Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2576937 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2576937
(54) Titre français: COMPOSITIONS NUTRITIVES AMELIOREES POUR SOLS ET METHODES D'UTILISATION
(54) Titre anglais: IMPROVED SOIL NUTRIENT COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING SAME
Statut: Durée expirée - au-delà du délai suivant l'octroi
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • C09K 17/02 (2006.01)
  • C09K 17/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • SANDERS, JOHN LARRY (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • SPECIALTY FERTILIZER PRODUCTS, LLC
(71) Demandeurs :
  • SPECIALTY FERTILIZER PRODUCTS, LLC (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 2008-12-30
(22) Date de dépôt: 1999-08-31
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 2000-04-06
Requête d'examen: 2007-02-16
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
09/162,013 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 1998-09-28

Abrégés

Abrégé français

On décrit des formulations et des méthodes permettant d'abaisser le pH du sol. Les formulations renferment du sulfate d'ammonium, du soufre élémentaire et un oligo-élément choisi parmi le groupe suivant : zinc, fer, manganèse, cuivre, bore, cobalt, vanadium, sélénium, silicium, nickel et mélanges de ce qui précède. Dans un mode de réalisation préféré, les formulations sont sous forme de granulés et sont appliquées sur le sol de manière à créer des microenvironnements où le pH est plus faible, dans le sol, sans pour autant abaisser le pH du sol dans son ensemble autour de ces microenvironnements. Dans ces microenvironnement, les oligo-éléments sont facilement assimilables par les racines des plantes, et ils sont absorbés plus efficacement par les plantes, ce qui réduit la quantité d'oligo-éléments qu'il faut appliquer sur le sol.


Abrégé anglais

Compositions and methods for lowering the pH of soil are provided wherein the compositions comprise ammonium sulfate, elemental sulfur, and a micronutrient selected from the group consisting of zinc, iron, manganese, copper, boron, cobalt, vanadium, selenium, silicon, nickel, and mixtures thereof. In the preferred embodiment, the compositions are in granulated form and are applied to the soil so as to creat lower pH microenvironments within the soil without decreasing the pH of the overall bulk soil surrounding the microenvironments. In the microenvironments, the micronutrients are readily available to the roots of plants and are taken up by the plants with increased efficiency, thus reducing the quantity of micronutrients required to be applied to the soil.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


Claims
1. A soil nutrient composition comprising ammonium sulfate, elemental sulfur,
and a
micronutrient selected from the group consisting of zinc, iron, manganese,
copper, boron,
cobalt, vanadium, selenium, silicon, nickel and mixtures thereof, the amount
of
ammonium sulfate present in said composition being greater than the amount of
elemental sulfur therein, on a weight basis.
2. The composition of claim 1, said micronutrient selected from the group
consisting of
zinc, boron, iron, copper, manganese and mixtures thereof.
3. The composition of claim 1, wherein said composition comprises from about 5
to
about 49% by weight ammonium sulfate, and from about 2.5 to about 49% by
weight
elemental sulfur, based upon the total weight of the composition taken as 100%
by
weight.
4. The composition of claim 1, said composition being granulated.
5. A composite comprising a self-sustaining body formed of a mixture
comprising
ammonium sulfate, elemental sulfur, and a micronutrient selected from the
group
consisting of zinc, iron, manganese, copper, boron, cobalt, vanadium,
selenium, silicon,
nickel and mixtures thereof, the amount of ammonium sulfate present in said
composite
being greater than the amount of elemental sulfur therein, on a weight basis.
6. The composite of claim 5, said micronutrient selected from the group
consisting of
zinc, boron, iron, copper, manganese and mixtures thereof.
7. The composite of claim 5, wherein said composite comprises from about 5 to
about
49% by weight ammonium sulfate, and from about 2.5 to about 49% by weight
elemental
sulfur, based upon the total weight of the composite taken as 100% by weight.
8

8. The composite of claim 5, said body being a granule.
9. The composite of claim 5, said body having a water solubility of about 10
to about
100%.
10. The composite of claim 5, a plurality of said bodies having a bulk density
of from
about 30 to about 100 lbs/ft3.
11. A method of providing nutrients to soil comprising the steps of:
providing a soil nutrient composition comprising ammonium sulfate, elemental
sulfur, and a micronutrient selected from the group consisting of zinc, iron,
manganese,
copper, boron, cobalt, vanadium, selenium, silicon, nickel and mixtures
thereof, the
amount of ammonium sulfate present in said composition being greater than the
amount
of elemental sulfur therein, on a weight basis; and
contacting said composition with said soil.
12. The method of claim 11, said micronutrient selected from the group
consisting of
zinc, boron, iron, copper, manganese and mixtures thereof.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein said composition comprises from about 5 to
about
49% by weight ammonium sulfate, and from about 2.5 to about 49% by weight
elemental
sulfur, based upon the total weight of the composition taken as 100% by
weight.
14. The method of claim 11, said composition being granulated.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein said contacting step comprises the step of
substantially uniformly spreading said composition on said soil.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein said contacting step further comprises the
step of
incorporating said composition into said soil.
9

