Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2954770 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 2954770
(54) Titre français: PROCEDE POUR SELECTIONNER LA COULEUR DE PRODUITS COSMETIQUES
(54) Titre anglais: METHOD OF SELECTING THE COLOUR OF COSMETIC PRODUCTS
Statut: Réputée abandonnée et au-delà du délai pour le rétablissement - en attente de la réponse à l’avis de communication rejetée
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • A45D 97/00 (2011.01)
  • A45D 44/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • WATSON, JOANNE (Royaume-Uni)
(73) Titulaires :
  • THE BOOTS COMPANY PLC
(71) Demandeurs :
  • THE BOOTS COMPANY PLC (Royaume-Uni)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré:
(86) Date de dépôt PCT: 2015-07-17
(87) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 2016-01-28
Requête d'examen: 2017-01-11
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Oui
(86) Numéro de la demande PCT: PCT/EP2015/025051
(87) Numéro de publication internationale PCT: WO 2016012104
(85) Entrée nationale: 2017-01-11

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
1413047.0 (Royaume-Uni) 2014-07-23

Abrégés

Abrégé français

La présente invention concerne un procédé pour sélectionner des produits cosmétiques de couleur qui conviennent le mieux à un teint donné.


Abrégé anglais

According to the present invention there is provided a method for selecting colour cosmetics which are most flattering for a given complexion shade.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


6
Claims
1. A method of selecting a suitable/coordinating lip product shade in which
1) An assessment is made of the complete complexion shade of the user
2) A range of lip product colour cosmetics is selected according to one of the
four
complexion groups wherein, if
a) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of 18-24 units
and a hue angle h° of
54-60°, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic
with hue angle h° 5-30°,
lightness L* of 40-45 units and chroma C* of 30-50;
b) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C* of 20-25 units
and a hue angle h° of
greater than 63°, then the user is matched with a lip product colour
cosmetic with hue angle
h° 10-30°, lightness L* of 40-47 units and chroma C* 30-50;
c) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25 units
and hue angle h° of
less than 50°, then then the user is matched with a lip product colour
cosmetic with hue
angle h° 5-20°, lightness L* 40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50;
d) the user has a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C* of
20-25 units and hue
angle h° of 56-63, then the user is matched with a lip product colour
cosmetic with hue
angle h° 5-25°, lightness L*40-49units and chroma C* 30-50.
2. A kit of colour cosmetics comprising selecting a foundation shade selected
from group consisting:
a) a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of 18-24 units and a hue angle
h° of 54-60°;
b) a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C* of 20-25 units and a hue angle
h° of greater than
63°;
c) a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25 units and hue angle
h° of less than 50;
and
d) a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C* of 20-25 units and
hue angle h° of 56-
63, and combining it with the appropriate lip product colour cosmetic
according to claim 1

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02954770 2017-01-11
WO 2016/012104
PCT/EP2015/025051
1
METHOD OF SELECTING THE COLOUR OF COSMETIC PRODUCTS
Technical Field
The present invention relates to a method of selection of colour cosmetics
that provides an objective
assessment of colours that suit a given user.
Background of the invention
The use of colour cosmetics is not a new concept or habit. Today, a user will
make their own choice
of colour cosmetics from the array of products that are presented in a shop.
In the former scenario, the user is required to subjectively decide which
colour cosmetics may suit
their complexion. The lighting in a shop will play an important role in the
perception of colour, and
in particular, whether a colour cosmetic will suit the user or not. Moreover,
the light output can be
different from different light sources, for example daylight light is slightly
bluish in colour compared
to an incandescent light bulb, leading to a slightly different perceived
colour. Users are often seen to
'test' a product on their hand, however the skin tone and texture of skin on a
hand is not equivalent
to complexion of the face, resulting in the user buying a product which may
well have suited the skin
tone of their hand, but not their face. Furthermore, even if the user
correctly selects a suitable
colour cosmetic, if foundation is applied to the skin, the foundation may
change the tone of the skin
to the extent that the colour cosmetic is no longer suitable.
Alternatively, a user may seek advice from an in-store colour cosmetic
adviser. However, although
more experienced in colour choice than some consumers, the offer of an adviser
may also be
subjective.
Attempts have been made in the past to group people of similar complexion,
such as the system
used by 'Colour Me Beautiful', whereby a user will be grouped into a warmer or
cooler shade or by
'season'. The aim of such a system was then to offer the user a pre-selected
palette of colours that
were defined to suit. Whilst the theory behind such attempts may be good, the
user would often
get the grouping wrong, because of some of the lighting issues discussed
above, or their own
perception of their skin tone. However the system was too simplistic and users
often made an
incorrect initial choice of which warm/cooler shade or 'season' they fell
into, as well as the pre-
selected colour palette also sometimes incorrectly leading the user to an
incorrect palette choice. In

