Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2733857 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 2733857
(54) Titre français: SYSTEME AUTOMATISE DE GENERATION ET DE REMPLISSAGE DE FORMULAIRES DE POLICE D'ASSURANCE
(54) Titre anglais: AUTOMATED INSURANCE POLICY FORM GENERATION AND COMPLETION
Statut: Réputée abandonnée et au-delà du délai pour le rétablissement - en attente de la réponse à l’avis de communication rejetée
Données bibliographiques
Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


Automated insurance policy form generation and completion includes
electronically receiving one or more forms and receiving an indication that a
particular form is an overflow form for a particular base form. The
relationship
between the overflow form and base form is recorded based on the received
indication and the fields on the base form and overflow form are tagged
according
to a naming convention. The number of overflow forms to use is determined
based on an amount of received data and by using the naming convention to
determine a number of available fields on the base form and overflow forms.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CLAIMS:
1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
determining by at least one processor that an electronically stored form is an
overflow form for a base form, wherein the overflow form and base form are
electronically stored forms;
recording on a non-transitory storage medium a relationship between the
overflow form and the base form based on the determination that that the
particular electronically stored form is an overflow form for the particular
electronically stored base form;
electronically tagging one or more fields on the base form and the overflow
form according to a naming convention;
receiving data with which to populate the one or more fields of the base
form or overflow form; and
automatically determining by the at least one processor a quantity of
electronically stored overflow forms to use corresponding to the overflow form
to
accommodate the received data based on an amount of the received data and
based at least in part on the naming convention.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
automatically populating the base form and the determined quantity of overflow
forms with the received data.
3. The method of claim 2 further comprising:
electronically making available to a remote entity the base form and the
determined quantity of overflow forms for validation.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the automatically determining by at least
one processor the quantity of electronically stored overflow forms to use
comprises:
determining whether a quantity of content sub-items of the received data
corresponding to a field on the base form exceeds an array size of the field
on the

base form as indicated by an index number within a tag used to identify a last
sub-
field within the array on the base form; and
if the quantity of content sub-items exceeds the array size of the field on
the base form, then determining the quantity of overflow forms to use by:
dividing an amount that the quantity of content sub-items exceeds the array
size of the field on the base form by an array size of a corresponding field
on an
overflow form corresponding to the field on the base form to generate a
resulting
number; and
rounding the resulting number up to the next whole number if the resulting
number is not a whole number.
5. The method of claim 4 further comprising repeating the determining
whether the quantity of content sub-items of the received data corresponding
to
the field on the base form exceeds the array size and the determining the
quantity
of overflow forms to use, for each field of the base form.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein one or more fields of the base form have
different corresponding overflow forms.
7. The method of claim 5 further comprising:
automatically selecting a largest determined quantity of overflow forms from
the determined quantities of overflow forms to use for each field; and
using the selected largest quantity as a quantity of overflow forms to use for
the base form.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the base form and the overflow forms are
electronically stored insurance policy forms and the received data includes
one or
more of insurance customer data and insurance customer property data.
9. A system, comprising:
a computer processor; and
a non-transitory memory communicatively coupled to the computer
processor having computer-executable instructions stored thereon that when
26

executed by the computer processor cause the computer processor to perform:
determining that an electronically stored form is an overflow form for a base
form, wherein the overflow form and base form are electronically stored forms;
determining a quantity of electronically stored overflow forms to use
corresponding to the overflow form to accommodate received data with which to
populate the base form and the overflow form, based on an amount of the
received data and based at least in part on a naming convention for tags of
fields
on the base form and tags of fields on the overflow form; and
automatically populating the base form and the determined quantity of
overflow forms with at least a portion of the received data.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the computer-executable instructions, when
executed by the computer processor, further cause the computer processor to
perform:
receiving an indication that a particular electronically stored form is the
overflow form for the base form; and
recording a relationship between the overflow form and the base form
based on the received indication.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein the computer-executable instructions,
when executed by the computer processor, further cause the computer processor
to perform electronically tagging the fields on the base form and the fields
on the
overflow form according to the naming convention.
12. The system of claim 9 wherein determining the quantity of electronically
stored overflow forms to use comprises:
determining whether a quantity of content sub-items of the received data
corresponding to a field on the base form exceeds an array size of the field
on the
base form as indicated by an index number within a tag used to identify a last
sub-
field within the array on the base form; and
if the quantity of content sub-items exceeds the array size of the field on
the base form, then determining the quantity of overflow forms to use by
dividing
an amount that the quantity of content sub-items exceeds the array size of the
27

field on the base form by an array size of a corresponding field on an
overflow
form corresponding to the field on the base form to generate a resulting
number;
and
rounding the resulting number up to the next whole number if the resulting
number is not a whole number.
13. The system of claim 9 wherein the base form and the overflow forms are
electronically stored insurance policy forms and the received data includes
one or
more of insurance customer data and insurance customer property data.
14. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium, having computer
computer-executable instructions stored thereon that when executed by a
computer processor cause the computer processor to perform:
determining a quantity of available fields on a base form and an overflow
form associated with the base form based at least in part on a naming
convention
for tags of fields of the base form and tags of fields of the overflow form,
wherein
the overflow form and the base form are electronically stored forms; and
automatically determining, based on the determined quantity of available
fields on the base form and the overflow form, a quantity of electronically
stored
overflow forms to use corresponding to the overflow form to accommodate
received data with which to populate the base form and overflow forms.
15. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein
the computer-executable instructions, when executed by the computer processor,
further cause the computer processor to perform:
electronically receiving one or more electronically stored forms;
receiving an indication that a particular form is the overflow form associated
with the base form, one or more of the overflow form and base form being of
the
received one or more electronically stored forms; and
recording a relationship between the overflow form and the base form
based on the received indication.
28

16. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein
the computer-executable instructions, when executed by the computer processor,
further cause the computer processor to perform electronically tagging fields
on
the base form and overflow form according to the naming convention.
17. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 14 wherein
the determining a quantity of available fields on the base form and the
overflow
form based at least in part on the naming convention comprises:
determining an array size of a field on the base form as indicated by an
index number within a tag used to identify a last sub-field within the array
on the
base form.
18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17 wherein
the automatically determining, based on the determined quantity of available
fields
on the base form and the overflow form, the quantity of electronically stored
overflow forms to use comprises:
if a quantity of content sub-items of the received data corresponding to the
field on the base form exceeds the array size of the field on the base form,
then
determining the quantity of overflow forms to use by:
dividing an amount that the quantity of content sub-items exceeds the array
size of the field on the base form by an array size of a corresponding field
on an
overflow form corresponding to the field on the base form to generate a
resulting
number; and
rounding the resulting number up to the next whole number if the resulting
number is not a whole number.
19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 14 wherein
the base form and the overflow forms are electronically stored insurance
policy
forms and the received data includes one or more of insurance customer data
and
insurance customer property data.
20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein
the computer-executable instructions, when executed by the computer processor,
29

further cause the computer processor to perform electronically making
available to
a remote entity a completed base form and a completed determined quantity of
overflow forms for validation.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02733857 2011-03-11
AUTOMATED INSURANCE POLICY FORM GENERATION AND COMPLETION
BACKGROUND
Technical Field
This disclosure generally relates to data services, and to automated form
generation and completion.
Description of the Related Art
Insurance agents (i.e., general agents) often compile a repository of
insurance endorsement forms, organize that collection and maintain the format
and version of the forms over time separately for various different insurance
carriers. These processes consume a high number of hours of working time and,
due to the fact that many of the forms have similar appearances and file
names,
such processes can be prone to user error. The insurance carrier delegates
which forms belong on a policy and apply rules for determining when those
forms
are mandatory or optional.
Some existing insurance policy issuance utilities require that the general
agent maintain insurance policy document templates to which the user must
attach the proper policy jackets and insurance endorsement forms. Some
insurance policy systems have grouping mechanisms for this selection process.
Otherwise, this manual selection process must be repeated for each time a
policy
is issued. These aforementioned document from collections often number in the
hundreds. The time spent on this selection process can add up to hundreds of
hours wasted each year, reducing the number of policies an individual
insurance
agent can process.
BRIEF SUMMARY
A computer-implemented method may be summarized as including
determining by at least one processor that an electronically stored form is an
overflow form for a base form, wherein the overflow form and base form are
electronically stored forms; recording on a non-transitory storage medium a
relationship between the overflow form and the base form based on the
1

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
determination that that the particular electronically stored form is an
overflow form
for the particular electronically stored base form; electronically tagging one
or
more fields on the base form and the overflow form according to a naming
convention; receiving data with which to populate the one or more fields of
the
base form or overflow form; and automatically determining by the at least one
processor a quantity of electronically stored overflow forms to use
corresponding
to the overflow form to accommodate the received data based on an amount of
the received data and based at least in part on the naming convention.
The computer-implemented method may further include automatically
populating the base form and the determined quantity of overflow forms with
the
received data.
The computer-implemented method may further include electronically
making available to a remote entity the base form and the determined quantity
of
overflow forms for validation.
The automatically determining by at least one processor the quantity of
electronically stored overflow forms to use may include determining whether a
quantity of content sub-items of the received data corresponding to a field on
the
base form exceeds an array size of the field on the base form as indicated by
an
index number within a tag used to identify a last sub-field within the array
on the
base form; and if the quantity of content sub-items exceeds the array size of
the
field on the base form, then determining the quantity of overflow may form to
use
by: dividing an amount that the quantity of content sub-items exceeds the
array
size of the field on the base form by an array size of a corresponding field
on an
overflow form corresponding to the field on the base form to generate a
resulting
number; and rounding the resulting number up to the next whole number if the
resulting number is not a whole number.
The computer-implemented method may further include repeating the
determining whether the quantity of content sub-items of the received data
corresponding to the field on the base form exceeds the array size and the
determining the quantity of overflow forms to use, for each field of the base
form.
One or more fields of the base form may have different corresponding
overflow forms.
2

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
The computer-implemented method may further include automatically
selecting a largest determined quantity of overflow forms from the determined
quantities of overflow forms to use for each field; and using the selected
largest
quantity as a quantity of overflow forms to use for the base form.
The base form and the overflow forms may be electronically stored
insurance policy forms and the received data includes one or more of insurance
customer data and insurance customer property data.
A system may be summarized as including a computer processor; and a
non-transitory memory communicatively coupled to the computer processor
having computer-executable instructions stored thereon that when executed by
the computer processor cause the computer processor to perform: determining
that an electronically stored form is an overflow form for a base form,
wherein the
overflow form and base form are electronically stored forms; determining a
quantity of electronically stored overflow forms to use corresponding to the
overflow form to accommodate received data with which to populate the base
form and the overflow form, based on an amount of the received data and based
at least in part on a naming convention for tags of fields on the base form
and tags
of fields on the overflow form; and automatically populating the base form and
the
determined quantity of overflow forms with at least a portion of the received
data.
The computer-executable instructions, when executed by the computer
processor, may further cause the computer processor to perform: receiving an
indication that a particular electronically stored form is the overflow form
for the
base form; and recording a relationship between the overflow form and the base
form based on the received indication. The computer-executable instructions,
when executed by the computer processor, may further cause the computer
processor to perform electronically tagging the fields on the base form and
the
fields on the overflow form according to the naming convention. Determining
the
quantity of electronically stored overflow forms to use may include
determining
whether a quantity of content sub-items of the received data corresponding to
a
field on the base form exceeds an array size of the field on the base form as
indicated by an index number within a tag used to identify a last sub-field
within
the array on the base form; and if the quantity of content sub-items exceeds
the
array size of the field on the base form, then determining the quantity of
overflow
3

