Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
1
AIRCRAFT CONTROL SURFACE
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the optimized
configuration of an aircraft flight control surface.
Background of the Invention
The most widely used configuration for modern aircraft
control surfaces generally consists of one or several
essentially planar elements located such that they form the
leading edge or trailing edge of the aerodynamic lifting
surfaces of the aircraft. The aircraft is controlled by means of
the deflection of the control surfaces, which causes a change in
the outer geometry of said aircraft resulting in aerodynamic
direction and magnitude forces suitable for carrying out the
control.
The change of aerodynamic shape required to control the
aircraft is generally achieved by means of the rotation of said
control surfaces around a hinge or rotating shaft fixed with
respect to the aerodynamic lifting surface to which they belong.
There are other configurations and methods to carry out the
control, for example by means of the elastic deformation of the
entire lifting surface, a method used by the Wright brothers in
the first airplane as described in document US821393; by means
of a complete rotation of the lifting surface as described in
document US6089503; by means of deformation of the lifting or
control surface caused by changes in the properties of the
material as described in documents US6209824B1, U55662294; or by
means of air blasts or engine exhaust gases, such as in the case
of the AV-B Harrier airplane, or the North American X-15.
The configurations of the control surfaces consisting of
rotating said surfaces around a hinge have been used in
aeronautics in most airplanes and are the only ones currently
used for large passenger transport airplanes. The first
airplanes to use this control surface configuration, as well as
most lightweight airplanes today, use a cable and pulley system
to transmit the pilot's control actions, either directly using
the force exerted by the pilot or through a servo system
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
2
mechanically amplifying the pilot's force. The cable and pulley
systems move the control surfaces through a lever system
converting the linear movements of the cables into rotations of
the control surfaces. This actuation method for actuating
control surfaces is suitable for lightweight aircraft or those
of a larger size flying at relatively low speeds (much less than
the speeds near the speed of sound at which commercial aircraft
currently fly), due to the fact that the forces which the cables
can transmit are relatively low and the aerodynamic forces
acting on the control surfaces, and which must compensate the
forces of the cables, linearly grow with the area of said
control surface and with the square of the flight speed. The
cable and pulley system has additional limitations due to the
inherent flexibility of the system, formed by long cables with a
small section, which can lead to aeroelastic instabilities if it
is applied to large control surfaces, in addition to introducing
a delay in the operation of the control surfaces and a possible
lack of response from the flight controls when the plan flies at
high speeds, all this due to the lengthening of the cable system
introduced by the aerodynamic loads.
With the development of aeronautic technology it was
necessary to develop new actuation methods for actuating the
flight control surfaces particularly adapted to large airplanes
flying at increasingly greater speeds, generally driven by
reaction engines. The adopted solution consisted of using servo-
actuators, necessary for exerting the high control forces
required in order to move large control surfaces at high flight
speeds and to place the mentioned actuators in a position such
that they could transmit the control forces directly to the
control surfaces, representative of a rudder, or to a typical
aileron or elevator installation.
The configuration of the previous typical aileron or
elevator installation has the evident drawback of requiring an
aerodynamic fairing for the actuator, which is an unwanted
source of aerodynamic drag. On the other hand, this
configuration has the advantage that the leading edge of the
control surface is very close to the rear stringer of the
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
3
lifting surface to which it is associated (generally the wing or
the stabilizers) therefore allowing the maximum sectional area
of the respective torsion boxes to be used, which results in an
increase in the rigidity of said boxes, particularly the
torsional rigidity and furthermore, where applicable, the
maximum volume of the fuel tank in the case of a wing or
horizontal stabilizer.
The configuration representative of a rudder, typical for a
modern commercial airplane rudder, does not require an
aerodynamic fairing for the actuator, but however has the
drawback of significantly reducing the available space between
the torsion box of the lifting surface and the control surface.
In all cases this involves an unwanted reduction of the
torsional rigidity of both elements (main torsion box and
aerodynamic control surface). The separation between the rear
stringer of the torsion box and the leading edge of the control
surface likewise requires installing relatively large and
flexible aerodynamic fairings which do not contribute to the
rigidity or resistance of the lifting surface, in addition to
introducing large bending loads on the ribs of the torsion box
at the base of the hinge fittings, all of which is undesirable.