CA 02954770 2017-01-11
WO 2016/012104
PCT/EP2015/025051
2
brief, it did not follow that if one found oneself to be of 'cool' skin tone,
that one should wear 'cool'
colours. The systems were subjective, and thus subject to human error.
The above inadequacies of the colour cosmetic selection process results in a
poor experience of the
user, which the Applicant has sought to address.
Summary of the invention
According to the present invention there is provided a method of selecting a
suitable/coordinating
lip product colour cosmetic in which
1) An assessment is made of the complete complexion shade of the user
2) A lip product colour cosmetic is selected according to one of the
four complexion groups
wherein, if
a) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of 18-24 units
and a hue angle h
of 54-600, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with
hue angle h 5-
300, lightness L* of 40-45units and chroma C* of 30-50;
b) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C* of 20-25 units
and a hue angle h of
greater than 63 , then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic
with hue angle
h 10-30 , lightness L* of 40-47 units and chroma C* 30-50;
c) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25 units
and hue angle h of
less than 500, then then the user is matched with a lip product colour
cosmetic with hue
angle h 5-20 , lightness L* 40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50;
d) the user has a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C* of
20-25 units and hue
angle h of 56-63, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic
with hue
angle h 5-25 , lightness L*40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50.
Detailed description of the invention
The Applicants of the present invention have been primarily concerned with
improving the
objectivity of the colour cosmetic selection process. The Applicants have
found that not all colour
cosmetics, such as lip shades for example, will suit every skin tone. For
example, for users with a
golden tone to their complexion, lip shades that are tonally more blue, such
as magenta/fuchsia in
colour, are less flattering to the complexion than lipstick shades that are
more yellow, such as ruby
or auburn toned shades.

CA 02954770 2017-01-11
WO 2016/012104
PCT/EP2015/025051
3
A wide variety of lipstick shades will flatter skins that are darker in tone,
such as for example,
magenta, rose, raspberry, ruby, coral and auburn toned shades flatter these
skin tones. However for
those users whose skin is very pink in tone will find that yellow toned
shades, such as auburn or
coral lipstick shades, are less flattering. Alternatively, bluer-toned
lipstick shades, for example rose,
magenta, raspberry shades will be more flattering.
For all other skin tones a wide range of lipstick shades are flattering, but
orange-toned shades, such
as coral, orange, auburn will be less flattering.
There is no accurate method for deciding whether a colour flatters a user or
not, but instead this is a
instinctive decision based on the perceived appearance of the user. When a
shade of a colour
cosmetic suits a user, their skin appears healthier, more radiant, lighter and
energised. Contrarily,
when a shade does not suit the user, the skin appears grey, drained and
unwell, and tends to
highlight negatively perceived areas, such as dark marks or bags under the
eye, the appearance of
blemishes, or uneven skin tone.
Colour of the complexion, foundation and colour cosmetic are measured within
the CIELAB(L*a*b*)
method. CIELAB (L*a*b*) is a three-dimensional colour space that can be used
to describe all
colours visible to the human eye. A particular colour can be specified in
CIELAB using three different
parameters: L* denotes the lightness of the colour and runs from 0,
representing black, and 100,
representing white; a* denotes the red/green value of the colour; and b*
denotes the yellow/blue
value of the colour. CIELAB uses Cartesian co-ordinates to describe a colour.
Polar co-ordinates can
also be used. This method is called CIELCH (L*C*h ) and is derived from
CIELAB. Here, L* denotes
lightness, C* denotes chroma and h denotes hue angle.
The objective of the present work was to identify which shades of colour
cosmetic was flattering to a
given complexion shade. The Applicant is able to measure shade of complexion
using their
marketed colour-measuring instrument, the 'Match Made' device, and will then
be able to offer a
client a pre-chosen range of colour cosmetics, for example lip shade, that
will flatter either their
complexion, or their complexion with foundation applied thereto. It has been
possible to group
complexion shades into 4 different areas of the colour space.
The first group are defined by a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of
18-24 units and a hue
angle h of 54-60 . These complexions are darker in colour, an example of
which may be an Afro-