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
forms to use by dividing an amount that the quantity of content sub-items
exceeds
the array size of the field on the base form by an array size of a
corresponding
field on an overflow form corresponding to the field on the base form to
generate a
resulting number; and rounding the resulting number up to the next whole
number
if the resulting number is not a whole number. The base form and the overflow
forms may be electronically stored insurance policy forms and the received
data
includes one or more of insurance customer data and insurance customer
property data.
A non-transitory computer readable storage medium may be summarized
as a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer
computer-executable instructions stored thereon that when executed by a
computer processor cause the computer processor to perform: determining a
quantity of available fields on a base form and an overflow form associated
with
the base form based at least in part on a naming convention for tags of fields
of
the base form and tags of fields of the overflow form, wherein the overflow
form
and the base form are electronically stored forms; and automatically
determining,
based on the determined quantity of available fields on the base form and the
overflow form, a quantity of electronically stored overflow forms to use
corresponding to the overflow form to accommodate received data with which to
populate the base form and overflow forms.
The computer-executable instructions, when executed by the computer
processor, may further cause the computer processor to perform: electronically
receiving one or more electronically stored forms; receiving an indication
that a
particular form is the overflow form associated with the base form, one or
more of
the overflow form and base form being of the received one or more
electronically
stored forms; and recording a relationship between the overflow form and the
base form based on the received indication. The computer-executable
instructions, when executed by the computer processor, may further cause the
computer processor to perform electronically tagging fields on the base form
and
overflow form according to the naming convention. The determining a quantity
of
available fields on the base form and the overflow form based at least in part
on
the naming convention may include determining an array size of a field on the
base form as indicated by an index number within a tag used to identify a last
sub-
4

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
field within the array on the base form. The automatically determining, based
on
the determined quantity of available fields on the base form and the overflow
form,
the quantity of electronically stored overflow forms to use may include if a
quantity
of content sub-items of the received data corresponding to the field on the
base
form exceeds the array size of the field on the base form, then determining
the
quantity of overflow forms to use by: dividing an amount that the quantity of
content sub-items exceeds the array size of the field on the base form by an
array
size of a corresponding field on an overflow form corresponding to the field
on the
base form to generate a resulting number; and rounding the resulting number up
to the next whole number if the resulting number is not a whole number. The
base form and the overflow forms may be electronically stored insurance policy
forms and the received data may include one or more of insurance customer data
and insurance customer property data. The computer-executable instructions,
when executed by the computer processor, may further cause the computer
processor to perform electronically making available to a remote entity a
completed base form and a completed determined quantity of overflow forms for
validation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or
acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not
necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and
angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elements are arbitrarily
enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular
shapes of the elements as drawn are not intended to convey any information
regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and have been solely
selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
Figure 1 is a system diagram of a networked environment, in which
systems, devices and methods for automated insurance policy form generation
and completion may be a part, or in which they it be implemented, according to
one illustrated embodiment.
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of an example computer system of any
one of the entities or systems of Figure 1, suitable for implementing
automated
5

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
insurance policy form generation and completion, according to one illustrated
embodiment.
Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating an automated process of insurance
policy quoting of which automated insurance policy form generation and
completion may be a part, according to one illustrated embodiment.
Figure 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an automated process of insurance
policy issuance of which automated insurance policy form generation and
completion may be a part, according to one illustrated embodiment.
Figure 5 is a flow diagram illustrating an automated process of insurance
policy endorsement of which automated insurance policy form generation and
completion may be a part, according to one illustrated embodiment.
Figure 6 is a block diagram showing the flow of data between components
of a policy issuance system which implements automated insurance policy form
generation and completion, according to one illustrated embodiment.
Figure 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of automated insurance
policy form generation and completion, according to one illustrated
embodiment.
Figure 8 is a flow diagram illustrating an automated process for determining
the number of overflow forms to use in the process of insurance policy form
generation and completion of Figure 7, according to one illustrated
embodiment.
Figure 9 is an example base form showing field names and associated tags
that may be used in automated insurance policy form generation and completion,
according to one illustrated embodiment.
Figure 10 is an example overflow form associated with the base form of
Figure 9, showing field names and associated tags that may be used in
automated insurance policy form generation and completion, according to one
illustrated embodiment.
Figure 11 is the example base form of Figure 9, populated with data
resulting from automated insurance policy form generation and completion,
according to one illustrated embodiment.
Figure 12 is an example overflow form associated with the base form of
Figure 11, populated with data resulting from automated insurance policy form
generation and completion, according to one illustrated embodiment.
6

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order
to
provide a thorough understanding of various disclosed embodiments. However,
one skilled in the relevant art will recognize that embodiments may be
practiced
without one or more of these specific details, or with other methods,
components,
materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures associated with
computing systems including client and server computing systems, as well as
networks, including various types of telecommunications networks, have not
been
shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of
the
embodiments.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and
claims which follow, the word "comprise" and variations thereof, such as
"comprises" and "comprising," are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense,
that is, as "including, but not limited to."
Reference throughout this specification to "one embodiment" or "an
embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic
described
in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment.
Thus,
the appearances of the phrases "in one embodiment" or "in an embodiment" in
various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring
to the
same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or
characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more
embodiments.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms
"a," "an," and "the" include plural referents unless the content clearly
dictates
otherwise. It should also be noted that the term "or" is generally employed in
its
sense including "and/or" unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
The headings and Abstract of the Disclosure provided herein are for
convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the embodiments.
Figure 1 is a system diagram of a networked environment, in which
systems, devices and methods for automated insurance policy form generation
and completion may be a part, or in which they it be implemented, according to
one illustrated embodiment.
7

