Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REMOTE RANGE-OF-MOTION TESTING
[0001]
BACKGROUND
[0002] A range-of-motion test is a test that is conducted on a patient's
joint to
measure the patient's ability to move the tested joint. A health care provider
commonly performs range-of-motion testing following surgery to a patient's
joint and
during the post-operative therapy period to measure and track a patient's
recovery.
Additionally, it is common for a provider to perform range-of-motion testing
on a
patient's joint when that joint is affected by a disease, such as arthritis,
to assess and
monitor the disease's effect on the joint.
[0003] Traditionally, a provider performs range-of-motion testing in-
person at the
provider's facility, such as a hospital or clinic. The provider performs the
range-of-
motion test with a mechanical or digital instrument such as a goniometer or an
inclinometer. Range-of-motion testing with instruments such as a goniometer or
an
inclinometer generally requires in-person testing because the provider must
hold the
instrument on or next to the patient's joint being measured.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0004] FIG. 1 is a system diagram generally illustrating the parties to and
components of a remote range-of-motion test, according to an embodiment of the
present invention;
[0005] FIG. 2A is a block diagram of a user device, according to an embodiment
of
the present invention;
__ [0006] FIG. 2B is a more detailed block diagram of the processor of FIG.
2A,
according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0007] FIG. 3A is a block diagram of a provider device, according to an
embodiment of the present invention;
1
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-03-19
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCMJS2018/021763
[0008] FIG. 38 is a more detailed block diagram of the processor of FIG. 3A,
according to an embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 4 is a flowchart
illustrating
how a remote range-of-motion test may be performed, according to an embodiment
of the present invention;
[0009] FIGS. 5A-5C show coordinate systems that may be used to determine the
range-of-motion test performance, according to an embodiment of the present
invention; and
[0010] FIGS. 6-22 are depictions of the displays of the user device and
provider
device during a range-of-motion test process, according to embodiments of the
present invention.
[0011] Where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among
the drawings to indicate corresponding or analogous elements. Moreover, some
of
the blocks depicted in the drawings may be combined into a single function.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0012] In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are
set forth
in order to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention.
However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the
embodiments of the present invention may be practiced without these specific
details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and
circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present
invention.
[0013] Conventionally, a range-of-motion test may be administered by a
health
care provider, typically at the provider's facility, and requires the use of
specialized
equipment or tools. Conventional methods of administering range-of-motion
tests
require at least one party, typically the patient, to travel to the other
party's location.
Furthermore, the provider must subjectively determine if the test was executed
properly and, therefore, whether the measured results are an accurate
reflection of
the patient's range of motion.
[0014] Given these problems, patients and providers responsible for
administering range-of-motion testing on patients would benefit from a system
that
allows for remote testing, with the provider receiving substantially real-time
feedback
of the test's performance. Such benefits may include removing the burden of
2
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561 PCT/1JS2018/021763
traveling to a health care provider's location to have a range-of-motion test
administered in, which optimizes the patient's and health care provider's
time, and
having a computer system determine the test's satisfactory completion, which
removes the health care provider's subjectivity from the testing process.
[0015] Reference is now made to FIG. 1, which shows a system diagram
generally illustrating the parties to and components of a remote range-of-
motion test,
according to an embodiment of the present invention. System 10 includes user
20
who performs the range-of-motion testing remotely from provider 60. User 20
may
be a patient or subject, who performs the range-of-motion testing via user
device 30.
User device 30 may be, for example, a cellular telephone or other mobile
device that
is operated by the user. User device 30 provides a communication platform for
receiving and transmitting range-of-motion testing information from and to
provider
60. Provider 60 in this example may be a healthcare provider, such as a
doctor,
nurse, or technician, or a test administrator who uses provider device 50 to
interact
with the subject performing the range-of-motion test remotely. Provider device
50
may be, for example, a computer, cellular telephone, or other type of computer
or
mobile device. Provider device 50 provides a communication platform for
receiving
and transmitting range-of-motion testing information from and to user 20.
