Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 3178893 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 3178893
(54) Titre français: GENERATION DE MODELES POUR LA RECOMMANDATION D'ARTICLES DE REMPLACEMENT POUR LES ACHATS EN MAGASIN NON DISPONIBLES
(54) Titre anglais: GENERATING MODELS FOR RECOMMENDING REPLACEMENT ITEMS FOR UNAVAILABLE IN -STORE PURCHASES
Statut: Demande conforme
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • G06Q 30/0601 (2023.01)
  • G06N 03/045 (2023.01)
  • G06N 03/08 (2023.01)
  • G06N 20/20 (2019.01)
  • G06Q 10/087 (2023.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • KRUCK, JOSHUA (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
  • CAPELLE, KIMBERLY (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • KOHL'S, INC.
(71) Demandeurs :
  • KOHL'S, INC. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L., S.R.L.
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré:
(22) Date de dépôt: 2022-10-11
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 2023-04-11
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
63/254,343 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 2021-10-11

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


In a "buy online, pick up in-store" service, customers place orders for items
that are
retrieved from store inventory and packaged for easy pick-up by the customer.
Since these
services typically fulfill orders from current store inventory, some items
purchased by users
are unavailable at the time of order fulfillment. In these circumstances, a
recommendation
system identifies a recommended replacement item using a trained model. The
trained
model includes a hierarchy of multiple sub-models, where each sub-model is
configured to
receive a different set of features of items as input and to generate, as
output, a candidate
recommended replacement item. A recommended replacement item is selected from
the
candidate recommendations generated by the multiple sub-models and sent for
display to a
user. The recommendation system receives user feedback regarding the
recommended
replacement item and selectively retrains one or more sub-models of the
multiple sub-
models based on the user feedback.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CLAIMS
l/We Claim:
1. A computer-implemented method comprising:
identifying, by a recommendation engine, a first item, of a set of one or more
items
purchased by a user for in-store fulfillment, that is unfulfillable at a time
of
intended fulfillment;
applying, by the recommendation engine, a trained model to select, from a set
of
additional items, a recommended replacement item for the first item,
wherein the trained model includes a hierarchy of multiple sub-models, each
of the sub-models configured to receive a different set of features of
additional items as input and to generate, as output, a candidate
recommended replacement item; and
wherein the trained model is configured to select the recommended
replacement item from the candidate recommended replacement items
generated by the multiple sub-models;
sending, to a user device, information about the recommended replacement item
for
display to the user;
receiving, from an input on the user device, user feedback regarding the
recommended replacement item; and
selectively retraining, by the recommendation engine, one or more sub-models
of the
multiple sub-models based on the user feedback.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving the user feedback regarding the
recommended replacement item comprises receiving a selection from the user of
a different
item instead of the recommended replacement item.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein selectively retraining the one or more
sub-
models based on the user feedback comprises:
identifying one or more features of the different item selected by the user;
-27-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

identifying a sub-model of the multiple sub-models that is configured to
receive, as
input, a type of feature corresponding to the one or more identified features
of
the different item selected by the user; and
adding the one or more identified features of the different item selected by
the user
to a retraining data set for the identified sub-model.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein a first one of the sub-models is a gift
categorization sub-model configured to output a prediction indicating whether
the first item
is likely to be a gift, and wherein a second one of the sub-models is a
replacement gift
selection sub-model configured to select a candidate replacement gift when the
output of
the gift categorization sub-model is a prediction that the first item is
likely to be a gift.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein selectively retraining the one or more
sub-
models comprises retraining the replacement gift selection sub-model based on
the user
feedback when the output of the gift categorization sub-model is the
prediction that the first
item is likely to be a gift.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the user feedback comprises an acceptance
by the user of the recommended replacement item, and wherein selectively
retraining the
one or more sub-models based on the user feedback comprises adding the
recommended
replacement item to a positive training set for retraining the one or more sub-
models.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the user feedback comprises a
cancellation of
an order for the first item, and wherein selectively retraining the one or
more sub-models
based on the user feedback comprises adding the recommended replacement item
to a
negative training set for retraining the one or more sub-models.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the recommended replacement
item
from the candidate recommended replacement items comprises:
applying a ranking to the candidate recommended replacement items; and
selecting the recommended replacement item based on the ranking.
-28-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

9. The method of claim 8, wherein applying the ranking comprises:
determining an expected likelihood of availability of each of the candidate
recommended replacement items at the time of intended fulfillment; and
ranking the candidate replacement items based on the expected likelihood of
availability.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the trained model further comprises a
recommendation selection model trained to select the recommended replacement
item from
among the candidate recommended replacement items, and wherein selectively
retraining
one or more of the sub-models comprises:
in response to determining the user selected a different item from the
candidate
recommended replacement items instead of the recommended replacement
item, adding information about the different item selected from the candidate
recommended replacement items to a retraining data set for the
recommendation selection model; and
retraining the recommendation selection model based on the retraining data
set.
11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
determining the first item is unfulfillable based on a notification received
from a store
inventory system.
12. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
querying a store inventory system at a specified time prior to the time of
intended
fulfillment; and
determining the first item is unfulfillable based on a response to the query.
13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
receiving input from a store employee indicating the first item is
unfulfillable.
-29-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

14. The method of claim 1, wherein applying the trained model comprises:
identifying a set of items within a store inventory having a likelihood of
availability at
the time of intended fulfillment that is greater than a threshold;
applying one or more of the sub-models to the identified set of items to
generate
respective candidate recommended replacement items.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein applying the trained model comprises:
determining, for each of the candidate recommended replacement items, a
likelihood
of availability of the respective candidate recommended replacement item at
the time of intended fulfillment; and
selecting the recommended replacement item from the candidate recommended
replacement items based on the respective likelihoods of availability.
16. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing executable
computer program instructions, the computer program instructions when executed
by a
processor causing the processor to:
identify a first item, of a set of one or more items purchased by a user for
in-store
fulfillment, that is unfulfillable at a time of intended fulfillment;
apply a trained model to select, from a set of additional items, a recommended
replacement item for the first item,
wherein the trained model includes a hierarchy of multiple sub-models, each
of the sub-models configured to receive a different set of features of
additional items as input and generate, as output, a candidate
recommended replacement item; and
wherein the trained model is configured to select the recommended
replacement item from the candidate recommended replacement items
generated by the multiple sub-models;
send, to a user device, information about the recommended replacement item for
display to the user;
receive, via an input on the user device, user feedback regarding the
recommended
replacement item; and
-30-
Date re gue/date rece ived 2022-10-11

selectively retrain one or more sub-models of the multiple sub-models based on
the
user feedback.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16,
wherein
receiving the user feedback regarding the recommended replacement item
comprises
receiving a selection from the user of a different item instead of the
recommended
replacement item, and wherein selectively retraining the one or more sub-
models based on
the user feedback comprises:
identifying one or more features of the different item selected by the user;
identifying a sub-model of the multiple sub-models that is configured to
receive, as
input, a type of feature corresponding to the one or more identified features
of
the different item selected by the user; and
adding the one or more identified features of the different item selected by
the user
to a retraining data set for the identified sub-model.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein
applying the trained model comprises:
identifying a set of items within a store inventory having a likelihood of
availability at
the time of intended fulfillment that is greater than a threshold;
applying one or more of the sub-models to the identified set of items to
generate
respective candidate recommended replacement items.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16,
wherein
applying the trained model comprises:
determining, for each of the candidate recommended replacement items, a
likelihood
of availability of the respective candidate recommended replacement item at
the time of intended fulfillment; and
selecting the recommended replacement item from the candidate recommended
replacement items based on the respective likelihoods of availability.
-31-
Date re gue/date rece ived 2022-10-11

