Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
DATA-DRIVEN SEPARATION OF UPGOING FREE-SURFACE MULTIPLES FOR
SEISMIC IMAGING
Background
[0001] Ocean Bottom Seismometer (OBS), Ocean Bottom Cable (OBC), and Ocean
Bottom
Node (OBN) refer to types of marine seismic data acquisition systems. In these
systems, generally,
seismic receivers (hydrophones, geophones, etc.) are positioned at or near the
ocean bottom, and
a seismic source sends shots downward, from a shallower depth. This technique
is often used to
create recordings in a relatively quiet environment (in comparison to
streamers) and/or where
obstructions are present that may make using a streamer difficult.
[0002] Seismic data in this context, and in other marine and land-based
contexts, may include a
combination of several signals or wavefields. Generally, a "primary"
reflection is the signal that is
sought to be extracted from the recorded signal. The primary represents a
seismic wave that is
reflected from a subsurface reflector (generally an interface between two
types of rock) and then
detected by a receiver as it returns upwards. Another signal that may be
present is a direct arrival.
In the OBS/OBC/OBN context, this may generally be a signal that propagates
from the source
through the water and directly to the receiver, without being reflected. The
seismic signals also
generally include multiple reflection signals (or "multiples" for short).
Multiple reflections occur
when a downgoing seismic wave is reflected by a reflector, but before
returning to the receiver, is
reflected at least one more time, by a second reflector before finally
propagating to the receiver.
The second reflector can be subsurface or may be a "free surface", e.g., the
ocean surface. Multiple
reflections are often considered a type of noise and have been the subject of
many different
techniques to identify and remove them from the seismic data, e.g., without
removing the desired
primary signals.
[0003] Recently, it has been recognized that multiples also contain
complementary information
about the reflectivity of the subsurface. Accordingly, separating multiples
and primaries is used to
image the primaries without the multiples, but now also to image the multiples
separately. Imaging
of multiples has been shown to add value to the primary imaging particularly
in areas where the
illumination from the primaries is poor.
1
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
Summary
[0004] Embodiments of the disclosure include a method that include receiving
seismic data
including signals collected using a receiver, the seismic data representing a
subsurface volume,
identifying a downgoing wavefield and an upgoing wavefield in the seismic
data, identifying direct
arrivals in the downgoing wavefield, estimating at least first-order multiple
reflection signals in
the upgoing wavefield based on the downgoing wavefield, the upgoing wavefield,
and the direct
arrivals, and generating seismic images representing the subsurface volume
based at least in part
on the at least first-order multiple reflection signals.
[0005] Embodiments of the disclosure include a non-transitory computer-
readable medium
storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a
computing system, cause
the computing system to perform operations that include receiving seismic data
including signals
collected using a receiver, the seismic data representing a subsurface volume,
identifying a
downgoing wavefield and an upgoing wavefield in the seismic data, identifying
direct arrivals in
the downgoing wavefield, estimating at least first-order multiple reflection
signals in the upgoing
wavefield based on the downgoing wavefield, the upgoing wavefield, and the
direct arrivals, and
generating seismic images representing the subsurface volume based at least in
part on the at least
first-order multiple reflection signals.
[0006] Embodiments of the disclosure include a computing system that includes
one or more
processors and a memory system that includes one or more non-transitory
computer-readable
medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one of the one or
more processors,
cause the computing system to perform operations that include receiving
seismic data including
signals collected using a receiver, the seismic data representing a subsurface
volume, identifying
a downgoing wavefield and an upgoing wavefield in the seismic data,
identifying direct arrivals in
the downgoing wavefield, estimating at least first-order multiple reflection
signals in the upgoing
wavefield based on the downgoing wavefield, the upgoing wavefield, and the
direct arrivals, and
generating seismic images representing the subsurface volume based at least in
part on the at least
first-order multiple reflection signals.
[0007] Thus, the computing systems and methods disclosed herein are more
effective methods
for processing collected data that may, for example, correspond to a surface
and a subsurface
region. These computing systems and methods increase data processing
effectiveness, efficiency,
and accuracy. Such methods and computing systems may complement or replace
conventional
2
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
methods for processing collected data. This summary is provided to introduce a
selection of
concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This
summary is not intended
to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it
intended to be used as
an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0008] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a
part of this
specification, illustrate embodiments of the present teachings and together
with the description,
serve to explain the principles of the present teachings. In the figures:
[0009] Figures 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 2, 3A, and 3B illustrate simplified, schematic
views of an oilfield
and its operation, according to an embodiment.
[0010] Figures 4A and 4B illustrate conceptual views of wavefields received at
ocean bottom
seismic receivers, according to an embodiment.
[0011] Figure 5 illustrates a flowchart of a method for seismic imaging one or
more upgoing
multiples reflection signals, according to an embodiment.
[0012] Figure 6 illustrates a flowchart of a method for seismic imaging one or
more upgoing
multiples reflection signals, according to an embodiment.
[0013] Figure 7A illustrates example parameters for a model used to generate
synthetic data to
demonstrate an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0014] Figure 7B illustrates a wavelet used to generate the synthetic data.
[0015] Figure 7C illustrates the wavelet after designature.
[0016] Figure 8 illustrates a plot of model data, showing downgoing direct
arrival, pressure and
vertical velocity components, upgoing wavefield with both model-based, and
data-driven
estimated free surface multiples, according to an embodiment.
[0017] Figure 9 illustrates the same plot as Figure 8, after source signature
and ghosting effects
have been removed, according to an embodiment.
[0018] Figure 10 illustrates a schematic view of a computing system, according
to an
embodiment.
3
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
Description of Embodiments
[0019] Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments, examples of which
are illustrated
in the accompanying drawings and figures. In the following detailed
description, numerous
specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of
the invention.
However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the
invention may be practiced
without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods,
procedures, components,
circuits and networks have not been described in detail so as not to
unnecessarily obscure aspects
of the embodiments.
[0020] It will also be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc.
may be used herein
to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these
terms. These terms are
only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first object
could be termed a
second object, and, similarly, a second object could be termed a first object,
without departing
from the scope of the invention. The first object and the second object are
both objects,
respectively, but they are not to be considered the same object.
