallelogram r2 = r3 =
r4 = r5, and sin p = sin(n - a) = sin a, and F1' = F1. The
output force from a parallel four-bar is equal to the input
force.
For other configurations, the equation holds, and
the links can be configured to set the desired force on the
scissors. Thus a correct choice of radii r2, r3, r4 and r5
gives the optimal force and angular range of motion for
simulation forces felt at the scissors handles while
executing cutting or clamping procedures.
One restriction that is placed on a four-bar
assembly is that the connecting angle a and the transmission

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 19 -
angle p should not be less than 450.
Below these angles,
coupling of motion through the connecting link is
inefficient, and the four-bar can lock up, with either the
output or the input link unable to move. This restricts the
linear motion of the slider to the distance between the ends
of an arc described by a point on the pulley at a given
radius r, while the pulley rotates between y = 45 and
y = 450 + 90 .
This distance is given by 2 r sin 45 = r42.
If 5 mm of motion the sliding shaft is desired, then the
lo radii r3 and r4 are approximately 3 mm or more.
In our exemplary case, we have T1 = 50 mN.m,
rl = 5 mm, r2 = 20 mm, r3 = 3 mm, r4 = 10 mm, r5 = 40 mm,
and we assume sin p = sin a, giving F1' = 17 N.
This is
comparable to the standard male gripping strength of 50 N.
The torque is quoted for a 10 W Maxon RE025 motor. Larger
motors would give greater torque.
The replaceable instrument mechanism generally
shown at 10 is mounted on a moveable platform. As described
previously, the coupler, generally shown at 12 in Figs. la
to 4b, has the drive pulley 36, and the slider 18 as part of
the force transmission mechanism, and the fixed shaft
coupler 66 has part of the coupler body. The drive pulley
36 is connected by the revolute joint 60 at its centre to
the platform 120. The slider 18 is joined by a prismatic
joint to the platform 120.
Likewise, the fixed shaft
coupler 66 is fixedly attached to the platform 120.
The
platform 120 is connected by the revolute roll joint 122 to
the platform 121, which is part of the haptic device.
Fig. 7 shows an isometric view of a pulley
assembly 123 allowing to route the tendon 102 from the
platform 121 over the roll joint 122 to the drive pulley 36.
Fig. 10a shows another view of the pulley assembly 123.
Seven pulleys are provided to make the transfer.
The
pulleys are configured so that turning the platform 120 in
roll around axis 124 relative to the moveable platform 121
will not result in a change to the overall length of the
tendon 102. The pulley set consists of a large pulley 112

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 20 -
generally in the same plane as the drive pulley 36 when the
roll joint 122 is in its home position, as shown in Fig. 7.
An inner set of roll idlers 114 and 115, an outer set of
roll idlers 116 and 117, and a set of crossover idlers 130
and 132 complete the pulley assembly 123.
The axes of rotation of idlers 114 and 115 are
generally orthogonal to the axis of rotation 125 of the
large pulley 112, and to the roll axis 124. Likewise, the
axes of rotation of idlers 116 and 117 are generally
lo orthogonal to the axis of rotation 126 of the scissors
pulley 36, and to the roll axis 124.
Reference will now generally be made to left-side
parts and right-side parts, as shown in Fig. 7.
It is
pointed out that Fig. 10a is a view from the underside of
the assembly 123, so right and left are reversed in this
view when compared to Fig. 7.
The tendon 102 has a left tendon half 106 and a
right tendon half 108. The left tendon half 106 is routed
by a one-quarter turn around the large pulley 112, over the
left inner roll idler 114, under the left crossover idler
130 (Fig. 10a), back up over the right outer idler 117, and
around the right side of the drive pulley 36. From the left
side of the drive pulley 36, the tendon right half 108 is
routed over the left outer idler 116, under the right
crossover idler 132 (Fig. 10a), over the right inner idler
115, and by a three-quarter turn around the large pulley
112. The idlers are arranged so that the tendon 102 arrives
at each pulley in a direction tangential to the surface of
the pulley, and generally in the plane of the pulley.
Fig. 8 shows a view of the assembly along the roll
axis 124 from the direction of the instrument.
The
platform 120 is shown in a position rolled about 45
counterclockwise from the home position. The tendon 102 can
be seen routed around idlers 112, 114, 115, 116 and 117, and
the drive pulley 36.
Idlers 116 and 117, and the drive
pulley 36 are shown rotated in roll about axis 124, since
they are attached to the platform 120. Idlers 112, 114 and

