Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2895021 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 2895021
(54) Titre français: SYSTEMES ET METHODES D'EVALUATION PREDESTINATION, MODIFICATION, REFUS ET INFORMATION RELATIVEMENT A UNE ORDONNANCE EN FORMAT ELECTRONIQUE
(54) Titre anglais: SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR E-PRESCRIPTION TRANSACTION PREDESTINATION EVALUATION, EDITING, REJECTION AND MESSAGING
Statut: Réputée abandonnée et au-delà du délai pour le rétablissement - en attente de la réponse à l’avis de communication rejetée
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • H04L 12/16 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • PINSONNEAULT, ROGER G. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
  • KAYE, ELIZABETH S. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • MCKESSON CORPORATION
(71) Demandeurs :
  • MCKESSON CORPORATION (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: AIRD & MCBURNEY LP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré:
(22) Date de dépôt: 2015-06-22
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 2015-12-23
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
14/674944 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 2015-03-31
62/016088 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 2014-06-23

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


A service provider computer can receive an e-prescription transaction from a
prescriber computer and evaluate the data therein to determine if errors exist
or if required
data elements are missing. A rejection of the e-prescription transaction can
be generated or
the transaction can be modified if errors exist, if data elements are missing,
and/or if
additional tests or additional information in the transaction is needed. If
modified, the
transaction can be sent to the pharmacy computer. The rejection response can
include a reject
code, basis for rejection, and override code, and can be transmitted back to
the prescriber
computer. Similarly, the service provider computer can receive an e-
prescription transaction
from the pharmacy computer, evaluate the data therein, and identify any errors
or missing
data. The e-prescription transaction can be modified to correct errors and
omissions and
transmitted to the prescriber computer or rejected and transmitted back to the
pharmacy
computer.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CLAIMS
What is claimed is:
1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
receiving, by one or more service provider computers associated with a service
provider and comprising one or more processors from a prescriber computer
associated with
a prescriber of medication, an e-prescription transaction comprising
healthcare transaction
data, wherein the healthcare transaction data comprises a medication
identifier identifying a
medication to be prescribed and at least one patient identifier identifying a
patient to receive
the prescribed medication;
identifying, by the one or more service provider computers, the healthcare
transaction
data in the e-prescription transaction;
determining, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on the evaluation of the identified healthcare transaction data, if the e-
prescription transaction
includes a basis for rejection in the identified healthcare transaction data;
generating, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on a positive determination that the e-prescription transaction includes the
basis for rejection,
a rejection response to the e-prescription transaction; and
transmitting, by the one or more service provider computers, the rejection
response to
the e-prescription transaction to the prescriber computer.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the basis for
rejection
comprises an error in the identified healthcare transaction data.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the rejection
response
comprises a rejection code identifying a basis for rejecting the e-
prescription transaction.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the rejection
response
further comprises an override code and wherein the method further comprises:
receiving, by the one or more service provider computers from the prescriber
computer, a modified e-prescription transaction comprising a second set of
healthcare
transaction data, wherein the second set of healthcare transaction data
comprises the
medication identifier, at least one patient identifier identifying the
patient, and the override
code;
38

identifying, by the one or more service provider computers, the override code
in the
second set of healthcare transaction data in the modified e-prescription
transaction;
determining, by the one or more service provider computers, that the override
code is
a valid override code; and
transmitting, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on the determination that the override code is the valid override code, the
modified e-
prescription transaction to a pharmacy computer for a pharmacy.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the positive
determination that the e-prescription transaction includes the basis for
rejection in the
identified healthcare transaction data comprises:
identifying, by the one or more service provider computers, the medication
identifier
in the healthcare transaction data; and
determining, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on the identified medication identifier, that at least one of an additional
test needed for the
patient or additional information in the e-prescription transaction is needed.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining if the e-
prescription transaction includes the basis for rejection comprises
determining, by the one or
more service provider computers and based at least in part on the evaluation
of the identified
healthcare transaction data, if the e-prescription transaction is missing at
least one required
data element.
7. A system comprising:
at least one memory operable to store computer-executable instructions; and
at least one processor configured to access the at least one memory and
execute the
computer-executable instructions to:
receive, from a prescriber computer associated with a prescriber of
medication, an e-prescription transaction comprising healthcare transaction
data, wherein the
healthcare transaction data comprises a medication identifier identifying a
medication to be
prescribed and at least one patient identifier identifying a patient to
receive the prescribed
medication;
identify the healthcare transaction data in the e-prescription transaction;
39

determine, based at least in part on the evaluation of the identified
healthcare
transaction data, if the e-prescription transaction includes a basis for
rejection in the identified
healthcare transaction data;
generate, based at least in part on a positive determination that the e-
prescription transaction includes the basis for rejection, a rejection
response to the e-
prescription transaction; and
direct communication of the rejection response to the e-prescription
transaction to the prescriber computer.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the basis for rejection comprises an
error in
the identified healthcare transaction data.
9. The system of claim 7, wherein the rejection response comprises: a
rejection
code identifying a basis for rejecting the e-prescription transaction.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the rejection response further comprises
an
override code and wherein the processor is further configured to access the at
least one
memory and execute the computer-executable instructions to:
receive a modified e-prescription transaction comprising a second set of
healthcare
transaction data, wherein the second set of healthcare transaction data
comprises the
medication identifier, at least one patient identifier identifying the
patient, and the override
code;
identify the override code in the second set of healthcare transaction data in
the
modified e-prescription transaction;
determine that the override code is a valid override code; and
direct, based at least in part on the determination that the override code is
the valid
override code, communication of the modified e-prescription transaction to a
pharmacy
computer for a pharmacy.
11. The system of claim 7, wherein the processor is further configured to
positively determine that the e-prescription transaction includes the basis
for rejection in the
identified healthcare transaction data by accessing the at least one memory
and executing the
computer-executable instructions to:
identify the medication identifier in the healthcare transaction data;

determine, based on the identified medication identifier, that at least one of
an
additional test is needed for the patient based on the medication identified
by the medication
identifier or additional information in the e-prescription transaction is
needed.
12. The system of claim 7, wherein the processor is configured to access
the at
least one memory and execute the computer-executable instructions to determine
if the e-
prescription transaction includes the basis for rejection comprises by
determining, based at
least in part on the evaluation of the identified healthcare transaction data,
if the e-
prescription transaction is missing at least one required data element.
13. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
receiving, by one or more service provider computers associated with a service
provider and comprising one or more processors from a pharmacy computer for a
pharmacy,
an e-prescription refill request transaction comprising healthcare transaction
data, wherein the
healthcare transaction data comprises a medication identifier identifying a
medication to be
refilled and at least one patient identifier identifying a patient to receive
the refilled
medication;
identifying, by the one or more service provider computers, the healthcare
transaction
data in the e-prescription refill request transaction;
determining, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on the evaluation of the identified healthcare transaction data, if the e-
prescription refill
request transaction includes a basis for rejection in the identified
healthcare transaction data;
generating, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on a positive determination that the e-prescription refill request transaction
includes the basis
for rejection, a rejection response to the e-prescription refill request
transaction; and
transmitting, by the one or more service provider computers, the rejection
response to
the e-prescription refill request transaction to the pharmacy computer.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the basis for
rejection comprises an error in the identified healthcare transaction data.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the rejection
response comprises: a rejection code identifying a basis for rejecting the e-
prescription refill
request transaction and an override code and wherein the method further
comprises:
41

receiving, by the one or more service provider computers from the pharmacy
computer, a modified e-prescription refill request transaction comprising a
second set of
healthcare transaction data, wherein the second set of healthcare transaction
data comprises
the medication identifier, at least one patient identifier identifying the
patient, and the
override code;
identifying, by the one or more service provider computers, the override code
in the
second set of healthcare transaction data in the modified e-prescription
refill request
transaction;
determining, by the one or more service provider computers, that the override
code is
a valid override code; and
transmitting, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on the determination that the override code is the valid override code, the
modified e-
prescription refill request transaction to a prescriber computer associated
with a prescriber of
medication.
16. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the positive
determination that the e-prescription refill request transaction includes the
basis for rejection
in the identified healthcare transaction data comprises:
identifying, by the one or more service provider computers, the medication
identifier
in the healthcare transaction data; and
determining, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on the identified medication identifier, that at least one of an additional
test is needed for the
patient based on the medication identified by the medication identifier or
additional
information in the e-prescription transaction is needed.
17. A system comprising:
at least one memory operable to store computer-executable instructions; and
at least one processor configured to access the at least one memory and
execute the
computer-executable instructions to:
receive, from a pharmacy computer for a pharmacy, an e-prescription refill
request transaction comprising healthcare transaction data, wherein the
healthcare transaction
data comprises a medication identifier identifying a medication to be refilled
and at least one
patient identifier identifying a patient to receive the refilled medication;
42

identify the healthcare transaction data in the e-prescription refill request
transaction;
determine, based at least in part on the evaluation of the identified
healthcare
transaction data, if the e-prescription refill request transaction includes a
basis for rejection in
the identified healthcare transaction data;
generate, based at least in part on a positive determination that the e-
prescription refill request transaction includes the basis for rejection, a
rejection response to
the e-prescription refill request transaction; and
direct communication of the rejection response to the e-prescription refill
request transaction to the pharmacy computer.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein the basis for rejection comprises an
error in
the identified healthcare transaction data.
19. The system of claim 17, wherein the rejection response comprises: a
rejection
code identifying a basis for rejecting the e-prescription refill request
transaction and an
override code and wherein the processor is configured to access the at least
one memory and
execute the computer-executable instructions to
receive, from the pharmacy computer, a modified e-prescription refill request
transaction comprising a second set of healthcare transaction data, wherein
the second set of
healthcare transaction data comprises the medication identifier, at least one
patient identifier
identifying the patient, and the override code;
identify the override code in the second set of healthcare transaction data in
the
modified e-prescription refill request transaction;
determine that the override code is a valid override code; and
direct, based at least in part on the determination that the override code is
the valid
override code, communication of the modified e-prescription refill request
transaction to a
prescriber computer associated with a prescriber of medication.
20. The system of claim 17, wherein the processor is further configured to
positively determine that the e-prescription transaction includes the basis
for rejection in the
identified healthcare transaction data by accessing the at least one memory
and executing the
computer-executable instructions to:
43

identifying, by the one or more service provider computers, the medication
identifier
in the healthcare transaction data; and
determining, by the one or more service provider computers and based at least
in part
on the identified medication identifier, that at least one of an additional
test is needed for the
patient based on the medication identified by the medication identifier or
additional
information in the e-prescription transaction is needed.
44