20. A replacement product recommendation system, comprising:
one or more processors; and
a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that,
when
executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors
to:
identify a first item, of a set of one or more items purchased by a user for
in-
store fulfillment, that is unfulfillable at a time of intended fulfillment;
apply a trained model to select, from a set of additional items, a recommended
replacement item for the first item,
wherein the trained model includes a hierarchy of multiple sub-models,
each of the sub-models configured to receive a different set of
features of additional items as input and generate, as output, a
candidate recommended replacement item; and
wherein the trained model is configured to select the recommended
replacement item from the candidate recommended
replacement items generated by the multiple sub-models;
send information about the recommended replacement item for display to the
user;
receive user feedback regarding the recommended replacement item; and
selectively retrain one or more sub-models of the multiple sub-models based
on the user feedback.
-32-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING MODELS FOR
RECOMMENDING REPLACEMENT ITEMS FOR UNAVAILABLE IN-
STORE PURCHASES
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent
Application
No. 63/254,343, filed October 11, 2021, which is incorporated herein by
reference in its
entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present technology generally relates systems and methods for
generating
models for recommending replacement items for unavailable in-store purchases.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Many types of businesses now offer customers "buy online, pick up in
store"
(BOPUS) services, in which an employee of the store picks items requested by a
customer
and packages them for easy pick-up by the customer. A customer selects desired
items for
purchase from a particular store, for example, by interacting with a web or
mobile application
provided by a BOPUS system. The BOPUS system transmits the order to the store,
where
an employee of the store is notified of the items to be retrieved from the
store's inventory to
fulfill the order.
[0004] Although the BOPUS system may interface with an inventory system in
the store
such that customers can only order items that are listed as available in the
store, some items
in BOPUS orders may be unavailable at the time the order is fulfilled by an
employee. For
example, a customer shopping in-person in the store may purchase an item
between the
time the BOPUS order was placed and the time the order is fulfilled. In other
cases, an
employee may be unable to locate an item requested in a BOPUS order (e.g.,
because the
item was moved to an unexpected location), the employee may discover that an
item is
damaged or otherwise unsuitable for sale, and/or the electronic inventory was
populated
with inaccurate data.
-1-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0005]
Detailed descriptions of implementations of the present invention will be
described and explained through the use of the accompanying drawings.
[0006]
Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating an environment in which a "buy
online,
pick up in-store" (BOPUS) system operates in accordance with embodiments of
the present
technology.
[0007]
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of an example recommendation model
configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.
[0008]
Figure 3 is a flowchart illustrating a process for fulfilling a BOPUS order in
accordance with embodiments of the present technology.
[0009]
Figure 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example processing system
configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.
[0010]
The technologies described herein will become more apparent to those skilled
in
the art from studying the Detailed Description in conjunction with the
drawings.
Embodiments or implementations describing aspects of the invention are
illustrated by way
of example, and the same references can indicate similar elements. While the
drawings
depict various implementations for the purpose of illustration, those skilled
in the art will
recognize that alternative implementations can be employed without departing
from the
principles of the present technologies. Accordingly, while specific
implementations are
shown in the drawings, the technology is amenable to various modifications.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0011]
The present technology is generally directed systems and methods for
generating models for recommending replacement items for unavailable in-store
purchases.
When an item purchased via a buy online, pick up in-store (BOPUS) service is
unavailable
at an intended time of order fulfillment, BOPUS systems configured in
accordance with
embodiments of the present technology can send the customer recommendations
for one
or more replacement items. The recommendations for replacement items are
generated by
a recommendation engine. The recommendation engine uses one or more models to
select
-2-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

items that are likely to be available in a given store and that are likely to
be of interest to the
customer who placed the BOPUS order. If a customer accepts the recommendation,
the
BOPUS system replaces the unavailable item with the recommended item and
enables
fulfillment of the order. The recommendation engine can also receive customer
responses
to the recommendation, including acceptance or rejection of a recommendation,
and use
the responses to continually update and improve the recommendation models.
[0012] In some implementations, a recommendation engine identifies a first
item,
purchased by a user for in-store fulfillment, that is unfulfillable at a time
of intended
fulfillment. The recommendation engine applies a trained model to select a
recommended
replacement item for the first item. The trained model includes a hierarchy of
sub-models,
each configured to receive a different set of features of additional items as
input and to
generate, as output, a candidate recommended replacement item. The trained
model is
then configured to select the recommended replacement item(s) from the
candidates
generated by the sub-models. The recommendation engine sends information about
the
recommended replacement item(s) for display to the user and receives feedback
regarding
the recommended replacement. For example, the user feedback may be that the
user
accepts the recommended replacement item as a substitute for the first item,
the user
selects a different item to replace the first item, or the user cancels the
order for the item.
The recommendation engine uses the user feedback received from the user to
selectively
retrain one or more sub-models of the trained model.
[0013] Although various embodiments are described herein with respect to a
buy
online, pick up in-store shopping model, they may similarly apply to any of a
variety of
shopping modalities in which the inventory within a store is used to fulfill
orders placed from
outside of the store. For example, embodiments described herein may relate to
both a pick
up model, where customers visit the store to pick up orders packed by a store
employee,
and a delivery model, where a delivery service or courier retrieves the order
from the store
and delivers it to the customer. Similarly, embodiments herein can be
implemented with
respect to any type of store selling any type of product, including department
stores,
boutique stores, grocery stores, or restaurants or cafes.
-3-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

