Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING
A MACHINING SYSTEM
BACKGROUND
[0001] The invention relates generally to an apparatus for controlling a
machining or a manufacturing system, and more particularly, to an apparatus
for
controlling process parameters of the machining system based upon real-time
measurement of parameters of an object manufactured by the machining system.
[0002] Various types of machining processes are known and are in use for
manufacturing and repairing parts. For example, laser net-shape machining
systems
are used to form functional components that are built layer by layer from a
computer-
aided design (CAD). Typically, such systems employ a laser beam to generate a
melt
pool. Further, a controlled amount of metal or alloy powder is deposited into
the
laser-generated melt pool to form a component. Monitoring parameters
associated
with the melt pool is desirable to control the machining process for achieving
a final
desired shape and size of the component. Unfortunately, due to the process
complexity of such systems, it is very difficult to obtain a real-time
estimation of such
parameters.
[0003] Certain systems employ a two-dimensional (2D) viewing system for
monitoring the borders of the melt pool while the system is in operation.
However,
such viewing systems provide a rough estimate of the melt pool area and do not
provide a measurement of parameters such as melt pool width and deposition
height
of the melt pool. Furthermore, certain systems employ sensors for measuring
the
height of the accumulated layers. However, such sensors do not have the
required
measurement resolution, accuracy or the measurement range to provide a
reliable
measurement. Further, control of the manufacturing or deposition process based
upon
such parameters may result in components with dimensional variations and poor
surface finish and would need additional machining to achieve the desired
shape and
size.
1
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
[0004] Accordingly, there is a need for an apparatus that provides an accurate
real-time measurement of parameters of an object manufactured by the machining
or
deposition system. Furthermore, it would be desirable to provide an apparatus
that
can provide an on-line measurement of the parameters of an object formed by a
machining process to facilitate a closed-loop control of the process.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
[0005] Briefly, according to one embodiment, an apparatus for controlling a
machining system is provided. The apparatus includes an optical unit
configured to
capture an image of an object based upon radiation generated from the object
and an
image processing unit configured to process the image and to obtain real-time
estimation of parameters associated with manufacture or repair of the object.
The
apparatus also includes a process model configured to establish target values
for the
parameters associated with the manufacture or repair of the object based upon
process
parameters for the machining system and a controller configured to control the
process parameters for the machining system based upon the estimated and
target
values of the parameters associated with the manufacture or repair of the
object.
[0006] In another embodiment, a laser net-shape machining system is
provided. The laser net-shape machining system includes a laser configured to
generate a melt pool, a nozzle configured to provide a powder material in the
melt
pool to form an object and an optical unit configured to capture an image of
the object
based upon radiation generated from the melt pool. The laser net-shape
machining
system also includes an image processing unit configured to process the image
and to
obtain real-time estimation of parameters associated with manufacture or
repair of the
object, a process model configured to establish target values for the
parameters
associated with the manufacture or repair of the object based upon process
parameters
for the machining system and a controller configured to control the process
parameters for the machining system based upon the estimated and target values
of
the parameters associated with the manufacture or repair of the object.
2
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
[0007] In another embodiment, a method for controlling a machining system
is provided. The method includes obtaining an image of an object based upon
radiation generated from the object and processing the image to estimate
parameters
associated with manufacture or repair of the object. The method also includes
establishing target values for parameters associated with the manufacture or
repair of
the object based upon process parameters for the machining system and
controlling
the process parameters for the machining system based upon the estimated and
target
values of the parameters associated with the manufacture or repair of the
object.
DRAWINGS
[0008] These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present
invention will become better understood when the following detailed
description is
read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters
represent
like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
[0009] FIG. 1 is a diagrammatical illustration of a laser net-shape machining
system having a closed-loop control in accordance with aspects of the present
technique.