[0021] The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for
the purpose of
describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of
the invention. As used
in the description of the invention and the appended claims, the singular
forms "a," "an" and "the"
are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise. It
will also be understood that the term "and/or" as used herein refers to and
encompasses any
possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. It will
be further understood
that the terms "includes," "including," "comprises" and/or "comprising," when
used in this
specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps,
operations, elements, and/or
components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other
features, integers,
steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. Further, as
used herein, the term
"if' may be construed to mean "when" or "upon" or "in response to determining"
or "in response
to detecting," depending on the context.
[0022] Attention is now directed to processing procedures, methods, techniques
and workflows
that are in accordance with some embodiments. Some operations in the
processing procedures,
methods, techniques and workflows disclosed herein may be combined and/or the
order of some
operations may be changed.
4
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
[0023] Figures 1A-1D illustrate simplified, schematic views of oilfield 100
having subterranean
formation 102 containing reservoir 104 therein in accordance with
implementations of various
technologies and techniques described herein. Figure 1A illustrates a survey
operation being
performed by a survey tool, such as seismic truck 106.1, to measure properties
of the subterranean
formation. The survey operation is a seismic survey operation for producing
sound vibrations. In
Figure 1A, one such sound vibration, e.g., sound vibration 112 generated by
source 110, reflects
off horizons 114 in earth formation 116. A set of sound vibrations is received
by sensors, such as
geophone-receivers 118, situated on the earth's surface. The data received 120
is provided as input
data to a computer 122.1 of a seismic truck 106.1, and responsive to the input
data, computer 122.1
generates seismic data output 124. This seismic data output may be stored,
transmitted or further
processed as desired, for example, by data reduction.
[0024] Figure 1B illustrates a drilling operation being performed by drilling
tools 106.2
suspended by rig 128 and advanced into subterranean formations 102 to form
wellbore 136. Mud
pit 130 is used to draw drilling mud into the drilling tools via flow line 132
for circulating drilling
mud down through the drilling tools, then up wellbore 136 and back to the
surface. The drilling
mud is typically filtered and returned to the mud pit. A circulating system
may be used for storing,
controlling, or filtering the flowing drilling mud. The drilling tools are
advanced into subterranean
formations 102 to reach reservoir 104. Each well may target one or more
reservoirs. The drilling
tools are adapted for measuring downhole properties using logging while
drilling tools. The
logging while drilling tools may also be adapted for taking core sample 133 as
shown.
[0025] Computer facilities may be positioned at various locations about the
oilfield 100 (e.g.,
the surface unit 134) and/or at remote locations. Surface unit 134 may be used
to communicate
with the drilling tools and/or offsite operations, as well as with other
surface or downhole sensors.
Surface unit 134 is capable of communicating with the drilling tools to send
commands to the
drilling tools, and to receive data therefrom. Surface unit 134 may also
collect data generated
during the drilling operation and produce data output 135, which may then be
stored or transmitted.
[0026] Sensors (S), such as gauges, may be positioned about oilfield 100 to
collect data relating
to various oilfield operations as described previously. As shown, sensor (S)
is positioned in one or
more locations in the drilling tools and/or at rig 128 to measure drilling
parameters, such as weight
on bit, torque on bit, pressures, temperatures, flow rates, compositions,
rotary speed, and/or other
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
parameters of the field operation. Sensors (S) may also be positioned in one
or more locations in
the circulating system.
[0027] Drilling tools 106.2 may include a bottom hole assembly (BHA) (not
shown), generally
referenced, near the drill bit (e.g., within several drill collar lengths from
the drill bit). The bottom
hole assembly includes capabilities for measuring, processing, and storing
information, as well as
communicating with surface unit 134. The bottom hole assembly further includes
drill collars for
performing various other measurement functions.
[0028] The bottom hole assembly may include a communication subassembly that
communicates with surface unit 134. The communication subassembly is adapted
to send signals
to and receive signals from the surface using a communications channel such as
mud pulse
telemetry, electro-magnetic telemetry, or wired drill pipe communications. The
communication
subassembly may include, for example, a transmitter that generates a signal,
such as an acoustic
or electromagnetic signal, which is representative of the measured drilling
parameters. It will be
appreciated by one of skill in the art that a variety of telemetry systems may
be employed, such as
wired drill pipe, electromagnetic or other known telemetry systems.
[0029] Typically, the wellbore is drilled according to a drilling plan that is
established prior to
drilling. The drilling plan typically sets forth equipment, pressures,
trajectories and/or other
parameters that define the drilling process for the wellsite. The drilling
operation may then be
performed according to the drilling plan. However, as information is gathered,
the drilling
operation may need to deviate from the drilling plan. Additionally, as
drilling or other operations
are performed, the subsurface conditions may change. The earth model may also
need adjustment
as new information is collected
[0030] The data gathered by sensors (S) may be collected by surface unit 134
and/or other data
collection sources for analysis or other processing. The data collected by
sensors (S) may be used
alone or in combination with other data. The data may be collected in one or
more databases and/or
transmitted on or offsite. The data may be historical data, real time data, or
combinations thereof.
The real time data may be used in real time, or stored for later use. The data
may also be combined
with historical data or other inputs for further analysis. The data may be
stored in separate
databases, or combined into a single database.
[0031] Surface unit 134 may include transceiver 137 to allow communications
between surface
unit 134 and various portions of the oilfield 100 or other locations. Surface
unit 134 may also be
6
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
provided with or functionally connected to one or more controllers (not shown)
for actuating
mechanisms at oilfield 100. Surface unit 134 may then send command signals to
oilfield 100 in
response to data received. Surface unit 134 may receive commands via
transceiver 137 or may
itself execute commands to the controller. A processor may be provided to
analyze the data (locally
or remotely), make the decisions and/or actuate the controller. In this
manner, oilfield 100 may be
selectively adjusted based on the data collected. This technique may be used
to optimize (or
improve) portions of the field operation, such as controlling drilling, weight
on bit, pump rates, or
other parameters. These adjustments may be made automatically based on
computer protocol,
and/or manually by an operator. In some cases, well plans may be adjusted to
select optimum (or
improved) operating conditions, or to avoid problems.
[0032] Figure 1C illustrates a wireline operation being performed by wireline
tool 106.3
suspended by rig 128 and into wellbore 136 of Figure 1B. Wireline tool 106.3
is adapted for
deployment into wellbore 136 for generating well logs, performing downhole
tests and/or
collecting samples. Wireline tool 106.3 may be used to provide another method
and apparatus for
performing a seismic survey operation. Wireline tool 106.3 may, for example,
have an explosive,
radioactive, electrical, or acoustic energy source 144 that sends and/or
receives electrical signals
to surrounding subterranean formations 102 and fluids therein.