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02576937 2007-02-16
WO 00/18703 PCT/US99/19717
IMPROVED SOIL NUTRIENT COIVIPOSITIONS
AND METHODS OF USING SAME
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention.
The pfesent invention is broadly concerned with compositions and methods for
lowering the pH of soil microenvironments so as to increase the micronutrient
uptake
of growing plants. The compositions of the invention are preferably granulated
and
comprise ammonium sulfate, elemental sulfur, and a micronutrient selected from
the
group consisting of zinc, iron, manganese, copper, boron, cobalt, vanadium,
selenium,
silicon, nickel, and mixtures thereof. In the preferred methods of the
invention,
granulated compositions are applied to the soil resulting in the formation of
acidic soil
micro-environments, while the soil surrounding the microenvironments retains
its
original pH. Such localized low pH conditions lead to an increased
availability and
plant uptake of the important micronutrients. In an alternative embodiment,
non-
granulated compositions can be utilixed when it is desirable to decrease the
overall pH
of bulk soil.
Description of the Prior Art.
In order to maintain healthy growth, plants must extract a variety of elements
from the soil in which they grow. These elements include the so-called
micronutrients
zinc, iron, manganese, copper, boron, cobalt, vanadium, selenium, silicon, and
nickel.
However, many soils lack sufficient quantities ofthese micronutrients or
contain them
only in forms which can not be readily taken up by plants. To counteract these
deficiencies, sources of the deficient element(s) are commonly applied to
soils in order
to improve growth rates and yields obtained from crop plants. This application
has
generally been accomplished using oxides, sulfates, oxysulfates, chelates, and
other
fonnulations.
In ordinary agricultural soil, pH's vary from about 4.5 to 8.3. Soils having
pH's
below 6.5 are normally subjected to liming to bring the pH of the soil to
neutral or near-
neutral. Liming is necessary for the availability of many macronutrients (such
as
nitrate, phosphates, magnesium, and especially'calcium). However, when lirne
is
applied, the availability of micronutrients is generally decreased due to the
formation
of insoluble products. This is especially true if over-liming occurs.
Similarly, fields
with naturally occurring pH's in excess of 7 have restricted availability of
micronutrients due to the formation therein of insoluble reaction products
(fixation).
It is known that the availability of most micronutrients increases as the pH
decreases.

CA 02576937 2007-02-16
WO 00/18703 PCT/US99/19717
2
In the past it has been impractical to utilize the knowledge that an acid
environment can
provide enhanced availability of micronutrients. One reason is that, although
micronutrient availability is enhanced by low pH's, maximum crop yields are
normally
obtainable at higher pH's.
In order to compensate for the lack of available micronutrients, many farmers
apply excess amounts of fertilizers containing those micronutrients to the
soil. Farmers'
may however apply expensive foliar applications which may solve the problems,
but
at a high cost to the farmer. The micronutrients (which are generally fixed or
become
unavailable when applied to soils) often limit the uptake of the
macronutrients. The
macronutrients may then wash off or leach out of the soil and contaminate the
groundwater or surface water.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The instant invention overcomes the problems described above by combining
ammonium sulfate, elemental sulfur, and micronutrients into compositions
capable of
providing an acid-forming microenvironment in soil, without decreasing the
overall
bulk soil pH. Preferably, the compositions are granular in form to provide the
low pH,
high micronutrient uptake soil microenvironments. Alternately, if it is
desirable to
decrease the overall bulk soil pH, non-granulated compositions (i.e., a fine
particle
mixture) can be used.
In more detail, the micronutrient compositions of the invention (both
granulated
and non-granulated) comprise ammonium sulfate, elemental sulfur, and a
micronutrient
selected from the group consisting of zinc, iron, manganese, copper, boron,
cobalt,
vanadium, selenium, silicon, nickel, and mixtures thereof. Prefened
micronutrients are
zinc, boron, iron, copper, and manganese, with zinc, boron, iron, and
manganese being
particularly preferred. The preferred ranges of concentrations of each of the
components of the compositions are set forth in Table 1.
While the non-granulated composition itself is useful for decreasing the
overall
pH of the bulk soil, it is a particular advantage of the instant invention
that the
composition can be formed into granules for situations where it is desirable
to decrease
the pH in only small portions of the soil, while not affecting the overall
bulk soil pH.
Broadly, granulated composites in accordance with the invention can be formed
by
granulating a mixture comprising ammonium sulfate, elemental sulfur, and a
micronutrient selected from the group consisting of zinc, iron, manganese,
copper,
boron, cobalt, vanadium, selenium, silicon, nickel, and mixtures thereof. The
granulation of the mixture can be carried out using any known granulation
method.