[0014] Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating an environment in which a
BOPUS
system operates according to some embodiments of the present technology. As
shown in
Figure 1, the environment can include the BOPUS system 110, one or more store
inventory
systems 120, a retailer system 130, and one or more user devices 140,
optionally
communicating over a network 150 such as the Internet. In other
implementations, the
environment can include additional, fewer, or different components. For
example, in some
implementations, some or all functionality of the BOPUS system 110, store
inventory system
120, and/or retailer system 130 can be combined into a single system.
[0015] The BOPUS system 110 receives orders for products sold via a
physical retail
store and manages fulfillment of the orders. The BOPUS system 110 can
communicate with
a store inventory system 120 associated with a physical store to determine
items available
for purchase in the store and receive customer orders for the items. When a
customer
orders an item for pick up at a particular store, the BOPUS system 110 can
process
payments or cause payment processing for the ordered item. The BOPUS system
110
manages fulfillment of the order, for example by notifying a store employee of
the items
ordered by a customer. The employee retrieves the items from the store and
packages the
items for pickup. As items are retrieved, the employee interacts with the
BOPUS system
110 either to confirm that each item in an order was retrieved, or to indicate
that an item is
unavailable. If an item in an order cannot be fulfilled, the BOPUS system 110
recommends
a replacement item to the customer. The BOPUS system 110 can communicate with
the
customer via any of a variety of communication channels to recommend
replacement
products and receive input accepting or rejecting a replacement, including
short message
service (SMS) messages, application notifications, emails, or phone calls.
[0016] The BOPUS system 110 can include an application, such as a web
application
or mobile application, that facilitates user orders. For example, the
application can generate
a user interface that displays available inventory, enables user filtering or
searching of the
inventory, receives user product selections and payment information, and
confirms order
details. Alternatively, the BOPUS system 110 includes an application
programming
interface (API) that is accessible by third-party applications, which in turn
enable users to
view inventory and place orders for pick up at a specified retail store. If an
item in a
-4-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

customer's order is determined to be unavailable after the order is placed,
some
implementations of the BOPUS system 110 send the recommendation for a
replacement
product to the user via the application.
[0017] The store inventory system 120 maintains a substantially real-time
record of
products available in a retail store. The store inventory system 120 can
interface with
systems used for purchase of items, such as point-of-sale systems within a
retail store and
the BOPUS system 110, to automatically remove items from inventory when they
are
purchased. Similarly, the store inventory system 120 can be automatically or
manually
updated to add items when new items become available in the store's inventory.
One or
more inventory systems 120 can be associated with each retail store and, in
some cases,
different retail stores may maintain their own inventory systems even if the
stores are
operated by the same retail company.
[0018] The retailer system 130 is a system operated by a retailer to
maintain
information about products or preferences of the retailer's customers. The
retailer system
130 can maintain customer accounts associated with each customer, including
information
about past purchases by the customer, contact information for the customer,
preferred store
locations visited by the customer, or other information. For example, a
customer account
can maintain records of any in-person or BOPUS purchases made by the customer,
storing
information such as the items that were purchased, the date and location of
the purchase,
whether the purchase was made in-store or via a BOPUS model, and any
applicable
attribute of the item such as brand, size, color, material, scent, or flavor.
In some cases, the
retailer system 130 maintains an ecommerce website, through which customers
can browse
the products sold by the retailer and purchase desired products for shipment
to the
customer. The ecommerce website can include functionality of the BOPUS system
110 in
some implementations. Where a retailer provides options for customers to shop
in-store,
online, and via BOPUS orders, the retailer system 130 can maintain customer
records that
merge data associated with any of these shopping modalities.
[0019] The retailer system 130 can further maintain information about
products sold
through any retail stores affiliated with the retailer, whether or not the
products are available
in inventory in a store at any given time. The product information can include
an identifier
-5-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

of each product (such as a SKU number), product reviews by customers who have
purchased the products, and any applicable attributes of the products. In some
cases, the
product information can include one or more tags that identify a category or
type of each
product. These categories or types can be manually input or automatically
derived by the
retailer system 130 based, for example, on past purchases of the item. For
example, some
items can be tagged as "gifts" if they are commonly purchased as gifts. Other
items can be
tagged as being items of likely interest to different demographic groups of
customers based
on the demographics of customers who have previously purchased the item.
Finally, the
retailer system 130 can maintain information describing attributes of some
products relative
to other products. For example, when the products are various brands of
clothing items, the
retailer system 130 can maintain information comparing the sizing of one brand
to the sizing
of another brand (e.g., indicating that a size Medium shirt in a first brand
is equivalent to a
size Large shirt in a second brand).
[0020] The user device 140 is a computing device used by a customer to
interact with
the BOPUS system 110, such as to place a BOPUS order or to view recommended
replacement products for unavailable items in a BOPUS order. The user device
140 can,
for example, execute an application that enables a customer to browse items
for sale at a
retail store and place a BOPUS order for any desired items.
[0021] As discussed above, if an item in a BOPUS order is not available at
the time the
order is fulfilled, the BOPUS system 110 can recommend one or more replacement
products
to substitute for the unfulfillable item. Although the disclosure herein
refers by way of
example to generating replacements for a target item that is unfulfillable as
part of a BOPUS
order, similar recommendations can be generated to recommend alternatives to
any of a
variety of items purchased via a variety of modalities. For example,
recommendations can
be generated prior to any determination of whether a target item is available
for fulfilment in
a BOPUS order. Recommended replacement items can be presented to a user when a
user
adds a target item to an order cart for a BOPUS order, enabling the user to
indicate one or
more of the replacements that would be acceptable replacements for the target
item should
the target item be unavailable. Alternatively, recommended alternatives to a
target item can
be presented to a user to enable the user to decide to purchase one of the
alternatives
-6-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

instead of the target item. To generate the recommendations, the BOPUS system
communicates with a recommendation engine 115. In various implementations, the
recommendation engine 115 is executed by the BOPUS system 110 (as illustrated
in the
implementation shown in Figure 1), or by another system such as the store
inventory system
120 or the retailer system 130.
[0022] In general, the recommendation engine 115 generates and applies one
or more
models to select one or more replacement products given features of an item in
a BOPUS
order that is not available at the time the order is fulfilled. The model
generated by the
recommendation engine 115 can include any combination of user-defined rules,
derived
rules, or machine learning models that are trained to generate
recommendations. A
"machine learning model," as used herein, refers to a construct that is
trained using training
data to make predictions or provide probabilities for new data items, whether
or not the new
data items were included in the training data. For example, training data for
supervised
learning can include items with various parameters and an assigned
classification. A new
data item can have parameters that a model can use to assign a classification
to the new
data item. As another example, a model can be a probability distribution
resulting from the
analysis of training data, such as a likelihood of an n-gram occurring in a
given language
based on an analysis of a large corpus from that language. Examples of models
include
neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees, Parzen windows,
Bayes
clustering, reinforcement learning, probability distributions, decision trees,
decision tree
forests, and others. Models can be configured for various situations, data
types, sources,
and output formats.
[0023] In some implementations, the model used by the recommendation engine
115
is a neural network with multiple input nodes that receive an input data point
or signal, such
as an identifier or attribute of an unfulfillable item in a BOPUS order. The
input nodes can
correspond to functions that receive the input and produce results. These
results can be
provided to one or more levels of intermediate nodes that each produce further
results based
on a combination of lower level node results. A weighting factor can be
applied to the output
of each node before the result is passed to the next layer node. At a final
layer ("the output
layer"), one or more nodes can produce a value classifying the input that,
once the model is
-7-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