[0033] Wireline tool 106.3 may be operatively connected to, for example,
geophones 118 and a
computer 122.1 of a seismic truck 106.1 of Figure 1A. Wireline tool 106.3 may
also provide data
to surface unit 134. Surface unit 134 may collect data generated during the
wireline operation and
may produce data output 135 that may be stored or transmitted. Wireline tool
106.3 may be
positioned at various depths in the wellbore 136 to provide a survey or other
information relating
to the subterranean formation 102.
[0034] Sensors (S), such as gauges, may be positioned about oilfield 100 to
collect data relating
to various field operations as described previously. As shown, sensor S is
positioned in wireline
tool 106.3 to measure downhole parameters which relate to, for example
porosity, permeability,
fluid composition and/or other parameters of the field operation.
[0035] Figure 1D illustrates a production operation being performed by
production tool 106.4
deployed from a production unit or Christmas tree 129 and into completed
wellbore 136 for
drawing fluid from the downhole reservoirs into surface facilities 142. The
fluid flows from
7
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
reservoir 104 through perforations in the casing (not shown) and into
production tool 106.4 in
wellbore 136 and to surface facilities 142 via gathering network 146.
[0036] Sensors (S), such as gauges, may be positioned about oilfield 100 to
collect data relating
to various field operations as described previously. As shown, the sensor (S)
may be positioned in
production tool 106.4 or associated equipment, such as Christmas tree 129,
gathering network 146,
surface facility 142, and/or the production facility, to measure fluid
parameters, such as fluid
composition, flow rates, pressures, temperatures, and/or other parameters of
the production
operation.
[0037] Production may also include injection wells for added recovery. One or
more gathering
facilities may be operatively connected to one or more of the wellsites for
selectively collecting
downhole fluids from the wellsite(s).
[0038] While Figures 1B-1D illustrate tools used to measure properties of an
oilfield, it will be
appreciated that the tools may be used in connection with non-oilfield
operations, such as gas
fields, mines, aquifers, storage or other subterranean facilities. Also, while
certain data acquisition
tools are depicted, it will be appreciated that various measurement tools
capable of sensing
parameters, such as seismic two-way travel time, density, resistivity,
production rate, etc., of the
subterranean formation and/or its geological formations may be used. Various
sensors (S) may be
located at various positions along the wellbore and/or the monitoring tools to
collect and/or
monitor the desired data. Other sources of data may also be provided from
offsite locations.
[0039] The field configurations of Figures 1A-1D are intended to provide a
brief description of
an example of a field usable with oilfield application frameworks. Part of, or
the entirety, of oilfield
100 may be on land, water and/or sea. Also, while a single field measured at a
single location is
depicted, oilfield applications may be utilized with any combination of one or
more oilfields, one
or more processing facilities and one or more wellsites.
[0040] Figure 2 illustrates a schematic view, partially in cross section of
oilfield 200 having data
acquisition tools 202.1, 202.2, 202.3 and 202.4 positioned at various
locations along oilfield 200
for collecting data of subterranean formation 204 in accordance with
implementations of various
technologies and techniques described herein. Data acquisition tools 202.1-
202.4 may be the same
as data acquisition tools 106.1-106.4 of Figures 1A-1D, respectively, or
others not depicted. As
shown, data acquisition tools 202.1-202.4 generate data plots or measurements
208.1-208.4,
8
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
respectively. These data plots are depicted along oilfield 200 to demonstrate
the data generated by
the various operations.
[0041] Data plots 208.1-208.3 are examples of static data plots that may be
generated by data
acquisition tools 202.1-202.3, respectively; however, it should be understood
that data plots 208.1-
208.3 may also be data plots that are updated in real time. These measurements
may be analyzed
to better define the properties of the formation(s) and/or determine the
accuracy of the
measurements and/or for checking for errors. The plots of each of the
respective measurements
may be aligned and scaled for comparison and verification of the properties.
[0042] Static data plot 208.1 is a seismic two-way response over a period of
time. Static plot
208.2 is core sample data measured from a core sample of the formation 204.
The core sample
may be used to provide data, such as a graph of the density, porosity,
permeability, or some other
physical property of the core sample over the length of the core. Tests for
density and viscosity
may be performed on the fluids in the core at varying pressures and
temperatures. Static data plot
208.3 is a logging trace that typically provides a resistivity or other
measurement of the formation
at various depths.
[0043] A production decline curve or graph 208.4 is a dynamic data plot of the
fluid flow rate
over time. The production decline curve typically provides the production rate
as a function of
time. As the fluid flows through the wellbore, measurements are taken of fluid
properties, such as
flow rates, pressures, composition, etc.
[0044] Other data may also be collected, such as historical data, user inputs,
economic
information, and/or other measurement data and other parameters of interest.
As described below,
the static and dynamic measurements may be analyzed and used to generate
models of the
subterranean formation to determine characteristics thereof. Similar
measurements may also be
used to measure changes in formation aspects over time.
[0045] The subterranean structure 204 has a plurality of geological formations
206.1-206.4. As
shown, this structure has several formations or layers, including a shale
layer 206.1, a carbonate
layer 206.2, a shale layer 206.3 and a sand layer 206.4. A fault 207 extends
through the shale layer
206.1 and the carbonate layer 206.2. The static data acquisition tools are
adapted to take
measurements and detect characteristics of the formations.
[0046] While a specific subterranean formation with specific geological
structures is depicted,
it will be appreciated that oilfield 200 may contain a variety of geological
structures and/or
9
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
formations, sometimes having extreme complexity. In some locations, typically
below the water
line, fluid may occupy pore spaces of the formations. Each of the measurement
devices may be
used to measure properties of the formations and/or its geological features.
While each acquisition
tool is shown as being in specific locations in oilfield 200, it will be
appreciated that one or more
types of measurement may be taken at one or more locations across one or more
fields or other
locations for comparison and/or analysis.
[0047] The data collected from various sources, such as the data acquisition
tools of Figure 2,
may then be processed and/or evaluated. Typically, seismic data displayed in
static data plot 208.1
from data acquisition tool 202.1 is used by a geophysicist to determine
characteristics of the
subterranean formations and features. The core data shown in static plot 208.2
and/or log data from
well log 208.3 are typically used by a geologist to determine various
characteristics of the
subterranean formation. The production data from graph 208.4 is typically used
by the reservoir
engineer to determine fluid flow reservoir characteristics. The data analyzed
by the geologist,
geophysicist and the reservoir engineer may be analyzed using modelling
techniques.