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 21 -
115 are shown in the same position as in Fig. 7, since they
are attached to the moveable platform 121.
Fig. 9a shows the tendon path in stylized form.
The large idler 112 is stationary in this frame, and the
s drive pulley 36, being mounted on the platform 120, is shown
rotated in roll.
Fig. 9b shows the overall tendon path as a
continuous loop from the right side of the large pulley 112,
around the roll joint 122, around the drive pulley 36,
around the roll joint 122 again, and back to the left side
of the large pulley 112. The drive pulley 36 has an axis of
rotation 126 that is normal to the roll axis 124. If the
tendon ends at the large pulley 112 are held, then rotating
the platform 120 about the roll axis 124 will result in
ls rotation of the drive pulley 36 about its axis 126.
On the other hand, holding the drive pulley 36
from rotating about its axis 126 will result in movement of
the tendon 102 about the large pulley 112. Therefore the
entire path of tendon 102 over its idler pulleys 112, 114,
115, 116, 117, 130, 132 and other idlers not shown along the
tendon path between the capstan 100 and the large pulley
112, must have low friction. In addition, the motor 101 and
all pulleys and idlers must have low inertia. To the extent
that these conditions are not met, the instrument will tend
to open or close as the platform 120 is rotated about the
roll axis 122.
In the exemplary system, care has been taken to
ensure that all idlers have low friction, and that the motor
101 and all pulleys and idlers have low inertia.
For
example, friction in the roll joint without the instrument
(but with tendon 102, together with the motor 101 and the
guide pulleys along the path between the roll joint and the
motor) is under 5 ml\I=m of torque.
The crossover pulleys 130 and 132 are shown in
Fig. 10b. In
this exemplary embodiment, left crossover
pulley 130 is an open-frame pulley, while the right
crossover pulley 132 is a closed-frame pulley.
In the

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 22 -
assembly, the right crossover pulley 132 is mounted inside
the open-frame left crossover pulley 130. The left tendon
half 106 (Fig. 10a) is routed under the left crossover idler
130, while the right tendon half 108 (Fig. 10a) is routed
under the right crossover idler 132 and through the centre
of the left crossover idler 130. Thus, the tendon halves
106 and 108 can cross over under the roll joint 122 without
touching each other.
It is possible to route the tendons so that no
io crossover is necessary.
Fig. 10c shows an alternative
configuration of the pulley assembly 123 from a similar
viewpoint as for Fig. 10a, while Fig. 10d shows the
alternative tendon routing from a similar viewpoint as for
Fig. 7.
Thus Fig. 10a and Fig. 10c show alternative
configurations of the pulley assembly 123.
In the alternative configuration, the crossover
pulleys 130 and 132 are replaced by a single roll idler 180
with an axis of rotation coincident with the roll axis 124.
As in Fig. 10a, the axes of rotation of idlers 114 and 115
are generally orthogonal to the axis of rotation of the
large pulley 112, and to the roll axis 124.
Unlike
Fig. 10a, however, the axes of rotation of idlers 116 and
117 are generally parallel to the axis of rotation 126 of
the drive pulley 36, and orthogonal to the roll axis 124.
This does not change the consideration of the independence
of the scissors angle opening of the roll angle, as
discussed in conjunction with Figs. 9a and 9b.
The left half 106 of tendon 102 is routed by a
one-quarter turn around the large pulley 112, over the left
inner roll idler 114, then under the single roll idler 180,
across its top surface and onto left outer idler 116, thence
around the left side of the drive pulley 36. From the right
side of the drive pulley 36, the tendon half 108 is routed
around the right outer idler 117, across and under the
single roll idler 180, then up over the right inner idler
115, and by a three-quarter turn around the large idler 112.