trained, can be used to generate a replacement product recommendation. In some
implementations, such neural networks, known as deep neural networks, can have
multiple
layers of intermediate nodes with different configurations, can be a
combination of models
that receive different parts of the input and/or input from other parts of the
deep neural
network, or are convolutions - partially using output from previous iterations
of applying the
model as further input to produce results for the current input.
[0024] A machine learning model can be trained with supervised learning,
where the
training data includes inputs and desired outputs. The inputs can include, for
example,
features of products or previously-placed BOPUS orders. The outputs can
include previous
recommendations given to BOPUS customers, which can be tagged with information
identifying the response of the customers to the recommendations (e.g.,
whether the
customers accepted the recommendations or canceled the item/order). As the
machine
learning model is trained, output from the model can be compared to the
expected output
and, based on the comparison, the model can be modified, such as by changing
weights
between nodes of the neural network or parameters of the functions used at
each node in
the neural network (e.g., applying a loss function). After applying each of
the data points in
the training data and modifying the model in this manner, the model can be
trained to
evaluate new data points (such as new products that cannot be fulfilled in a
BOPUS order)
to generate corresponding recommendations.
[0025] The model applied by the recommendation engine 115 can use any of a
variety
of types of data to generate the recommendations, including product search
data by the
customer who placed the BOPUS order or by other customers, customers' previous
responses to recommended BOPUS replacements, features of products requested by
customers in BOPUS orders, features of products available in the retail store
in which the
order was placed, or known or derived information about the products that can
substitute for
other products.
Example Recommendation Model
[0026] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example
recommendation model
200 that can be used by the recommendation engine 115 to select recommended
replacement items. In general, the recommendation model 200 includes a
hierarchical
-8-
Date recue/date received 2022-10-11

structure of sub-models. Within the hierarchy are multiple sub-models that are
each
configured to generate a candidate recommended replacement item. The
recommendation
model 200 inputs the candidates generated by the sub-models and selects one or
more of
the candidates as the recommended replacement item(s) to recommend when an
ordered
item cannot be fulfilled. Some sub-models in the hierarchy can include their
own sub-
models. In these cases, a higher-level sub-model can receive candidates
generated by
lower-level sub-models and select one or more candidates to pass to the next
highest level
in the hierarchy. These intermediate sub-models may generate their own
candidate
recommendations, in addition to selecting from candidates generated by lower-
level sub-
models.
[0027] The recommendation model 200 illustrated in Figure 2 illustrates a
hierarchical
structure of several example sub-models. Different types of sub-models may be
incorporated into the recommendation model 200 in other implementations,
instead of or in
addition to the illustrated sub-models. Furthermore, the recommendation engine
215 may
not use every illustrated sub-model when generating replacement item
recommendations.
For example, when an unfulfillable item does not have a size, the version of
the model 200
used to generate a recommended recommendation may not use the item size sub-
model
232.
[0028] An item similarity sub-model 210 selects candidate replacement items
based on
their similarity to the target item they are replacing. The item similarity
sub-model 210 can
be trained to take product attributes of pairs of items as inputs and to
generate, as output, a
similarity score between the pairs of items. The model can be trained by any
of a variety of
unsupervised learning methods (e.g., using product attributes as inputs) or
supervised
learning methods (e.g., using customer interactions with items, via any retail
channel, to
label similar or dissimilar products). For example, when using customer
interactions to
generate training data sets for supervised learning, the recommendation engine
115 can
identify sets of items with which a customer interacts during a browsing
session on the
retailer's ecommerce website. The recommendation engine 115 can also recommend
items
that are predicted to be similar to a first item and receive customer
responses that are
indicative of whether the items are similar. Based on the customer responses,
the
-9-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

recommendation engine 115 modifies the similarity model to improve its
predictions of
similarity between items. The recommendations for similar items can be
provided across
any of a variety of retail channels associated with a retailer, such as on a
website or in a
suggestion for replacement products in a BOPUS order. The customer responses
used to
assess the similarity of products can include actions such as clicking through
to a suggested
item, accepting or rejecting a replacement item, or any other applicable
action based on the
format and context in which the similar item is presented.
[0029] A customer interests sub-model 220 selects candidate replacement
items
based on data indicating interests of a customer or set of customers, such as
purchase
history or search history. For example, the customer interests sub-model 220
is trained to
predict that a customer would be interested in a second item, given that the
customer
purchased a first item. The first item can be the item that is unavailable and
identified for
replacement by the second item, or the first item can be a different item
ordered by the
customer in the same order or in a previous order. In another example, the
model can be
trained to predict that a customer would be interested in a given item based
on items for
which the customer has searched, regardless of whether the customer actually
purchased
the items. When training the customer interests sub-model 220, the
recommendation engine
115 can use previous purchase data by any segment of customers, such as
customers with
similar demographic profiles to the customer who placed the BOPUS order,
customers with
similar purchase histories to the customer who placed the order, or customers
who shop at
the same store location as the customer who placed the order.
[0030] In some implementations, the recommendation engine 115 maintains
multiple
sub-models within the customer interests sub-model 220 to represent different
subsets of
users. For example, the recommendation engine 115 may maintain a general
customer
interests sub-model 222 (e.g., to represent purchase history across a customer
base), a
sub-model 224 to represent the purchase history of users with specified
demographics, and
a sub-model 226 to represent the purchase history of users who visit a
specific retail store
or a specific set of retail stores. When applying the recommendation model 200
to select a
recommended replacement item, one or more of the sub-models 222, 224, 226 can
be
applied to generate respective candidate replacement items. The customer
interests sub-
-10-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

model 220 selects one or more items from among the candidates generated by the
sub-
models 222, 224, 226, passing the selected item(s) to the top-level
recommendation model
200 as the candidate(s) selected based on customer interests.
[0031] The physical attributes sub-model 230 selects a replacement item
based on
features that represent physical attributes of the items, such as size, color,
flavor, or scent.
In some implementations, the physical attributes sub-model 230 includes a
plurality of sub-
models that are each configured to take corresponding physical attribute
features as input
and to generate corresponding candidate recommendation items based on the
respective
physical attribute features.
[0032] For example, the physical attributes sub-model 230 can include an
item size
sub-model 232. When the product purchased in a BOPUS order is an item that is
sold in
different sizes (such as clothing items), the item size sub-model 232 is
trained to predict an
appropriate size for the replacement item. In some cases, the item size sub-
model 232
accesses size information associated with the customer who placed the BOPUS
order. The
customer's size information can be derived from explicit information the user
has provided
(such as applicable measurements) or derived from implicit information, such
as sizes of
clothing items the user has purchased in the past. Additionally or
alternatively, the item size
sub-model 232 accesses sizing information associated with the unavailable
product and
sizing information associated with potential replacement products to determine
the relative
sizes between the ordered and recommended products. The relative sizing
information can
be derived from explicit information associated with the ordered and
recommended
products, such as size charts provided by each product's manufacturer.
Relative sizing
information can also be derived from other customers' purchases (e.g.,
customers who buy
a size small in one brand frequently buy a size medium in another brand) or
information
provided by other customers (e.g., an indication that a given product runs
small, large, or
true to size).
[0033] As shown in Figure 2, the physical attributes sub-model 230 can
further include
sub-models such as an item color sub-model 234 and/or other physical attribute
sub-models
236 (e.g., a flavor sub-model or a scent sub-model). When the product
purchased in a
BOPUS order is an item that is sold in different colors, flavors, or scents,
the corresponding
-11-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