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02895021 2015-06-22
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR E-PRESCRIPTION TRANSACTION PRE-
DESTINATION EVALUATION, EDITING, REJECTION, AND MESSAGING
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S.
Provisional
Patent Application No. 62/016,088, titled Systems and Methods for E-
Prescription Pre-
destination Evaluation, Editing, and Messaging, which was filed on June 23,
2014, the entire
contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference for all
purposes.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] Aspects of the disclosure relate generally to the evaluation of e-
prescription
transactions, and more particularly, to systems and methods for evaluating,
editing, rejecting
and/or messaging originators of e-prescription transactions prior to
delivering the transactions
on for fulfillment.
BACKGROUND
[0003] In the current environment, using a prescription as an example, a
pharmacy or
other ultimate destination of an e-prescription transaction, may have to
request a clarification
of the prescription or request to alter the prescription because, for example
i) the prescription
is incomplete, ii) there are errors within the prescription, iii) there are
inconsistencies within
the prescription, or iv) the pharmacy may have additional information that is
not available to
the prescriber or other originator of the e-prescription transaction. Upon
receipt of the
notification from the phaimacy, such as via a phone call, the prescriber may
alter the original
prescription, discontinue the order, or provide an explanation for the current
order to the
pharmacy. It can take significant time for the pharmacy to reach the
prescriber and receive
the necessary information from the prescriber. This additional time creates
inefficiencies in
the filling process and can result in safety/health issues for the patient
(due to errors,
inconsistencies, lack of information in the prescription and/or the patient
leaving the
pharmacy without getting the prescription filled. Upon receipt, the prescriber
may alter the
original prescription, discontinue the order, or provide an explanation for
the current order.
The current solution is inefficient if the quality and/or the richness of the
transaction data can
be improved via automation.
1

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0004] Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are
not
necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
[0005] Figure 1 illustrates an example overview of a system that
facilitates evaluating,
editing, rejecting, and/or messaging back to originators of e-prescription
transactions prior to
transmitting the transaction or a revised transaction from the originators of
the e-prescription
transaction to its ultimate destination, according to one exemplary embodiment
of the
disclosure.
[0006] Figure 2A is a diagram of an example data flow for evaluating,
editing, rejecting,
and/or messaging back to originators of e-prescription transactions prior to
transmitting the
transaction or a revised transaction from the originators of the e-
prescription transaction to its
ultimate destination as part of the processing of the e-prescription
transaction, according to
one exemplary embodiment of the disclosure.
[0007] Figure 2B is a diagram of another example data flow for evaluating,
editing,
rejecting, and/or messaging back to originators of e-prescription transactions
prior to
transmitting the transaction or a revised transaction from the originators of
the e-prescription
transaction to its ultimate destination as part of the processing of the e-
prescription
transaction processed through one or more service providers, according to an
alternative
exemplary embodiment of the disclosure.
[0008] Figure 3 is a flow chart of an example method for evaluating,
editing, rejecting,
and/or messaging back to originators of e-prescription transactions prior to
transmitting the
transaction or a revised transaction from the originators of the e-
prescription transaction to its
ultimate destination as part of the processing of the e-prescription
transaction, according to
one exemplary embodiment of the disclosure.
[0009] Figure 4 is a diagram of an example data flow for evaluating,
editing, rejecting,
and/or messaging back to originators of e-prescription transactions, such as
refill request
transactions, prior to transmitting the transaction or a revised transaction
from the originators
of the e-prescription transaction to its ultimate destination as part of the
processing of the e-
prescription transaction, according to one exemplary embodiment of the
disclosure.
[0010] Figure 5 is a flow chart of an example method for evaluating,
editing, rejecting,
and/or messaging back to originators of e-prescription transactions, such as
refill request
transactions, prior to transmitting the transaction or a revised transaction
from the originators
of the e-prescription transaction to its ultimate destination as part of the
processing of the e-
prescription transaction, according to one exemplary embodiment of the
disclosure.
2

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
[0011] Exemplary embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter
with
reference to the accompanying drawings, in which exemplary embodiments are
shown. The
concepts disclosed herein may, however, be embodied in many different forms
and should
not be construed as limited to the exemplary embodiments set forth herein;
rather, these
embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and
complete, and will
fully convey the scope of the concepts to those skilled in the art. Like
numbers refer to like,
but not necessarily the same or identical, elements throughout.
[0012] Exemplary embodiments described herein include systems and methods
that
facilitate evaluating, editing, rejecting, and/or messaging back to
originators of e-prescription
transactions prior to transmitting the transaction to its ultimate destination
as part of the
processing of the e-prescription transaction in real-time or near real-time.
In one example, a
prescription can be a medication, product/device, or service order (for a
service to be
provided to a patient), and a prescriber of medications, products, and/or
services to patients,
such as a physician, physician's assistant, nurse, or any other person
permitted to prescribe
medication or prescribe or provide healthcare services to a patient, can
transmit an e-
prescription transaction, via a prescriber/provider computer, to a service
provider computer
for ultimate submission to a pharmacy computer. The e-prescription transaction
can be an e-
prescription transaction for a prescribed medication, product, or service for
a patient.
Examples of e-prescription transactions include a new prescription transaction
(providing a
prescription for a medication, product, or service for a patient - transmitted
from the
prescriber computer through the service provider computer and to the pharmacy
computer), a
refill request transaction (requesting additional refills of a prescribed
medication, product, or
service, for a patient - transmitted from the pharmacy computer through the
service provider
computer and to the prescriber computer), a response to the refill request
transaction
(transmitted from the prescriber computer through the service provider
computer and to the
pharmacy computer), a product change request transaction (requesting a change
to the
prescribed product identified in the prescription - transmitted from the
pharmacy computer
through the service provider computer and to the prescriber computer), a
response to the
product change request transaction (transmitted from the prescriber computer
through the
service provider computer and to the pharmacy computer), a cancel prescription
request
transaction (to cancel a prescription for a patient - transmitted from the
prescriber computer
through the service provider computer and to the phaimacy computer), a
response to the
3

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
cancel prescription request transaction (transmitted from the pharmacy
computer through the
service provider computer and to the prescriber computer), error messages, and
status
messages.
[0013] The e-prescription transaction can be received by the service
provider computer,
which can parse and evaluate the contents of e-prescription transaction. Based
on the
evaluation of the e-prescription transaction, the service provider computer
can determine any
errors, issues, or additional information or testing related to the
medication, product, or
service being requested in the transaction. The service provider computer can
generate a
response to the e-prescription transaction that identifies the errors, issues,
or additional
information needed in relation to the e-prescription transaction. This
response can be inserted
into a message field of the e-prescription transaction or can be a separate
message from the
transaction. In addition, the message can be accompanied by a reject or issue
code that can
be included in a predetermined field of the e-prescription transaction or can
be included with
the message separate from the transaction. Further, the message can include an
override code
that can be inserted by the prescriber when the e-prescription transaction is
resubmitted. The
response can be transmitted by the service provider computer back to the
prescriber/provider
computer.
[0014] The prescriber can modify the e-prescription transaction to clarify
errors or issues
and/or to provide the additional information needed and can resubmit the
modified e-
prescription transaction to the service provider computer via the
prescriber/provider
computer. The service provider computer can receive the modified e-
prescription transaction
and can determine that no additional errors, issues, or additional information
needs remain
and can deliver/transmit the modified e-prescription transaction to the
pharmacy computer for
filling.
[0015] System Overview
[0016] Figure 1 illustrates an example system 100 supporting electronic
prescription
transaction activities according to one example embodiment. The exemplary
system 100
facilitates evaluating, editing, rejecting, and/or messaging back to
originators of e-
prescription transactions prior to transmitting the transaction or a revised
transaction from the
originator of the e-prescription transaction to its ultimate destination and
as part of the
processing of the e-prescription transaction, including, but not limited to,
an electronic
prescription transaction transaction, e-script, refill request transaction, or
e-prescription, and
will now be described illustratively with respect to Figure 1. As shown in
Figure 1, the
4

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
system 100 may include at least one prescriber/provider computer 102, at least
one pharmacy
computer 104, and at least one service provider computer 106.
[0017] As
desired, each of the prescriber/provider computers 102, pharmacy computers
104, and service provider computers 106 may include one or more processing
devices that
may be configured for accessing and reading associated computer-readable media
having
stored thereon data and/or computer-executable instructions for implementing
various
methods, including those described herein. Additionally, in certain exemplary
embodiments,
the service provider computer 106 may be in communication with one or more e-
prescription
evaluation modules 180, which may access and/or be in communication with one
or more
suitable data storage devices, such as database 182. The e-prescription
evaluation module
180 may receive e-prescription transactions for all or a portion of the data
from e-prescription
transactions from the service provider computer 106. Upon receipt of the e-
prescription
transaction data, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 may evaluate the
data to determine
if there are any errors. The e-prescription evaluation module 180 may also
evaluate the data
to determine if any of the data is outside of threshold parameters, such as
dosage, days'
supply, number of refills. The e-prescription evaluation module 180 can
further evaluate the
data, including the medication identifier or service identifier for the
medication or service
requested in the transaction to determine any risk evaluation and mitigation
strategies
(REMS) opportunities or medication therapy management (MTM) service
opportunities for
the medication or service. This can include, for example, any tests the
patient may need prior
to receiving the requested medication or service or any comprehensive
medication review
(CMR), drug regimen review (DRR), medication regimen review (MRR), targeted
medication review (TMR), and so forth that should be completed prior to the
patient being
prescribed the medication or service identified in the e-prescription
transaction. If any errors
or issues are identified by the e-prescription evaluation module 180, it can
generate a
response message and/or rejection message that identifies the errors or issues
and that can be
transmitted back to the prescriber/provider computer 102 from which the e-
prescription
transaction originated. The response/rejection message can include a rejection
code or other
information that can be inserted into the e-prescription transaction or can be
provided
separate from the e-prescription transaction. Further, the response/rejection
message can
include an override code that can be included in a subsequent e-prescription
transaction by
the prescriber to continue normal processing of the transaction without
substantive evaluation
by the e-prescription evaluation module 180.

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
=
[0018]
Generally, network devices and systems, including one or more of the
prescriber/provider computers 102, the pharmacy computers 104, service
provider computer
106, and e-prescription evaluation module 180 may include or otherwise be
associated with
suitable hardware and/or software for transmitting and receiving data and/or
computer-
executable instructions over one or more communications links or networks.
These network
devices and systems may also include any number of processors for processing
data and
executing computer-executable instructions, as well as other internal and
peripheral
components that are well known in the art. Further, these network devices and
systems may
include or be in communication with any number of suitable memory devices
operable to
store data and/or computer-executable instructions. By executing computer-
executable
instructions, each of the network devices may form a special purpose computer
or particular
machine. As used herein, the term "computer-readable medium" describes any
form of
suitable memory or memory device.
[0019] As
shown in Figure 1, the prescriber/provider computers 102, pharmacy
computers 104, service provider computer 106, and e-prescription evaluation
module 180
may be in communication with each other via one or more networks, such as
network 110,
which as described below can include one or more separate or shared private
and public
networks, including the Internet or a publicly switched telephone network.
Each of these
components¨the prescriber/provider computers 102, the pharmacy computers 104,
the
service provider computer 106, the e-prescription evaluation module 180, and
the network
110 will now be discussed in further detail.
[0020]
Each prescriber/provider computer 102 may be associated with a prescriber of
medications, products and/or services to patients (e.g., a physician,
physician's assistant,
nurse, nurse practitioner, or any other person permitted to prescribe
medications, products,
and/or services to patients) and/or other providers of healthcare services to
patients. It should
be understood that more than one prescriber or provider may be associated with
one
prescriber/provider computer 102, as may be the case at a hospital, clinic or
group physician
practice. While the exemplary prescriber/provider computer 102 reference a
prescriber of
medication this is for example only and is not intended to be limiting in any
manner. The
prescriber/provider computer 102 may be any suitable processor-driven device
that facilitates
the generation and processing of healthcare requests, such as e-prescription
transactions,
made by prescribers or providers and the communication of the e-prescription
transactions
and/or information associated with e-prescription transactions to the service
provider
computer 106, such as a server computer, a mainframe computer, one or more
networked
6