Reducing the area of the section of the torsion box of the
lifting surface, imposed by the previously described and
necessary separation in order to install the actuator, usually
results in a weight increase of the structure since thicker
skins and stringers are required in order to restore the desired
torsional rigidity for aerodynamic and
aeroelastic
considerations.
The problem of elastic deformation of the mentioned
surfaces under aerodynamic load has to be solved in all flight
control systems based on the rotation of the control surfaces.
In cable and pulley systems, in which the levers to which the
control cables are connected are usually at one end of the
control surfaces, the aerodynamic loads cause torsional
deformation on the control surface tending to take away control
effectiveness. In order to restore control surface
effectiveness, the surface's torsional rigidity must be
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
4
increased, either by increasing the thickness of its structural
skins (which adds weight and increases the inertia of the
control surface, both unwanted consequences, i.e. weight for
aircraft efficiency reasons and inertia for tending to reduce
the speed at which dynamic aeroelastic instability or fluttering
occurs), or by using a torsion bar near the leading edge of the
control surface, which also adds weight but limits the increase
of the moment of inertia of the surface.
In the case of systems in which the actuators are connected
directly to the control surfaces, said actuators are usually
located approximately in the middle of the span of the control
surface in order to minimize torsional deformation, or several
actuators are used in parallel, which also provides the control
system with redundancy. In any case, the placement of the
actuators within the aerodynamic surface requires providing
accesses thereto for inspection, which complicates the design of
said aerodynamic surfaces, and in the case of the rudders makes
access difficult for maintenance personnel.
The object of the present invention is to solve the
previously mentioned problems with regard to making control
surfaces, particularly those associated to the configuration in
which the actuators are directly connected to said control
surfaces, since this is the configuration used for control
surfaces in stabilizers in large modern commercial airplanes.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention thus relates to a control surface
configuration for aircraft in which said control surface is
integral with a torsion bar rotating with respect to its shaft
by means of the action of actuators installed inside the
fuselage of the aircraft in question.
The present invention describes a configuration and
actuation method which can be applied to the control surfaces of
an aircraft, whether they are rudders, elevators, ailerons,
flaps or air brakes, consisting of actuating the rotation of the
mentioned surfaces by means of a torsion bar concentric with the
hinge pin of the control surface, the mentioned torsion bar
being connected by means of a lever inside the fuselage of the
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
aircraft to one or several conventional actuators (hydraulic,
electrohydraulic, electric or any other type used in
aeronautics), these being double-acting actuators, i.e. being
able to exert force in both directions of their shaft.
5 Due
to the distribution of aerodynamic forces on the
control surface and the resulting torsional deformation, the
configuration object of the present invention is particularly
adapted to very narrow control surfaces, such that the area
enclosed by sections of the control surface that are
perpendicular to the hinge pin reduces significantly from the
end where the torsion bar acts to the free end. The main
advantage of the configuration of the invention in relation to
classic configurations is that it allows drawing the leading
edge of the control surface closer to the rear stringer of the
torsion box of the aerodynamic surface, which reduces the size
and the bending loads on the hinge fittings, allows increasing
the enclosed area of the torsion box of the lifting surface or
of the control surface, or both at the same time, with a
torsional rigidity increase directly proportional to said
enclosed area, all these advantages being obtained without the
aerodynamic penalty caused by a fairing for the actuator. This
all allows increasing the length of the lever arm on which the
servoactuators act without the geometrical restriction imposed
by the aerodynamic profile, therefore reducing the forces
required for actuation, which can result in a weight reduction
for the actuators.
The configuration according to the present invention
likewise allows, for a torsion box of the same size and planform
of the lifting surface, having a larger aerodynamic control
surface with the possible associated control efficiency
increase.
The configuration of the invention additionally allows
using larger actuators, if necessary, since the space limitation
imposed by the geometry of the aerodynamic surface is for the
most part eliminated. Furthermore, in the case of application to
the rudders, the position of the actuators within the rear
fuselage facilitates maintenance operations.
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
6
There are additional advantages associated to the favorable
geometry of the leading edge of the control surface in its
deflected configuration due to the larger radius of said leading
edge, which is possible to obtain upon moving the hinge pin
forward, which can increase the aerodynamic stalling angle that
the control surface can reach.