sub-model 234, 236 is trained to predict an appropriate replacement item
based, for
example, on past purchases of the items with each of the different available
attributes.
[0034] A gifts replacement sub-model 240 identifies when an unfulfillable
item is likely
to be a gift and selects an alternative gift as a recommended replacement
item. As shown
in Figure 2, the gifts replacement sub-model 240 can include a gift
categorization sub-model
242 and a replacement gift selection sub-model 244.
[0035] The gift categorization sub-model 242 predicts whether a target item
is likely
being purchased as a gift. In some cases, some items are directly assigned
tags (e.g., by
the retailer of the item or by users) to indicate that the items are likely to
be given as gifts.
The gift categorization sub-model can therefore include a set of rules that
cause the
recommendation engine 115 to determine an item is a gift if the item is tagged
as a likely
gift, or if the item is tagged as a likely gift and the item is being
purchased within a specified
time window near a gift-giving holiday. The gift categorization sub-model 242
can
additionally or alternatively include one or more models trained to predict
whether a
particular item being purchased by a user is being purchased as a gift, take
into account
factors such as proximity to a holiday at the time of purchase, features of
the item itself, how
many previous purchases of the item were gifts (e.g., based on customers
requesting a gift
receipt for the product at the time of purchase), and/or features of previous
items purchased
by the customer who is placing the BOPUS order. The trained gift
categorization sub-model
242 outputs a probability that a given item in a BOPUS order is a gift.
[0036] If the recommendation engine 115 determines an unfulfillable ordered
item is
likely to be a gift (e.g., based on the probability output by the gift
categorization sub-model
242), the recommendation engine 115 can employ a replacement gift selection
sub-model
244 to the recommendations generated by the recommendation engine 115 can be
different
from the recommendations generated for non-gift replacement products. For
example,
when selecting a replacement product for a gift, the recommendation engine 115
may select
from a set of other items that are tagged as being popular gifts rather than
from a set of
items that are likely to interest the customer.
[0037] As described above, a common reason for an item to be unfulfillable
in a
BOPUS order is that the item was sold to an in-store customer between the time
the BOPUS
-12-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

customer placed the order and the time the order was fulfilled. To reduce the
likelihood that
the replacement product will similarly sell before it can be added to a
customer's order, the
recommendation engine 115 can apply an item availability sub-model 250 to
predict likely
availability of an item. The item availability sub-model 250 can be a rule-
based or machine
learning-based model configured to predict item availability based factors
that may be
correlated with the likely availability of the item. Example factors that
indicate the likely
availability of an item include the number of that item in stock, an amount of
time since the
last sale of the item, a moving average frequency of sales of the product, or
an average
frequency of sales on a given day of the week or a given hour of the day. In a
simple
example of a rule-based item availability sub-model 250, the sub-model 250
selects a
product recommendation from among any products that have a threshold number of
items
in stock, for example selecting a product only if there are at least five of
the product available
in the store inventory at the time the recommendation is generated. In another
example, a
rule-based item availability sub-model 250 estimates whether a product is
likely to sell out
in the time between the replacement recommendation being generated and the
order being
fulfilled based on the average frequency of sales and the number of items of
the product
remaining in inventory at the time the recommendation is generated, selecting
product
recommendations if the estimated likelihood of selling out prior to order
fulfillment is less
than a specified threshold. A machine learning-based item availability sub-
model 250 can
be trained to predict a likelihood of product availability based on these or
other features of
the items or the store in which the order is to be fulfilled.
[0038]
The recommendation engine 115 can similarly account for other reasons that
products are unfulfillable. For example, if a store employee is unable to find
a product in a
store at the time the employee is fulfilling a BOPUS order for the product
(e.g., because the
product was misplaced), the store employee may mark the product as
unfulfillable in the
order. To reduce the likelihood that replacement products are similarly
difficult to find, the
recommendation engine 115 can account for factors that may be correlated with
the
likelihood that an item is in a known or expected location. For example,
clearance items
may be more difficult to find in a retail store than regular-price items if
the clearance items
are moved to designated clearance racks. Accordingly, the recommendation
engine 115
can apply a policy to select any products that are not likely to be located on
a clearance
-13-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

racks as replacement products. Similarly, products that are newer to the store
may be more
easily located than items that have been in the store for longer periods of
time, and thus the
recommendation engine 115 may apply a policy to select products that were
added to the
store's inventory less than a threshold amount of time before the replacement
recommendation is generated.
[0039] The top-level recommendation model 200 receives candidate
replacement
items from some or all of the sub-models and selects one or more of the
candidates to output
to the user as the recommended replacement item(s).
[0040] In some implementations, the recommendation model 200 selects a
recommended replacement item from a set of candidates by ranking the
candidates received
from the sub-models. In one example, the recommendation model 200 ranks the
candidates
based on likelihood that the candidate items will be available at the time of
fulfillment (e.g.,
ranking items based on the number of units available in the store at the time
of
recommendation selection, or ranking based on predicted likelihood of
availability output by
the item availability sub-model 250).
[0041] In another example, the recommendation model 200 ranks the
candidates
based on scores output by the sub-models, such as scores generated by the sub-
models
indicating a likelihood that the candidate will be a good replacement for the
unfulfillable target
item. The recommendation model 200 may apply a weighting function to the
scores output
by the sub-models before ranking the candidates based on these scores. Such
weights can
be set based on the category of the item in some implementations, for example
based on
historical data indicating that some of the sub-models perform better when
selecting
candidate replacement items for some product categories than for other product
categories.
Alternatively, the weights can be set manually by a system designer, for
example to account
for one sub-model tending to produce higher scores than other sub-models,
[0042] Some implementations of the recommendation model 200 select from
among
the candidates based on explicit rules. For example, if the gift
categorization sub-model 242
predicted that an unfulfillable item is likely to be a gift, the
recommendation model 200
applies a rule to output at least the candidate replacement recommended
generated by the
gift replacement sub-model 240.
-14-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