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
computers, a desktop computer, a personal computer, a digital assistant, a
personal digital
assistant, a digital tablet, an Internet appliance, an application-specific
circuit,
microcontroller, minicomputer, or any other processor-based device. In certain
example
embodiments, the prescriber/provider computer 102 may be a suitable personal
computer or
laptop computer associated with (e.g., located within) a prescriber's
practice. The execution
of the computer-implemented instructions by the prescriber/provider computer
102 may form
a special purpose computer or other particular machine that is operable to
facilitate the
generation and processing of healthcare requests, including e-prescription
transactions, for
patients and the communication of the e-prescription transactions and/or
information
associated with e-prescription transactions to a service provider computer
106. Additionally,
in certain example embodiments of the disclosure, the operations and/or
control of each
prescriber/provider computer 102 may be distributed amongst several processing
components.
[0021] In
addition to the prescriber/provider computer 102 having one or more processors
114, the prescriber/provider computer 102 may also include one or more memory
devices
112, one or more input/output ("I/O") interfaces 118, and one or more network
interfaces
116. The memory devices 112 may be any suitable memory device, for example,
caches,
read-only memory devices, random access memory devices, magnetic storage
devices,
removable storage devices, etc. The memory devices 112 may store data,
executable
instructions, and/or various program modules utilized by the
prescriber/provider computer
102, for example, data files 120, an operating system ("OS") 122, and/or a
client module 125.
The data files 120 may include any suitable data that facilitates the
generation and/or
processing of e-prescription transactions by the prescriber/provider computer
102 and the
transmission of e-prescription transactions that are communicated to the
service provider
computer 106. For example, the data files 120 may include, but are not limited
to, healthcare
information and/or contact information associated with one or more patients,
information
associated with the particular prescriber/provider and/or the respective
prescriber/provider
computer 102, information associated with the service provider computer 106,
information
associated with one or more pharmacies and/or pharmacy computers 104, and/or
information
associated with one or more healthcare transactions, including e-prescription
transactions.
The OS 122 may be any suitable software module that controls the general
operation of the
prescriber/provider computer 102. The OS 122 may also facilitate the execution
of other
software modules by the one or more processors 114, for example, the client
module 125.
The OS 122 may be any currently existing or future-developed operating system
including,
7

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
but not limited to, Microsoft Windows , Apple OSXTM, Linux, Unix, or a
mainframe
operating system.
[0022] The client module 125 may be, for example, an Internet browser or
other suitable
software, including a dedicated program, for interacting with the service
provider computer
106. For example, a user 120, such as a prescriber or employee of the
prescriber may utilize
the client module 125 in generating and transmitting an e-prescription
transaction, such as an
electronic prescription transaction, e-script, refill request transaction, or
e-prescription, to the
service provider computer 106. The prescriber/provider computer 102 may also
utilize the
client module 125 to retrieve or otherwise receive data, messages, or
responses from the
service provider computer 106 and/or other components of the system 100.
[0023] The one or more I/O interfaces 118 may facilitate communication
between the
prescriber/provider computer 102 and one or more input/output devices, for
example, one or
more user interface devices, such as, a display, keypad, control panel, touch-
screen display,
remote control, microphone, etc., that facilitate user interaction with the
prescriber/provider
computer 102. For example, the one or more I/O interfaces 118 may facilitate
receipt,
generation, and/or entry of information associated with an e-prescription
transaction by an
employee/contractor of the prescriber or provider. The one or more network
interfaces 116
may facilitate connection of the prescriber/provider computer 102 to one or
more suitable
networks, for example, the network 110 illustrated in Figure 1. In this
regard, the
prescriber/provider computer 102 may transmit, receive, and/or communicate
information to
other network components of the system 100, such as the service provider
computer 106.
[0024] Each pharmacy computer 104 may be associated with a pharmacy or
other
healthcare provider that fills e-prescriptions for medications, products, or
services for a
patient, including a hospital, clinic, or hospice, etc. While the exemplary
pharmacy
computers 104 reference a pharmacy this is for example only and is not
intended to be
limiting in any manner. The pharmacy computer 104 may be any suitable
processor-driven
device that facilitates the processing of healthcare requests, such as e-
prescription
transactions, made by patients, consumers, or prescribers and the
communication of
information associated with e-prescription transactions to the service
provider computer 106,
such as a server computer, a mainframe computer, one or more networked
computers, a
desktop computer, a personal computer, a digital assistant, a personal digital
assistant, a
digital tablet, an Internet appliance, an application-specific circuit,
microcontroller,
minicomputer, or any other processor-based device. In certain example
embodiments, the
pharmacy computer 104 may be a suitable point of sale device associated with
(e.g., located
8

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
within) a pharmacy. The execution of the computer-implemented instructions by
the
pharmacy computer 104 may form a special purpose computer or other particular
machine
that is operable to facilitate the processing of healthcare requests,
including e-prescription
transactions, made by patients or received from prescribers/providers and the
communication
of information associated with e-prescription transactions from a service
provider computer
106. Additionally, in certain example embodiments of the disclosure, the
operations and/or
control of each pharmacy computer 104 may be distributed amongst several
processing
components.
[0025] In addition to the pharmacy computer 104 having one or more
processors 124, the
pharmacy computer 104 may also include one or more memory devices 126, one or
more
input/output ("I/0") interfaces 128, and one or more network interfaces 130.
The memory
devices 126 may be any suitable memory device, for example, caches, read-only
memory
devices, random access memory devices, magnetic storage devices, removable
storage
devices, etc. The memory devices 126 may store data, executable instructions,
and/or various
program modules utilized by the pharmacy computer 104, for example, data files
132, an
operating system (-OS") 134, and/or a client module 138. The data files 132
may include
any suitable data that facilitates the receipt and/or processing of e-
prescription transactions by
the pharmacy computer 104 and the processing of e-prescription transactions
that are
communicated by the service provider computer 106. For example, the data files
132 may
include, but are not limited to, healthcare information and/or contact
information associated
with one or more patients, information associated with the particular
prescriber/provider
and/or the respective prescriber/provider computer 102, information associated
with the
service provider computer 106, and/or information associated with one or more
healthcare
transactions, including e-prescription transactions. The OS 134 may be any
suitable software
module that controls the general operation of the pharmacy computer 104. The
OS 134 may
also facilitate the execution of other software modules by the one or more
processors 124, for
example, the client module 138. The OS 134 may be any currently existing or
future-
developed operating system including, but not limited to, Microsoft Windows ,
Apple
OSXTM, Linux, Unix, or a mainframe operating system.
[0026] The client module 138 may be, for example, an Internet browser or
other suitable
software, including a dedicated program, for interacting with the service
provider computer
106. For example, a user 120, such as a pharmacist, pharmacy assistant, or
pharmacy
employee may utilize the client module 138 in receiving and responding to an e-
prescription
transaction, such as an electronic prescription transaction, e-script, refill
request transaction,
9

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
or e-prescription, from the service provider computer 106. The pharmacy
computer 104 may
also utilize the client module 138 to retrieve or otherwise receive data,
messages, or
responses from the service provider computer 106 and/or other components of
the system
100.
[0027] The one or more I/O interfaces 128 may facilitate communication
between the
pharmacy computer 104 and one or more input/output devices, for example, one
or more user
interface devices, such as, a display, keypad, control panel, touch-screen
display, remote
control, microphone, etc., that facilitate user interaction with the pharmacy
computer 104.
For example, the one or more I/O interfaces 128 may facilitate receipt and/or
entry of
information associated with an e-prescription transaction by an
employee/contractor of the
pharmacy. The one or more network interfaces 130 may facilitate connection of
the
pharmacy computer 104 to one or more suitable networks, for example, the
network 110
illustrated in Figure 1. In this regard, the pharmacy computer 104 may receive
and/or
communicate information to other network components of the system 100, such as
the service
provider computer 106.
[0028] With continued reference to Figure 1, the service provider computer
106 may
include, but is not limited to, any suitable processor-driven device that is
configured for
receiving, processing, and fulfilling requests from the prescriber/provider
computers 102,
pharmacy computers 104, and the e-prescription evaluation module 180 relating
to electronic
prescription submission (e.g., e-prescription transactions), other healthcare
transactions,
and/or other activities. In certain exemplary embodiments, the service
provider computer 106
may be a switch/router that routes e-prescription transactions and other
healthcare
transactions. For example, the service provider computer 106 may route e
prescription
transactions communicated from one of the prescriber/provider computers 102 to
a pharmacy
computer 104.
[0029] In certain example embodiments, the service provider computer 106
may include
a suitable host server, host module, or other software that facilitates the
receipt of an e-
prescription transaction from a prescriber/provider computer 102 and/or the
routing of the
received e-prescription transaction to a pharmacy computer 104. Any number of
prescriber/provider computers 102, pharmacy computers 104, and e-prescription
evaluation
modules 180 may be in communication with the service provider computer 106 as
desired in
various embodiments.
[0030] The service provider computer 106 may include any number of special
purpose
computers or other particular machines, application-specific circuits,
microcontrollers,

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
personal computers, minicomputers, mainframe computers, servers, networked
computers,
and/or other processor-driven devices. In certain example embodiments, the
operations of the
service provider computer 106 may be controlled by computer-executed or
computer-
implemented instructions that are executed by one or more processors
associated with the
service provider computer 106 to form a special-purpose computer or other
particular
machine that is operable to facilitate the receipt, routing, and/or processing
of e-prescription
transactions. The one or more processors that control the operations of the
service provider
computer 106 may be incorporated into the service provider computer 106 and/or
in
communication with the service provider computer 106 via one or more suitable
networks.
In certain exemplary embodiments, the operations and/or control of the service
provider
computer 106 may be distributed amongst several processing components.
[0031] Similar to the pharmacy computer 104 described above, the service
provider
computer 106 may include one or more processors 140, one or more memory
devices 142,
one or more input/output ("1/0") interface(s) 144, and one or more network
interface(s) 146.
The one or more memory devices 142 may be any suitable memory devices, for
example,
caches, read only memory devices, random access memory devices, magnetic
storage
devices, removable memory devices, etc. The one or more memory devices 142 may
store
data, executable instructions, and/or various program modules utilized by the
service provider
106, for example, data files 148, an operating system ("OS") 150, the host
module 154, a
service provider module 156, and a database management system ("DBMS") 152 to
facilitate
management of data files 148 and other data stored in the memory devices 142.
The OS 150
may be and currently existing or future-developed operating system including,
but not limited
to, Microsoft Windows , Apple OSXTM, Linux, Unix, or a mainframe operating
system.
The OS 150 may be a suitable software module that controls the general
operation of the
service provider computer 106 and/or that facilitates the execution of other
software modules.
[0032] The service provider module 156 may be operable to perform one or
more pre-
edits or pre-analysis on a received e-prescription transaction prior to
routing or otherwise
communicating the received e-prescription transaction either back to the
prescriber/provider
computer 102 for further information or to a suitable pharmacy computer 104. A
wide
variety of different pre-edits may be performed as desired in various
embodiments of the
disclosure.
[0033] According to one exemplary embodiment, the data files 148 may store
e-
prescription transaction records associated with communications received from
various
prescriber/provider computers 102, the pharmacy computers 104, and the e-
prescription
11