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 23 -
From the point of view of distance along the roll
axis 124, the left outer idler 116 is placed closer to the
large idler 112 than the right outer idler 117. Similarly,
the left inner idler 114 is placed closer to the large idler
112 than the right inner idler 115. The tendon half 106 is
fed from the left inner idler 114 around the roll idler 180
to the left outer idler 116. Similarly, the tendon half 108
is fed from the right inner idler 115 around the roll idler
180 to the right outer idler 117. Because the left idlers
lo 114 and 116 are closer to the large idler 112 than the right
idlers 115 and 117, the wrapping of the left tendon 106
around the roll idler 180 is closer to the large idler 112
than the wrapping of the right tendon 108. Thus, the two
wrappings are separated. In this way, the tendon paths wind
in a helical fashion about the roll idler 180, but do not
touch each other.
Moreover, to ensure free rotation of the platform
120 about roll joint 122, the left outer idler 116, although
it is closer to the large idler 112 than the right outer
idler 117, it must be farther from the large idler 112 than
the right inner idler 115. On rotation clockwise about roll
axis 124, tendon 106 eventually touches tendon 108,
preventing further rotation.
The same is true of
counterclockwise rotation. The interference between strings
is estimated to occur at 125 clockwise rotation, or 235
counterclockwise rotation. If the idlers were not separated
in the manner just described, idlers 115 and 116 themselves
would touch upon rotation of the platform 120 about the roll
axis 124. This would give a more restricted range of roll
angles, since idlers 115 and 116 subtend a larger angle in
roll than the narrow tendons.
We note that the tendon routing configuration 123
shown in Fig. 10a also has a restricted range of roll, since
tendon 108 passing through the inner idler 132 would touch
the inside surface of the outer idler 130 if platform 120 is
rotated counterclockwise by less than 90 . If platform 120
is rotated counterclockwise by 180 , then tendon 106 would

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 24 -
become disengaged from its idlers.
For this reason, the
alternative tendon routing shown in Figs. 10c and 10d offers
a wider range of rotation of the platform 120 about the roll
axis 124.
It would be clear to those conversant with the art
that the description of the mechanism in terms of "right"
and "left" do not preclude the possibility of interchanging
the left and right sides of the assembly.
The mechanism 10 described above presents several
lo advantages. Various types of instruments can be attached to
the coupler and removed, so that the operator feels the
shape and texture of each instrument in ways reminiscent of
the corresponding instrument as it is used in surgery.
Because in a preferred embodiment the removable
instrument is mounted on the sixth joint of a six-degree-of-
freedom hand controller, a high degree of movement is
permitted. In this way, many different surgical procedures
can be duplicated, with the instrument oriented in the hand
of the surgeon in ways appropriate for each surgical
procedure.
In the exemplary case of the hand controller, the
device is counterbalanced, so that the only weight that the
surgeon feels is the weight of the instrument itself.
Because of the counterweights, the five-degree-of-freedom
moveable platform 121 is balanced in a gravitational field.
Accordingly, the coupler 12 maintains any position without
assistance when no motion is transmitted by the instrument.
This reduces the load on the motors, which can put their
energy into positioning rather than holding a position.
Another embodiment of the moveable platform 121 is
shown at 168 in Fig. 14. The instrument of the replaceable
instruments mechanism 10 is shown in place in an apparatus
168, at the end of a balanced arm.
The replaceable
instrument mechanism 10 may itself be counterbalanced
partially by the addition of counterweights 162 to the
distal stage 164, as shown in Fig. 13. The counterweights
162 will serve to balance the weight of the replaceable

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 25 -
mechanism 10 about the pitch axis 166 of the distal
stage 164. The force transmission mechanism in this example
has the pulley 36 mounted directly to the pivot of the
scissors-like handle.
A further embodiment of the removeable instrument
mechanism 10 is illustrated in Fig. 15. In this embodiment,
idlers 114 and 115 are shown supported by brackets 186
fixedly attached to the distal stage 164. Similarly, idlers
116 and 117 are supported by brackets 188 fixedly attached
lo to the platform 120. The large idler 112 may be seen in its
location in the distal stage 164.
Likewise, the drive
pulley 36 is seen in its location in the platform 120. The
fixed scissors handle 24 is fixedly attached to the platform
120, while the moveable scissors handle 22 is fixedly
attached to the drive pulley 36. In
this embodiment, the
scissors handles 22 and 24 can each be detached and
reattached from the assembly by couplings 182 and 184,
respectively. These are prismatic joints that may be, for
example, in the form of the dovetail joint shown in Fig. 5b.
Fig. 16 shows the handle coupling in more detail.
The handle 24 is fixedly attached to a member 190 by means
of a dovetail joint 184.
The member 190 has its body
fixedly attached to the platform 120, and is formed into a
receptacle half 192 of the dovetail joint 184.
The handle 24 has a first end and a second end.
Its first end has a finger ring 198, into which a user may
insert a finger. Its second end is formed into an insertion
half 194 of the dovetail joint 184 that is complementary to
the dovetail joint 192 in member 190, so that the ends 192
and 194 may be slid together by prismatic motion, so that
the two form the complete joint 184.
The joint 184 is
further secured by a screw 196. A hole 193 with threads
that match the screw 196 is made in the middle of end 192.
A hole 195 through which the screw 196 passes is made in the
middle of joint 194. The screw 196 is then inserted into
the hole 195, and screwed into the threaded hole 193,
thereby holding the dovetail joint 184 securely closed. One