[0043] In some implementations, the recommendation model 200 includes a top-
level
recommendation selection model, including a machine learning algorithm trained
to select
one or more recommendations from among the candidates. The machine learning
algorithm
can operate in conjunction with or instead of the example rules provided
above.
[0044] In some implementations, at least some of the sub-models illustrated
in Figure
2 are applied to a set of items that are determined to be likely available at
a time of order
fulfillment, in order to select a candidate replacement from among the likely
available items.
For example, the recommendation model 200 first applies the item availability
sub-model
250 to determine a likelihood that each of a plurality of items will be
available in a store at a
time of order fulfillment within the store. The sub-models within the
recommendation model
200 are then applied to a set of items for which the likelihood of
availability is greater than a
threshold.
[0045] In addition to applying sub-models as illustrated for example in
Figure 2, some
implementations of the recommendation model 200 select from candidate
recommended
replacement items received from external sources. For example, the
recommendation
engine 115 monetizes recommendations by enabling manufacturers to bid to have
their
products recommended. When a recommendation for a replacement product is
needed, the
recommendation engine 115 can operate an advertisement auction to select the
product
that will be recommended. Manufacturers can bid to advertise products to
customers with
certain attributes, to customers who ordered certain types of products, or to
customers who
both satisfy certain specified attributes and who ordered certain types of
products. A
candidate recommended replacement item generated by the advertisement auction
can be
added to the set of candidates generated by one or more of the sub-models of
the
recommendation model 200.
Generating Recommendations for Replacement Items
[0046] Figure 3 is a flowchart illustrating a process for fulfilling a
BOPUS order
according to some implementations of the present technology. The process shown
in Figure
3 can be performed by the BOPUS system 110 of Figure 1. Other implementations
can
include additional, fewer, or different steps, or can perform the steps in
different orders.
-15-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

[0047] As shown in Figure 3, the BOPUS system 110 receives a BOPUS order
for one
or more items at block 302. The BOPUS order can specify a particular store at
which an
associated customer would like to pick up the order. Alternatively, the BOPUS
system 110
automatically selects a store that is closest to the customer's location, that
is most likely to
have the items in stock, or based on other factors.
[0048] At block 304, the BOPUS system 110 determines whether all items in
the order
are available for fulfillment. The BOPUS system 110 can receive information
indicating that
an ordered item cannot be fulfilled in several ways. If the last of an item
sells after the time
the BOPUS order was placed but before the order is fulfilled, the BOPUS system
110 may
receive a notification of the item's unavailability from the store inventory
system 120. For
example, the BOPUS system 110 queries the store inventory system 120 shortly
before the
order is to be fulfilled to determine if all items are still available in
inventory. The BOPUS
system 110 can additionally receive an input from the store employee who is
fulfilling the
order. For example, if the employee cannot find an item, determines the last
of an item is
damaged, or otherwise determines that an item from an order cannot be
fulfilled, the
employee provides an input that is received by the BOPUS system 110 as an
indication that
an item is unavailable.
[0049] If all items in an order were determined to be available at block
304, the BOPUS
system 110 causes fulfillment of the order at block 306. For example, after an
employee
retrieves all items from an order, the BOPUS system 110 receives an indication
that the
order is ready and sends a notification to the corresponding customer. The
BOPUS system
110 can also process the customer's payment for the order at block 306.
[0050] If an item was determined to be unavailable at block 304, the BOPUS
system
110 applies a recommendation model at block 308 to generate at least one
recommendation
for a replacement item. The recommendation model, which can be the model 200
described
with respect to Figure 2, is a hierarchical model with multiple sub-models,
each configured
to select a candidate recommended replacement item based on different features
of the
item. The recommendation model can select items that are more likely to be
available for
fulfillment in the BOPUS order than the originally ordered item. The model can
also leverage
information about the customer or the products that is derived from multiple
shopping
-16-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

modalities, including other BOPUS orders as well as in-store shopping and/or
online
shopping, to generate recommendations for replacement products that are likely
to interest
or satisfy the customer.
[0051] The BOPUS system 110 sends the recommendation to the customer who
placed the order and receives, at block 310, a response from the customer to
the
recommendation. Recommendations can be sent, and customer responses received,
via
any of a variety of media including SMS messages, in-application
notifications, email
messages, or telephone calls. A customer may, for example, accept the
recommendation
to replace the unavailable item with the recommended item. If a customer
accepts the
recommendation, the BOPUS system 110 enables fulfillment of the order with the
replacement product substituted for the original item. Other customers may
request a
different replacement product, either by requesting a new recommendation from
the BOPUS
system 110 or by explicitly searching for the desired replacement. Still other
customers may
cancel the item or the entire order. For example, the BOPUS system 110
generates an in-
app notification to display the item that is unavailable, one or more
recommended
replacement items, and a selectable element to approve or reject the
recommendation. The
application can further allow the customer to browse for other replacement
items. For
example, if a user rejects the recommended replacement items, the application
can display
other candidate replacement items that were ranked lower by the recommendation
model.
Alternatively, the user can use the application to view other items sold by
the store from
which the user placed the original order, submitting search queries to find
specific items or
browsing other items by category or attribute.
[0052] Based on the customer's response to the recommendation, the BOPUS
system
110 updates the recommendation model at block 312. For example, the customer's
acceptance of a recommendation or cancellation of an item/order can be input
to the
recommendation engine 115 as positive or negative feedback, respectively. The
recommendation engine 115 can retrain the recommendation model based on the
user
feedback in order to continually improve the model's recommendations.
Retraining of the
model can be triggered at periodic intervals (e.g., at a time-based interval
such as once per
week, or after a specified number of BOPUS orders). In other implementations,
retraining
-17-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

is triggered if the acceptance rate of recommended replacement items (Le., a
number of
times a user accepts the recommended replacement item as a percentage of the
total
number of recommended replacements that are output) falls below a threshold.
Retraining
can additionally or alternatively be triggered manually by an operator of the
recommendation
engine 115.
[0053] In order to retrain the recommendation model to continually improve
the model's
recommendations, the recommendation engine 115 selectively retrains one or
more sub-
models of the recommendation model. As the sub-models are designed to account
for
different features of items and to produce different types of candidate
recommendations,
selectively retraining the sub-models based on user feedback results in an
improved model.
Selective retraining can also be more computationally efficient than, for
example, retraining
a larger machine learning model that attempts to account for a larger number
of features
and a larger number of types of BOPUS orders.
[0054] In an example, the recommended replacement item output to the user
is the
candidate recommendation selected by one of the sub-models shown in Figure 2,
and the
recommendation engine 115 uses any feedback related to the candidate
recommendation
to retrain the corresponding model that produced the candidate. If the user
accepts the
recommended replacement, the item is tagged as a positive training example
(e.g., as an
item that is interesting to users who purchased the replaced item). If the
user selects a
different item instead of the recommended replacement, the recommended
replacement is
tagged as a negative training example (e.g., as an item that is not
interesting to users who
purchased the replaced item) while the user-selected item is tagged as a
positive training
example. Similarly, if the user cancels the item or the entire order, instead
of selecting a
replacement item, the recommended item is tagged as a negative training
example. The
positive or negative training examples collected based on such user feedback
are added to
a model retraining set used to retrain the sub-model that selected the
candidate
recommendations for which the user feedback was received. In another example,
the
recommendation engine 115 adds such positive and/or negative training examples
to a
model retraining set used to retrain one or more customer interests sub-
models, such as the
-18-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