The configuration object of the present invention is also
particularly favorable for including a second hinge pin located
at an intermediate point of the control surface, which gives
rise to the double hinge configuration in the control surface.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will
be inferred from the following detailed description of an
illustrative embodiment of its object in relation to the
attached figures.
Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 depicts a schematic view of the rear fuselage and
the stabilizers and rudders of a modern commercial airplane, in
which the arrangement of the actuators and the hinge fittings
are schematically shown according to the previously known prior
art.
Figure 2 shows a detailed sectional view of the vertical
stabilizer depicted in Figure 1, in which the actuator of the
control surface and the manner in which said actuator is joined
to the torsion box and to the mentioned control surface, in this
case a rudder, is schematically depicted according to the known
prior art.
Figure 3 shows a detailed sectional view of a lifting
surface, typically a wing, and of an associated control surface,
in this case actuated from outside the aerodynamic surface
according to the known prior art.
Figure 4 depicts a schematic view of the rear fuselage and
of the stabilizers and rudders of a modern commercial airplane,
in which the arrangement of the actuators, the hinge fittings
and the torsion bar of the control surface, as well as the
considerable narrowing shape of the control surface are
schematically shown according to a preferred embodiment of the
present invention.
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
7
Figure 5 shows a detailed view of the vertical stabilizer
depicted in Figure 4 focusing on the detail of the end of the
control surface to which the torsion bar is connected, in which
the two concentric torsion bars, the closing rib to which the
outer torsion bar is joined and the secondary torsion box of the
control surface, as well as one of the hinge fittings are
depicted according to a preferred embodiment of the present
invention.
Figure 6 depicts a detailed schematic view of the rear
fuselage and of the stabilizers and rudders of a modern
commercial airplane, in which the arrangement of the actuators
and the levers on which they act, the hinge fittings, the
primary and secondary torsion bars, the secondary torsion box of
the control surface, the lower closing rib of the control
surface, as well as the intermediate reinforcing ribs of the
control surface, as well as the considerable narrowing shape of
the control surface are schematically shown according to a
preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 7 shows a detailed sectional view of the vertical
stabilizer depicted in Figure 4 but with the double hinge
configuration of the control surface, at the height of an
intermediate point in its span, in which a hinge fitting, the
primary element of the control surface, a coupling bar for
mechanically coupling with the secondary element, said secondary
element and the secondary hinge fitting are schematically
depicted according to a preferred embodiment of the present
invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
It is understood from the description made in the
background of the invention and from the known prior art that it
is generally desirable for torsion boxes of lifting and control
surfaces to have the largest area possible in order to increase
their rigidity and reduce their structural weight. The
configuration shown in Figure 3, in which the actuator 4 is
located outside the aerodynamic surface 2, has these qualities
but at the expense of an increase in aerodynamic drag due to the
fairing 17 of the actuator 4. Some flight control system
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
8
configurations using cables and pulleys include a torsion bar on
the control surface with a lever to which the control cables are
connected, the mentioned lever being located inside the
fuselage, such that the need of an aerodynamic fairing is
eliminated. This configuration can be observed in most rudders
in lightweight airplanes today. Nevertheless, as has been
previously explained, the use of control systems based on cables
and pulleys is limited to lightweight aircraft or generally to
aircraft flying at relatively low speeds.
Flight control systems using servoactuators 4 located
within the aerodynamic contour of the lifting surface 2 and
which are connected directly to the control surfaces 3, such as
in the example of Figures 1 and 2, require sufficient space
between the rear stringer 5 of the torsion box 13 of the lifting
surface 2 and the leading edge 22 of the control surface 3 in
order to be able to install said servoactuators 4, with the
subsequent unwanted reduction of the area of the torsion box 13
of the lifting surface 2. It must be noted that in large
commercial airplanes using this configuration of actuators there
are usually two or more actuators, generally connected to
different hydraulic circuits, for each control surface, for the
purpose of providing the control system with redundancy in the
event that one of the actuators or its hydraulic circuit fails,
this failure tolerance being an essential requirement in the
design of modern flight control systems.
The present invention has been developed for the purpose of
obtaining a configuration of control surfaces with maximum
torsional rigidity of the lifting surface, which is desirable in
order to reduce the structural weight thereof, but without the
aerodynamic drag penalty associated to the fairing 17 of Figure
3 and maintaining the redundancy in the control system at least
at the same level as in the control systems with several
actuators currently in use, such as those shown in Figure 1.