[0016] In this example, user device 30 communicates with provider device
50
through network 40, which may be any network that allows for communications
between electronic devices. Although network 40 is depicted as a singular
network,
the network may comprise more than one network. For example, network 40 may be
any type of communications network, including a public or private telephone
(e.g.,
cellular, public switched, etc.) network and/or a computer network, such as a
WAN
(wide area network), MAN (metropolitan area network), or LAN (local area
network)
or the Internet or an intranet. Communications to and from devices 30, 50 may
be
via transmission protocols that are well known to persons of ordinary skill in
the art.
[0017] Reference is now made to FIG. 2A, which is a block diagram of
user
device 30, according to an embodiment of the present invention. User device 30
may include display 210, processor 220, sensors 230, transceiver 240, and user
interface 250. Display (or monitor) 210 may display range-of-motion test
information
to user 20. User interface 250 may receive input from user 20. While user
interface
3
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCMJS2018/021763
250 is depicted as a component separate from display 210, display 210 and user
interface 250 may be integrated to provide a screen that both displays
information to
user 20 and receives inputs from user 20. Sensors 230 may be micro electro-
mechanical systems ("MEMS") inertial sensors. Types of MEMS sensors may
.. include accelerometers to measure linear acceleration, gyroscopes to
measure
angular velocity, magnetometers to determine direction of earth's magnetic
north,
and pressure sensors to measure air pressure for altitude determinations.
User's
device 30 may include an accelerometer, gyroscope, and/or magnetometer to
determine range of motion using the quaternion measure, as will be described
.. below. Data from sensors 230 may be used to provide a continuous indication
of
performance of the range-of-motion test to user 20 and/or provider 60.
Transceiver
240 may transmit and receive information through network 40. Transceiver 240
allows user device 30 to receive information (e.g., range-of-motion test
instructions)
from provider device 50 and send information (e.g., data from sensors 230) to
provider device 50. Processor 220 may include program instructions for running
user device 30's functionality.
[0018] FIG. 2B is a more detailed block diagram of processor 220,
according to
an embodiment of the present invention. Processor 220 may include range-of-
motion initializer 221 and range-of-motion tester 222. Processor 220 may
include
many other blocks or functionalities to control user device 30 that are not
shown in
FIG. 2B. Other blocks and functionalities of processor 220 are omitted to
provide a
clearer picture of an embodiment of the present invention.
[0019] Range-of-motion initializer 221 determines and sets up the range-
of-
motion test to be performed. By way of example, range-of-motion initializer
221 may
receive instructions, including range-of-motion test link 241, from provider
device 50.
After the user receives and clicks on range-of-motion test link 241, range-of-
motion
initializer 221 begins setting up the range-of-motion test and, when
indicated,
commences the test. Range-of-motion test initializer 221 transmits range-of-
motion
test instructions 211 to user device 30's display 210. For example, range-of-
motion
initializer 221 may provide user 20 instructions on preparing for the test
(e.g., how to
hold user device 30 for the test), options for selecting certain types of
range-of-
motion tests (e.g., user 20 may choose an extension-flexion test, a pronation-
4
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCMJS2018/021763
supination test, or a radial-ulnar deviation test), and/or options for
selecting the
right/left hand of user 20. Range-of-motion initializer 221determines that the
range-
of-motion test is set-up and then transmits an indication to user device 30's
display
210 that the range-of-motion test should commence.
[0020] Range-of-motion tester 222 conducts the range-of-motion test. During
the
test, user device 30's sensors 230 continuously output sensor data 231 to
range-of-
motion tester 222. Range-of-motion tester 222 then transmits an indication 212
of
performance of the test to user device 30's display 210. Additionally, range-
of-
motion tester 222 outputs range-of-motion test data 242 to provider device 50
through user device 30's transceiver 240. Range-of-motion test data 242 may
include raw sensor data, processed data such as data indicating the test being
performed, calculated range-of-motion test measurements, and/or data providing
user device 30's calculated position in three-dimensional space.