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
evaluation module 180. The data files 148 may also store any number of
suitable routing
tables that facilitate determining the destination of communications received
from a
prescriber/provider computer 102, the pharmacy computer 104, and the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180. The exemplary data files 148 may also store records
containing, for
example, medication identifiers and other medication information.
[0034] The host module 154 may receive, process, and respond to requests
from the
client module 138 of the pharmacy computer 104 and/or the client module 125 of
the
prescriber computer 102. The service provider computer 106 may include
additional
program modules for performing other processing methods described herein.
Those of
ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the service provider computer
106 may include
alternate and/or additional components, hardware, or software without
departing from
exemplary embodiments disclosed herein.
[0035] With continued reference to the service provider computer 106, the
one or more
I/O interfaces 144 may facilitate communication between the service provider
computer 106
and one or more input/output devices, for example, one or more user interface
devices, such
as a display, keypad, control panel, touch-screen display, remote control,
microphone, etc.
that facilitate user interaction with the service provider computer 106. The
one or more
network interfaces 146 may facilitate connection of the service provider
computer 106 to one
or more suitable networks, for example, the network 110 illustrated in Figure
1. In this
regard, the service provider computer 106 may communicate with other
components of the
system 100.
[0036] The e-prescription evaluation module 180 of Figure 1 represents one
or more
modules that can evaluate an e-prescription transaction or data from an e-
prescription
transaction to determine if there are any errors, to determine if any
additional information is
needed, or to determine if any additional services can or may be provided by
the
prescriber/provider prior to sending the e-prescription transaction to the
desired pharmacy,
via the pharmacy computer 104. The example e-prescription evaluation module
180 may
include computer-executable instructions for receiving and processing e-
prescription
transactions or e-prescription transaction data from a service provider
computer 106. The e-
prescription evaluation module 180 may receive e-prescription transactions for
all or a
portion of the data from e-prescription transactions from the service provider
computer 106.
Upon receipt of the e-prescription transaction data, the e-prescription
evaluation module 180
may evaluate the data to determine if there are any errors. The e-prescription
evaluation
module 180 may also evaluate the data to determine if any of the data is
outside of threshold
12

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
parameters, such as dosage, days' supply, number of refills. The e-
prescription evaluation
module 180 can further evaluate the data, including the medication identifier
or service
identifier for the medication or service requested in the transaction to
determine any risk
evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) opportunities or medication
therapy
management (MTM) service opportunities for the medication or service. This can
include,
for example, any tests the patient may need prior to receiving the requested
medication or
service or any comprehensive medication review (CMR), drug regimen review
(DRR),
medication regimen review (MRR), targeted medication review (TMR), and so
forth that
should be completed prior to the patient being prescribed the medication or
service identified
in the e-prescription transaction. If any errors or issues are identified by
the e-prescription
evaluation module 180, it can generate a response message and/or rejection
message that
identifies the errors or issues and that can be transmitted back to the
prescriber/provider
computer 102 from which the e-prescription transaction originated. The
response/rejection
message can include a rejection code or other information that can be inserted
into the e-
prescription transaction or can be provided separate from the e-prescription
transaction.
Further, the response/rejection message can include an override code that can
be included in a
subsequent e-prescription transaction by the prescriber to continue normal
processing of the
transaction without substantive evaluation by the e-prescription evaluation
module 180. The
e-prescription evaluation module can communicate its analysis as well as any
rejection/response messages to the service provider computer 106 or pass along
the e-
prescription transaction to the pharmacy computer 104.
[0037] As
desired, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 may include any number of
special purpose computers or other particular machines, application-specific
circuits,
microcontrollers, personal computers, minicomputers, mainframe computers,
servers, and the
like. In certain exemplary embodiments, the operations of the e-prescription
evaluation
module 180 may be controlled by computer-executed or computer-implemented
instructions
that are executed by one or more processors associated with the e-prescription
evaluation
module 180 to form a special purpose computer or other particular machine that
is operable
to facilitate the receipt, processing, and/or storage of e-prescription
transactions and/or e-
prescription transaction data received from the service provider computer 106.
The one or
more processors that control the operations of the e-prescription evaluation
module 180 may
be incorporated into the e-prescription evaluation module 180 and/or in
communication with
the e-prescription evaluation module 180 via one or more suitable networks,
such as network
13

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
110. In certain example embodiments, the operations and/or control of the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180 may be distributed amongst several processing
components.
[0038] Similar to other components of the system 100, the e-prescription
evaluation
module 180 may include one or more processors, one or more memory devices, one
or more
I/O interfaces, and one or more network interfaces. The one or more memory
devices may be
any suitable memory devices, for example, caches, read only memory devices,
random access
memory devices, magnetic storage devices, removable memory devices. The one or
more
memory devices may store data, executable instructions, and/or various program
modules
utilized by the e-prescription evaluation module 180, for example, data files,
an OS, a
DBMS, and a host module. The data files may include any suitable information
that is
utilized by the e-prescription evaluation module 180 to receive, process,
analyze, and/or store
e-prescription transaction data. The OS may be a suitable software module that
controls the
general operation of the particular e-prescription evaluation module 180. The
OS may also
facilitate the execution of other software modules by the one or more
processors, for
example, the DBMS and/or the host module. The OS may be any currently existing
or
future-developed operating system including, but not limited to, Microsoft
Windows , Apple
OSXTM, Linux, Unix, or a mainframe operating system. The DBMS may be a
suitable
software module that facilitates access and management of one or more
databases, such as
database 182, that are utilized to store information that is received by or
utilized by the e-
prescription evaluation module 180 and/or the service provider computer 106.
The host
module may initiate, receive, process, analyze, store, and/or respond to
requests, such as the
receipt of e-prescription transactions or e-prescription transaction data from
the host module
154 of the service provider computer 106. The e-prescription evaluation module
180 may
include additional program modules as desired. Those of ordinary skill in the
art will
appreciate that the e-prescription evaluation module 180 may include alternate
and/or
additional components, hardware or software without departing from example
embodiments
disclosed herein.
[0039] The one or more I/O interfaces may facilitate communication between
the e-
prescription evaluation module 180 and one or more input/output devices, for
example, one
or more user interface devices, such as a display, keypad, control panel,
touch-screen display,
remote control, microphone, etc. that facilitate user interaction with the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180. The one or more network interfaces may facilitate
connection of the
e-prescription evaluation module 180 to one or more suitable networks, for
example, the
network 110 illustrated in Figure 1. In this regard, the e-prescription
evaluation module 180
14

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
may receive e-prescription transactions, e-prescription transaction data,
and/or other
communications from the service provider computer 106. While Figure 1 shows
the e-
prescription evaluation module 180 as being separate from the service provider
computer
106, in certain example embodiments, the e-prescription evaluation module 180
is part of the
service provider computer 106 and sending and receiving between the two are
internal
communications within the service provider computer 106.
[0040] The database(s) 182 may be operable to store information associated
with various
patients and/or various e-prescription transactions including, but not limited
to, patient
identification data (e.g., patient first name, patient last name, patient
social security number
or HICN number, cardholder ID and/or person code for the patient), tables,
schedules, or lists
of medications, products, and services along with corresponding service and
medication
identifiers (e.g., the related NDC code or RxNorm number for the medication,
product, or
service) that provide any prerequisite tests, information, or notifications
and/or any MTM, or
REMS services associated with those corresponding medications, products,
and/or services,
tables, schedules, or lists of pharmacy identifiers (e.g., pharmacy name or
NPI number) for
pharmacies and the associated pharmacy computer 104, tables, schedules, or
lists of
prescriber and/or provider identifiers (e.g., NPI number, DEA number,
prescriber name) for
prescribers and/or providers of medications and services as well as the
corresponding
prescriber/provider computer 102 associated with the prescriber or provider.
The data in the
database 182 may be accessed and evaluated by the e-prescription evaluation
module 180
and/or the service provider computer 106.
[0041] The network 110 may include any telecommunication and/or data
network,
whether public, private, or a combination thereof, including a local area
network, a wide area
network, an intranet, the Internet, intermediate hand-held data transfer
devices, and/or any
combination thereof and may be wired and/or wireless. The network 110 may also
allow for
real-time, off-line, and/or batch transactions to be transmitted between or
among the
prescriber/provider computer 102, the pharmacy computer 104, the service
provider computer
106, and the e-prescription evaluation module 180. Due to network
connectivity, various
methodologies, as described herein may be practiced in the context of
distributed computing
environments. Although the service provider computer 106 is shown for
simplicity as being
in communication with the prescriber/provider computer 102, the pharmacy
computer 104,
and the e-prescription evaluation module 180 via one intervening network 110,
it is to be
understood that any other network configuration is possible. For example,
intervening
network 110 may include a plurality of networks, each with devices such as
gateways and

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
routers for providing connectivity between or among networks 110. Instead of
or in addition
to a network 110, dedicated communication links may be used to connect the
various devices
in accordance with an example embodiment. For example, the service provider
computer
106 may form the basis of network 110 that interconnects one or more of the
prescriber/provider computer 102, the pharmacy computer 104, and the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180.
[0042] Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the system
100 shown in and
described with respect to Figure 1 is provided by way of example only.
Numerous other
operating environments, system architectures, and device configurations are
possible. Other
system embodiments can include fewer or greater numbers of components and may
incorporate some or all of the functionality described with respect to the
system components
shown in Figure 1. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, the service
provider
computer 106 (or other computer) may be implemented as a specialized
processing machine
that includes hardware and/or software for performing the methods described
herein. In
addition, at least a portion of the processor and/or processing capabilities
of the service
provider computer 106 may be implemented as part of the prescriber/provider
computer 102
or the pharmacy computer 104. In addition, at least a portion of the processor
and/or
processing capabilities of the prescriber/provider computer 102, and/or the
pharmacy
computer 104 may be implemented as part of the service provider computer 106.
Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments described herein should not be
construed as being
limited to any particular operating environment, system architecture, or
device configuration.
[0043] Operational Overview
[0044] Figure 2A is a diagram of one example data flow 200 for evaluating,
editing,
rejecting, and/or messaging back to originators of e-prescription transactions
prior to
transmitting the transaction or a revised transaction from the originator of
the e-prescription
transaction to its ultimate destination as part of the processing of the e-
prescription
transaction through a service provider computer, such as through the service
provider
computer 106 illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 3 is a flow chart of an example
method 300 for
evaluating, editing, rejecting, and/or messaging back to originators of e-
prescription
transactions prior to transmitting the transaction or a revised transaction
from the originator
of the e-prescription transaction to its ultimate destination as part of the
processing of the e-
prescription transaction, (such as an electronic prescription transaction, e-
script, refill request
transaction, or e-prescription) for that patient through a service provider
computer 106, in
accordance with one exemplary embodiment. All or a portion of the steps in the
exemplary
16