The features of the present invention will be better
understood upon describing a preferred embodiment of a rudder of
a modern commercial airplane as depicted in Figures 4, 5 and 6.
For this purpose the control surface of the present
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PCT/EP2008/067980
9
invention comprises:
- an aerodynamic lifting surface 2 to which a control
surface 3 is associated;
- a main closing rib 9 located at one end of the control
surface 3 to which a main torsion bar 8 is joined, the
mentioned bar 8 being integrally joined at its other end
to a lever system 14 on which at least two double-acting
servoactuators 15 supplied by independent power systems
act, said servoactuators 15 working simultaneously in
normal conditions, such that in the event that one of
them or the power system supplying it fails, the
operating servoactuator has enough power to actuate the
control surface on its own, thus providing the present
configuration with redundancy in the actuation system.
In order to increase the redundancy and tolerance to
structural damage, the control system comprises a secondary
torsion bar 11, concentric with the main bar 8, located inside
the latter and likewise integrally connected with the lever
system 14 and with a secondary closing rib 28 of the control
surface 3. In normal conditions the torsional moment required in
order to move the control surface 3 is transmitted by the main
torsion bar 8 to the main closing rib 9. In the event that said
main torsion bar 8 or main closing rib 9 fails, the torsional
moment is transmitted by the secondary torsion bar 11 to the
secondary closing rib 28, thus providing the control system with
an additional degree of tolerance to structural failure.
The control surface 3 is rigidized internally by at least
two stringers 12 which, together with the skin 19, form a
continuous torsion box providing the control surface 3 with the
torsional rigidity required for aerodynamic and aeroelastic
considerations.
The skins 19 and stringers 12 of the control surface, as
well as the main torsion bar 8 and secondary torsion bar 11, are
preferably manufactured from a material made up of highly rigid
and strong fibers, such as carbon fiber or nanotechnological
materials, such as carbon nanotubes, and synthetic resin, epoxy
for example, and a large portion of said fibers are oriented in
CA 02710119 2010-06-18
WO 2009/080736 PC T/EP2008/067980
directions close to 45 and 135 degrees with respect to the hinge
pin as shown in detail 29 of Figure 5.
The control surface 3 is joined to the rear stringer 5 of
the torsion box 13 of the lifting surface 2 through several
5 hinge fittings 6 joined to removable pins on the control
surface, this method being known and generally applied in
control surfaces.
The shape of the control surface 3 is preferably as shown
in Figure 4, in which it can be observed that the trailing edge
10 21 of said control surface is curved and the control surface
becomes significantly narrower upon getting further away from
the fuselage 1, unlike the common practice depicted in Figure 1,
which, in addition to other possible aerodynamic advantages or
flight qualities, results in a distribution of aerodynamic
forces the resultant of which is closer to the fuselage 1 and
therefore to the torsion bar and the actuation levers 14, this
being beneficial for the purpose of rigidity and of load
transmission. Furthermore, the geometry shown in Figure 4, both
of the lifting surface 2 and of the control surface 3, presents
problems for installing the actuators in a classic configuration
such as that of Figure 1, due to the required space between the
rear stringer of the lifting surface 5 and the leading edge of
the control surface 22.
According to another preferred embodiment of the
configuration object of the present invention, a secondary hinge
pin 27 is added, as shown in Figure 7, such that the control
surface is divided into a primary element 24 and a secondary
element 25, the rotation of which is mechanically limited by a
coupling bar 26 arranged as indicated in Figure 7. The present
invention is particularly favorable for implementing this double
hinge configuration due to the fact that said double hinge
configuration causes aerodynamic loads that are larger than
those of the classic single hinge configuration, therefore
requiring larger actuators, the installation of which within the
fuselage, as proposed by the present invention, is less
problematic than in the classic case of Figure 1.
According to another aspect, the present invention relates
CA 02710119 2015-08-05
11
to an actuation method for actuating the previously described
control surface 3 in which said control surface 3 is actuated
through at least one torsion bar 8 to which at least two double-
acting servoactuators 15 are connected by means of a lever
system 14.
The scope of the claims should not be limited by the
embodiments set forth above, but should be given the broadest
interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