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
The networked environment 100 may include one or more general agent
(e.g., insurance agent) systems, such as general agent system 1 102, general
agent system 2 104, and general agent system m 106; one or more insurance
carrier systems, such as insurance carrier system x 108 and insurance carrier
system y 110; and a policy (e.g., insurance policy) issuance server 112.
General
agent system 1 102, general agent system 2 104, general agent system m 106,
insurance carrier system x 108, insurance carrier system y 110, and the policy
issuance server 112 may all be communicatively coupled via a network 116.
Alternatively, one or more of the systems or devices may be located on a
single
system and/or at a single physical location. Additional systems and devices
may
also be present, but are not illustrated for clarity of presentation.
A general agent system, e.g., general agent system 102, may include an
agency information management (AIM) database 124 that stores insurance
customer or property data included, or that may be included, on an insurance
policy. Other insurance policy information may also be stored on the AIM
database 124. One or more AIM clients, such as AIM client 1 118, AIM client 2
120 and AIM client n 122, may be communicatively connected to the AIM
database 124 such that the insurance customer data or property data can be
collected and stored in the AIM database 124 and subsequently accessed,
modified or deleted via the one or more AIM clients 118 120 122. For example,
in
some cases a server installation of the AIM database is shared to the AIM
clients
118 120 122. This may be implemented using Citrix networking software
provided by Citrix Systems, Inc. located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. However,
other networking software may instead or also be used. The AIM clients 118 120
122 retrieve raw policy data from the AIM database 124 and convert that data
into
a standardized format such as Association for Cooperative Operations Research
and Development Extensible Markup Language (ACORD XML). That XML is sent
to the policy issuance server 112 over network 116. However, the raw data may
be converted into other standardized formats including other declarative
programming language formats, among others.
The policy issuance server 112 may provide the general agent systems
102 104 106 the ability to process and issue insurance policies and policy
endorsements using a policy issuance web service of the policy issuance server
8

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
112. The policy issuance and policy endorsement process may include
customized automated compiling, completion, validation and/or verification, of
various policy forms and forms packages originating from or provided by the
one
or more insurance carriers 108 110 using insurance customer or property data
information gathered by the one or more general agent systems 102 104 106
and/or provided by the one or more general agent systems 102 104 106 to the
policy issuance server 112. For example, general agent system 1 102 may
electronically collect data from an insurance customer and provide such data
to
the policy issuance server 112 in a specified format. The policy issuance
server
112 will then compile that data and automatically complete the applicable
insurance policy forms for the particular insurance carrier (e.g. insurance
carrier
110) based on form templates generated by the policy issuance server 112,
insurance carrier 110 and/or the general agent system 102 and communicate the
completed insurance policy package back to the general agent system 102 for
further verification and/or validation before ultimately issuing the policy.
The network 116 may be any computer network, telecommunications
network or combination of telecommunications and computer networks that
enables communication between the various systems and entities connected to
the network 116 shown in Figure 1. General agent system 1 102, general agent
system 2 104, general agent system m 106, insurance carrier system x 108,
insurance carrier system y 110, and the policy issuance server 112 may be
additionally or optionally linked by one or more other communication links or
networks that comprise network 116. For example, a communications network of
network 116 may include a local area network that uses wireless fidelity (Wi-
Fi)
high frequency radio signals to transmit and receive data over distances of a
few
hundred feet. The local area network may be a wireless local area network
(WLAN) based on the Institute of Electric and Electronic Engineers (IEEE)
802.11
standards. However, other wired and wireless communications networks and
protocols may be used to link the various entities and systems shown in Figure
1.
The network 116 may comprise connections to the general agent system 1
102, general agent system 2 104, general agent system m 106, insurance carrier
system x 108, insurance carrier system y 110, and the policy issuance server
112
such that the policy issuance server 112 may provide the general agent systems
9

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
102 104 106 the ability to process and issue insurance policies and policy
endorsements using the policy issuance web service of the policy issuance
server
112, and may itself represent multiple interconnected networks. For instance
wired and wireless enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, extranets,
and/or the Internet may be included in or comprise a part of network 116.
Embodiments may include various types of communication networks including
other telecommunications networks, cellular networks, and other mobile
networks.
There may be any variety of computers, switching devices, routers, bridges,
firewalls, edge devices, multiplexers, phone lines, cables, telecommunications
equipment and other devices within network 116 and/or in the communications
paths between the systems and entities of Figure 1.
In accordance with an aspect of the disclosure, the systems and/or
systems shown in Figure 1 may contain discrete functional program modules that
might make use of an application programming interface (API), or other object,
software, firmware and/or hardware, to request or provide services of one or
more
of the other entities or systems within or connected to the network 116. For
example, communication can be provided over a communications medium, e.g.,
client and server systems running on any one of the systems or systems of the
entities shown in Figure 1.
These client and server systems may be communicatively coupled to one
another via transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP)
connection(s)
for high-capacity communication. The "client" is a member of a class or group
that
uses the services of another class or group to which it is not related. In
computing, a client is a process, i.e., roughly a set of instructions or
tasks,
executed by hardware that requests a service provided by another program.
Generally, the client process utilizes the requested service without having to
"know" any working details about the other program or the service itself. In a
client/server architecture, particularly a networked system, a client is
usually a
computer or device that accesses shared network resources provided by another
computer or device, e.g., a server. Any system in Figure 1, including the
general
agent system 1 102, general agent system 2 104, general agent system m 106,
insurance carrier system x 108, insurance carrier system y 110, the policy
issuance server 112, the AIM database 124 and the one or more AIM clients 118

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
120 122, can be considered a client, a server, or both, depending on the
circumstances.
Although the physical environment of the network 116 may have connected
devices such as computers, the physical environment may alternatively have or
be described as comprising various digital devices such as personal digital
assistants (PDAs), televisions, MP3 players, etc., software objects such as
interfaces, Component Object Model (COM) objects and the like.
There are a variety of systems, components, and network configurations
that may also support distributed computing environments within the network
116.
For example, computing systems may be connected together within the network
116 by wired or wireless systems, by local networks or by widely distributed
networks. Currently, many networks are coupled to the Internet, which provides
an infrastructure for widely distributed computing and encompasses many
different networks. Any such infrastructures, whether coupled to the Internet
or
not, may be used in conjunction with, be connected to, or comprise part of the
network 116.
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of an example computer system of any
one of the entities or systems of Figure 1, suitable for implementing
automated
insurance policy form generation and completion, according to one illustrated
embodiment.
The computer system 200 is suitable for implementing systems, devices
and methods for automated insurance policy form generation and completion,
according to one illustrated embodiment. The computer system 200 will at times
be referred to in the singular herein, but this is not intended to limit the
embodiments to a single device since in typical embodiments, there may be more
than one computer system or devices involved. Unless described otherwise, the
construction and operation of the various blocks shown in Figure 2 are of
conventional design. As a result, such blocks need not be described in further
detail herein, as they will be understood by those skilled in the relevant
art.
The computer system 200 may include one or more processing units 212a,
212b (collectively 212), a system memory 214 and a system bus 216 that couples
various system components including the system memory 214 to the processing
units 212. The processing units 212 may be any logic processing unit, such as
11