[0048] Figure 3A illustrates an oilfield 300 for performing production
operations in accordance
with implementations of various technologies and techniques described herein.
As shown, the
oilfield has a plurality of wellsites 302 operatively connected to central
processing facility 354.
The oilfield configuration of Figure 3A is not intended to limit the scope of
the oilfield application
system. Part, or all, of the oilfield may be on land and/or sea. Also, while a
single oilfield with a
single processing facility and a plurality of wellsites is depicted, any
combination of one or more
oilfields, one or more processing facilities and one or more wellsites may be
present.
[0049] Each wellsite 302 has equipment that forms wellbore 336 into the earth.
The wellbores
extend through subterranean formations 306 including reservoirs 304. These
reservoirs 304
contain fluids, such as hydrocarbons. The wellsites draw fluid from the
reservoirs and pass them
to the processing facilities via surface networks 344. The surface networks
344 have tubing and
control mechanisms for controlling the flow of fluids from the wellsite to
processing facility 354.
[0050] Attention is now directed to Figure 3B, which illustrates a side view
of a marine-based
survey 360 of a subterranean subsurface 362 in accordance with one or more
implementations of
various techniques described herein. Subsurface 362 includes seafloor surface
364. Seismic
sources 366 may include marine sources such as vibroseis or airguns, which may
propagate seismic
waves 368 (e.g., energy signals) into the Earth over an extended period of
time or at a nearly
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
instantaneous energy provided by impulsive sources. The seismic waves may be
propagated by
marine sources as a frequency sweep signal. For example, marine sources of the
vibroseis type
may initially emit a seismic wave at a low frequency (e.g., 5 Hz) and increase
the seismic wave to
a high frequency (e.g., 80-90Hz) over time.
[0051] The component(s) of the seismic waves 368 may be reflected and
converted by seafloor
surface 364 (i.e., reflector), and seismic wave reflections 370 may be
received by a plurality of
seismic receivers 372. Seismic receivers 372 may be disposed on a plurality of
streamers (i.e.,
streamer array 374). The seismic receivers 372 may generate electrical signals
representative of
the received seismic wave reflections 370. The electrical signals may be
embedded with
information regarding the subsurface 362 and captured as a record of seismic
data.
[0052] In one implementation, each streamer may include streamer steering
devices such as a
bird, a deflector, a tail buoy and the like, which are not illustrated in this
application. The streamer
steering devices may be used to control the position of the streamers in
accordance with the
techniques described herein.
[0053] In one implementation, seismic wave reflections 370 may travel upward
and reach the
water/air interface at the water surface 376, a portion of reflections 370 may
then reflect downward
again (i.e., sea-surface ghost waves 378) and be received by the plurality of
seismic receivers 372.
The sea-surface ghost waves 378 may be referred to as surface multiples. The
point on the water
surface 376 at which the wave is reflected downward is generally referred to
as the downward
reflection point.
[0054] The electrical signals may be transmitted to a vessel 380 via
transmission cables, wireless
communication or the like. The vessel 380 may then transmit the electrical
signals to a data
processing center. Alternatively, the vessel 380 may include an onboard
computer capable of
processing the electrical signals (i.e., seismic data). Those skilled in the
art having the benefit of
this disclosure will appreciate that this illustration is highly idealized.
For instance, surveys may
be of formations deep beneath the surface. The formations may typically
include multiple
reflectors, some of which may include dipping events, and may generate
multiple reflections
(including wave conversion) for receipt by the seismic receivers 372. In one
implementation, the
seismic data may be processed to generate a seismic image of the subsurface
362.
[0055] Marine seismic acquisition systems tow each streamer in streamer array
374 at the same
depth (e.g., 5-10m). However, marine based survey 360 may tow each streamer in
streamer array
11
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
374 at different depths such that seismic data may be acquired and processed
in a manner that
avoids the effects of destructive interference due to sea-surface ghost waves.
For instance, marine-
based survey 360 of Figure 3B illustrates eight streamers towed by vessel 380
at eight different
depths. The depth of each streamer may be controlled and maintained using the
birds disposed on
each streamer.
Multiple Reflections ("Multiples") Identification
[0056] In ocean bottom seismic data, the free surface multiple may be the
strongest multiple in
the data. For primary signal ("primaries") imaging, properly and efficiently
removing such free
surface multiples may be desired to avoid inaccurate imaging. Demultiple
techniques generally
involve a complex workflow that includes time-consuming parameter testing
techniques.
[0057] Upgoing and downgoing wavefield deconvolution is a method for removing
free surface
multiples, as well as source ghost and signature effects on marine data. In
general, the method may
not call for assumptions as to the complexity of the subsurface, but may
employ spatially well
sampled upgoing and downgoing wavefields across sources and receivers.
However, if the medium
can be approximated as one-dimensional (1D), e.g., physical properties of the
medium are a
function of depth or are horizontally layered, the method greatly simplifies
and can be conducted
by a trace-by-trace deconvolution of the upgoing and downgoing wavefields in
the plane-wave
domain. For ocean-bottom node (OBN) seismic data, the plane-wave decomposition
may then be
built from the better sampled 3D common receiver gathers. This approach, known
as up/down
deconvolution (UDD), may be used for processing multi-component OBN data where
the
combination of recorded pressure and vertical velocity components yields the
upgoing and
downgoing wavefields.
[0058] Several formulations of UDD have been proposed. UDD can be formulated
for directly
predicting the data without free surface multiples, or for predicting upgoing
free surface multiples
or downgoing free surface multiples. In the latter approach, multiples that
are identified may then
be adaptively subtracted from upgoing or downgoing wavefields. Such an
approach may offer
some robustness against the 1D local medium approximation and against the
noise.
[0059] Embodiments of the present disclosure may extend the prediction of
upgoing and
downgoing free surface multiples using data-based or data-driven operators as
opposed to model-
based operators. The embodiments disclosed herein may thus provide an improved
prediction of
the multiple wavefields, as the predictions may be less sensitive to the 1D
medium assumption.
12
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372
PCT/US2021/033690
More specifically, the prediction may become less sensitive to moderate
deviations from a 1D
propagation in the water layer. The downgoing arrival pressure wavefield may
be employed for
this technique, as will be described in greater detail below.