CA 02954770 2017-01-11
WO 2016/012104
PCT/EP2015/025051
4
Caribbean origin and the like?. When a user has a complexion tone in this
range, then the user is
matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h 5-300, lightness L*
of 40-45units and
chroma C* of 30-50.
The second group are defined by a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C*
of 20-25 units and a
hue angle h of greater than 63 . These complexions have golden tones and
examples of which may
be people of Asian-origin When a user has complexion tone in this range, then
the user is matched
with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h 10-300, lightness L* of 40-
47 units and chroma C*
30-50.
The third group have a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25
units and hue angle h of
less than 50 . These people have a complexion with a pinker undertone and
examples of which are
people of Caucasian origin with a ruddy complexion. When a user has a
complexion tone in this
range, the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h
5-20 , lightness L* 40-
49 units and chroma C* 30-50.
The fourth group have a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C*
of 20-25 units and hue
angle of 56-63. These people have a range of complexions and examples of which
are people of
darker toned Caucasian or Hispanic origin. When a user has a complexion tone
in this range, then
the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h 5-25 ,
lightness L*40-49units
and chroma C* 30-50.
Suitable lip colour products include lipsticks, lip pencils, lip gloss, lip
liners and mixtures thereof.
Historically Lip colour shades were developed by random choice based on a
preference of the
formulator. The present colour understanding has permitted the Applicant to be
able to develop an
organised, logical range of lip colour shades which permit a selection of
shades which are suitable
for each of the four complexion groups. The Applicant has produced a range of
lip shades along
fixed increments of L* C* h within the area of CIELAB colour space where
lipstick shades sit. By
developing lip shades in this way the Applicant is able to ensure improved
suitability of a lipshade for
a given user, reducing the level of subjectivity in the lipshade choice.
Suitable lipstick products may be creamy and matt or glossy and shiny.
Preferably lipstick products
are creamy and matt, as the Applicants have found that creamy shades enhance
lipstick suitability.

CA 02954770 2017-01-11
WO 2016/012104
PCT/EP2015/025051
In a preferred embodiment a kit may be provided including a colour cosmetic
foundation and one or
more suiting lip products.
Whilst the present invention is designed toward selecting lip colour
cosmetics, the invention can be
5 manipulated to understand and provide a similar objective method of
selecting other colour
cosmetics, such as blushers, bronzers, eye shadows, pencils and mascaras.

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2954770 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : Morte - Aucune rép à dem par.86(2) Règles 2021-10-05
Demande non rétablie avant l'échéance 2021-10-05
Lettre envoyée 2021-07-19
Représentant commun nommé 2020-11-07
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à une demande de l'examinateur 2020-10-05
Inactive : COVID 19 - Délai prolongé 2020-07-02
Rapport d'examen 2020-06-05
Inactive : Rapport - Aucun CQ 2020-05-31
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2020-03-03
Rapport d'examen 2019-12-17
Inactive : Rapport - CQ échoué - Mineur 2019-12-13
Représentant commun nommé 2019-10-30
Représentant commun nommé 2019-10-30
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2019-08-21
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2019-05-31
Inactive : Rapport - Aucun CQ 2019-05-21
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2019-02-20
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2018-11-01
Inactive : Rapport - Aucun CQ 2018-10-30
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2018-06-27
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2018-01-26
Inactive : Rapport - Aucun CQ 2018-01-23
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2017-02-27
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2017-02-23
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2017-02-23
Inactive : Acc. récept. de l'entrée phase nat. - RE 2017-01-23
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2017-01-18
Lettre envoyée 2017-01-18
Demande reçue - PCT 2017-01-18
Exigences pour l'entrée dans la phase nationale - jugée conforme 2017-01-11
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 2017-01-11
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 2017-01-11
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 2016-01-28

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
2020-10-05

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2020-07-10

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Requête d'examen - générale 2017-01-11
Taxe nationale de base - générale 2017-01-11
TM (demande, 2e anniv.) - générale 02 2017-07-17 2017-07-07
TM (demande, 3e anniv.) - générale 03 2018-07-17 2018-07-06
TM (demande, 4e anniv.) - générale 04 2019-07-17 2019-07-03
TM (demande, 5e anniv.) - générale 05 2020-07-17 2020-07-10
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
THE BOOTS COMPANY PLC
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
JOANNE WATSON
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Description 2017-01-11 5 178
Revendications 2017-01-11 1 33
Abrégé 2017-01-11 1 44
Page couverture 2017-02-27 1 24
Description 2018-06-27 7 246
Revendications 2018-06-27 2 60
Description 2019-02-20 7 259
Revendications 2019-02-20 2 73
Revendications 2019-08-21 3 101
Revendications 2020-03-03 2 61
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 2017-01-18 1 176
Avis d'entree dans la phase nationale 2017-01-23 1 203
Rappel de taxe de maintien due 2017-03-20 1 112
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (R86(2)) 2020-11-30 1 546
Avis du commissaire - non-paiement de la taxe de maintien en état pour une demande de brevet 2021-08-30 1 561
Demande de l'examinateur 2018-11-01 3 157
Demande d'entrée en phase nationale 2017-01-11 3 61
Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT) 2017-01-11 1 43
Rapport de recherche internationale 2017-01-11 2 59
Demande de l'examinateur 2018-01-26 3 143
Modification / réponse à un rapport 2018-06-27 8 268
Modification / réponse à un rapport 2019-02-20 9 371
Demande de l'examinateur 2019-05-31 3 197
Modification / réponse à un rapport 2019-08-21 10 422
Demande de l'examinateur 2019-12-17 4 240
Modification / réponse à un rapport 2020-03-03 6 238
Demande de l'examinateur 2020-06-05 4 263