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
one or more central processing units (CPUs) 212a, digital signal processors
(DSPs) 212b, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable
gate
arrays such as field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc. The system bus
216 can employ any known bus structures or architectures, including a memory
bus with memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus. The system
memory 214 includes read-only memory ("ROM") 218 and random access
memory ("RAM") 220. A basic input/output system ("BIOS") 222, which can form
part of the ROM 218, contains basic routines that help transfer information
between elements within the computer system 200, such as during start-up.
The computer system 200 may include a hard disk drive 224 for reading
from and writing to a hard disk 226, an optical disk drive 228 for reading
from and
writing to removable optical disks 232, and/or a magnetic disk drive 230 for
reading from and writing to magnetic disks 234. The optical disk 232 can be a
CD-ROM, while the magnetic disk 234 can be a magnetic floppy disk or diskette.
The hard disk drive 224, optical disk drive 228 and magnetic disk drive 230
may
communicate with the processing unit 212 via the system bus 216. The hard disk
drive 224, optical disk drive 228 and magnetic disk drive 230 may include
interfaces or controllers (not shown) coupled between such drives and the
system
bus 216, as is known by those skilled in the relevant art. The drives 224, 228
and
230, and their associated computer-readable storage media 226, 232, 234, may
provide nonvolatile and non-transitory storage of computer readable
instructions,
data structures, program modules and other data for the computer system 200.
Although the depicted computer system 200 is illustrated employing a hard disk
224, optical disk 228 and magnetic disk 230, those skilled in the relevant art
will
appreciate that other types of computer-readable storage media that can store
data accessible by a computer may be employed, such as magnetic cassettes,
flash memory, digital video disks ("DVD"), Bernoulli cartridges, RAMs, ROMs,
smart cards, etc. For example, computer-readable storage media may include,
but is not limited to, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM),
electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory,
compact disc ROM (CD-ROM), digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk
storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other
magnetic storage devices, solid state memory or any other medium which can be
12

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
used to store the desired information and which may be accessed by processing
unit 212a.
Program modules can be stored in the system memory 214, such as an
operating system 236, one or more application programs 238, other programs or
modules 240 and program data 242. Application programs 238 may include
instructions that cause the processor(s) 212 to provide automated insurance
policy form generation and completion such as, for example, automated
insurance
policy form generation and completion performed during the policy issuance
service provided by the policy issuance server 112 based on insurance customer
and property data received by the general agent system 102. Other program
modules 240 may include instructions for handling security such as password or
other access protection and communications encryption. The system memory
214 may also include communications programs, for example, a Web client or
browser 244 for permitting the computer system 200 to access and exchange data
with sources such as Web sites of the Internet, corporate intranets,
extranets, or
other networks and devices as described herein, as well as other server
applications on server computing systems. The browser 244 in the depicted
embodiment is markup language based, such as Hypertext Markup Language
(HTML), Extensible Markup Language (XML) or Wireless Markup Language
(WML), and operates with markup languages that use syntactically delimited
characters added to the data of a document to represent the structure of the
document. A number of Web clients or browsers are commercially available such
as those from Mozilla, Google, and Microsoft of Redmond, Washington.
While shown in Figure 2 as being stored in the system memory 214, the
operating system 236, application programs 238, other programs/modules 240,
program data 242 and browser 244 can be stored on the hard disk 226 of the
hard
disk drive 224, the optical disk 232 of the optical disk drive 228 and/or the
magnetic disk 234 of the magnetic disk drive 230.
An operator can enter commands and information into the computer
system 200 through input devices such as a touch screen or keyboard 246 and/or
a pointing device such as a mouse 248, and/or via a graphical user interface.
Other input devices can include a microphone, joystick, game pad, tablet,
scanner, etc. These and other input devices are connected to one or more of
the
13

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
processing units 212 through an interface 250 such as a serial port interface
that
couples to the system bus 216, although other interfaces such as a parallel
port, a
game port or a wireless interface or a universal serial bus ("USB") can be
used. A
monitor 252 or other display device is coupled to the system bus 216 via a
video
interface 254, such as a video adapter. The computer system 200 can include
other output devices, such as speakers, printers, etc.
The computer system 200 can operate in a networked environment using
logical connections to one or more remote computers and/or devices as
described
above with reference to Figure 1. For example, the computer system 200 can
operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more
mobile devices, landline telephones and other service providers or information
servers. Communications may be via a wired and/or wireless network
architecture, for instance wired and wireless enterprise-wide computer
networks,
intranets, extranets, telecommunications networks, cellular networks, paging
networks, and other mobile networks.
Although not required, the embodiments will be described in the general
context of computer-executable instructions, such as program application
modules, objects, or macros stored on computer- or processor-readable storage
media and executed by a computer or processor. Those skilled in the relevant
art
will appreciate that the illustrated embodiments as well as other embodiments
can
be practiced with other system configurations and/or other computing system
configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems,
microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, personal
computers ("PCs"), network PCs, mini computers, mainframe computers, and the
like. The embodiments can be practiced in distributed computing environments
where tasks or modules are performed by remote processing devices, which are
linked through a communications network such as network 116. In a distributed
computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and
remote memory storage devices.
Agency information management (AIM) systems may offer the user built-in
options to issue insurance policies. These built-in options vary from
internally
generating the document directly from policy data, to sending policy data to
word
processing utilities which generate the actual document using templates.
External
14