[0021] Reference is now made to FIG. 3A, which is a block diagram of
provider
device 50, according to an embodiment of the present invention. Provider
device 50
may include some of the same (or similar) items as user device 30, including
display
310, processor 320, transceiver 340, and user interface 350. Display (or
monitor)
310 may display range-of-motion test information to provider 60. User
interface 350
may receive input from provider 60. Similar to user device 30, while user
interface
350 is depicted as a component separate from display 310, display 310 and user
interface 350 may be integrated to provide a screen that both displays
information to
provider 60 and receives inputs from provider 60. Transceiver 340 may transmit
and
receive information through network 40. Transceiver 340 allows provider device
50
to receive information (e.g., a substantially real-time, continuous stream of
range-of-
motion test performance information) and send information (e.g., a range-of-
motion
test link). Processor 320 may include program instructions for running
provider
device 50's functionality.
[0022] FIG. 3B is a more detailed block diagram of processor 320,
according to
an embodiment of the present invention. Processor 320 may include range-of-
motion test determiner 321 and range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322.
Processor 320 may include many other blocks or functionalities to control
provider
device 50 that are not shown in FIG. 3B. Other blocks and functionalities of
5
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561 PCT/1JS2018/021763
processor 320 are omitted to provide a clearer picture of an embodiment of the
present invention.
[0023] Range-of-motion test determiner 321 determines the range-of-
motion test
to be performed. By way of example, range-of-motion test determiner 321 may
receive inputs 351 from provider 60. Based upon these inputs 351, range-of-
motion
test determiner 321 determines instructions, including range-of-motion test
link 241,
to transmit to user device 30.
[0024] Range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322 monitors the
performance of
the range-of-motion test and analyzes the range-of-motion test data to
determine the
quality of the test. Range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322 receives a
substantially real-time and continuous stream of range-of-motion test data 242
and
then transmits performance data 311 to provider device 50's display 310 in
real-time
for observation by provider 60. Performance data 311 may include the type of
test
being conducted, range-of-motion test data, and/or real-time three-dimensional
images of user device 30 as it is being manipulated during the range-of-motion
test.
Despite user 20's remote location, provider 60 is shown a substantially real-
time and
continuous display of the device and testing data. Depending on the type of
data
being transmitted from user device 30 to provider device 50, range-of-motion
test
monitor/analyzer 322 may be responsible for processing user device 30's raw
sensor
data, data that indicate the test being performed, calculated range-of-motion
test
measurements, and/or user device 30's calculated three-dimensional position
data.
[0025] Range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322 also analyzes range-of-
motion
test data 242 to determine the quality of the test, i.e., if it was
satisfactory, which may
be based on many factors. These factors may be programmed into range-of-motion
test monitor/analyzer 322 such that range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322
produces a result for the range-of-motion test (e.g., "Good" or "Bad) without
provider
60's intervention. Beneficially, provider 60's subjectivity in determining
whether a
test was satisfactory may be removed from the testing process. Other
embodiments,
however, may include accessing the judgment of provider 60.
[0026] Range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322 may use one or more of the
following parameters to determine if a range-of-motion test was satisfactory:
user
device 30's starting position, the number of times user 20 completes the
required
6
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561 PCMJS2018/021763
movements, user device 30's movement orientation, and/or user device 30's
range
of movement. Regarding user device 30's starting position, the range-of-motion
test
instructions may require user 20 to start with user device 30 in a particular
position
for the test to be adjudged "Good." If this instruction is ignored, range-of-
motion test
monitor/analyzer 322 may output a result that the range-of-motion test was
"Bad."
For the number of times user 20 completes the required movements, the range-of-
motion test instructions may direct user 20 to repeat a range-of-motion test
multiple
times to provide a more reliable measurement. If user 20 does not perform the
minimum number of movements, range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322 may
output a result that the range-of-motion test was "Bad." The frequency may be
measured by half of the number of local optimum (i.e., maximum and minimum) of
the measurement angle. An example of a lower bound to be set is 1.5.
[0027] With respect to user device 30's movement orientation, several
sub-factors
may be considered when determining whether user device 30's movement
orientation is satisfactory: movement of the rotation axis, the correlation of
angle
measures, and the primary movement direction. More details regarding these sub-
factors are provided below in discussing the measurement of the angles and
axes.
Regarding user device 30's range of movement, range-of-motion test
monitor/analyzer 322 may output a determination that the range-of-motion test
was
"Bad" if user device 30's range of movement was beyond a threshold
establishing
the normal range, which would indicate that other joints that were not being
tested
were being moved simultaneously with the tested joint.