[0010] FIG. 2 is a diagrammatical illustration of an exemplary configuration
of the optical unit employed in the laser net-shape machining system of FIG. 1
in
accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0011] FIG. 3 is a diagrammatical illustration of an exemplary parameter of
the melt pool estimated using the image captured by the optical unit of FIG. 2
in
accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0012] FIG. 4 is a diagrammatical illustration of another exemplary parameter
of the melt pool estimated using the image captured by the optical unit of
FIG. 2 in
accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0013] FIG. 5 is a diagrammatical illustration of an exemplary controller
employed in the laser net-shape machining system of FIG. 1 for controlling
process
3
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
parameters of the laser net-shape machining system based upon estimated
parameters
of FIGS. 3 and 4 in accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0014] FIG. 6 is a diagrammatical illustration of an exemplary image
processing technique for processing the image captured using the optical unit
of FIG.
2 in accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0015] FIG. 7 is a diagrammatical illustration of another exemplary image
processing technique for processing the image captured using the optical unit
of FIG.
2 in accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0016] FIG. 8 is a diagrammatical illustration of real and ghost images
generated from the melt pool using the optical unit of FIG. 2 in accordance
with
aspects of the present technique.
[0017] FIG. 9 is a diagrammatical illustration of an exemplary configuration
of a beam splitter employed for separating real and ghost images of FIG. 8 in
accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0018] FIG. 10 is a diagrammatical illustration of another exemplary
configuration of a beam splitter employed for separating real and ghost images
of
FIG. 8 in accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0019] FIG. 11 is a diagrammatical illustration of a component manufactured
through a closed-loop control of the laser net-shape machining system of FIG.
1 in
accordance with aspects of the present technique.
[0020] FIG. 12 is a diagrammatical illustration of a component manufactured
without a closed-loop control of the laser net-shape machining system of FIG.
1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0021] As discussed in detail below, embodiments of the present technique
function to provide a real-time measurement of parameters associated with
manufacture or repair of an object using a machining or manufacturing system.
Further, an adaptive control technique is employed to control process
parameters of
4
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
the machining system based upon the real-time measurement and target values
for the
parameters associated with the manufacture or repair of the object. Referring
now to
the drawings, FIG. 1 is a diagrammatical illustration of a machining or a
manufacturing system 10 having a closed-loop control in accordance with
aspects of
the present technique. In this exemplary embodiment, the machining system 10
includes a laser net-shape machining (LNSM) system. The laser net-shape
machining
system 10 includes a laser 12 configured to generate a melt pool 14 on a
substrate 16
and a nozzle 18 configured to provide a powder material 20 to form an object
22.
Further, the laser net-shape machining system 10 includes an optical unit 24
configured to capture an image of the object 22 based upon radiation generated
from
the melt pool 14. Advantageously, such self luminous characteristic of the
melt pool
14 eliminates the need of external illuminators for capturing an image of the
melt pool
14 and also enables measurement of radiation intensity of the melt pool 14
without
external disturbances. In this exemplary embodiment, the optical unit 24 and
the laser
12 are positioned such than an axis of the laser beam generated from the laser
12 is
concurrent with an axis of the optical unit 24. Beneficially, such co-axial
set up of the
optical unit 24 and the laser 12 facilitates the melt pool image to be
positioned at a
fixed location without having distortion in any moving directions.
[0022] In addition, an image processing unit 26 is employed to process the
image captured by the optical unit 24 and to obtain real-time estimation of
parameters
associated with the manufacture or repair of the object 22. Examples of such
parameters include a melt pool width, a deposition height of the melt pool 14,
a length
of melt pool 14, a temperature of the melt pool 14 and so forth.
[0023] In this exemplary embodiment, the optical unit 24 includes a first
imaging camera 28 configured to capture a first image of the object 22 for
monitoring
the width of the melt pool 14. In addition, the optical unit 24 includes a
second
imaging camera 30 configured to capture a second image of the object 22 for
monitoring the deposition height of the melt pool 14. Examples of the first
and
second imaging cameras 28 and 30 include complementary metal oxide
semiconductor (CMOS) cameras, charge couple device (CCD) cameras and so forth.