CA 02576937 2007-02-16
WO 00118703 PCT/US99/19717
3
One preferred method of fonning granulated composites in accordance with the
invention involves mixing ammonium sulfate, elemental sulfiu, and the desired
micronutrient(s) to form a mixture, and then adding a chemical reactant to the
mixture.
Suitable chemical reactants include sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, or
anhydrous
ammonia (or any chemical reactant which will react with the mixture to
generate heat
and thus initiate a chemical binding reaction). The resulting mixture is then
processed -
in any granulation machinery known in the art, including but not limited to
rotary dram
granulators, rotary pan granulators, fluid bed granulators, or prilling
towers. As the
chemical reactions proceed, the granules will harden.
If a physical granulation method is preferred, the same procedure can be
followed as described above for chemical granulation with the exception that,
instead
of adding a chemical reactant to the mixture, a binding agent (such as
lignosulfonates
or attapulgite clay) is added to the mixture. If the use ofphysical or
chemical binding
agents is not desirable, the anunonium sulfate, elemental sulfur, and desired
micronutrient(s) can be ground to a relatively fine mesh size (generally from
about
0.005 mm to about 1.0 mm) and mixed together. The resulting mixture is then
processed through rollers exerting pressures onto the mixtures of from about
20,000 to
about 60,0001bs/inz. The sheets or ribbons of processed material are broken
into small
pieces by a chain mill or other device. These pieces can then be screened into
groups
of uniform sizes before drying.
The preferred micronutrients and the preferred concentration ranges of the
components making up the granulated composites are the same as those described
for
the non-granulated composites above. The micronutrient granules of the instant
invention should have a bulk density of from about 30-100 lbs/ft3, preferably
from
about 45-851bs/ft , and more preferably about 60 lbs/ft3. The granules should
have a
water solubility of from about 10-100%, preferably from about 20-95%, and more
preferably from about 25-90%. The largest surface dimension of the granules is
preferably from about 0.1-30 num, more preferably from about 0.1-3.0 mm, and
most
preferably from about 1.5-3.0 mm. While these ranges are preferred, those
skilled in
the art will recognize that the granule size can be varied according to the
crop with
which it will be used.
The granulated and non-granulated composites of the invention can be applied
to the soil by any method known in the art which suits the needs of the
fartner,
including bybroadcast application, banded application, sidedress application,
with-the-
seed applications, or any combination of these application methods.

CA 02576937 2007-02-16
WO 00/18783 PCT/US99/19717
4
While the non-granulated compositions will decrease the overall bulk soil pHõ
the granulated composites provide intimate contact between the components of
the
granules, resulting in a unique, localized acid microenvironment that
increases the
availability of the micronutrients (i.e., zinc, iron, manganese, copper,
boron, cobalt,
vanadium, selenium, silicon, nickel). When applied to the soil as a
fertilizer, the
microenvironment will have a pH distinct from the pH of the bulk soil
surrounding the
miaroenvironment. As the plant roots randomly grow throughout the soil, they
will
encounter these microenvironments, allowing access to the readily available
micronutrients while simultaneouslypermitting the roots to absorb
othernutrients (such
as nitrogen or phosphorous) from the non-acidified bulk soil surrounding the
microenvironment.
When the granulated composites of the invention are applied to soil, the
resulting rnicroenvironments should have a soil pH of from about 3-7,
preferably from
about 4-6, and more preferably from about 5-6. Expressed another way, the pH
within
the microenvironments should be from about 1-4, and preferably from about 2-3
pH
units lower than the pH of the bulk soil (i.e., soil surrounding the
microenvironments
but whose pH has been essentially unaffected by the granules). The pH of the
microenvironment should remain acidic (i.e., pH of less than 7) for at least
about 30
days, preferably at least about 60 days, and more preferably for from about 90-
120 days
after the granule has been contacted with the soil. The granulatefl composites
can be
randomly distributed throughout the soil (as are the roots of the growing
plants),
however, it is preferred that the granulated composites be distributed in a
quantity such
that a sufficient number of low pH microenvironments are formed to allow an
adequate
number of plant roots to contact the microenvironment, and thus access the
readily
available micronutrients. Therefore, it is preferred that there be from about
1-100
microenvironments per cubic foot of soil, more preferably from about 10-50
microenvironments per cubic foot of soil, and most preferably from about 12-40
microenvironments per cubic foot of soil. Preferably, the microenvironments
(forrned
by granules whose largest surface dimensions are from about 1.5-3.0 mm) are of
such
a size that the largest dimensiona of the microenvironment average from about
5-10
mm, more preferably from about 4-8 mm, and mpst preferably from about 3-6 mm.
Because the microenviromnents are acidic, the micronutrients from the granules
are more readily available, and thus are more efficiently taken up by the
plant roots.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that this efficiency allows for a
substantial
decrease in the quantity of micronutrients required, saving money for the
farmer.
Specifically, use of the granulated composites in accordance with the methods
of the