Upgoing/Downgoing Deconvolution
[0060] UDD includes considering vertical propagation in a single water layer
with a surface
reflection coefficient Rs, e.g., a scalar such as -1. UDD also includes a
bottom reflection coefficient
R. Further, the round-trip in the water delay operator is Z. A schematic
representation of the
physical upgoing and downgoing wavefields (specifically, one ray thereof) and
the reflection
coefficients is shown in Figures 4A and 4B.
[0061] The downgoing (DN) and upgoing (UP) rays that build the total pressure
wavefields
recorded at the seabed are:
DA
DN = DA + DA(RR,Z) + DA(RR,Z)2 + = ___________________________________ (1)
1¨ RR,Z
DA x R (2)
UP = DAR + DAR(RR,Z) + DAR(RR,Z)2 + = ____________
1¨ RR,Z
[0062] Here DA represents the downgoing pressure direct arrival event with its
source to
receiver propagation time, source ghost and source signature (possibly
including bubble) effects.
Further, equations 1 and 2 are in the z-transform (or Laplace) domain, and
products represent time
domain convolutions.
[0063] In addition, the downgoing direct arrival, upgoing and downgoing
wavefields satisfy:
DN = DA + RsZ x UP (3)
[0064] Applying a round trip in the water delay to the upgoing wavefield,
accounting for the sea
surface reflection produces a downgoing wavefield. The downgoing direct
arrival may be included
separately.
[0065] This propagation model is a proxy for the UDD method under the 1D
medium assumption
as applied to field data. In that case, the terms in equations 1, 2 and 3 are
expressed in the plane-
wave domain and depend on the frequency and slowness (or wavenumber) 2D
coordinates. R
represents the medium reflectivity response (a series) for a given plane wave
referenced to the
recording level, and Z becomes a dip (slowness/wavenumber) dependent
extrapolation delay
operator.
[0066] Assuming both series (1 and 2) can be factorized, the spectral division
of UP and DN
fields cancels the reverberation operator (hence the multiples) and yields the
reflectivity R:
13
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372
PCT/US2021/033690
UP
R= ¨ (4)
DN
[0067] This is the UDD method, and the R (scalar or reflection series)
represents the medium
response without free surface multiples, without source signature and ghost
effects, and with
source redatumed at the seabed. The original acquisition source datum may be
restored by
redatuming.
[0068] Several variations of the UDD method have been proposed. Instead of
directly estimating
the primaries (as in equation 4), the upgoing free surface multiples MULT UP
(with >1 bounces
off the free surface, as shown in Figures 4A and 4B) can be computed from the
estimated
reflectivity R:
MULT_UP = DAR(RR,Z) + DAR(RR,Z)2 + === = RR,Z x UP (5)
[0069] The multiples are predicted by a convolution of the estimated
reflectivity R (standard
UDD) with a propagation model in the water column (Rs and Z) and with the
upgoing wavefield.
This approach explicitly uses a 1D medium propagation operators in the water
layer (namely Rs
and Z). Multiples may then be adaptively subtracted from the upgoing
wavefield.
[0070] Similar developments relate to the downgoing wavefield. The downgoing
data may be
processed for improved illumination of shallow targets and model building
purposes. In this case,
the target event is the first downgoing water bounce event: (RR,Z) shown in
Figures 4A and 4B.
Other events in the downgoing wavefield may be considered as noise. Using
equation 1, the desired
event can be obtained from the downgoing wavefield:
DN ¨ DA
RR,Z = ____________________________ DN (6)
[0071] This is referred to as the downgoing demultiple method ("DGD"). The
deconvolution
predicts the first-order multiple bounce without source signature and without
ghost effects. This
approach calls for knowledge of the downgoing pressure direct arrival DA. For
deep water data,
careful muting the downgoing arrival may suffice. For shallow water,
additional information is
called for via, e.g., processing of pressure and vertical velocity component
(e.g., cross-ghosting),
or the acquisition and processing of near field hydrophone (NFH) recordings
with calibrated
marine source (CMS) technology, or the modelling of the directional response
of the seismic
source array.
14
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372
PCT/US2021/033690
[0072] As for the processing of the upgoing, in some cases the downgoing free
surface multiples
(with >2 bounces off the free surface, as shown in Figure 1) may be computed.
These may be
derived from equations 3 and 5:
MULT_DN = DA(RR,Z)2 + === = RsZ x MULT_UP (7)
[0073] Again, this approach uses a model of the propagation in the water (used
twice here).
Data-Driven Multiples Identification
[0074] DGD provides the primary event when processing the downgoing wavefield.
Equation 6
has two interpretations as the primary event could be obtained from a model-
based approach (left
side) or a data-driven approach (right side). The model-based approach
explicitly uses a 1D
propagation model in the water layer (e.g., Rs and 1D medium round trip in
water layer
extrapolation Z operators) for convolution with the UDD estimated seabed
reflectivity R to
compute: RR,Z. This approach explicitly uses the 1D water layer assumption and
may thus be
more sensitive to deviations from it. The second approach estimates the same
event but, in this
case, the information comes from the data itself: (DN ¨ DA)/DN. The data-
driven approach
provides further robustness to the prediction of the first multiple bounce and
may extend the
window of application of the method under the 1D medium assumption of the
water layer. The
cost of this data-driven approach is the knowledge the down-going direct
arrival wavefield.
[0075] Regarding the robust prediction of multiples (order >1), it can be
shown (using equations
and 6) that the prediction of up-going free surface multiples can be made data-
driven:
DN¨DA
MULT_UP = RR,Z x UP = _____________________ DN UP (8)
[0076] That is, the direct arrivals can be separated from the downgoing
wavefield to generate a
first "intermediate" wavefield. Then the downgoing wavefield can be
deconvolved from the first
intermediate product to generate a second intermediate wavefield. The second
intermediate
wavefield can then be convolved with the upgoing wavefield, yielding the data-
driven
identification of the upgoing multiples.
[0077] The propagation model in the water layer is not explicitly used;
rather, the multiples are
identified from the data itself: DN-DA, DN and UP fields. This second approach
of prediction of
upgoing multiples may be more robust to non-1D-medium effects of the water
layer, but calls for
a priori knowledge of the downgoing direct arrival DA.