[0028] At the conclusion of range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322's
analysis,
range-of-motion test monitor/analyzer 322 will output results 312 (e.g.,
"Good" or
"Bad"). Range-of-motion test analysis results 312 may be transmitted to
provider
device 50's display 310 and/or to provider device 50's transceiver 340 for
transmission to user device 30. Range-of-motion test analysis results 312 may
be
transmitted prior to termination of the test if at any time during the test
range-of-
motion test monitor/analyzer 322 determines that the test is "Bad," e.g., user
20 did
not start device 30 in the correct position. After completion of the range-of-
motion
test, user device 30's processor 220 may automatically proceed on to another
range-
of-motion test assigned by provider 60 or, if provider 60 assigned user 20
only one
7
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561 PCMJS2018/021763
test, the program could terminate. Additionally, processor 320 may transmit
range-
of-motion test instructions to user device 30 that instruct user 20 to re-
perform the
range-of-motion test. Instructions to re-perform the range-of-motion test may
be sent
automatically from provider device 50 or may be sent after the health care
provider
inputs a request into provider device 50.
[0029] The blocks shown in FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B are examples of
modules
that may comprise system 10 and do not limit the blocks or modules that may be
part
of or connected to or associated with these modules. For example, there may be
many more than just four parameters or factors that processor 320 uses to
determine if a range-of-motion test was satisfactory. The range-of-motion test
monitor/analyzer may be split into two or more blocks to more specifically
address
the monitoring and/or the analysis. Analysis of motion data and calculation of
performance and results may be performed in user device 30, provider device
50, or
a combination. The blocks in FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B may be implemented in
software or hardware or a combination of the two, and may include memory for
storing software instructions.
[0030] Reference is now made to FIG. 4, which is a flowchart 400
illustrating how
a remote range-of-motion test may be performed, according to an embodiment of
the
present invention. In operation 405, provider 60 determines the desired range-
of-
motion test for the particular user 20 and sends a link from provider device
50 to user
device 30. User 20 then selects the link, which causes user device 30 to
select/load
the assigned range-of-motion test on user device 30.
[0031] In operation 410, user device 30 displays range-of-motion test
instructions.
By way of example, the range-of-motion test instructions may provide user 20
instructions on preparing for the test (e.g., how to hold user device 30 for
the test),
options for selecting certain types of range-of-motion tests (e.g., user 20
may choose
an extension-flexion test, pronation-supination test, or a radial-ulnar
deviation test),
options for selecting the right/left hand of user 20, etc. After the range-of-
motion test
instructions have completed the set-up process for the range-of-motion test,
user 20
may be prompted to commence the range-of-motion test, which is commenced in
operation 415.
8
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561 PCMJS2018/021763
[0032] In operation 420, user 20 performs the assigned range-of-motion
test with
user device 30 such that user device 30's sensors 230 begin transmitting data
indicating user device 30's movements during the range-of-motion testing. In
operation 425, user device 30 provides a substantially real-time and
continuous
indication of the range-of-motion test performance to user device 30 and
provider
device 50. The substantially real-time and continuous indication of the range-
of-
motion test performance may include the type of test being conducted, the
range-of-
motion measured by user device 30, and/or a real-time three-dimensional image
or
depiction of the device as it is being manipulated during the range-of-motion
test.
[0033] In operation 430, provider device 50 analyzes the substantially real-
time
range-of-motion test performance to determine if the range-of-motion test is
being
conducted satisfactorily. Alternatively, user device 30 may analyze the
performance
and transmit the analysis to provider device 50. As previously discussed,
provider
device 50 may use any or all of the following parameters to determine if the
range-of-
motion test was satisfactory: user device 30's starting position, the number
of times
user 20 completes the required movements, user device 30's movement
orientation,
and/or user device 30's range of movement.
[0034] In operation 435, the range-of-motion test is terminated. The
range-of-
motion test may be terminated by user 20, provider 60, automatically by user
device
30, and/or automatically by provider device 50. In operation 440, the results
of the
range-of-motion test are displayed. As described above, the range-of-motion
test
results may be a simple "Good" or "Bad" indication or may be a more complex
result
that shows user 20 and/or provider 60 the precise indicators and/or attributes
of the
test that caused the test to be "Bad."