sub-models 220, 222, or 224 shown in Figure 2, regardless of whether the
interests sub-
models produced the candidate that was ultimately presented to the user.
[0055] In another example, when a user selects a different item instead of
the
recommended replacement item, the recommendation engine 115 identifies one or
more
features of the user-selected item. The one or more features can then be added
to a
retraining data set for a sub-model that is configured to receive the
corresponding features
as input. For example, if the user-selected item is a clothing item with a
size, the size of the
user-selected clothing item can be used to retrain the item size sub-model
232. If the user-
selected item is a candle with a scent, the scent of the user-selected candle
can be used to
retrain an item scent sub-model.
[0056] If the user selects an item other than the recommended replacement
item, the
recommendation engine 115 according to another example computes a similarity
score
between the selected item and the recommended item based on respective feature
vectors
for the items that represent various attributes of the items. If the
similarity score between
the selected item and the recommended item is greater than a threshold
similarity score, the
recommendation engine 115 identifies one or more attributes for which the
selected item
and recommended item are most different. Information about the user's selected
item can
then be used to retrain the physical attributes sub-model corresponding to the
most-different
attribute. For example, if the recommended replacement item is a shirt in size
small and the
selected item is the same shirt in size medium, the recommendation engine 115
determines
the recommended and selected items are similar (e.g., because they have
identical
attributes other than size), and determines that the size attribute of the
shirts is the most
different attribute. The user's selection of the size medium shirt can then be
used to retrain
the item size sub-model 232. In another example, if the user selects both a
different size
and different color of the same shirt, the recommendation engine 115 may
retrain both
corresponding sub-models or may select one of the sub-models for retraining
based on a
rule. Such a rule may indicate, for example, that the item size sub-model
should be retrained
and not the item color sub-model, based on an expectation that clothing size
is a more
important attribute to most customers than clothing colors.
-19-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

[0057] As described above, some implementations of the recommendation model
200
includes a gift categorization sub-model 242, which is configured to predict
whether an item
ordered by a user is likely to be a gift, and a replacement gift selection sub-
model 244, which
is configured to select a candidate replacement item based on the likelihood
that the
unfulfillable item is a gift. When the gift categorization sub-model 242
predicts an
unfulfillable item is a gift, feedback received with respect to a recommended
replacement
item can be used to retrain the replacement gift selection sub-model 244. One
example
implementation of the recommendation engine 115 determines that feedback
related to
replacement gifts should not be used to retrain other sub-models, such as the
customer
interests sub-model 220 or the physical attributes sub-model 230, based on a
determination
that users are likely to select different items as alternative gifts than they
would select when
replacing an item purchased for a different purpose. For example, users may be
less
sensitive to an item's color when purchasing a gift than they would be when
purchasing
items for other purposes.
[0058] In an example in which the recommendation model 200 includes a top-
level
recommendation selection model that is trained to select from among the
candidates
generated by the other sub-models, the top-level recommendation selection
model can be
selectively retrained based on the feedback. For example, if the user rejected
the
recommended replacement item output by the recommendation model, information
about
the actual replacement item selected by the user can be added to a retraining
data set for
the top-level recommendation selection model in the circumstance where the
user selected
one of the other candidate items generated by a sub-model.
Example Computer System
[0059] Figure 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a processing
system 400
in which at least some operations described herein can be implemented. For
example, any
of the BOPUS system 110, the store inventory system 120, the retailer system
130, or the
user device 140 described above with respect to FIGS. 1 and 2 can be
implemented as the
processing system 400.
-20-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

[0060] Figure 4 and the discussion herein provide a brief, general
description of a
suitable computing environment in which the variable bias computer system can
be
supported and implemented. Although not required, aspects of the variable bias
computer
system are described in the general context of computer-executable
instructions, such as
routines executed by a computer, e.g., mobile device, a server computer, or
personal
computer. The system can be practiced with other communications, data
processing, or
computer system configurations, including: Internet appliances, hand-held
devices
(including tablet computers and/or personal digital assistants (PDAs)),
Internet of Things
(loT) devices, all manner of cellular or mobile phones, multi-processor
systems,
microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, set-top boxes,
network PCs,
mini-computers, mainframe computers, and the like. Indeed, the terms
"computer," "host,"
and "host computer," and "mobile device" and "handset" are generally used
interchangeably
herein, and refer to any of the above devices and systems, as well as any data
processor.
[0061] Aspects of the system can be embodied in a special purpose computing
device
or data processor that is specifically programmed, configured, or constructed
to perform one
or more of the computer-executable instructions explained in detail herein.
Aspects of the
system can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks
or modules
are performed by remote processing devices, which are linked through any
communications
network, such as a Local Area Network (LAN), Wide Area Network (WAN), or the
Internet.
In a distributed computing environment, program modules can be located in both
local and
remote memory storage devices.
[0062] Aspects of the system can be stored or distributed on computer-
readable media
(e.g., physical and/or tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage
media), including
magnetically or optically readable computer discs, hard-wired or preprogrammed
chips (e.g.,
EEPROM semiconductor chips), nanotechnology memory, or other data storage
media.
Indeed, computer implemented instructions, data structures, screen displays,
and other data
under aspects of the system can be distributed over the Internet or over other
networks
(including wireless networks), on a propagated signal on a propagation medium
(e.g., an
electromagnetic wave(s), a sound wave, etc.) over a period of time, or they
can be provided
on any analog or digital network (packet switched, circuit switched, or other
scheme).
-21-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

Portions of the system reside on a server computer, while corresponding
portions reside on
a client computer such as a mobile or portable device, and thus, while certain
hardware
platforms are described herein, aspects of the system are equally applicable
to nodes on a
network. In an alternative implementation, the mobile device or portable
device can
represent the server portion, while the server can represent the client
portion.
[0063] As shown in Figure 4, the processing system 400 may include one or
more
central processing units ("processors") 402, main memory 406, non-volatile
memory 410,
network adapter 412 (e.g., network interfaces), video display 418,
input/output devices 420,
control device 422 (e.g., keyboard and pointing devices), drive unit 424
including a storage
medium 426, and signal generation device 430 that are communicatively
connected to a bus
416. The bus 416 is illustrated as an abstraction that represents any one or
more separate
physical buses, point to point connections, or both connected by appropriate
bridges,
adapters, or controllers. The bus 416, therefore, can include, for example, a
system bus, a
Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus or PCI-Express bus, a
HyperTransport or
industry standard architecture (ISA) bus, a small computer system interface
(SCSI) bus, a
universal serial bus (USB), IIC (I2C) bus, or an Institute of Electrical and
Electronics
Engineers (IEEE) standard 494 bus, also called "Firewire."
[0064] In various implementations, the processing system 400 operates as
part of a
user device, although the processing system 400 may also be connected (e.g.,
wired or
wirelessly) to the user device. In a networked deployment, the processing
system 400 may
operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server
network environment,
or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.
[0065] The processing system 400 may be a server computer, a client
computer, a
personal computer, a tablet, a laptop computer, a personal digital assistant
(PDA), a cellular
phone, a processor, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a
console, a hand-
held console, a gaming device, a music player, network-connected ("smart")
televisions,
television-connected devices, or any portable device or machine capable of
executing a set
of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by
the processing
system 400.
-22-
Date recue/date received 2022-10-11