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372
PCT/US2021/033690
[0078] Similarly, the downgoing free surface multiple field (order >2) can be
written as (using
equations 3, 6 and 8):
DN¨DA
MULT_DN = RsZ x MULT_UP = ________________ DN (DN ¨ DA) (9)
[0079] The data-driven expression of the downgoing multiples may capture at
least some of the
wavefield complexity compared to 1D medium model-based approach, which may be
desired
because the sensitivity of non 1D medium effects may increase with the order
of predicted
multiple.
[0080] Improved prediction of the multiples (equations 8 and 9) may enhance
adaptive
subtraction, because the adaptive subtraction process is delicate as it
attempts to remove the
multiples without modifying the primary events. Improving the timing, phase,
and amplitude
information of the upgoing or downgoing multiples will limit the adaptivity of
the process and
hence the risk of removal/attenuation of target events.
[0081] When using a two-part approach (e.g., multiple prediction and
subtraction), the
deconvolution process may not provide source designature and deghosting (as
per UDD (equation
4) or DGD (equation 6)). However, this can be obtained by a deconvolution with
the downgoing
direct arrival (DA) in the plane-wave domain. Such a deconvolution provides
designature and
deghosting functionalities, similar to UDD and DGD. This deconvolution can be
applied to the
complete upgoing and upgoing multiple wavefields, or to the complete downgoing
and downgoing
multiple wavefields before multiple subtraction. Alternatively, it could be
applied after multiple
subtraction.
[0082] As noted above, the data-driven estimation of multiples calls for a
priori knowledge of
the downgoing direct arrival signal. For deep water data, careful muting the
down-going arrival
may suffice. In other cases, additional information is collected, e.g., by
processing of pressure and
vertical velocity component (cross-ghosting), or the acquisition and
processing of near field
hydrophone (NFH) recordings with calibrated marine source (CMS) technology, or
the modelling
of the directional response of the seismic source array.
[0083] Furthermore, the method disclosed herein may also be used to determine
whether a 1D
medium assumption is appropriate, e.g., to validate the use of the UDD/DGD
techniques above.
For example, the comparison between the upgoing and downgoing wavefields and
the modelling
16
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
of the upgoing and downgoing free surface multiples may be useful in assessing
the complexity of
the data and deciding if the data can be processed with a 1D medium
assumption.
[0084] Equation 8 yields the upgoing multiple with order >1. The upgoing
multiples may also
be separated according to their order (or number of bounces off the free
surface). For example,
using equations 2 and 6, yields:
MULT (UP) (DN-DA)
_UP(order = 1) = DAR(RRsZ) = DA A1) DN ) (10)
MULT_UP(order = 2) = DAR(RRsZ)2 = DA (")(DN-DA)2
(11)
DN DN )
[0085] This progression may continue for sequentially higher-order multiples,
e.g., the exponent
of the (RRsZ) term increments to match the order. In other words, to estimate
the first-order
multiples (separately from the second-order multiples), the direct arrivals
may be subtracted from
the downgoing wavefield to generate a first intermediate wavefield. The
downgoing wavefield
may be deconvolved from the first intermediate wavefield to generate a second
intermediate
wavefield. Further, the downgoing wavefield can be deconvolved from the
upgoing wavefield to
generate a third intermediate wavefield. The direct arrivals can be convolved
with the second and
third intermediate wavefields to generate the data-driven estimation of the
first-order multiples.
Further, the estimation of the first-order multiples can be changed to an
estimation of second-order
multiples by convolving the second intermediate wavefield (as can be seen by
the difference
between equations 10 and 11). Higher-order multiples estimation can be
accomplished by
successively convolving the second intermediate wavefield.
[0086] Further, in some embodiments, the upgoing multiples may be separated by
order, without
source ghost and source signature effects (e.g., by deconvolving the direct
arrivals) and referenced
with both source and receiver at the seabed:
MULT_UP(order = 1) = R(RRsZ) = (UP) (DN-DA) (12)
DN )
MULT_UP(order = 2) = R(RRsZ)2 = (tP)(DN-DA)2
(13)
DN DN )
[0087] The deconvolutions (righthand side of the equations 10-13) employs data-
driven
operators which are obtained from the decomposed upgoing, downgoing, and
downgoing direct
arrival wavefields. The first (and/or the second) order upgoing multiple may
have a denser angle
sampling, similar to imaging of downgoing multiples.
17
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
[0088] Figure 5 illustrates a flowchart of a method 500 for generating images
from seismic
signals that represent a subsurface volume, according to an embodiment. The
method 500 may
include receiving seismic data, as at 502. The seismic data may include
signals recorded using
geophones, hydrophones, or any other suitable seismic receivers. In at least
some embodiments,
the seismic receivers may be positioned at or near a seafloor (ocean bottom,
etc.). The seismic
receivers may thus be below the surface of the water (ocean, sea, any other
body of water). The
seismic data may thus include multiples created by signals reflecting from the
surface ("free
surface").
[0089] The seismic data may include an upgoing wavefield and a downgoing
wavefield, and the
method 500 may include separating (identifying, decomposing, etc.) the upgoing
wavefield from
the downgoing wavefield, as at 504. In some embodiments, multicomponent
measurements may
be used to achieve such separation. For example, a hydrophone (P) and vertical
geophone/accelerometer (Vz or Az) may be used for the up-down separation; in
such case, the
projection from the vertical to the actual wavefield direction can be handled
in the plane-wave
domain or in the time space domain.
[0090] Further, direct arrivals in the seismic data, i.e., those signals that
proceed directly from
the seismic source to the receiver without reflecting, may also be estimated
in the seismic data, as
at 506. For deep-water data, muting of the downgoing arrivals may be employed.
For shallow
water, additional information may be collected by, e.g., processing of
pressure and vertical velocity
component (e.g., cross-ghosting), or the acquisition and processing of near
field hydrophone
(NFH) recordings with calibrated marine source (CMS) technology, or the
modelling of the
directional response of the seismic source array.