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
method 300, described below, may be performed by a suitable service provider
computer 106
or e-prescription evaluation module 180. The exemplary method 300 will be
described with
reference to a physician as the prescriber/provider (and accordingly a
prescriber computer as
the prescriber/provider computer 102); however, this is only for purposes of
example as other
healthcare prescribers and providers could be substituted for, and should each
be individually
read as being a part of each of these methods. As such, where the discussion
of the methods
below and the drawings state a physician, any other healthcare prescriber or
provider could
be substituted, such as a nurse, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner,
hospital, physician's
office, clinic, healthcare center or any other person permitted to prescribe
medications,
products, or services to a patient.
[0045] In
addition, the exemplary method 300 will be described with reference to an e-
prescription transaction (e.g., electronic prescription transaction, e-script,
refill request
transaction, or e-prescription); however, this also is only for purposes of
example as other
healthcare transactions, originating from a prescriber or healthcare
medications, products, or
services could be substituted for the e-prescription transaction and each form
of healthcare
transaction should each individually be read as being used in the method
described below.
Examples of e-prescription transactions include a new prescription transaction
(providing a
prescription for a medication, product, or service for a patient - transmitted
from the
prescriber computer through the service provider computer and to the pharmacy
computer), a
refill request transaction (requesting additional refills of a prescribed
medication, product, or
service, for a patient - transmitted from the pharmacy computer through the
service provider
computer and to the prescriber computer), a response to the refill request
transaction
(transmitted from the prescriber computer through the service provider
computer and to the
pharmacy computer), a product change request transaction (requesting a change
to the
prescribed product identified in the prescription - transmitted from the
pharmacy computer
through the service provider computer and to the prescriber computer), a
response to the
product change request transaction (transmitted from the prescriber computer
through the
service provider computer and to the pharmacy computer), a cancel prescription
request
transaction (to cancel a prescription for a patient - transmitted from the
prescriber computer
through the service provider computer and to the pharmacy computer), a
response to the
cancel prescription request transaction (transmitted from the pharmacy
computer through the
service provider computer and to the prescriber computer), error messages, and
status
messages.
17

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
[0046]
Referring now to Figures 1, 2A, and 3, the exemplary method 300 begins at the
START step and proceeds to step 302, where a patient visits a prescriber for a
healthcare
check-up 202 or other healthcare service and, in response, the prescriber,
such as a physician,
nurse, nurse practitioner, physician's assistant or any other person permitted
to prescribe
medications, products, or services to patients, can generate a first e-
prescription transaction
204 at the prescriber/provider computer 102 for the patient. The physician,
for example,
determines the patient's name and accesses the prescriber/provider computer
102, which
receives a selection of patient information from the prescriber (or an
employee or contractor
of the prescriber, the prescriber's practice or the employer of the
prescriber) via the I/0
interface 118 in step 304. For example, the physician accesses the
prescriber/provider
computer 102 and accesses a database of patient information, which may be
stored in
memory 112 or in another database either local or remote from the
prescriber/provider
computer 102. The physician can then select the name or other patient
identification
information in the patient information database that matches the name or other
identification
information of the patient.
[0047] In
step 306, a first e-prescription transaction 204 is formatted at the
prescriber/provider computer 102. In
certain exemplary embodiments, the
prescriber/provider computer 102 formats the first e-prescription transaction
204 with patient
information (e.g., patient identifiers), pharmacy identifiers (e.g., NPI code,
store name, chain
identifier, pharmacy address), and medication information (e.g., medication
identifiers). The
information can be input into the first e-prescription transaction 204 by the
physician via the
I/O interface 118 or automatically retrieved and entered by the
prescriber/provider computer
102 and, in certain situations, can be based at least in part on historical
transaction
information for the patient in the data files 120 or a database communicably
coupled to the
prescriber/provider computer 102. According to one example embodiment, the
first e-
prescription transaction 204 may be formatted in accordance with a version of
the NCPDP
Script Standard, although other standards, such as American National Standards
Institute
ASC X-12 Standard, or Health Level 7 (HL7) Standard may be utilized as well.
[0048] As
discussed above, the first e-prescription transaction 204 may include a
pharmacy identifier for identifying a particular pharmacy computer 104 as a
destination for
the first e-prescription transaction 204. In addition, the first e-
prescription transaction 204
may also include information relating to the patient, payor, prescriber,
healthcare provider,
and/or the requested medication. As an example, the first e-prescription
transaction 204 may
include one or more of the following information:
18

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
[0049] Patient Information
o Name (e.g. Patient Last Name, Patient First Name, etc.)
o Relationship to cardholder
o Date of Birth of Patient
o Age of Patient
o Gender of Patient
o Patient Address (e.g. Street Address, City, State, Zip/Postal Code, etc.)
o Patient Contact Information (e.g. Patient Telephone Number, Email
Address,
etc.)
o Patient Health Condition Information
o Patient ID or other identifier (e.g., Health Insurance Claim Number
(HICN),
Social Security Number, etc.)
[0050] Insurance/Coverage Information
o Cardholder Name (e.g. Cardholder First Name, Cardholder Last Name)
o Cardholder ID and/or other identifier (e.g. Person Code)
o Group ID and/or Group Information
[0051] Prescriber Information
o Prescriber ID or other identifier (e.g. NPI code, DEA number)
o Prescriber Name (e.g. Last Name, First Name)
o Prescriber Specialty
o Prescriber Address (e.g. Street Address, City, State, Zip/Postal Code,
etc.)
o Clinic Name
o Prescriber Contact Information (e.g. Telephone Number, Email Address, Fax
Number, etc.)
[0052] Pharmacy Information
o Pharmacy or other Healthcare Provider Information (e.g. Store Name, Chain
Identifier, etc.)
o Pharmacy or other Healthcare Provider ID (e.g. NPI code)
o Pharmacist Name (e.g., Last Name, First Name)
o Pharmacy Address (e.g., Street Address, City, State, Zip/Postal Code,
etc.)
o Phainiacy Contact Information (e.g. Telephone Number, Email Address, Fax
Number, etc.)
[0053] Product/Service Information
19

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
o Drug, service, or product information/identifier (e.g. Drug Name,
Strength,
Formulary, National Drug Code (NDC) code, RxNorm code, etc.)
o Prescription/Service Reference Number
o DEA Schedule
o Date Prescription Written
o Quantity Dispensed
o Dosage Level
o Days' Supply
o Diagnosis/Condition (e.g., Diagnosis Code (e.g., International
Statistical
Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) Diagnosis
Code)
o Number of Refills Authorized
o One or more NCPDP Message Fields
o Date of Service.
[0054] The first e-prescription transaction 204 can be used to transmit a
prescription from
a prescriber to a pharmacy for filling of the medication, product, or service
identified in the
prescription. The prescriber/provider computer 102 can transmit the first e-
prescription
transaction 204 to the service provider computer 106 in step 308. In step 310,
the service
provider computer 106 receives the first e-prescription transaction 204. For
example, the first
e-prescription transaction 204 can be transmitted by the prescriber/provider
computer 102 to
the service provider computer 106 through the network 110.
[0055] In step 312, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or another
portion of the
service provider computer 106 evaluates the contents of the first e-
prescription transaction
204. For example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can parse the first
e-prescription
transaction 204 and evaluate the e-prescription transaction data according to
one or more
business rules. In certain example, embodiments, the business rules used for
the evaluation
may vary depending on the prescriber it was received from or the pharmacy that
it will be
transmitted to. As such, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 may identify
the prescriber
identifier (e.g., NPI number or DEA code) or the pharmacy identifier (e.g.,
NPI number,
chain identifier, pharmacy name or pharmacy address), and compare the
identified identifier
to a table, schedule, or listing of identifiers to determine the particular
set of business rules to
use for editing, evaluating, and/or rejecting the first e-prescription
transaction 204. In certain
example embodiments, the evaluation of the e-prescription transaction data is
conducted to
determine if the data (or lack of data) creates a basis for rejection of the e-
prescription

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
transaction 204. Examples of a basis for rejection include the e-prescription
transaction data
containing errors, data is missing or data elements are missing from the e-
prescription
transaction data, an incorrect quantity of medication is being prescribed, the
requested
medication or product is discontinued or otherwise no longer available, due to
the age and/or
gender of the patient, the medication or product cannot be prescribed to that
patient, based on
the medication requested in the e-prescription transaction 204 additional
tests for the patient
are needed, or additional information is needed to be included in the
transaction 204.
[0056] In step 314, an inquiry is conducted to determine if the first e-
prescription
transaction 204 includes an override code or some other designation or entry
to provide
notification that editing, evaluation, and/or rejection of the first e-
prescription transaction 204
should not occur. The determination can be made, for example, by the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180 or another portion of the service provider computer 106.
In one
example embodiment, an override code can be included in an agreed upon field
of the first e-
prescription transaction and identified by the e-prescription evaluation
module 180. The e-
prescription evaluation module 180 can parse the transaction 204, identify the
override code,
and compare the identified override code to a schedule of one or more override
codes to
determine if the identified override code is a proper override code. In
certain example
embodiments, the override code may have been previously provided to the
physician at the
prescriber/provider computer 102 via a rejection and/or response message from
the e-
prescription evaluation module 180. If the first e-prescription transaction
204 does include a
proper override code, the YES branch is followed to step 334. Otherwise, if
the first e-
prescription transaction 204 does not include a proper override code, the NO
branch is
followed to step 316.
[0057] An inquiry is conducted to determine if there are any issues or
edits needed to the
content of the first e-prescription transaction 204 in step 316. In one
example embodiment,
the determination can be made by the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or
another
portion of the service provider computer 106. For example, the e-prescription
evaluation
module 180 can evaluate one or all of the entries in the fields of the
transaction 204 (e.g.,
depending on the particular business rules) and may determine if the first e-
prescription
transaction 204 is missing a prescribed quantity or some other field is
missing a needed entry
or the entry is the wrong format. In another example, the e-prescription
evaluation module
180 can evaluate one or more fields of the transaction 204 to determine if the
proposed
medication dosing, days' supply, number of refills, patient age, patient
gender, or total
quantity of the requested medication in the first e-prescription transaction
204 exceeds the
21

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
recommended/allowed guidelines for the medication. For example, the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180 can identify the medication identifier (e.g., NDC code)
in the first e-
prescription transaction 204 and can compare that to a schedule of medication
identifiers in
the database 182 to identify a matching record. The e-prescription evaluation
module 180
can then determine prescribing recommendations/allowances (e.g., dosing
amount, days'
supply, number of refills, patient age, patient gender, other medications
being taken by the
patient, or total quantity) in the matching record and can compare the data in
the fields of the
first e-prescription transaction 204 to determine if one or more of the data
in the fields does
not satisfy (e.g., match or fall within the particular parameter) the
particular
recommendation/allowance for the prescribed medication. In another example,
the e-
prescription evaluation module 180 can evaluate the drug identifier field in
the transaction
204 to determine if the NDC and RxNorm values are consistent or if they match
the other
drug description fields in the transaction 204. In yet another example, the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180 can evaluate a portion of the transaction 204 and
determine if it is
consistent with the content of the notes to the pharmacy presented in one of
the text fields of
the transaction 204. In another example, the e-prescription evaluation module
180 can
compare the data in the transaction 204 to a database of stored transactions
to determine if the
transaction 204 is a duplicate transaction that should not be processed and
should be rejected.
In another example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can compare the
one or more
sender identifiers (e.g. prescriber identifier or pharmacy identifier) in the
transaction 204 to
determine if the transaction includes duplicate sender identifiers identifying
more than one
sender. In yet another example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can
compare the
one or more identifiers (e.g., transaction identifier) in the e-prescription
transaction 204 to
determine if the transaction 204 includes duplicate identifiers identifying
two different e-
prescriptions with the same identifier. In another example, the e-prescription
evaluation
module 180 can evaluate the fields of the transaction 204 to determine if the
transaction
satisfies compliance or regulatory requirements. If any errors are identified
or any
recommendations/allowance for the requested medication are not met or the
first e-
prescription transaction 204 otherwise needs edits or has issues in the
content of the
transaction data, the YES branch can be followed to either step 320 or step
317. In certain
example embodiments, it may be desirable to immediately reject a first e-
prescription
transaction 204 if initial edits or issues are identified, and as such, the
YES branch can be
followed to step 320. Alternatively, there may be a desire to check the first
e-prescription
transaction 204 for additional issues and MTM or REMS opportunities that can
be included
22