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 26 -
skilled in the art would recognize that the joint 184 could
equally well have been secured in the opposite direction,
with threads in hole 195 and hole 193 widened to allow the
screw 196 to pass.
A rotational sensor 68 mounted in the coupler 12
permits the opening angle of the scissors to be determined
from the rotational angle of the drive pulley 36.
Since
this angle is determined close to the hand of the user,
there is minimal time lag in sensing the angle, as there
lo would be if the angle sensor 68 were mounted near the drive
capstan 100.
This permits the simulation of contact with
virtual rigid bodies.
Preloaded bearings in each joint, including the
roll joint, the idler rotational joints, and the joints of
the removable instruments, allow response with reduced
backlash and a minimum of friction.
Alternative means for attachment of the instrument
to the device are possible.
Fig. lla shows an exemplary
embodiment with the handles 24 and 22 separately attached,
with the fixed handle 24 plugged into the platform 120 and
the moveable handle 22 attached directly to the drive pulley
36 by means of a temporary coupler, rather than attached by
means of sliding member 18.
In a second alternative embodiment shown in
Fig. 11b, the fixed handle 24 alone is connected to the
platform 120 by way of, for example, the vertical fixed
shaft coupler 66 (Figs. 4a and 4h) or the horizontal fixed
shaft coupler 70, or even by way of the moveable shaft
coupler 16.
In this way, non-jointed handles of different
types can be attached to the hand controller by way of the
same coupling mechanism that is used to temporarily attach
revolute jointed handle mechanisms.
Again alternatively, as shown in Fig. llc, a
handle that has only a prismatic joint, such as a plunger
mechanism 170 operating in a casing 172, can be operated
with sliding shaft 26 fixedly attached to the plunger 170,
and fixed shaft 28 fixedly attached to the casing 172, and

CA 02550077 2006-06-09
- 27 -
the assembly attached to the receiver on the platform 120 by
way of the moveable shaft coupler 16 and one of the fixed
shaft couplers 66 or 70, and both sensed in linear position
and activated by way of the sensor 68 and the drive shaft
18. This could
most conveniently be coupled using the
inside slider/outside shell mechanism pictured at 74 and 76
in Fig. 5a.
By making use of a magneto-resistance effect angle
sensor connected to a 16-bit analog to digital converter,
the mechanism can deliver an angular resolution of some 7
seconds of arc over a 120 degree range of motion of the
drive pulley 36, without the weight, size and expense
penalties incurred by optical encoders. This angular range
is well suited for the opening angle of a typical hand-held
surgical instrument, where ranges of motion of only 20
degrees are common. Alternatively, a precise linear sensor
sensing the movement of the sliding drive shaft 18 relative
to the fixed coupler 66 or 70 could be used in the same way
with a 16-bit analogue to digital converter.
Fig. 12 illustrates a processing system for
coupling the hand controller device to a computer.
The
angle sensor signal 152 is conditioned to provide a clean
signal of the instrument motion.
In operation, the user chooses the instrument from
a set of choices, illustrated by 14, 46 and 50, and plugs
the instrument into the haptic device through the coupler
12. The user
then grasps the handles 22 and 24 of the
instrument, and moves them toward or away from each other,
while at the same time positioning the instrument with three
translational degrees of freedom and three rotational
degrees of freedom, according to a preferred embodiment.
Movements of the moveable handle 22 relative to the fixed
handle 24 are measured by the rotational sensor 68 attached
to the drive pulley 36 on the platform 120.
In the processing system of Fig. 12, the voltages
representing angle sensor signals 152 of the sensor 68,
together with other angle sensors on the hand controller,