CA 02576937 2007-02-16
WO 00/18703 PCT/US99/19717
invention results in a decrease of at least about 25% by weight per acre,
preferably at
least about 35% by weight per acre, and more preferably at least about 50% by
weight
per acre, in the quantity of at least one of the micronutrients within the
composites in
comparison to the quantity of the respective micronutrient which would be
required
5 using compositions and methods known in the art.
Table 1
CoZnponent Broad Range' Pref '
ammonium sulfate 5-49% by wt. 10-25% by wt.
elemental sulfur 2.5-49% by wt. 5-25% by wt.
zinc 0.02-74% by wt. 1-40% by wt.
manganese 0.02-55% by wt. 2-40% by wt.
copper 0.02-74% by wt. 1-40% by wt.
iron 0.02-55% by wt. 1-40% by wt.
boron 0.02-18% by wt. 0.05-12% by wt.
nickel 0.015-0.025% by wt. 0.01-0.02% by wt.
cobalt 0.002-0.02% by wt. 0.005-0.01 % by wt.
silicon 1-25% by wt. about 20% by wt.
selenium 0.005-.2% by wt. about 0.125% by wt.
vanadium 0.005-.2% by wt. about 0.09% by wt.
sulfuric acid 5-25% by wt. 10-15% by wt.
Approximate percent by weight, based upon the total weight of the composition
taken as 100% by
weight.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
EXA V! LES
The following examples set forth preferred methods in accordance with the
invention. It is to be understood, however, that these examples are provided
by way of
illustration and nothing therein should be taken as a linutation upon the
overall scope
of the invention.

CA 02576937 2007-02-16
Wo 06n$703 PCT/US99n9717
6
EXAMPLE I
Preparation of a 200/o Copper Ivlicronutrient Composition
The following ingredients were added to a rotary drum granulator and raixed
until substantially homogeneous: 400 lbs of ammonium sulfate; 818 lbs of zinc
oxide
reactant (10% zinc); 432 lbs copper oxide; and 200 lbs elemental sulfur. After
mixing,
286 lbs of sulfaric acid was added to the mixture in the granulator to form a
semi-liquid -
slurry. The granulator (which was angled with its mouth positioned slightly
above the
horizontal) was then rotated in order to form the slurry into granules. As the
granules
reached the appropriate size, they rolled out of the mouth of the granulator
drum. The
formed granules were heated in a dryer (to approximately 200-250 F) causing
the
excess moisture to evaporate and hardening the granule. After drying, the
granules
were passed over a series of vibrating screens in order to obtain only
granules having
a size of from 1.5-3.0 mm. The granules outside this size range were then
crushed and
reprocessed as described above. Those granules having the appropriate sizes
were then
sprayed with a coating of lignosulfonate in order to increase hardness and
reduce dust
formation.
EXAMI'LE 2
Preparation of a 20% Zinc Micronutrient Composition
The following ingredients were mixed in a pug mill mixer mixed until
substantially homogeneous: 400 lbs of ammonium sulfate; 854 lbs of zinc oxide
reactant (10"/o zinc); 397 lbs zinc oxide (76% zinc); and 200 lbs elemental
sulfur. The
resulting mixture was added to a rotary drum granulator, followed by the
addition of
286 lbs of sulfuric acid to the granulator. All of the ingredients were mixed
in the
granulator until a semi-liquid slurry was formed. The granulator was then
rotated in
order to form the slurry into granules, which then exited the mouth of the
drum
(positioned slightly above the horizontal). The formed granules were heated in
a dryer
(to approximately 200-250 F) evaporating the excess moisture and hardening the
granules. After drying, the granules were passed over a series of vibrating
screens in
order to obtain granules having a size of at least 3.0 mm. The granules
outside this size
range were then crushed and reprocessed as desaribed above. Those granules
having
the appropriate size were sprayed with a coating of lignosulfonate.