[0035] Besides the operations shown in FIG. 4, other operations or series
of
operations are contemplated to perform the remote range-of-motion test.
Moreover,
the actual order of the operations in the flowchart in FIG. 4 is not intended
to be
limiting, and the operations may be performed in any practical order.
[0036] The determination of the quality of the range-of-motion test will
now be
discussed. Reference is now made to FIGS. 5A-5C, which show coordinate systems
that may be used to determine the range-of-motion test performance, according
to
an embodiment of the present invention. FIGS. 5A and 5B respectively show two
9
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561 PCMJS2018/021763
reference frames that are relevant to the orientation measure: the body frame
and
the global frame. The body frame is the coordinate frame fixed on the center
of user
device 30, denoted by [xb,yb,zb]. As shown in FIG. 5A, yb is in the plane of
user
device 30's display 210 and is positive toward the top of display 210, xb is
also in the
plane of display 210 and is perpendicular to yb positive toward the right side
of
display 210, and zb is perpendicular to display 210 and is positive pointing
away
from display 210. The body frame is fixed relative to the device position, but
is not
fixed in space. The global reference frame may vary based on application and
is
denoted by [xg, yg, zgl. As shown in FIG. 5B, by way of example, the global
reference frame may be as follows: zg is perpendicular to the ground plane and
is
positive upward (away from the center of the earth), and xg and yg are
determined
as the projections of xb and yb to the ground plane at the starting position
of user
device 30. In this embodiment, yg overlaps yb.
[0037] As discussed above, the range-of-motion test utilizes signals
from user
device 30's sensors 230, which may be MEMS sensors. While the range-of-motion
test calculation may be performed in user device 30's processor 220 or
provider
device 50's processor 320, the following description assumes that the
calculations
are performed on user device 30 by processor 220. Processor 220 may produce
the
range-of-motion test values using sensors 230 and the quaternion, which is a
four-
element vector describing rotation in a three-dimension coordinate system. The
quaternion may be described as follows:
1 1 1 1
q = [w, x, y, z]T = [cos (¨ 0) , vx sin (-0), vy sin (-0), I), sin (-0)]
2 2 2 2
Intuitively, the quaternion may be thought of as describing a clockwise
rotation of
angle 6 around a unit axis v = [vx, v31, vzi represented in the global
reference
frame.
[0038] The processor may also produce a rotation matrix that describes the
body
frame orientation relative to the global reference frame. The rotation matrix
may be
derived from the quaternion by:
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCMJS2018/021763
Rb = [xb(R),yb(R), zb(R)]
g
w2 + x2 _ y2 _ z2 2xy ¨ 2wz 2xz + 2wy
= 2xy + 2wz w2 ¨x2 +y2 ¨z2 2yz
¨ 2wx
2xz ¨ 2wy 2yz + 2wx w2 ¨x2 ¨y2 +z2
[0039] The rotation matrix from one vector a to another vector b may be
computed as follows. The axis u around which the rotation is made is the
normalized cross product of a and b:
uo = a x b
Ito
u = ¨ = [ux, u, u]
iluoli 37z
The angle e of the rotation is the angle between a and b, which is given by:
aT b
cos 0 = ____________________________________
iiaiiilbli '
sin 0 = \ 11 ¨ cos2 0
Thus the matrix of a rotation by angle 6 about the axis u in the direction of
u is:
[ cos 6+ +14(1¨ cos 0)
uxuy(1¨ cos 0) ¨u, sin 0 uxu,(1¨ cos 0) +uy sin 6+
u
R = xuy(1¨ cos 0 )+u, sin 6) cos 0
+4(1 ¨ cos 0) uyu,(1¨ cos 0)¨u, sin 0
uxu,(1¨ cos 0 )¨uy sin 0 uyu,(1¨ cos 0 )+ux sin 0 cos 0 +1.4(1 ¨ cos 0)
Reference is now made to FIG. 5C, which shows a movement reference frame that
may be used to determine range-of-motion test performance for a wrist
extension-
flexion test, according to an embodiment of the present invention. The
extension-
flexion range-of-motion test describes extension, which is the movement of
raising
the back of the hand towards the wrist, and flexion, which is the movement of
bending the palm towards the wrist. The following description of the extension-
flexion range-of-motion test measurement assumes that (1) user 20 starts the
test
11
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCMJS2018/021763
with palm flat facing the ceiling, and holding user device 30 with the top
towards the
thumb side and (2) user device 30 is parallel to the plane of user 20's palm
at any
time point. The movement reference frame in FIG. 5C has basis vectors
xm, ym, zm, that are used to decompose the wrist motion. Vector xm points to
the
arm direction and, based on the starting position assumption, is also parallel
to the
horizontal plane. Vector ym is perpendicular to xm and parallel to the
horizontal
plane, and vector zm is perpendicular to the horizontal plane. Given the
assumption
of the starting position, the movement reference frame is the same as the
global
reference frame, and therefore, in the following description both are referred
to as
the "movement reference frame."