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
policy issuance utilities may also follow this model, and accept policy data
which is
then placed in pre-defined locations and eventually produce a policy document
in
a similar manner. Although each of these approaches addresses certain
difficulties inherent to issuing insurance policies, there still exists the
potential of
user error surrounding the issuance process and may also involve an excessive
amount of time to maintain these systems.
Advantageously, the embodiments of the general agent system described
herein instead or additionally provide an integration library and associated
programs that produce policy data in a standardized declarative language
format
(e.g., in Association for Cooperative Operations Research and Development
Extensible Markup Language (ACORD XML)), which is then transmitted to the
policy issuance server 112. Note that the transmitted XML need not communicate
to the policy issuance server 112 where to place the data on any particular
policy
document or form, and the user (e.g., the general agent) need not have seen
the
policy form templates nor its endorsement forms prior to using the system.
This
substantially reduces potential of user error surrounding the policy issuance
process and also reduces the amount of time to maintain the general agent
systems.
Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating an automated process 300 of
insurance policy quoting of which automated insurance policy form generation
and
completion may be a part, according to one illustrated embodiment.
The process 300 starts at 302, wherein the basic policy data is received by
the policy issuance server (e.g., in ACORD XML format). For example, the
general agent or other user may enter basic policy data into the general agent
system, and then send a request that includes the basic policy data to the
policy
issuance server for a list of required and optional policy forms based on the
received basic policy data.
At 304, based on the received policy data, the policy issuance server
automatically determines and sends the list of required and optional policy
forms
to the general agent system. The policy issuance server may use the received
policy data to determine the listed optional forms, and those that are marked
as
required for the particular policy. The policy issuance server may
automatically
apply custom business rules for each individual insurance carrier to compile
policy

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
documents, automating an otherwise typically error-prone and time consuming
process. The policy issuance server may automatically generate the insurance
policy form templates, including overflow forms, based on forms previously
received corresponding to the applicable insurance carrier and then populate
the
forms with the appropriate received basic policy data.
At 306, the general agent system selects forms from the required and
optional policy forms to include on an insurance quote document.
At 308, the policy issuance server may send a list of all forms for a
particular carrier to the general agent if requested for an additional
endorsement
to the policy being quoted. For example, if the user decides that an
endorsement
form that is not listed needs to be attached to the policy, they can request a
list of
all of the forms the corresponding carrier has made available to the general
agent.
At 310, the general agent system attaches the selected endorsement forms
to the policy.
Figure 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an automated process 400 of
insurance policy issuance of which automated insurance policy form generation
and completion may be a part, according to one illustrated embodiment.
At 402, after the policy has been bound, the general agent system may
then submit the completed policy's data, exported to ACORD XML, to the policy
issuance server.
At 404, the policy issuance server automatically validates the policy data to
ensure the policy is valid.
At 406, if the policy is valid, the policy issuance server sends a policy
issuance policy identifier (policy ID) to enable the policy issuance workflow
to be
completed by the general agent. For example, this new ID is used to generate a
uniform resource locator (URL) to a web page on the policy issuance server
that
will allow the user to complete the service's issuance workflow.
At 408, based on the received policy data, the policy issuance server
automatically generates completed policy forms (e.g., in Adobe portable
document format (PDF)) when the policy workflow is completed. For example, the
policy issuance server may automatically generate the insurance policy form
templates, including overflow forms, based on forms received from the
16

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
corresponding insurance carrier and then populate the forms with the
applicable
received policy data.
At 410, the completed policy forms are made available to the user for
verification and the policy is automatically marked issued once verified. For
example, the general agent system polls another generated URL, again using the
policy ID, until a link to the issued policy's PDF URL is available. Once the
PDF's
link is retrieved, the PDF is downloaded, saved to the general agent system's
attachment directory, logged to the general agent system's activity log and
displayed to the user for validation. The policy can be modified and re-issued
until
the policy has been marked as issued on policy issuance server. After the
policy
has been issued and verified, the general agent can then mail out the policy.
This
also marks the policy as completed on the policy issuance server. Once the
policy has been mailed out, it may be modified by an endorsement.
Figure 5 is a flow diagram illustrating an automated process 500 of
insurance policy endorsement of which automated insurance policy form
generation and completion may be a part, according to one illustrated
embodiment.
At 502, the policy issuance server receives modified policy data after the
policy is issued.
At 504, the policy issuance server automatically identifies policy changes
and validates policy data.
At 506, based on the received modified policy data, the policy issuance
server automatically identifies and generates completed applicable policy
endorsement forms. For example, the policy issuance server may automatically
generate the insurance policy endorsement form templates, including overflow
forms, based on forms received from the corresponding insurance carrier and
then populate the forms with the applicable received policy data.
At 510, the completed policy forms including endorsement forms are made
available to the user for verification (e.g., by the policy issuance server
automatically posting a link to the completed endorsement forms or sending a
link
to the completed endorsement forms to the general agent system).
17

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
Figure 6 is a block diagram showing the flow of data 600 between
components of a policy issuance system which implements automated insurance
policy form generation and completion, according to one illustrated
embodiment.
Internally, the general agent system may use mapping files 610 to export
policy data 604 retrieved from the AIM database 602 as valid ACORD XML 612.
These mapping files 610 may also be formatted as XML and are distributed with
the AIM client 606 software (e.g., AIM.exe). These mapping files 610 can be
broken into parts, which are compiled into a full map file before being
processed
by AIM client software 606. The appropriate mapping files are loaded based on
the policy's line(s) of business that are currently being exported. Before the
mapping files are processed, the raw policy data 604 is loaded into policy
objects
608 and it is these policy objects 608 that are directly mapped to ACORD XML.
In the mapping files 610, each of the policy objects 608 are represented as
data sources and the pieces of data held by the object are represented as
fields.
The AIM client software 606 processes the map files sequentially, allowing the
map files to dictate how the policy's objects are accessed and what data is
being
exported. The mapping files 610 takes these data sources and fields, and
places
them into ACORD XML nodes 612. The latter part of this process is also
performed sequentially, allowing the AIM client software 606 to adhere to the
ordering of the mapped ACORD XML nodes 612. This ACORD XML 612 is then
communicated to the policy issuance web service 614 such that policy issuance
server may automatically generate the insurance policy form templates,
including
overflow forms, based on forms received from the corresponding insurance
carrier
or other sources and then populate the forms with the applicable policy data
of the
received ACORD XML 612.
Figure 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a process 700 of automated
insurance policy form generation and completion, according to one illustrated
embodiment.
Insurance policy forms are often a fixed size with a fixed number of fields to
place data. Certain fields on the form come from a list of data that is of
unknown
size. If there isn't enough room on the form, then that data must "flow" onto
another form (i.e., an overflow form). This other form may be a completely
different form designed to contain this overflow data. There may be more than
18