CA 02576937 2007-02-16
WO 00/18703 PCT/US99/19717 '
7
EXAMPLE 3
Tests were conducted to detennine the effects of various micronutrient
combinations on soil pH's and micronutrient uptakes by soybeans. Those
combinations
were: anunonium sulfate with a micronutrient mix; elemental sulfur with a
micronutrient mix; and a combination of ammonium sulfate and elemental sulfur
with
a micronutrient mix. The micronutrient mixes contained Zn, Fe,1Vin, and Cu in
such-
amounts that the following quantities of each were applied per acre: 1 lb Zn,
0.5 lb Fe,
0.5 lb Mn, and 0.51b Cu. In each run, twenty pounds of sulfur was applied to
each acre
of soil. The sulfur applied in each run was obtained in the following
variations: twenty
pounds of sulfur from (NH4)2SO4; twenty pounds of sulfur that was elementaI
sulfur;
and a combination of ten pounds of sulfur from (NH4}~SO4 and ten pounds of
sulfur that
was elemental sulfur. Each combination was applied to the soil by banded
applications
at planting. The soil pH and leaf tissue was tested at 60 days after planting.
The results
from these tests are set forth in Table 2 below. Treatment (III) decreased the
soil pH
0.5 units more than treatment (I), and treatment (III) decreased the soil pH
1.2 units
more than treatment (II}. This in turn led to a large increase in the uptake
of Zn, Fe,
Mn, and Cu by the plant subjected to treatment (III) in comparison to those
plants
subjected to treatments (1) or (II).
Table 2
Soybean Uptake - ppm
Treatment Soil pH Zn Fe Mn Cu
Control 7.4 37 70 48 5
(1) 20 lbs. from (NH4)2S0' 6.1 42 98 73 7
(II) 201bs. from Sb 6.8 39 84 57 6
(III) 201bs. Combination 5.6 49 160 82 9
wenty pounds of sulfur per acre, with the sulfur being obtained from
(NH,,)zSO,.
ITwenty pounds of sulfur per acre, with the sulfiu being elemental sulfur.
'Twenty pounds of sulfur per acre, with ten pounds of the sulfur being
obtained from (NH4)2SO4 and ten
pounds of the sulfiu being elemental sulfiir.

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2576937 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Représentant commun nommé 2019-10-30
Représentant commun nommé 2019-10-30
Inactive : Périmé (brevet - nouvelle loi) 2019-09-03
Requête pour le changement d'adresse ou de mode de correspondance reçue 2018-06-11
Lettre envoyée 2013-06-11
Accordé par délivrance 2008-12-30
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2008-12-29
Préoctroi 2008-10-08
Inactive : Taxe finale reçue 2008-10-08
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2008-05-06
Lettre envoyée 2008-05-06
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2008-05-06
Inactive : Approuvée aux fins d'acceptation (AFA) 2008-04-17
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2007-04-25
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2007-04-24
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2007-04-24
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2007-04-24
Lettre envoyée 2007-03-14
Lettre envoyée 2007-03-07
Exigences applicables à une demande divisionnaire - jugée conforme 2007-03-06
Lettre envoyée 2007-03-06
Demande reçue - nationale ordinaire 2007-03-06
Demande reçue - divisionnaire 2007-02-16
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 2007-02-16
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2007-02-16
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 2007-02-16
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 2000-04-06

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2008-07-16

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
SPECIALTY FERTILIZER PRODUCTS, LLC
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
JOHN LARRY SANDERS
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Description 2007-02-16 7 401
Abrégé 2007-02-16 1 20
Revendications 2007-02-16 7 270
Page couverture 2007-04-25 1 33
Revendications 2007-02-17 2 76
Page couverture 2008-12-08 1 33
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 2007-03-06 1 176
Avis du commissaire - Demande jugée acceptable 2008-05-06 1 165
Correspondance 2007-03-07 1 38
Correspondance 2007-03-14 1 38
Correspondance 2008-10-08 2 53