[0091] The method 500 may then proceed in either or both of two conceptual
"directions" or
legs, as shown in Figure 5. In the first direction, at block 508, the method
500 may proceed to
estimating the first-order multiples using a data-driven approach, as
discussed above with respect
to, e.g., equation 10. In particular, the first-order multiples may be
estimated based on the upgoing
wavefield, the downgoing wavefield, and the direct arrivals. Moreover, because
the approach
employed is data-driven (e.g., right-side of equation 8), the estimation of
the multiples may not
rely upon a water-propagation model (e.g., no water-propagation model is used
for the estimation
of first-order and/or other multiples in the upgoing wavefield). Similarly,
the method 500, at block
509, may include estimating the second-order multiples, e.g., as discussed
above with respect to
18
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
equation 11. Again, this may be based on the data derived from the seismic
signals for the upgoing
wavefield, downgoing wavefield, and direct arrivals, and without using or
otherwise relying upon
a water-propagation model. As discussed above, higher-order multiples may also
be calculated
based on the progression demonstrated by equations 10 and 11 above.
[0092] In some embodiments, source signature and ghosting effects may be
removed, as at 510.
For example, the direct arrivals, estimated as discussed above, may be
deconvolved from the
upgoing wavefield, upgoing multiples, downgoing wavefield, and/or downgoing
wavefield, e.g.,
as discussed above with reference to equations 12 and 13.
[0093] The first and/or second-order multiples in the upgoing wavefield, which
are separately
identified, e.g., at 508 and 509, whether or not source signature and ghosting
effects are removed
at 510, may then be imaged, as at 511. As discussed above, the imaging of
multiples may provide
additional detail, e.g., as to the intrabed (between reflectors) structure, of
the subsurface volume.
This may enhance the image over those that rely solely on the primary
reflections.
[0094] In the second direction, returning to the split that is shown in Figure
5 that occurs after
box 506, the method 500 may include estimating the first and higher-order
multiples (e.g., as a
group, rather than individually). This may proceed using equation 8 as
discussed above. Further,
source signature and ghosting effects may be removed, in at least some
embodiments, as at 513.
For example, this may be accomplished by deconvolving the direct arrivals, as
discussed above.
The identified multiples may then be subtracted (e.g., adaptively subtracted)
from the upgoing
wavefield, as at 514. In some embodiments, the source signature and ghosting
effects removal at
513 may occur after the subtraction at 514.
[0095] In some embodiments, the removal of the multiples (in either or both
directions of Figure
5) may be compared to the multiples identified by a water propagation model.
If the differences in
the multiples (or, similarly, the estimated primaries signal after subtracting
the multiples) is below
a certain threshold, the water-propagation model may be considered
sufficiently accurate to be
employed for imaging. If not, the water-propagation model may be modified or
not used.
[0096] In some embodiments, the upgoing wavefields, downgoing wavefields, and
any
identified multiple signals can be employed to generate velocity models of the
subsurface volume
that the seismic data represents. As noted above, the multiple reflection
signals can provide
enhanced data related to intrabed structure and/or otherwise enhance the
identification of the
signals in the seismic data. Further, the accurate identification of the
multiple reflection signals
19
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
can permit more accurate identification of the upgoing and downgoing
wavefields, e.g., the
primary signals thereof. Thus, the velocity model can be enhanced in either or
both manners. From
the velocity model, seismic images (among other things) can be generated that
visually represent
the subsurface volume and permit users to make determinations related to
operations in the
subsurface (e.g., exploration, well planning, drilling equipment adjustments,
etc.).
[0097] Figure 6 illustrates a flowchart of a method 600 for generating images
from seismic
signals that represent a subsurface volume, according to an embodiment. The
method 600 may be
similar to an embodiment of the method 500, and thus should be considered
along therewith. The
method 600 may include receiving recorded seismic data, as at 602. The seismic
data received at
602 may include an upgoing wavefield (UP), a downgoing wavefield (DN), and
direct arrivals
(DA). The signals representative of these components may be identified in the
data (e.g.,
"separated"), as indicated at 604, 606, and 608, respectively. The direct
arrivals may be
deconvolved from the upgoing wavefield, as shown, to remove source signature
and ghosting
effects. In other embodiments, this block 610 may be skipped.
[0098] The method 600 may further include separately estimating first-order
multiples at 612
and second-order multiples at 614 in the upgoing wavefield. Such estimation
may be data-driven,
using the wavefield operators representing the upgoing wavefield, the
downgoing wavefield, and
the direct arrivals, as discussed above, and using the relationships and
equations shown and
discussed above. Additionally or alternatively, the method 600 may include
estimating first-order
and higher-order multiples together, as at 618.
[0099] The method 600 may further include imaging the first and/or second-
order multiples, as
at 616. Additionally or alternatively, the method 600 may include subtracting
the multiples (e.g.,
the first-order and higher-order multiples) as at 620. In some embodiments,
the separately
identified first and/or second-order multiples may be subtracted separately.
In some embodiments,
the remaining seismic data, after (e.g., adaptive) subtraction, may be imaged
and used to create a
visual representation of the subsurface volume represented by the seismic
data. Further, in at least
some embodiments, the results of the multiples estimation and/or the results
after subtracting the
multiples may be compared to the results of UDD and/or DGD methods, in order
to determine
whether a one-dimensional water-propagation assumption is appropriate, or
whether it generates
a difference that is beyond a threshold, and thus is considered to yield
results that are too
inaccurate.
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
Synthetic Data Example
[0100] An embodiment of the present disclosure may be understood in view of
the following
non-limiting example related to deghosting and designature operations. More
particularly, the
model-based and data-based approaches for predicting upgoing and downgoing
multiples are
illustrated with a simple synthetic data example. Figure 7A illustrates
example parameters for a
model used to generate the synthetic data. Figure 7B illustrates a wavelet
used to generate the
synthetic data. Figure 7C illustrate the wavelet after designature.
[0101] The data may be modelled assuming vertical propagation in a shallow
water model with
two primary reflections (Figure 7A). The source is at 5m depth and the
receiver is on the seabed
at 50m depth. The data is modeled with a realistic source signature (Figure
7B). Figure 8 illustrates
a plot of model data, showing down-going direct arrival (for example estimated
from pressure and
vertical velocity cross-ghosting), pressure and vertical velocity components,
upgoing wavefield
with both model-based and data-based estimated free surface multiples. The
same wavefields are
shown for the downgoing wavefield. Arrows point to the target events when
processing upgoing
or downgoing wavefield. All traces have a same display amplitude.
[0102] Water column multiples and source and receiver side peg-leg multiple
signals are related
to the deeper primary and are separated in time. Source bubble and ghost
effects are also included.
The upgoing and downgoing wavefields are computed from a combination of the
pressure and
vertical velocity components. The arrows indicate the target events (or
primaries) when processing
the up- or down-going wavefields.