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
one of these fields on the original form (e.g. locations and classes of
business). If
one of the items overflows, then a new page will need to be used. The process
700 of automated insurance policy form generation and completion provides one
embodiment to automate this overflow form process as part of or separate from
the automated policy issuance process described above.
At 702, the applicable policy forms are received by the policy issuance
server. These may be received from the insurance carrier, general agent or
other
party.
At 704, the policy issuance server receives an indication from the general
agent or other entity that one or more of the received forms is an overflow
form for
another form. For example, one of the received forms may be designated an
overflow form for another form of the received forms or for another previously
received form. This other form may be referred to the base form. Also, another
form of the received forms or another previously received form may be
designated
as an overflow form for one of the received forms. This designation or
indication
may be made and/or received electronically with or separate from the receiving
of
the form itself.
At 706, the policy issuance server defines the relationship between
indicated overflow form and base form based on the received indication and
records this relationship directly within the forms and/or separately from the
forms.
At 708, the policy issuance server tags fields on the base forms and
indicated overflow forms according to a naming convention. For example, this
naming convention may indicate how many sub-items or sub-fields a particular
field may contain within an array for the particular form. Figure 9 and Figure
10
show tags according to one such example naming convention for a sample form.
At 710, the policy issuance server receives policy data from the general
agent system with which to populate form fields. For example, this policy data
may be received in the XML ACORD format as described above.
At 712, the policy issuance server automatically determines the number of
overflow forms to use based on the received policy data and available fields
on
the base form and designated overflow forms. This may include dynamically
determining the number of available fields on the base form and dynamically
determining the number of overflow forms needed to handle all or part of the
19

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
received policy data. One base form may have many different designated
overflow forms each corresponding to a field determined to have data which
will
overflow. An example of this process to automatically determine the number of
overflow forms is described further in Figure 8.
At 714, the policy issuance server automatically populates the base forms
and any needed overflow form fields and generates completed forms. These
completed forms may then be made available to a user for verification and
policy
issuance as described above in the policy issuance process.
Figure 8 is a flow diagram illustrating an automated process 712 for
determining the number of overflow forms to use in the process of insurance
policy form generation and completion of Figure 7, according to one
illustrated
embodiment.
At 802, the policy issuance server retrieves content from the received
policy data with which to populate a form field.
At 804, the policy issuance server determines from the retrieved content
the number of content sub-items, if any, for the field.
At 806, the policy issuance server determines whether number of content
sub-items exceeds the array size of the field on the base form.
At 808, if the policy issuance server had determined that the number of
content sub-items exceeds the array size of the field on the base form, then
the
policy issuance server determines how many overflow forms to use by dividing
the
amount the number of content sub-items exceeds the array size of the field on
the
base form by the array size of the corresponding field on the overflow form
(rounding up to the next whole number). If the policy issuance server had
determined that the number of content sub-items does not exceed the array size
of the field on the base form, then the process continues directly to 810
instead.
At 810, the policy issuance server determines whether there are any
unprocessed fields in received policy data. For example, one form may have
multiple fields which may each contain multiple content sub-items in sub-
fields
that could possibly need to overflow onto a same or different overflow form.
At 812, if the policy issuance server had determined there are not any
unprocessed fields in received policy data, the process finishes. Otherwise,
the

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
process continues to 802 to continue processing fields which may need to
contain
data that might overflow onto an overflow form.
Figure 9 is an example base form 900 showing example field names and
associated tags that may be used in automated insurance policy form generation
and completion, according to one illustrated embodiment. Shown is an example
Coverages Provided section 902. The Coverages Provided section 902 includes
three subsections which may be populated with content sub-items, such as
insurance coverages for different buildings. However, if more than three
buildings
need coverage, an overflow form will be utilized. Each corresponding field
within
the three subsections is tagged according to a naming convention as shown
wherein each subsection corresponds to a sub-field of the Coveragesfl field
904
(which is an array of sub-fields) designated by a corresponding index integer.
The
first Coverages Provided subsection is indicated by the Coverages[1] sub-field
906, the second subsection is indicated by the Coverages[2] sub-field 908, and
the third subsection is indicated by the Coverages[3] sub-field 910. The
process
issuance server determines the number of coverages fields available on the
form
(i.e., the array size of the Coveragesfl field 904) by reading the largest
available
index number of the Coverages0 field 904. In this example, it is three since
Coverages[3] 910 has the largest index number.
Figure 10 is an example overflow form 1000 associated with the base form
of Figure 9, showing field names and associated tags that may be used in
automated insurance policy form generation and completion, according to one
illustrated embodiment. The overflow form 1000 in this case is similar to the
base
form 900 except that it has been previously indicated as an overflow form for
form
900, as designated by the overflow form title 1001. It also has a Coverages
Provided section 1002. The Coverages Provided section 1002 also includes three
subsections in which insurance coverages for different buildings may be
indicated
on the form 1000. The first coverages subsection is indicated by the
Coverages[l] sub-field 1006 of the general Coveragesp field 1004, the second
subsection is indicated by the Coverages[2] sub-field 1008 of the general
Coverages[] field 1004, and the third subsection is indicated by the
Coverages[3]
sub-field 1010 of the general Coveragesp field 1004. However, if more than an
21