[0040] High-frequency signals of the orientation of user device 30 are
received
throughout the test. Each signal may be regarded as a new ending orientation,
and
is compared with a common starting orientation where [xb,yb, zb] is the same
as
[xm, ym, zm], and arrive at a set of continuous angle measures. Given an
ending
.. orientation, the motion can be decomposed into first a rotation of angle A1
around
ym, then some other types of rotation to arrive at the ending orientation. The
angle
A1 is defined as the angle of extension-flexion, as the extension-flexion
movement is
a rotation around ym. However, different rotation assumptions generally lead
to
different movement decomposition, resulting in slightly different rotation
angles. The
decomposition method used in this application is described as follows.
[0041] The following simplifying assumption of the wrist motion is made
as shown
in FIG. 50: to get from orientation [xm, ym, zm] to orientation [xb,yb, zb]
(body-
frame x-axis is omitted in the figure), the subject first rotates around ym by
angle A1 to
arrive at orientation [xmf, ymr,zmf] with ymf = ym, then rotates around the
norm of
plane yb ¨ yin, by an angle A2 to arrive at [xb,yb, zb]. The intuition is that
a
mechanical (i.e., an exact rotation around ym) extension-flexion movement will
have
yb = ym, thus eliminating all the motion that resulted in an orientation
change of yb.
The rotation matrix R E R3x3 from yin/ to yb may be calculated as described
three
paragraphs above. The angle measure may be obtained via:
12
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561 PCMJS2018/021763
Zinf = ZbRT, COS Ai = ZmT Zmf ,
assuming zm,zmf, and zb are unit vectors. Angle A1 is further assigned to be
positive if the projection of zmf onto xm is positive, and negative otherwise.
[0042] During testing, subjects may perform the desired movement
multiple
times. The angle A1 is tracked throughout the test by the orientation of user
device
30 at each sample time point to identify local minima and maxima. The range of
movement is measured as the difference between successive local minima and
maxima. Various summary statistics of the sequence of movements may be
obtained; an embodiment of the present invention reports the median range of
movement of each test.
[0043] Range-of-motion tests other than extension-flexion may be performed.
In
a radial-ulnar deviation test, radial deviation is the movement of bending the
wrist to
the thumb side, and ulnar deviation is the movement of bending the wrist
towards the
little finger side. The radial-ulnar deviation movement is a rotation around
the zm
axis rather than the ym axis. In a supination-pronation test, pronation
describes the
movement of rotating the palm towards the trunk of the body, and supination
describes the movement of rotating the palm away from the trunk of the body.
The
supination-pronation movement is a rotation around the xm axis rather than the
ym
or zm axes. However, when evaluating the supination-pronation movement, the
neutral position occurs when the hand is perpendicular to the ground plane
with the
palm facing the trunk of the body. Thus, 90 are added to the clockwise angle
measure and subtracted from the counter-clockwise measure to determine the
movement range.
[0044] Quality control (determination of a Good or Bad test) was
discussed above
and focused on four parameters: starting position, the number of times user 20
completes the required movements, user device 30's movement orientation, and
user device 30's range of movement. Given the reference frames shown in FIGS.