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
in the rejection/response messaging back to the prescriber/provider computer
102, and as
such, the YES branch can be followed to step 317. If there are not issues or
edits needed in
the content of the first e-prescription transaction 204, the NO branch is
followed to step 317.
[0058] In step 317, the requested medication, product, or service in the
first e-prescription
transaction 204 can be identified. For example, the e-prescription evaluation
module 180 or
another portion of the service provider computer 106 can identify the NDC code
or RxNorm
number in the product field of the first e-prescription transaction 204. In
step 318, an inquiry
can be conducted to determine if any additional information or tests are
needed based on the
medication, product, or service requested in the first e-prescription
transaction 204. In one
example embodiment, the determination can be made by the e-prescription
evaluation module
180 or another portion of the service provider computer 106. For example, the
e-prescription
evaluation module 180 can compare the identified medication, product, or
service identifier
to a table, list, or schedule of medication, product, or service identifiers
in the database 182 to
locate a record with a matching medication, product, or service identifier.
The e-prescription
evaluation module 180 can identify any additional information or tests needed
based on the
information in the matching record. For example, the e-prescription evaluation
module 180
can evaluate the data in the matching record for any risk evaluation and
mitigation strategies
(REMS) opportunities (e.g., a determination that the requested medication has
a REMS
requirement for testing liver enzymes at defined intervals while taking the
medication) or
medication therapy management (MTM) service opportunities for the medication
or service.
This can include, for example, any tests the patient may need prior to
receiving the requested
medication, product, or service or any comprehensive medication review (CMR),
drug
regimen review (DRR), medication regimen review (MRR), targeted medication
review
(TMR), and so forth that should be completed prior to the patient being
prescribed the
medication, product, or service identified in the first e-prescription
transaction 204.
[0059] If no additional tests or information are needed, such as REMS
requirements or
MTM opportunities, then the NO branch is followed to step 334. Otherwise, the
YES branch
is followed to step 320. In step 320, a response message 206 to the first e-
prescription
transaction 204 is generated. In one example embodiment, the response message
206 can be
generated by the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or another portion of
the service
provider computer 106. For example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180
can generate
a response 206 to the first e-prescription transaction 204 that identifies the
errors, issues, or
additional 'information needed in relation to the first e-prescription
transaction 204. In one
example embodiment, the response 206 may include a warning to the prescriber
associated
23

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
with the prescriber computer 102 regarding, for example, the prescribed
medication, quantity,
dosage, or days' supply, in the first e-prescription transaction 204. This
response message
206 can be inserted into a message field of the first e-prescription
transaction 204 or can be a
separate message from the transaction 204.
[0060] In step 322, a reject or issue code and/or a reject or issue message
that provides an
indication of the reason the first e-prescription transaction 204 is being
rejected and/or the
response message is being sent can be inserted into the first e-prescription
transaction 204 as
part of the response message 206. The reject or issue code can be included in
a
predetermined field of the first e-prescription transaction 204 or can be
included with the
message 206 separate from the transaction 204. Further, the response message
206 can
include an override code that can be inserted by the prescriber when the first
e-prescription
transaction 208 is resubmitted. The override code can be inserted by the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180 into a predetermined field of the first e-prescription
transaction 204 or
can be included separately with the response message 206. In one example
embodiment, the
response/rejection message 206 (hereinafter referred to as a response) to the
first e-
prescription transaction 204 can be generated by the e-prescription evaluation
module 180 or
another portion of the service provider computer 106 without sending the
transaction 204 to
the pharmacy computer 104.
[0061] In step 324, all or a portion of the information from the first e-
prescription
transaction 204 and/or the response to the first e-prescription transaction
206 can be stored
for subsequent evaluation. For example, the information can be stored in the
database 182
and/or the data files 148 and can include, but is not limited to, the
prescription number, the
medication identifier, the one or more patient identifiers, and the pharmacy
identifier. In one
example embodiment, the information from the first e-prescription transaction
204 and/or the
response 206 can be stored by the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or
another portion of
the service provider computer 106. In step 326, the response to the first e-
prescription
transaction 206 can be transmitted to the prescriber/provider computer 102.
For example, the
service provider computer 106 can transmit the response 206 via the network
110 to the
prescriber/provider computer 102.
[0062] The prescriber/provider computer 102 can receive the response to the
first e-
prescription transaction 206, which includes the rejection/response message by
the service
provider computer 106, in step 328. In step 330, the physician or other
prescriber can
generate a modified e-prescription transaction 208 and the prescriber/provider
computer 102
can transmit the modified e-prescription transaction 208 to the service
provider computer 106
24

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
via, for example, the network 110. For example, the modified e-prescription
transaction 208
can include the override code that was previously provided to the
prescriber/provider
computer 102 in the response to the first e-prescription transaction 206. In
this example, the
override code can be placed into an agreed upon field of the modified e-
prescription
transaction 208. Further, in certain example embodiments, the prescription
number,
medication identifier, pharmacy identifier, and one or more patient
identifiers in the modified
e-prescription transaction 208 and the first e-prescription transaction 204
can be the same. In
step 332, the service provider computer 106 receives the modified e-
prescription transaction
208 from the prescriber/provider computer 102. The process can then return to
step 312,
where all or a portion of steps 312-332 may be repeated for the modified e-
prescription
transaction 208 in a manner substantially the same as that discussed above for
the first e-
prescription transaction 204, as one of ordinary skill in the art will
recognize.
[0063] The service provider computer 106 can transmit the first e-
prescription transaction
204 or the modified e-prescription transaction 208 to the pharmacy computer
104 in step 334.
For example, a first e-prescription transaction 204 or modified e-prescription
transaction 208
can be transmitted from the service provider computer 106 to the pharmacy
computer 104 via
the network 110. The pharmacy computer 104 receives the first e-prescription
transaction
204 or the modified e-prescription transaction 208 in step 336. In step 338,
the pharmacy,
such as a pharmacist or other pharmacy employee can dispense the medication or
product or
can provide the service to the patient based on information in the first e-
prescription
transaction 204 or the modified e-prescription transaction 208. The process
then continues to
the END step.
[0064] Figure 4 is a diagram of another example data flow 400 for
evaluating, editing,
rejecting, and/or messaging back to originators of e-prescription transactions
prior to
transmitting the transaction or a revised transaction from the originator of
the e-prescription
transaction to its ultimate destination as part of the processing of the e-
prescription
transaction through a service provider computer, such as through the service
provider
computer 106 illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 5 is a flow chart of another
example method 500
for evaluating, editing, rejecting, and/or messaging back to originators of e-
prescription
transactions prior to transmitting the transaction or a revised transaction
from the originator
.
of the e-prescription transaction to its ultimate destination as part of the
processing of the e-
prescription transaction originating from a phaimacy computer (such as a
refill request
transaction) for that patient through a service provider computer 106, in
accordance with one
exemplary embodiment. All or a portion of the steps in the exemplary method
500, described

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
below, may be performed by a suitable service provider computer 106 or e-
prescription
evaluation module 180. The exemplary method 500 will be described with
reference to a
pharmacy as a healthcare provider and a physician as a prescriber/provider
(and accordingly a
pharmacy computer and a prescriber computer respectively as the pharmacy
computer 104
and prescriber/provider computer 102 respectively); however, this is only for
purposes of
example as other healthcare providers (e.g., clinic, hospital, mail-order
pharmacy, pharmacy,
etc.) and other healthcare prescribers and providers could be substituted for,
and should each
be individually read as being a part of each of these methods. As such, where
the discussion
of the methods below and the drawings state a physician, any other healthcare
prescriber or
provider could be substituted, such as a nurse, physician's assistant, nurse
practitioner,
hospital, physician's office, clinic, healthcare center or any other person
permitted to
prescribe medications, products, or services to a patient. Further, where the
discussion of the
methods below and the drawings state a pharmacy, any other healthcare provider
could be
substituted, such as a hospital, clinic, hospice facility or mail order
clinic.
[0065] In addition, the exemplary method 500 will be described with
reference to a refill
request transaction as the e-prescription transaction; however, this also is
only for purposes of
example as other e-prescription transactions (e.g., a new prescription
transaction (providing a
prescription for a medication, product, or service for a patient - transmitted
from the
prescriber computer through the service provider computer and to the pharmacy
computer), a
response to the refill request transaction (transmitted from the prescriber
computer through
the service provider computer and to the pharmacy computer), a product change
request
transaction (requesting a change to the prescribed product identified in the
prescription -
transmitted from the pharmacy computer through the service provider computer
and to the
prescriber computer), a response to the product change request transaction
(transmitted from
the prescriber computer through the service provider computer and to the
pharmacy
computer), a cancel prescription request transaction (to cancel a prescription
for a patient -
transmitted from the prescriber computer through the service provider computer
and to the
pharmacy computer), a response to the cancel prescription request transaction
(transmitted
from the pharmacy computer through the service provider computer and to the
prescriber
computer), error messages, and status messages) could be substituted for the
refill request
transaction and each form of e-prescription transaction should each
individually be read as
being used in the method described below.
[0066] Referring now to Figures 1, 4, and 5, the exemplary method 500
begins at the
START step and proceeds to step 502, where a patient visits a pharmacy to
request 402 a
26

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
refill for a medication or product. In response, the pharmacist or other
pharmacy employee
can generate a first refill request transaction 404 at the pharmacy computer
104 for the
patient. The pharmacist, for example, determines the patient's name and
accesses the
pharmacy computer 104, which receives a selection of patient information from
the
pharmacist (or an employee or contractor of the pharmacist) via the I/O
interface 128 in step
504. For example, the pharmacist accesses the pharmacy computer 104 and
accesses a
database of patient information, which may be stored in memory 126 or in
another database
either local or remote from the pharmacy computer 104. The pharmacist can then
select the
name or other patient identification information in the patient information
database that
matches the name or other identification information of the patient.
[0067] In step 506, a first refill request transaction 404 is formatted at
the pharmacy
computer 104. In certain exemplary embodiments, the pharmacy computer 104
formats the
first refill request transaction 404 with patient information (e.g., patient
identifiers),
prescriber identifiers (e.g., NPI code, or DEA number), and medication
information (e.g.,
medication identifiers). The information can be input into the first refill
request transaction
404 by the pharmacist via the I/O interface 128 or automatically retrieved and
entered by the
pharmacy computer 104 and, in certain situations, can be based at least in
part on historical
transaction information for the patient in the data files 132 or a database
communicably
coupled to the pharmacy computer 104. According to one example embodiment, the
first
refill request transaction 404 may be formatted in accordance with a version
of the NCPDP
Script Standard, although other standards, such as American National Standards
Institute
(ANSI) ASC X-12 Standard, or Health Level 7 (HL7) Standard may be utilized as
well.
[0068] As discussed above, the first refill request transaction 404 may
include a
prescriber identifier for identifying a particular prescriber/provider
computer 104 as a
destination for the first refill request transaction 404. In addition, the
first refill request
transaction 404 may also include information relating to the patient, payor,
pharmacy,
healthcare provider, and/or the requested medication. As an example, the first
refill request
transaction 404 may include one or more of the following information:
[0069] Patient Information
o Name (e.g. Patient Last Name, Patient First Name, etc.)
o Relationship to cardholder
o Date of Birth of Patient
o Age of Patient
o Gender of Patient
27