In this exemplary embodiment, high pass filters such as represented by
reference
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
numerals 32 and 34 may be coupled to the first and second imaging camera 28
and 30
respectively. Further, the laser net-shape machining system 10 also includes a
beam
splitter 36 configured to split illumination from the object 22 for inputs to
the first and
second imaging cameras 28 and 30 respectively.
[0024] Moreover, the laser net-shape machining system 10 includes a process
model 38 that is configured to establish target values for the parameters
associated
with the manufacture or repair of the object 22 based upon process parameters
for the
machining system 10. Examples of process parameters include a laser power, a
traverse velocity, a powder material feed rate, and so forth. The laser net-
shape
machining system 10 also includes a controller 40 that is configured to
control the
process parameters of the laser net-shape machining system 10 based upon the
estimated and target values of the parameters associated with the manufacture
or
repair of the object 22. The estimation of the parameters associated with the
manufacture or repair of the object using the image captured through the
optical unit
will be described below with reference to FIGS.6-7. Further, the control of
the
process parameters of the laser net-shape machining system 10 based upon the
estimated and target values of the parameters associated with the manufacture
or
repair of the object will be described in detail below with reference to FIG.
5.
[0025] FIG. 2 is a diagrammatical illustration of an exemplary configuration
50 of the optical unit 24 employed in the laser net-shape machining system 10
of FIG.
1 for capturing an image of the melt pool 14 in accordance with aspects of the
present
technique. As illustrated, the optical unit 50 includes the first and second
imaging
cameras 28 and 30 configured to capture first and second images of the melt
pool 14.
The first and second images are subsequently processed by the imaging
processing
unit 26 (see FIG. 1) for real-time estimation of parameters associated with
the
manufacture or repair of the object 22 (see FIG. 1). In the illustrated
embodiment, the
first and second images are processed to estimate a melt pool width 52, a melt
pool
length 54 and a deposition height 56 of the melt pool 14 as illustrated in
FIGS 3 and
4, respectively. In another exemplary embodiment, the image captured by the
first
and second imaging cameras 28 and 30 may be processed to estimate a
temperature of
the melt pool 14. As illustrated, the optical unit 50 includes two imaging
cameras 28
6
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
and 30. However, a greater or a lesser number of imaging cameras may be
employed
for estimation of a desired number of parameters associated with the
manufacturing or
repair of the object 22.
[0026] The first and second images captured using the first and second
imaging cameras 28 and 30 are processed by the image processing unit 26. In
this
exemplary embodiment, the image processing unit 26 employs an image processing
algorithm for processing the first and second images to estimate the
parameters
associated with the manufacture or repair of the object 22. Examples of the
image
processing algorithms include, but are not limited to blob analysis, maximum
inside
circle analysis, and clipper. Such image processing algorithms will be
described in
detail below with reference to FIGS. 6-7.
[0027] The parameters, such as the melt pool width 52, melt pool length 54
and the deposition height 56 of the melt pool 14, estimated using the first
and second
images are further utilized to control the process parameters for the laser
net-shape
machining system 10. FIG. 5 is a diagrammatical illustration of an exemplary
controller 60 employed in the laser net-shape machining system 10 of FIG. 1
for
controlling process parameters 62 of the laser net-shape machining system 10
based
upon estimated parameters 52, 54 and 56 of FIGS. 3 and 4 in accordance with
aspects
of the present technique. In this exemplary embodiment, the controller 60 is
configured to receive estimated values 64 of the parameters such as the melt
pool
width 52 and the deposition height 56 of the melt pool associated with the
manufacture or repair of the object 22 (see FIG. 1) from the image processing
unit 26.
[0028] Further, the controller 60 is configured to receive target values 66 of
the parameters such as the melt pool width 52 and the deposition height 56
associated
with the manufacture or repair of the object 22 from the process model 38. In
the
illustrated embodiment, the process model 38 includes a parametric model 68
that is
configured to simulate the process for manufacturing or repair of the object
using the
laser net-shape machining system 10 to establish the target values 66 for the
parameters associated with the manufacture or repair of the object 22. In
certain
embodiments, the parametric model 68 may be developed using experimental data
7
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
and mathematical equations. In particular, the parametric model 68 may be
configured to simulate the process for manufacturing or repair of the object
22 using
the laser net-shape machining system 10 to establish the target values 66 for
the
parameters for a plurality of operating conditions of the machining system 10.