[0066] While the main memory 406, non-volatile memory 410, and storage
medium
426 (also called a "machine-readable medium) are shown to be a single medium,
the term
"machine-readable medium" and "storage medium" should be taken to include a
single
medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or
associated
caches and servers) that store one or more sets of instructions 428. The term
"machine-
readable medium" and "storage medium" shall also be taken to include any
medium that is
capable of storing, encoding, or carrying a set of instructions for execution
by the computing
system and that cause the computing system to perform any one or more of the
methodologies of the presently disclosed embodiments.
[0067] In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of
the
disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific
application,
component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as
"computer
programs." The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions
(e.g.,
instructions 404, 408, 428) set at various times in various memory and storage
devices in a
computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or
processors
402, cause the processing system 400 to perform operations to execute elements
involving
the various aspects of the disclosure.
[0068] Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of
fully
functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will
appreciate that the
various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a
variety of
forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular
type of machine
or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution. For
example, the
technology described herein could be implemented using virtual machines or
cloud
computing services.
[0069] Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable
media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to,
recordable type
media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices 410, floppy and other
removable
disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory
(CD ROMS),
Digital Versatile Disks (DVDs)), and transmission type media, such as digital
and analog
communication links.
-23-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

[0070] The network adapter 412 enables the processing system 400 to mediate
data
in a network 414 with an entity that is external to the processing system 400
through any
known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the processing
system 400
and the external entity. The network adapter 412 can include one or more of a
network
adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a
wireless router,
a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge,
bridge router, a hub,
a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
[0071] The network adapter 412 can include a firewall which can, in some
embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a
computer
network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or
applications.
The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware
and/or
software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights
between a
particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or
applications
and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource
sharing between
these varying entities. The firewall may additionally manage and/or have
access to an
access control list which details permissions including for example, the
access and operation
rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and
the circumstances
under which the permission rights stand.
[0072] As indicated above, the techniques introduced here implemented by,
for
example, programmable circuitry (e.g., one or more microprocessors),
programmed with
software and/or firmware, entirely in special-purpose hardwired (i.e., non-
programmable)
circuitry, or in a combination or such forms. Special-purpose circuitry can be
in the form of,
for example, one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs),
programmable
logic devices (PLDs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.
Conclusion
[0073] Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the
description and
the claims, the words "comprise," "comprising," and the like are to be
construed in an
inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to
say, in the sense
of "including, but not limited to." As used herein, the terms "connected,"
"coupled," or any
variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect,
between two or
-24-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be
physical, logical,
or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words "herein," "above," "below,"
and words of
similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application
as a whole and
not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits,
words in the
above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number can also
include the plural
or singular number respectively. The word "or," in reference to a list of two
or more items,
covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in
the list, all of the
items in the list, or any combination of the items in the list.
[0074] The above detailed description of implementations of the system is
not intended
to be exhaustive or to limit the system to the precise form disclosed above.
While specific
implementations of, and examples for, the system are described above for
illustrative
purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of
the system, as
those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, some network
elements are
described herein as performing certain functions. Those functions could be
performed by
other elements in the same or differing networks, which could reduce the
number of network
elements. Alternatively, or additionally, network elements performing those
functions could
be replaced by two or more elements to perform portions of those functions. In
addition,
while processes, message/data flows, or blocks are presented in a given order,
alternative
implementations can perform routines having blocks, or employ systems having
blocks, in a
different order, and some processes or blocks can be deleted, moved, added,
subdivided,
combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of
these
processes, message/data flows, or blocks can be implemented in a variety of
different ways.
Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in
series, these
processes or blocks can instead be performed in parallel, or can be performed
at different
times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples:
alternative
implementations can employ differing values or ranges.
[0075] The teachings of the methods and system provided herein can be
applied to
other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements,
blocks and acts
of the various implementations described above can be combined to provide
further
implementations.
-25-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

[0076] Any patents and applications and other references noted above,
including any
that can be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by
reference.
Aspects of the technology can be modified, if necessary, to employ the
systems, functions,
and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further
implementations of the technology.
[0077] These and other changes can be made to the invention in light of the
above
Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain
implementations of the
technology, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed
the above
appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. Details of the
system can vary
considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by
the technology
disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing
certain
features or aspects of the technology should not be taken to imply that the
terminology is
being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics,
features, or aspects of
the technology with which that terminology is associated. In general, the
terms used in the
following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the
specific implementations
disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section
explicitly
defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the invention encompasses
not only
the disclosed implementations, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or
implementing
the invention under the claims.
[0078] While certain aspects of the technology are presented below in
certain claim
forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the technology in any
number of
claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the invention is recited as
implemented
in a computer-readable medium, other aspects can likewise be implemented in a
computer-
readable medium. Accordingly, the inventors reserve the right to add
additional claims after
filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects
of the
technology.
-26-
Date re gue/date received 2022-10-11

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2023-10-12
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2023-10-12
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2023-10-12
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2023-10-12
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2023-10-12
Inactive : CIB attribuée 2023-10-12
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 2023-04-11
Exigences quant à la conformité - jugées remplies 2023-03-27
Demande de priorité reçue 2022-11-17
Lettre envoyée 2022-11-17
Exigences de dépôt - jugé conforme 2022-11-17
Lettre envoyée 2022-11-17
Exigences applicables à la revendication de priorité - jugée conforme 2022-11-17
Demande reçue - nationale ordinaire 2022-10-11
Inactive : Pré-classement 2022-10-11
Inactive : CQ images - Numérisation 2022-10-11

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Enregistrement d'un document 2022-10-11 2022-10-11
Taxe pour le dépôt - générale 2022-10-11 2022-10-11
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
KOHL'S, INC.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
JOSHUA KRUCK
KIMBERLY CAPELLE
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.

({010=Tous les documents, 020=Au moment du dépôt, 030=Au moment de la mise à la disponibilité du public, 040=À la délivrance, 050=Examen, 060=Correspondance reçue, 070=Divers, 080=Correspondance envoyée, 090=Paiement})


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Dessin représentatif 2023-10-24 1 6
Description 2022-10-10 26 1 574
Revendications 2022-10-10 6 249
Abrégé 2022-10-10 1 27
Dessins 2022-10-10 4 51
Courtoisie - Certificat de dépôt 2022-11-16 1 567
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 2022-11-16 1 353
Nouvelle demande 2022-10-10 15 949