5A-5C, the sub-factors of movement orientation ¨ movement of the rotation
axis, the
correlation of angle measures, and the primary movement direction ¨ are
discussed
in more detail. Device orientation may be monitored via the rotation matrix
shown
13
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCMJS2018/021763
above, and the test may be determined to be "Bad" if the orientation deviates
too
much from the desired movement. To determine whether the rotation axis has
moved too much, in extension-flexion movement, yb should overlap ym and the
movement is a rotation around yb. In the ideal case, the zm ¨ yb angle (the
angle
between vectors zm and yb) would be constantly around 900. This angle is
measured during the test, and the subject is notified if the range of angle
change is
larger than a certain threshold. This controls for the scenario in which the
test is
extension-flexion while the subject primarily performed supination-pronation.
A
similar approach applies to the other two types of tests: for supination-
pronation, the
zm ¨ xb angle is monitored, and for radial-ulnar deviation, the zm ¨ zb angle
is
monitored.
[0045] Regarding correlation of angle measures, because the desired
movement
is a rotation around one of the body frame axes, the movement of the other two
body
frame axes should be highly correlated. Using extension-flexion movement as an
example, zb and xb should move together. Thus, the correlation between the
zm ¨ zb angle and the zm ¨ xb angle is monitored, and the subject is notified
if the
correlation drops below a certain threshold. This criterion identifies cases
in which
the test is extension-flexion while the subject primarily performed radial-
ulnar
deviation. A similar approach applies to the other two types of tests.
[0046] The primary movement direction is measured to determine how much it
deviates from the desired direction. In the extension-flexion test, the
primary
movement direction is defined as follows: project the trace of the top of zb
onto the
xm ¨ ym plane, and the primary component direction, which may be measured by
the regression coefficient because the projections are in a two-dimensional
space, is
the primary movement direction. In an ideal extension-flexion test, the
primary
direction will align well with the xmdirection. The angle between the primary
movement direction and the xm vector is then measured, and the test is
determined
to be "Bad" if the angle is larger than a certain threshold. An extreme
example that
will pass the other two orientation criteria but not this one occurs as
follows: the
subject turns the device in his or her palm after the test begins, so that the
top of the
14
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561 PCMJS2018/021763
device is aligned with the subject's four fingers, then the subject performs a
supination-pronation test instead of the extension-flexion test. Similar
measurements are derived for the other two tests: in the supination-pronation
test,
zb is also projected onto the xm ¨ ym plane, and the primary movement
direction
should align with ym. In the radial-ulnar deviation test, xbis projected onto
the
ym ¨ zm plane, and the primary movement direction should align with yrn.
[0047] Reference is now made to FIGS. 6-22, which are depictions of the
displays
of both user device 30 (left or "subject" side) and provider device 50 (right
or
"provider side) during a range-of-motion test process, according to
embodiments of
the present invention. The particular joint being tested in these embodiments
of the
present invention is the wrist. User device 30 in these embodiments is a
smartphone
with a touch screen, and provider device 50 is a computer, but the invention
is not
limited to these specific devices.
[0048] In FIG. 6, the provider sends the subject a link to begin the
test. The
subject clicks on the "YES!" button to begin. In FIG. 7, the provider is
notified that
the subject clicked on the link and is connected and ready to begin the test.
The
provider clicks on the "Next" button to start the test. In FIG. 8, the
provider's display
changes to show the test screen, along with a red "Reset Current Test" button
so
that the provider may reset the test and have it performed again, if desired.
In FIG.
9, the display asks the subject to select the particular wrist test that the
provider
directed the subject to perform. The choices in this embodiment are extension-
flexion, radial-ulnar deviation, and pronation-supination. The subject chooses
"extension-flexion," as shown on the provider side of FIG. 10 ("Test" now says
"extension"). In FIG. 10, the display asks the subject which hand will be
tested. The
subject chooses the right hand, as shown on the provider side of FIG. 11 (the
right
hand turns black). In FIG. 11, the display directs the subject to establish
the initial
device position for the particular range-of-motion test. FIG. 11 also shows
that the
subject display provides the subject with a clickable "Next" link, which will
send the
subject to the testing screen, and a clickable "Switch Hand" link, which
allows the
subject to switch hands.