CA 02550077 2012-11-13
-28-
are passed to a computer 150 through a signal conditioner
154 and an analogue to digital converter 156. In the signal
conditioner 154, the signals 152 are amplified to the full
voltage range of the A/D converter 156 and filtered with a
100 Hz low pass filter to remove noise.
In a preferred embodiment, a program in the
computer 150 accepts the angle measurements 152 and moves a
virtual instrument synchronously with the motion of the
mechanism 10. If desired, the computer program computes the
required force to be reflected to the user's hand, when, for
example, the virtual probe touches a virtual surface. The
program uses kinematics algorithms to convert this required
force to a required motor torque, then to a voltage known to
produce that torque which is fed to a digital to analogue
converter 158. The output of the D/A converter 158 is fed
to a voltage to current converter 160 connected to the motor
101. The current applied to the motor 101 then produces the
required torque.
In a preferred embodiment, the motor 101 is a
10-Watt DC motor from Maxon, Model 118746, with precious-
metal brushes, although the 20-Watt Model 118752 with carbon
brushes may also be used, with its increased power but
slightly greater commutation noise. The D/A converter 158
is a PCI-6208 converter from Adlink, while the voltage to
current converter 160 for each motor is a model PA12A
converter from Apex. The
rotational sensors 68 is a
magneto-resistance sensor from Midori America Corporation,
Model CP-2UPX. The A/D
converter 156 for up to eight
sensors is a KPCI-3107 converter from Keithley.

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 2016-06-09
Lettre envoyée 2015-06-09
Accordé par délivrance 2014-01-21
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2014-01-20
Inactive : Taxe finale reçue 2013-11-05
Préoctroi 2013-11-05
Lettre envoyée 2013-08-19
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2013-08-19
month 2013-08-19
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2013-08-19
Inactive : Approuvée aux fins d'acceptation (AFA) 2013-08-15
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2012-11-13
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2012-09-28
Lettre envoyée 2011-05-02
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 2011-04-15
Requête d'examen reçue 2011-04-15
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2011-04-15
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2011-04-15
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 2011-04-15
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 2006-12-10
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2006-12-10
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2006-11-02
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2006-11-02
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2006-10-12
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2006-10-12
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2006-10-12
Inactive : Certificat de dépôt - Sans RE (Anglais) 2006-07-21
Lettre envoyée 2006-07-21
Demande reçue - nationale ordinaire 2006-07-18

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2013-03-12

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Les taxes sur les brevets sont ajustées au 1er janvier de chaque année. Les montants ci-dessus sont les montants actuels s'ils sont reçus au plus tard le 31 décembre de l'année en cours.
Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Taxe pour le dépôt - générale 2006-06-09
Enregistrement d'un document 2006-06-09
TM (demande, 2e anniv.) - générale 02 2008-06-09 2008-05-06
TM (demande, 3e anniv.) - générale 03 2009-06-09 2009-06-01
TM (demande, 4e anniv.) - générale 04 2010-06-09 2010-06-09
TM (demande, 5e anniv.) - générale 05 2011-06-09 2011-03-21
Requête d'examen - générale 2011-04-15
TM (demande, 6e anniv.) - générale 06 2012-06-11 2012-03-14
TM (demande, 7e anniv.) - générale 07 2013-06-10 2013-03-12
Taxe finale - générale 2013-11-05
TM (brevet, 8e anniv.) - générale 2014-06-09 2014-04-04
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
MPB TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
IAN SINCLAIR
MARILYN J. POWERS
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Description 2006-06-08 29 1 349
Abrégé 2006-06-08 1 32
Revendications 2006-06-08 4 130
Dessins 2006-06-08 12 205
Dessin représentatif 2006-11-15 1 15
Page couverture 2006-11-27 2 59
Revendications 2011-04-14 4 141
Description 2012-11-12 28 1 328
Page couverture 2013-12-16 2 59
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 2006-07-20 1 105
Certificat de dépôt (anglais) 2006-07-20 1 158
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 2008-02-11 1 113
Rappel - requête d'examen 2011-02-09 1 117
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 2011-05-01 1 178
Avis du commissaire - Demande jugée acceptable 2013-08-18 1 163
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2015-07-20 1 171
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2015-07-20 1 171
Correspondance 2013-11-04 2 67