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
additional three buildings need coverage, an additional overflow form will be
utilized.
For example, if the number of content sub-items exceeds the array size of
the field on the base form, then the policy issuance server determines how
many
overflow forms to use by dividing the amount the number of content sub-items
exceeds the array size of the field on the base form by the array size of the
corresponding field on the overflow form (rounding up to the next whole
number).
In the present example, say there are five content sub-items corresponding to
five
different building which need coverage as indicated in the policy data
received by
the policy issuance server from the general agent system.
As shown above, the array size of the Coverages[] field 904 on the base
form 900 is three. The array size of the general Coverages0 field 1004 on the
designated overflow form 1000 is also three, although it may be larger or
smaller
in other embodiments. Thus, the amount the number of content sub-items
exceeds the array size of the Coverageso field 904 on the base form is five
minus
three, which equals two. Two divided by the array size, three, of the
corresponding Coveragesp field 1004 on the overflow form is 2/3. This is then
rounded up to the next whole number, one. Thus the number of overflow forms to
be used is one. The result of the above example using sample data for five
buildings that need coverage is shown in Figures 11 and 12.
Figures 11 and 12 are the example base form 900 of Figure 9, and
example overflow form 1000 of Figure 10, respectively, populated with sample
data 1102 resulting from the example provided above. Note that each subsection
1104 1106 1108 of the Coverages Provided 902 section on the base form 1000 is
full. On the overflow form 1000, only two subsections 1204 1206 of the
Coverages Provided 1002 section are populated with data 1202 as there are only
five buildings total needing coverage resulting in five total content sub-
items. The
number of overflow forms may also depend on the number of other available
fields
on the form than the Coveragesfl field 904 on the base form, in which case the
number of overflow forms is the minimum number needed to accommodate the
received policy content data taking into account the number of available
fields of
all the different types of fields. In one embodiment, this may be determined
by
repeating the above process described to determine the quantity of overflow
forms
22

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
for each field on the form and then selecting the largest determined quantity
from
those determined for each filed. Also, other different overflow forms may be
used
for one or more particular fields on the base form and the overflow forms may
differ in appearance and layout than the associated base form.
Although the determining the number of overflow forms and generating the
completed base forms and overflow forms is described above as being performed
by the policy issuance server, these processes may be performed by other
components or systems separate from the policy issuance server or located
remotely form the policy issuance server. Also, although the policy data is
described above as being generated by and received from the general agent
system, the policy data may be generated by and received from other systems
separate from the general agent system or located remotely form the general
agent system.
The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the
devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, schematics, and
examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, schematics, and examples contain
one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those
skilled in
the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams,
flowcharts,
or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide
range
of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one
embodiment, the present subject matter may be implemented via Application
Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). However, those skilled in the art will
recognize that the embodiments disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be
equivalently implemented in standard integrated circuits, as one or more
computer
programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs
running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on
one or more controllers (e.g., microcontrollers) as one or more programs
running
on one or more processors (e.g., microprocessors), as firmware, or as
virtually
any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the
code
for the software and or firmware would be well within the skill of one of
ordinary
skill in the art in light of this disclosure.
In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms
taught herein are capable of being distributed as a program product in a
variety of
23

CA 02733857 2011-03-11
forms, and that an illustrative embodiment applies equally regardless of the
particular type of signal bearing media used to actually carry out the
distribution.
Examples of signal bearing media include, but are not limited to, the
following:
recordable type media such as floppy disks, hard disk drives, CD ROMs, digital
tape, and computer memory.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide
further embodiments. To the extent that they are not inconsistent with the
specific
teachings and definitions herein, all of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent
application
publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent
applications
and non-patent publications referred to in this specification are incorporated
herein by reference, in their entirety, including U.S. Provisional Patent
Application
No. 61/422,090, field December 10, 2010. Aspects of the embodiments can be
modified, if necessary, to employ systems, circuits and concepts of the
various
patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the
above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms
used
should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments
disclosed
in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all
possible
embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are
entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
24

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 2017-03-13
Demande non rétablie avant l'échéance 2017-03-13
Inactive : Abandon.-RE+surtaxe impayées-Corr envoyée 2016-03-11
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 2016-03-11
Inactive : Regroupement d'agents 2015-05-14
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 2012-09-11
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2012-09-10
Inactive : CIB désactivée 2012-01-07
Inactive : Symbole CIB 1re pos de SCB 2012-01-01
Inactive : CIB expirée 2012-01-01
Inactive : CIB du SCB 2012-01-01
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2011-05-04
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2011-05-04
Inactive : Réponse à l'art.37 Règles - Non-PCT 2011-04-13
Inactive : Demande sous art.37 Règles - Non-PCT 2011-04-05
Demande reçue - nationale ordinaire 2011-03-28
Exigences de dépôt - jugé conforme 2011-03-28
Inactive : Certificat de dépôt - Sans RE (Anglais) 2011-03-28

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
2016-03-11

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2015-03-05

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Taxe pour le dépôt - générale 2011-03-11
TM (demande, 2e anniv.) - générale 02 2013-03-11 2013-02-22
TM (demande, 3e anniv.) - générale 03 2014-03-11 2014-02-20
TM (demande, 4e anniv.) - générale 04 2015-03-11 2015-03-05
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
VERTAFORE, INC.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
HARRY SNYDER
YI ZHANG
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Description 2011-03-11 24 1 327
Abrégé 2011-03-11 1 16
Revendications 2011-03-11 6 224
Dessins 2011-03-11 12 349
Dessin représentatif 2011-11-09 1 9
Page couverture 2012-09-05 2 40
Certificat de dépôt (anglais) 2011-03-28 1 166
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 2012-11-14 1 111
Rappel - requête d'examen 2015-11-16 1 125
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (requête d'examen) 2016-04-25 1 164
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 2016-04-22 1 174
Correspondance 2011-04-05 1 35
Correspondance 2011-04-13 2 59