[0029] In an exemplary embodiment, the process model 38 includes an auto
regressive with moving average extra input signal (ARMAX) model. The
controller
60 is configured to control the process parameters 62 based upon the estimated
and
target values 64 and 66 of the parameters associated with the manufacture or
repair of
the object 22. In this exemplary embodiment, the process parameters 62 include
a
laser power and a traverse velocity. However, other process parameters 62 of
the
manufacturing system 10 may be controlled using the controller 60.
[0030] In the illustrated embodiment, the controller 60 includes closed-loop
control algorithms 70 for controlling the process parameters 62 of the
manufacturing
system 10 based upon the estimated and target values 64 and 66 of the
parameters
associated with the manufacture or repair of the object 22. In this exemplary
embodiment, the controller 60 includes first and second control loops 72 and
74
configured to control the laser power and traversal velocity based upon the
estimated
and target values 62 and 64 of the melt pool width and the deposition height
respectively. It should be noted that the first and second control loops 72
and 74 may
function independently or in combination for controlling the process
parameters 62 of
the laser net-shape manufacturing system 10. In one embodiment, the controller
60
includes a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, or a predictive
controller,
or a fuzzy controller. However, other types of controllers may be employed. In
certain embodiments, the controller 60 is configured to control the
operational settings
of the first and second imaging cameras 28 and 30 (see FIG. 1).
[0031] As noted above, the image processing unit 26 (see FIG. 1) employs an
image processing algorithm for processing the first and second images from the
first
and second imaging cameras 28 and 30 for estimating the parameters associated
with
the manufacture or repair of the object 22. FIG. 6 is a diagrammatical
illustration of
an exemplary image processing technique 90 for processing the image captured
using
8
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
the optical unit 50 of FIG. 2 in accordance with aspects of the present
technique. In
this exemplary embodiment, the image processing technique 90 includes maximum
inside circle analysis for estimation of the melt-pool width 52 (see FIG. 3)
of the melt
pool 14 (see FIG. 3). As illustrated, the first imaging camera 28 (see FIG. 2)
is
employed to capture an image 92 of the melt pool 14. The image 92 is then
binarized
to segment the object from the background to form a binary large object (blob)
94. In
this embodiment, the pixels in the blob 94 have a gray-level value that is
greater than
a preset threshold value. Further, the pixels in the background have a gray-
level value
that is less than the preset threshold value.
[0032] In one embodiment, a biggest blob 96 is selected and a distance of each
pixel inside the blob 96 from the boundary of the blob 96 is estimated.
Further, the
distance of a pixel farthest from the boundary of the blob 96 is selected.
This distance
may be represented as a radius of a maximum inside circle 98 of the melt pool
14.
Moreover, a diameter of the circle 100 is representative of the melt pool
width 52 of
the melt pool 14.
[0033] FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating another exemplary image processing
technique 110 for processing the image captured using the optical unit 50 of
FIG. 2 in
accordance with aspects of the present technique. In this exemplary
embodiment, the
image processing technique 110 includes blob analysis for estimation of the
deposition height 56 (see FIG. 4) of the melt pool 14 (see FIG. 3). As
illustrated, the
second imaging camera 30 (see FIG. 2) is employed to capture an image 112 of
the
melt pool 14. The image 112 is then binarized to segment object from the
background
to form a binary large object (blob) 114. In this embodiment, the pixels in
the blob
114 have a gray-level value that is greater than a preset threshold value.
Further, the
pixels in the background have a gray-level value that is less than the preset
threshold
value. In one embodiment, a top pixel 116 in the blob 114 is identified and a
distance
118 of the top pixel from the substrate 16 (see FIG. 1) is a measure of the
deposition
height 56 of the melt pool 14.