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCT/US2018/021763
[0049] When ready, the subject clicks on the "Next" button, as indicated
by the
new screen displayed on the subject side of FIG. 12, which shows a status
screen
for the test. The test is ready to be commenced upon the subject selecting the
clickable "Go!" button on the display. FIG. 13 shows the subject and provider
sides
at the beginning of the actual test. The subject side displays to the subject
a
continuous indication of performance of the test. The "Alpha," "Beta," and
"Gamma"
angles vary (Alpha between 0 and 360 , Beta and Gamma between 0 and 180 )
and the "Frame" value increases as more data are received. In this test, there
are
approximately 50 frames per second. FIG. 13 also shows that the subject side
displays a clickable "Stop" button, allowing the subject to stop the test if
desired.
The provider side of FIG. 13 shows a three-dimensional representation of the
subject's device that provides a substantially real-time and continuous
depiction of
the subject's device during the test. The provider side also provides
graphical and
textual indications of the current "Extent Angle." If the Alpha and Beta
angles are 0,
then the extent angle will equal the Gamma angle. FIG. 14 is a few more
seconds
into the test and shows on the graphical degree indicator on the provider side
that
the subject has performed both extension and flexion (showing maximum positive
and negative deviations from 0). FIG. 14 also shows that the subject is not
keeping
the device perfectly within the desired axis, because the provider can see the
face of
the subject's device. On the subject side, this deviation from desired axis is
shown
by Alpha and Beta angles diverging from 0. The provider can view the subject's
device from four perspectives. The view in the figures up to FIG. 14 has been
of the
bottom of the device. FIG. 15 shows the provider's view a few seconds later of
the
top of the subject's device. FIGS. 16 and 17 show the provider's view a few
seconds
after that of the left side of the subject's device, and FIG. 18 shows the
provider's
view of the right side of the subject's device.
[0050] FIG. 19 shows the end of the test: the subject's display stops
changing
and the "Stop" button becomes a "Go" button, and the values on the provider
display
for Extent Median, Cycles, and Sample Quality are processing. FIG. 20 shows on
the provider that the test was "Good," the Extent Median was 88 , and the
number of
cycles was 7. FIG. 21 shows the provider clicking on the "Reset Current Test"
button
to begin a new test. In this test, the subject is purposefully moving the
device in
16
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCT/US2018/021763
axes other than the desired axis ¨ see the large value of Beta and note that
the
provider can see the full face of the subject device in the "Bottom" view.
Unsurprisingly, the test terminates prematurely as shown in FIG. 22 (the
number of
frames is only 356 compared to 916 in the previous test) and the provider
display
shows a "Bad" test label.
[0051] Accordingly, a remote range-of-motion test is provided that
beneficially
gives a health care provider real-time feedback of the test's performance and
a
three-dimensional view of a user's device during the test's performance.
Additionally, the user/ subject may perform the range-of-motion test remotely
without
having the burden of having to travel to the health care provider's location.
[0052] Aspects of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a
system, a computer program product, or a method. Similarly, aspects of the
present
invention may be embodied as hardware, software or a combination of both.
Aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a computer program product
saved on one or more computer-readable media in the form of computer-readable
program code embodied thereon.
[0053] The computer-readable medium may be a computer-readable storage
medium or a computer-readable signal medium. A computer-readable storage
medium may be, for example, an electronic, optical, magnetic, electromagnetic,
infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination
thereof.
[0054] A computer-readable signal medium may include a propagated data
signal
with computer-readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband
or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a
variety of
forms, including, but not limited to, electromagnetic, optical, or any
suitable
combination thereof. A computer-readable signal medium may be any computer-
readable medium that is not a computer-readable storage medium and that may
communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection
with an
instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
[0055] Computer program code in embodiments of the present invention may
be
written in any suitable programming language. The program code may execute on
a
single computer, or on a plurality of computers. The computer may include a
processing unit in communication with a computer-usable medium, where the
17
CA 03055763 2019-09-06
WO 2018/165561
PCT/1JS2018/021763
computer-usable medium contains a set of instructions, and where the
processing
unit is designed to carry out the set of instructions.
[0056] The above discussion is meant to be illustrative of the principles
and
various embodiments of the present invention. Numerous variations and
modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above
disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be
interpreted
to embrace all such variations and modifications.
18