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
o Patient Address (e.g. Street Address, City, State, Zip/Postal Code, etc.)
o Patient Contact Information (e.g. Patient Telephone Number, Email
Address,
etc.)
o Patient Health Condition Information
o Patient ID or other identifier (e.g., Health Insurance Claim Number
(HICN),
Social Security Number, etc.)
[0070] Insurance/Coverage Information
o Cardholder Name (e.g. Cardholder First Name, Cardholder Last Name)
o Cardholder ID and/or other identifier (e.g. Person Code)
o Group ID and/or Group Information
[0071] Prescriber Information
o Prescriber ID or other identifier (e.g. NPI code, DEA number)
o Prescriber Name (e.g. Last Name, First Name)
o Prescriber Specialty
o Prescriber Address (e.g. Street Address, City, State, Zip/Postal Code,
etc.)
o Clinic Name
o Prescriber Contact Information (e.g. Telephone Number, Email Address, Fax
Number, etc.)
[0072] Pharmacy Information
o Pharmacy or other Healthcare Provider Information (e.g. Store Name, Chain
Identifier, etc.)
o Pharmacy or other Healthcare Provider ID (e.g. NPI code)
o Pharmacist Name (e.g., Last Name, First Name)
o Pharmacy Address (e.g., Street Address, City, State, Zip/Postal Code,
etc.)
o Pharmacy Contact Information (e.g. Telephone Number, Email Address, Fax
Number, etc.)
[0073] Product/Service Information
o Drug, service, or product information/identifier (e.g. Drug Name,
Strength,
Formulary, National Drug Code (NDC) code, RxNorm code, etc.)
o Prescription/Service Reference Number
o DEA Schedule
o Date Prescription Written
o Quantity Dispensed
o Dosage Level
28

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
o Days' Supply
o Diagnosis/Condition (e.g., Diagnosis Code (e.g., International
Statistical
Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) Diagnosis
Code)
o Number of Refills Authorized
o One or more NCPDP Message Fields
o Date of Service.
[0074] The first refill request transaction 404 can be used to transmit a
refill request for a
prescription from a pharmacy to a prescriber for authorization, and then back
to the pharmacy
for filling of the medication, product, or service identified in the first
refill request transaction
404. The pharmacy computer 104 can transmit the first refill request
transaction 404 to the
service provider computer 106 in step 508. In step 510, the service provider
computer 106
receives the first refill request transaction 404. For example, the first
refill request
transaction 404 can be transmitted by the pharmacy computer 104 to the service
provider
computer 106 through the network 110.
[0075] In step 512, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or another
portion of the
service provider computer 106 evaluates the contents of the first refill
request transaction
404. For example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can parse the first
refill request
transaction 404 and evaluate the refill request transaction data according to
one or more
business rules. In certain example, embodiments, the business rules used for
the evaluation
may vary depending on the pharmacy it was received from or the prescriber that
it will be
transmitted to. As such, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 may identify
the prescriber
identifier (e.g., NPI number or DEA code) or the pharmacy identifier (e.g.,
NPI number,
chain identifier, pharmacy name or pharmacy address) and compare the
identified identifier
to a table, schedule, or listing of identifiers to determine the particular
set of business rules to
use for editing, evaluating, and/or rejecting the first refill request
transaction 204. In certain
example embodiments, the evaluation of the refill request transaction data is
conducted to
determine if the data (or lack of data) creates a basis for rejection of the
refill request
transaction 404. Examples of a basis for rejection include the e-prescription
transaction data
containing errors, data is missing or data elements are missing from the e-
prescription
transaction data, an incorrect quantity of medication is being prescribed, the
requested
medication or product is discontinued or otherwise no longer available, due to
the age and/or
gender of the patient, the medication or product cannot be prescribed to that
patient, based on
29

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
the medication requested in the e-prescription transaction 404 additional
tests for the patient
are needed, or additional information is needed to be included in the
transaction 404.
[0076] In step 514, an inquiry is conducted to determine if the first
refill request
transaction 404 includes an override code or some other designation or entry
to provide
notification that editing, evaluation, and/or rejection of the first refill
request transaction 404
should not occur. The determination can be made, for example, by the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180 or another portion of the service provider computer 106.
In one
example embodiment, an override code can be included in an agreed upon field
of the first
refill request transaction 404 and identified by the e-prescription evaluation
module 180. The
e-prescription evaluation module 180 can parse the transaction 404, identify
the override
code, and compare the identified override code to a schedule of one or more
override codes to
determine if the identified override code is a proper override code. In
certain example
embodiments, the override code may have been previously provided to the
pharmacy at the
pharmacy computer 104 via a rejection and/or response message from the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180. If the first refill request transaction 404 does
include a proper
override code, the YES branch is followed to step 534. Otherwise, if the first
refill request
transaction 404 does not include a proper override code, the NO branch is
followed to step
516.
[0077] An inquiry is conducted to determine if there are any issues or
edits needed to the
content of the first refill request transaction 404 in step 516. In one
example embodiment, the
determination can be made by the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or
another portion of
the service provider computer 106. For example, the e-prescription evaluation
module 180
can evaluate one or more of the entries in the fields of the transaction 404
(e.g., depending on
the particular business rules) and may determine the first refill request
transaction 404 is
missing a prescribed quantity or some other field is missing a needed entry or
the entry is the
wrong format. In another example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can
evaluate
one or more fields of the transaction 404 to determine if the proposed
medication dosing,
days' supply, number of refills, patient age, patient gender, or total
quantity of the requested
medication in the first refill request transaction 404 exceeds the
recommended/allowed
guidelines for the medication. For example, the e-prescription evaluation
module 180 can
identify the medication identifier (e.g., NDC code) in the first refill
request transaction 404
and can compare that to a schedule of medication identifiers in the database
182 to identify a
matching record. The e-prescription evaluation module 180 can then determine
prescribing
recommendations/allowances (e.g., dosing amount, days' supply, number of
refills, patient

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
age, patient gender, other medications being taken by the patient, or total
quantity) in the
matching record and can compare the data in the fields of the first refill
request transaction
404 to determine if one or more of the data in the fields does not satisfy
(e.g., match or fall
within the particular parameter) the particular recommendation/allowance for
the prescribed
medication. In another example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can
evaluate the
drug identifier field in the transaction 404 to determine if the NDC and
RxNorm values are
consistent or if they match the other drug description fields in the
transaction 404. In another
example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can compare the data in the
transaction
404 to a database of stored transactions to determine if the transaction 404
is a duplicate
transaction that should not be processed and should be rejected. In another
example, the e-
prescription evaluation module 180 can compare the one or more sender
identifiers (e.g.
prescriber identifier or pharmacy identifier) in the transaction 404 to
determine if the
transaction includes duplicate sender IDs for more than one sender. In yet
another example,
the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can compare the one or more
identifiers (e.g.,
transaction identifier) in the first refill request transaction 404 to
determine if the transaction
404 includes duplicate identifiers identifying two different e-prescriptions
with the same
identifier. In another example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 can
evaluate the
fields of the transaction 404 to determine if the transaction satisfies
compliance or regulatory
requirements. If any errors are identified or any recommendations/allowance
for the
requested medication are not met or the first refill request transaction 404
otherwise needs
edits or has issues in the content of the transaction data, the YES branch can
be followed to
either step 520 or step 517. In certain example embodiments, it may be
desirable to
immediately reject a first refill request transaction 404 if initial edits or
issues are identified,
and as such, the YES branch can be followed to step 520. Alternatively, there
may be a
desire to check the first refill request transaction 204 for additional issues
and MTM or
REMS opportunities that can be included in the rejection/response messaging
back to the
pharmacy computer 104, and as such, the YES branch can be followed to step
517. If there
are not issues or edits needed in the content of the first refill request
transaction 404, the NO
branch is followed to step 517.
[0078] In
step 517, the requested medication, product, or service in the first refill
request
transaction 404 can be identified. For example, the e-prescription evaluation
module 180 or
another portion of the service provider computer 106 can identify the NDC code
or RxNorm
number in the product field of the first refill request transaction 404. In
step 518, an inquiry
can be conducted to determine if any additional information or tests are
needed based on the
31

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
medication, product, or service requested in the first refill request
transaction 404. In one
example embodiment, the determination can be made by the e-prescription
evaluation module
180 or another portion of the service provider computer 106. For example, the
e-prescription
evaluation module 180 can compare the identified medication, product, or
service identifier
to a table, list, or schedule of medication, product, or service identifiers
in the database 182 to
locate a record with a matching medication, product, or service identifier.
The e-prescription
evaluation module 180 can identify any additional information or tests needed
based on the
information in the matching record. For example, the e-prescription evaluation
module 180
can evaluate the data in the matching record for any risk evaluation and
mitigation strategies
(REMS) opportunities (e.g., a determination that the requested medication has
a REMS
requirement for testing liver enzymes at defined intervals while taking the
medication) or
medication therapy management (MTM) service opportunities for the medication
or service.
This can include, for example, any tests the patient may need prior to
receiving the requested
medication, product, or service or any comprehensive medication review (CMR),
drug
regimen review (DRR), medication regimen review (MRR), targeted medication
review
(TMR), and so forth that should be completed prior to the patient being
prescribed the
medication, product, or service identified in the first refill request
transaction 404.
[0079] If no additional tests or information are needed, such as REMS
requirements or
MTM opportunities, then the NO branch is followed to step 534. Otherwise, the
YES branch
is followed to step 520. In step 520, a response message 406 to the first
refill request
transaction 404 is generated. In one example embodiment, the response message
406 can be
generated by the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or another portion of
the service
provider computer 106. For example, the e-prescription evaluation module 180
can generate
a response 406 to the first refill request transaction 404 that identifies the
errors, issues, or
additional information needed in relation to the first refill request
transaction 404. This
response message 406 can be inserted into a message field of the first refill
request
transaction 404 or can be a separate message from the transaction 404.
[0080] In step 522, a reject or issue code and/or a reject or issue message
that provides an
indication of the reason the first refill request transaction 404 is being
rejected and/or the
response message 406 is being sent can be inserted into the first refill
request transaction 404
as part of the response message 406. The reject or issue code can be included
in a
predetermined field of the first refill request transaction 404 or can be
included with the
message 406 separate from the transaction 404. Further, the response message
406 can
include an override code that can be inserted by the pharmacist when the
modified refill
32