[0034] As described above, image processing techniques such as the
maximum inside circle analysis and blob analysis may be employed for
estimating the
9
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
parameters such as the melt-pool width 52 and the deposition height 56 of the
melt
pool 14. However, a plurality of other suitable image processing techniques
may be
employed to estimate the parameters associated with the manufacture or repair
of the
object 22 using the images captured through the optical unit 50.
[0035] The laser net-shape machining system 10 of FIG. 1 includes the beam
splitter 36 is configured to split illumination from the object 22 for inputs
to the first
and second imaging cameras 28 and 30. In one embodiment, the beam splitter 36
causes generation of two images from the melt pool 14. FIG. 8 is a
diagrammatical
illustration of real and ghost images 130 generated from the melt pool 14 of
FIG. 1
using the optical unit 50 of FIG. 2 in accordance with aspects of the present
technique. As illustrated, a real image 132 is generated from a bottom surface
of the
beam splitter 36. Further, a ghost image 134 is generated from a top surface
of the
beam splitter 36. In certain embodiments, the ghost image 134 may affect the
image
quality and measurement accuracy of the parameters estimated from the image
due to
the overlap between the real and ghost images 132 and 134.
[0036] FIG. 9 is a diagrammatical illustration of an exemplary configuration
140 of the beam splitter 36 employed for separating real and ghost images 132
and
134 of FIG. 8 in accordance with aspects of the present technique. In the
illustrated
embodiment, a thickness 142 of the beam splitter 36 is selected to increase
the
distance between the real and ghost images 132 and 134 for separating the real
and
ghost images 132 and 134. As a result, the overlap between the real and ghost
images
132 and 134 is eliminated thereby enhancing the image quality. FIG. 10 is a
diagrammatical illustration of another exemplary configuration 150 of the beam
splitter 36 employed for separating real and ghost images 132 and 134 of FIG.
8 in
accordance with aspects of the present technique. In this exemplary
embodiment, the
beam splitter 36 includes a coating 152 deposited on a reflecting surface 154
of the
beam splitter. Further, a filter 156 is positioned in front of the first
imaging camera
28 for filtering the ghost image 134 generated from the melt pool 14. Thus,
the ghost
image 134 is completely eliminated and the first imaging camera receives the
real
image 132 corresponding to the melt pool.
CA 02690989 2009-12-17
WO 2009/002638 PCT/US2008/064224
[0037] As described above, an adaptive control technique is employed to
control process parameters 62 (see FIG. 5) of the laser net-shape machining
system 10
(see FIG. 1) based upon the real-time measurement 64 and target values 66 for
the
parameters associated with the manufacture or repair of the object.
Advantageously,
such closed-loop control of the process parameters 62 substantially enhances
the
deposition geometry accuracy of the object 22 formed using the laser net-shape
machining system 10. FIG. 11 illustrates a component 160 manufactured with a
closed-loop control of the laser net-shape machining system of FIG. 1. FIG. 12
illustrates a component 162 manufactured without a closed-loop control of a
laser net-
shape machining system. As can be seen, the component 160 formed by the closed-
loop control of the process parameters of machining system 10 has relatively
better
geometric accuracy as compared to the component 162 formed without the closed-
loop control of the process parameters of machining system 10.
[0038] The various aspects of the method described hereinabove have utility
in different machining applications. The technique illustrated above may be
used for
providing a real-time measurement of parameters associated with a
manufacturing or
repair operation of an object using a machining system. The technique may also
be
used for a closed-loop control of the machining system based upon estimated
and
target values of the parameters to improve the geometric accuracy of the
objects
manufactured using the machining system. Advantageously, the present technique
facilitates substantially fast and customized manufacture or repair of objects
with
complex shapes such as airfoils. Further, the technique facilitates near net
shape
manufacturing of complex shapes without a need for additional machining
thereby
reducing the cost of manufacturing and repair of complex objects.
[0039] While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and
described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled
in the
art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended
to cover
all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the
invention.
11