[0103] The upgoing and downgoing multiples have been estimated twice, once
with a model-
based approach (equations 6 and 7) and once with a data-based approach
(equations 8 and 9). Both
approaches are equivalent for this simple model but are expected to differ on
field data where the
data-based approach may provide a more accurate estimation of the multiples.
[0104] Figure 9 is the same as Figure 8, but after designature by convolving
the downgoing
direct arrival wavefield (Figure 9 leftmost trace) and re-signature with the
wavelet shown in Figure
8C. Source ghost and bubble effects have been removed in the wavefields.
Computing Environment
[0105] In one or more embodiments, the functions described can be implemented
in hardware,
software, firmware, or any combination thereof. For a software implementation,
the techniques
described herein can be implemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions,
subprograms,
21
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
programs, routines, subroutines, modules, software packages, classes, and so
on) that perform the
functions described herein. A module can be coupled to another module or a
hardware circuit by
passing and/or receiving information, data, arguments, parameters, or memory
contents.
Information, arguments, parameters, data, or the like can be passed,
forwarded, or transmitted
using any suitable means including memory sharing, message passing, token
passing, network
transmission, and the like. The software codes can be stored in memory units
and executed by
processors. The memory unit can be implemented within the processor or
external to the processor,
in which case it can be communicatively coupled to the processor via various
means as is known
in the art.
[0106] In some embodiments, any of the methods of the present disclosure may
be executed by
a computing system. Figure 10 illustrates an example of such a computing
system 1000, in
accordance with some embodiments. The computing system 1000 may include a
computer or
computer system 1001A, which may be an individual computer system 1001A or an
arrangement
of distributed computer systems. The computer system 1001A includes one or
more analysis
module(s) 1002 configured to perform various tasks according to some
embodiments, such as one
or more methods disclosed herein. To perform these various tasks, the analysis
module 1002
executes independently, or in coordination with, one or more processors 1004,
which is (or are)
connected to one or more storage media 1006. The processor(s) 1004 is (or are)
also connected to
a network interface 1007 to allow the computer system 1001A to communicate
over a data network
1009 with one or more additional computer systems and/or computing systems,
such as 1001B,
1001C, and/or 1001D (note that computer systems 1001B, 1001C and/or 1001D may
or may not
share the same architecture as computer system 1001A, and may be located in
different physical
locations, e.g., computer systems 1001A and 1001B may be located in a
processing facility, while
in communication with one or more computer systems such as 1001C and/or 1001D
that are
located in one or more data centers, and/or located in varying countries on
different continents).
[0107] A processor can include a microprocessor, microcontroller, processor
module or
subsystem, programmable integrated circuit, programmable gate array, or
another control or
computing device.
[0108] The storage media 1006 can be implemented as one or more computer-
readable or
machine-readable storage media. Note that while in the example embodiment of
Figure 10 storage
media 1006 is depicted as within computer system 1001A, in some embodiments,
storage media
22
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
1006 may be distributed within and/or across multiple internal and/or external
enclosures of
computing system 1001A and/or additional computing systems. Storage media 1006
may include
one or more different forms of memory including semiconductor memory devices
such as dynamic
or static random access memories (DRAMs or SRAMs), erasable and programmable
read-only
memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable and programmable read-only memories
(EEPROMs)
and flash memories, magnetic disks such as fixed, floppy and removable disks,
other magnetic
media including tape, optical media such as compact disks (CDs) or digital
video disks (DVDs),
BLURAY disks, or other types of optical storage, or other types of storage
devices. Note that the
instructions discussed above can be provided on one computer-readable or
machine-readable
storage medium, or alternatively, can be provided on multiple computer-
readable or machine-
readable storage media distributed in a large system having possibly plural
nodes. Such computer-
readable or machine-readable storage medium or media is (are) considered to be
part of an article
(or article of manufacture). An article or article of manufacture can refer to
any manufactured
single component or multiple components. The storage medium or media can be
located either in
the machine running the machine-readable instructions, or located at a remote
site from which
machine-readable instructions can be downloaded over a network for execution.
[0109] In some embodiments, computing system 1000 contains one or more
multiples
estimation module(s) 1008. In the example of computing system 1000, computer
system 1001A
includes the multiples estimation module 1008. In some embodiments, a single
multiples
estimation module may be used to perform some or all aspects of one or more
embodiments of the
methods. In alternate embodiments, a plurality of multiples estimation modules
may be used to
perform some or all aspects of methods.
[0110] It should be appreciated that computing system 1000 is only one example
of a computing
system, and that computing system 1000 may have more or fewer components than
shown, may
combine additional components not depicted in the example embodiment of Figure
10, and/or
computing system 1000 may have a different configuration or arrangement of the
components
depicted in Figure 10. The various components shown in Figure 10 may be
implemented in
hardware, software, or a combination of both hardware and software, including
one or more signal
processing and/or application specific integrated circuits.
[0111] Further, the steps in the processing methods described herein may be
implemented by
running one or more functional modules in information processing apparatus
such as general
23
CA 03221058 2023-11-21
WO 2022/245372 PCT/US2021/033690
purpose processors or application specific chips, such as ASICs, FPGAs, PLDs,
or other
appropriate devices. These modules, combinations of these modules, and/or
their combination with
general hardware are all included within the scope of protection of the
invention.
[0112] Interpretations, models and/or other interpretation aids may be refined
in an iterative
fashion; this concept is applicable to embodiments of the present methods
discussed herein. This
can include use of feedback loops executed on an algorithmic basis, such as at
a computing device
(e.g., computing system 1000, Figure 10), and/or through manual control by a
user who may make
determinations regarding whether a given step, action, template, model, or set
of curves has
become sufficiently accurate for the evaluation of the subsurface three-
dimensional geologic
formation under consideration.
[0113] Further, it will be appreciated that the steps of the methods disclosed
herein may be
performed in the order in which they are described, or performed in a
different order, without
departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Further, the steps may be
combined, separated,
or performed in parallel or simultaneously, consistent with the present
disclosure.
[0114] The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been
described with reference
to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not
intended to be
exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many
modifications and
variations are possible in view of the above teachings. Moreover, the order in
which the elements
of the methods are illustrated and described may be re-arranged, and/or two or
more elements may
occur simultaneously. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to
best explain the
principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable
others skilled in the art
to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various
modifications as are suited to
the particular use contemplated.
24