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
request transaction 408 is resubmitted. The override code can be inserted by
the e-
prescription evaluation module 180 into a predetermined field of the first
refill request
transaction 404 or can be included separately with the response message 406.
In one example
embodiment, the response/rejection message 406 (hereinafter referred to as a
response) to the
first refill request transaction 404 can be generated by the e-prescription
evaluation module
180 or another portion of the service provider computer 106 without sending
the transaction
404 to the prescriber/provider computer 102.
[0081] In step 524, all or a portion of the information from the first
refill request
transaction 404 and/or the response to the first refill request transaction
406 can be stored for
subsequent evaluation. For example, the information can be stored in the
database 182 and/or
the data files 148 and can include, but is not limited to, the prescription
number, the
medication identifier, the one or more patient identifiers, and the pharmacy
identifier. In one
example embodiment, the information from the first refill request transaction
404 and/or the
response 406 can be stored by the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or
another portion of
the service provider computer 106. In step 526, the response to the first
refill request
transaction 406 can be transmitted to the pharmacy computer 102. For example,
the service
provider computer 106 can transmit the response 406 via the network 110 to the
pharmacy
computer 104.
[0082] The pharmacy computer 104 can receive the response to the first
refill request
transaction 406, which includes the rejection/response message by the service
provider
computer 106, in step 528. In step 530, the pharmacist can generate a modified
refill request
transaction 408 and the pharmacy computer 104 can transmit the modified refill
request
transaction 408 to the service provider computer 106 via, for example, the
network 110. For
example, the modified refill request transaction 408 can include the override
code that was
previously provided to the pharmacy computer 104 in the response to the first
refill request
transaction 406. In this example, the override code can be placed into an
agreed upon field of
the modified refill request transaction 408. Further, in certain example
embodiments, the
prescription number, medication identifier, pharmacy identifier, and one or
more patient
identifiers in the modified refill request transaction 408 and the first
refill request transaction
404 can be the same. In step 532, the service provider computer 106 receives
the modified
refill request transaction 208 from the pharmacy computer 104. The process can
then return
to step 512, where all or a portion of steps 512-532 may be repeated for the
modified refill
request transaction 408 in a manner substantially the same as that discussed
above for the
first refill request transaction 404, as one of ordinary skill in the art will
recognize.
33

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
[0083] The service provider computer 106 can transmit the first refill
request transaction
404 or the modified refill request transaction 408 to the prescriber/provider
computer 102 in
step 534. For example, a first refill request transaction 404 or modified
refill request
transaction 408 can be transmitted from the service provider computer 106 to
the
prescriber/provider computer 102 via the network 110 for authorization of the
requested refill
for the patient. The prescriber/provider computer 102 receives the first
refill request
transaction 404 or the modified refill request transaction 408 in step 536. In
step 538, the
prescriber, via the prescriber/provider computer 102 can generate a refill
response 410 to the
transaction 404, 408. The refill response can provide an indication as to
whether the
prescriber approves or denies the request for refill in the refill request
transaction 404 or
modified refill request transaction 408. The indication can be, for example, a
code or
designation placed in an agreed upon field of the transaction 404, 408 to
create the refill
response 410. In step 540, the prescriber/provider computer 102 can transmit
the refill
response 410 to the service provider computer 106, via, for example, the
network 110.
[0084] In step 542, the service provider computer 106 can receive the
refill response 410
and can transmit the refill response 410 to the pharmacy computer that was the
origination of
the refill request transaction 404 and/or the modified refill request
transaction 408. In certain
example embodiments, the service provider computer 106 can conduct one or more
post-edits
or evaluations on the refill response 410 and can store all or a portion of
the data in the refill
response 410 in, for example, the database 182. In step 544, the pharmacy
computer 104 can
receive the refill response 410 from the service provider computer 106 via the
network 110.
In step 546, the pharmacy, such as a pharmacist or other pharmacy employee can
dispense
the medication or product or can provide the service to the patient based on
information in the
refill response 410, the first refill request transaction 204, and/or the
modified refill request
transaction 208. The process then continues to the END step.
[0085] The methods described and shown in Figures 3 and 5 may be carried
out or
performed in any suitable order as desired in various embodiments.
Additionally, in certain
exemplary embodiments, at least a portion of the operations may be carried out
in parallel.
Furthermore, in certain exemplary embodiments, less than or more than the
operations
described in Figures 3 and 5 may be perfointed.
[0086] Likewise, while Figures 3 and 5 have been described primarily in
conjunction
with Figures 2A and 4 respectively, it will be appreciated that variations of
Figures 2A and 4
are available. As shown by Figure 2B, the service provider computer 106 may
include two or
more distinct service provider computers 106a and 106b that are in
communication with each
34

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
other. These distinct service provider computers 106a and 106b may be owned,
operated,
and or located by the same or distinct and wholly-unrelated companies. The
service provider
computer 106a may be operative with the prescriber/provider computer 102 and
the
pharmacy computer 104, while the service provider computer 106b may be
operative with
other healthcare provider computers and/or other third-party entity computers.
However, the
service provider computer 106b may have a data processing arrangement with the
service
provider computer 106a. Under the data processing arrangement, the service
provider
computer 106a may be permitted to utilize or offer services of the service
provider computer
106b, including the operations and use of the e-prescription evaluation module
180 and/or the
database 182 to conduct e-prescription editing, evaluations, and rejections
for e-prescription
transactions, as discussed above in Figures 3 and 5. Accordingly, the services
accessible by
the service provider computer 106b, including the e-prescription transaction
field evaluation
and response messaging, may be available to the prescriber/provider computer
102 and the
pharmacy computer 104 via the service provider computers 106a and 106b.
[0087] Accordingly, example embodiments disclosed herein can provide the
technical
effects of creating a system and methods that provide a real-time or near real
time way to
evaluate e-prescription transactions to determine any errors, issues, or
additional information
or services that can be associated therewith and for the generation of
response/rejection
messages to the e-prescription transaction that can be sent back to the
originating prescriber
at an originating prescriber/provider computer or an originating pharmacist at
a pharmacy
computer without sending the e-prescription transaction onward to its ultimate
destination. In
this regard, pharmacies and prescribers of medications, products, or services
are less likely to
have errors in e-prescription transactions that reach a pharmacy and
pharmacists and/or
pharmacy employees are less likely to have to track down medication, product,
or service
prescribers to correct errors or obtain additional information related to
prescriptions from
prescribers.
[0088] While certain example embodiments disclosed herein describe the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180 as being separate of the service provider computer 106,
in alternate
embodiments, the e-prescription evaluation module 180 or the functions that it
completes
may be part of the service provider computer 106. In those embodiments where
the e-
prescription evaluation module 180 is incorporated into the service provider
computer 106,
and with regard to the methods described above, the steps describing
transmitting or
receiving between the service provider computer 106 and the e-prescription
evaluation
module 180 may be internal transmissions within the service provider computer
106 or may

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
be omitted altogether. Further, while the exemplary embodiments described
herein disclose
certain steps occurring at the service provider computer 106 and/or the e-
prescription
evaluation module 180, in alternative embodiments those steps described with
reference to
Figures 1-5 may alternately be completed at a pharmacy computer 104, a
prescriber/provider
computer 102, an e-prescription evaluation module 180, any combination
thereof, and/or a
combination of those devices along with the service provider computer 106. In
those
alternate embodiments, certain transmission/receiving steps described above
with reference to
Figures 1-5 may be omitted while others may be added, as understood by one or
ordinary
skill in the art. The intent being that in alternate embodiments, any of the
devices/computers
discussed in Figure 1 are capable of completing any or any part of the methods
described
with reference to Figures 2A-5.
[0089] Various block and/or flow diagrams of systems and methods and/or
computer
program products according to example embodiments are described above. It will
be
understood that one or more blocks of the block diagrams and flow diagrams,
and
combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and flow diagrams, respectively,
can be
implemented by computer-executable program instructions. Likewise, some blocks
of the
block diagrams and flow diagrams may not necessarily need to be performed in
the order
presented, or may not necessarily need to be performed at all, according to
some
embodiments.
[0090] These computer-executable program instructions may be loaded onto a
special
purpose computer or other particular machine, a processor, or other
programmable data
processing apparatus to produce a particular machine, such that the
instructions that execute
on the computer, processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus
create means
for implementing one or more functions specified in the flowchart block or
blocks. These
computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory
that can
direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function
in a particular
manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory
produce an article
of manufacture including instruction means that implement one or more
functions specified
in the flow diagram block or blocks. As an example, embodiments of the
disclosure may
provide for a computer program product, that includes a computer usable medium
(e.g.,
transitory or non-transitory) having a computer-readable program code or
program
instructions embodied therein, said computer-readable program code adapted to
be executed
to implement one or more functions specified in the flow diagram step or
steps. The
computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other
programmable
36

CA 02895021 2015-06-22
data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational elements or steps
to be performed
on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer-
implemented
process such that the instructions that execute on the computer or other
programmable
apparatus provide elements or steps for implementing the functions specified
in the flow
diagram step or steps.
[0091] Accordingly, blocks of the block diagrams and flow diagrams support
combinations of means for performing the specified functions, combinations of
elements or
steps for performing the specified functions and program instruction means for
performing
the specified functions. It will also be understood that each block of the
block diagrams and
flow diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and flow
diagrams, can be
implemented by special-purpose, hardware-based computer systems that perform
the
specified functions, elements or steps, or combinations of special purpose
hardware and
computer instructions.
[0092] Many modifications and other embodiments of those set forth herein
will be
apparent having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing
descriptions and the
associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the disclosure is
not to be limited
to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other
embodiments are
intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although
specific terms are
employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not
for purposes
of limitation.
37

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Demande non rétablie avant l'échéance 2018-06-22
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 2018-06-22
Inactive : CIB expirée 2018-01-01
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 2017-06-22
Requête pour le changement d'adresse ou de mode de correspondance reçue 2016-10-27
Exigences relatives à la nomination d'un agent - jugée conforme 2016-04-14
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2016-04-14
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2016-04-14
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2016-04-14
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2016-04-14
Exigences relatives à la révocation de la nomination d'un agent - jugée conforme 2016-04-14
Demande visant la révocation de la nomination d'un agent 2016-03-22
Demande visant la nomination d'un agent 2016-03-22
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2016-01-28
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 2015-12-23
Inactive : Certificat dépôt - Aucune RE (bilingue) 2015-09-08
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2015-07-14
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2015-07-14
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2015-07-13
Inactive : Certificat dépôt - Aucune RE (bilingue) 2015-06-29
Exigences de dépôt - jugé conforme 2015-06-29
Demande reçue - nationale ordinaire 2015-06-26
Inactive : CQ images - Numérisation 2015-06-22
Inactive : Pré-classement 2015-06-22

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
2017-06-22

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Taxe pour le dépôt - générale 2015-06-22
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
MCKESSON CORPORATION
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
ELIZABETH S. KAYE
ROGER G. PINSONNEAULT
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Description 2015-06-22 37 2 373
Revendications 2015-06-22 7 315
Abrégé 2015-06-22 1 28
Dessins 2015-06-22 6 151
Dessin représentatif 2015-11-25 1 10
Page couverture 2016-01-28 2 51
Certificat de dépôt 2015-06-29 1 188
Certificat de dépôt 2015-09-08 1 178
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 2017-02-23 1 112
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 2017-08-03 1 172
Nouvelle demande 2015-06-22 4 110
Correspondance 2016-03-22 6 178
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 2016-04-14 1 21
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 2016-04-14 1 24
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 2016-04-14 1 25
Courtoisie - Lettre du bureau 2016-04-14 1 22
Correspondance 2016-10-27 2 67