Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2131109 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2131109
(54) Titre français: LANCE A MOUSSE
(54) Titre anglais: FOAM NOZZLE
Statut: Durée expirée - au-delà du délai suivant l'octroi
Données bibliographiques
Abrégés

Abrégé français

Lance à mousse à air comprimé (MAC) comprenant un baril stationnaire et un ensemble distributeur avec typiquement trois sorties qui sont coudées et les unes contre les autres. L'ensemble distributeur est raccordé avec faculté de rotation au baril et tourne lorsqu'un courant de fluide passe à travers la lance. La lance active la fourniture d'un courant de MAC selon un angle de fourniture relativement large sans affaisser significativement la structure en bulles de la mousse.


Abrégé anglais

A compressed-air foam (CAF) nozzle has a stationary barrel and a distributor assembly with typically three outlets which are angled and skewed against each other. The distributor assembly is rotatably connected to the barrel and rotates when a stream of fluid is passed through the nozzle. The nozzle enables the delivery of a CAF stream at a relatively wide delivery angle without significantly collapsing the bubble structure of the foam.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


What Is Claimed Is:
1. ~A foam generating nozzle, the nozzle comprising:
a barrel section having a longitudinal axis
defining a passageway therein,
a distributor assembly connected rotatably to the
barrel section for rotation about the longitudinal
axis of the barrel section,
the assembly having a number of outlets, each of
these outlets having a longitudinal axis and defining
a passageway in register with the passageway of the
barrel section,
wherein the longitudinal axis of at least one of
the outlets is disposed at an angle to the
longitudinal axis of the barrel section and skewed
relative to the other outlets so as to cause, upon a
forced flow of a fluid through the barrel section and
the outlets, a rotational movement of the distributor
assembly relative to the barrel section.
2.~A foam generating nozzle, the nozzle comprising:
a barrel section having a longitudinal axis
defining a passageway therein,
a distributor assembly connected rotatably to the
barrel section for rotation about the longitudinal
axis of the barrel section,
the assembly having a cylindrical section
defining a second passageway coaxial with the
passageway of the barrel section,
the assembly having a number of outlets, each
having a longitudinal axis, and defining passageways
in register with the second passageway,
wherein the longitudinal axis of at least one of
the outlets is disposed at an angle to the
longitudinal axis of the cylindrical section and
skewed relative to tale other outlets so as to cause,
upon a forced flow of a fluid through the cylindrical

section and the outlets, a rotational movement of the
distributor assembly relative to the barrel section.
3. The nozzle as defined in claim 1 or 2 wherein
said outlets are tubular.
4. The nozzle as defined in claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein
the combined cross-sectional area of the outlets is
approximately equal to the cross-sectional area of the
passageway of the barrel.
5. The nozzle as defined in claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein
the combined cross-sectional area of the outlets is
not less than the cross-sectional area of the
passageway of the barrel and not larger than twice the
cross-sectional area of the delivery tube.
6. The nozzle as defined in claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein
the outlets are angles at 45° relative to the
longitudinal axis of the cylindrical section.
7. The nozzle as defined in claim 6 wherein the
outlets are skewed by an angle of 120° against each
other.
8. The nozzle as defined in claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein
the outlets is truncated to distribute stream of foam
close to the longitudinal axis of the cylindrical
section.
9. The nozzle as defined in claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein
the distributor assembly is coupled to the barrel by
means of an adjustable loose-fit bearing.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


CA 02131109 2001-11-07
FOAM NOZZLE
This invention relates to foam nozzles, and more
particularly, to a nozzle for producing a stream of
compressed-air(or r:ompressed-gas) foam capable of
controlling or extinguishing a fire in the path of the foam
stream.
Foam solution consists of water mixed with a foam
concentrate. The volume of solution is expanded by the
addition of air and mechanical energy to form a bubble
structure resembling shaving cream. The foam suffocates and
cools the fire and protects adjacent structures from radiant
exposure.
Foam can be generated using an aspirating nozzle
which entrains air into the solution and agitates the
mixture producing bubbles of non-uniform size. With an
aspirating system, the foam is formed at the nozzle using
the energy of the solution stream.
Foam can also be generated by injecting the air under
pressure into the solution stream. The solution and air
mixture is scrubbed by the hose (or pipe) to form foam or
uniform bubble size. The energy used in this system comes
from the solution stream and the air injection stream. This
system creates "ComprE~ssed-Air Foam" which delivers the foam
with a greater force than the "Aspirated" systems.
There are two major problems associated with using
compressed-air foam ((:AF) in a fixed piping fire suppression
system:
- The distribution of CAF to allow a broad
area of coverage without collapsing the
1

bubble structure thus reducing the
expansion ratio.
Broadening the area of distribution
without losing much of the beneficial
forward momentum associated with CAF.
This momentum is necessary to penetrate
the strong fire plume dynamics and
blanket the fuel source.
Presently, CAF is delivered as a manually-operated hose
stream. It has been demonstrated to be effective in wildland
and structural fire fighting applications. The nozzles in use
are of a smooth bore design, releasing a "rope" of foam with
i5 high forward momentum. Widening the delivery angle with
conventional nozzles collapses the bubble structure and
degenerates the foam turning it back into solution and air.
A fixed fire suppression system using CAF has not been
developed due to the difficulty in distributing and delivering
the expanded foam. Foam systems using aspirating nozzles are
in wide use, however, their effectiveness is limited due to
several factors:
a) The work required to generate the foam
comes from the solution flow which
reduces the delivered momentum.
b) The foam generated is not as stable and
consistent as CAF, and the expansion
ratios are not as high, limiting its
ability to adhere to vertical surfaces.
c) The air used to expand the solution comes
from a fire environment and is
2

2~.3~1~9
contaminated with smoke and soot which
degrades the foam and, in some nozzles,
plugs the screen which generates the
foam.
d) The concentration of foaming agent in
solution must be at least 2 times greater
than a CAF system which greatly increases
the operating costs.
According to the invention, there is provided a nozzle
for generating an expanding stream of air-compressed foam, the
nozzle comprising:
a barrel section defining a passageway therein,
a distributor assembly connected rotatably to the barrel
section for rotation essentially about the longitudinal axis
of the barrel section, the assembly having from two to four
outlets, the assembly and the outlets defining passageways in
register with the passageway of the barrel section. The
longitudinal axis of at least one of the outlets is disposed
at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the barrel section and
skewed relative to the other outlets so as to cause, upon a
forced f low of a f luid through the barrel section and the
outlets, a rotational movement of the distributor assembly
relative to the barrel section.
The cross-sectional area of the passageway of the barrel
section should approximately match the sum of the cross-
sectional area of the passageways of the outlets.
In the drawings which illustrate the invention in more
details,
Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of the nozzle of the
invention,
Fig. 2 is a longitudinal, partly cross-sectional view of
the nozzle, and
3

CA 02131109 2001-11-07
Fig. 3 is plan view from the top of Fig. 2, of the
distributor assembly.
The nozzle as shown in Fig. 1 and 2 has a barrel
which is adapted to be connected to a source of
air-compressed foam for delivering a stream of the foam to
the distributor assembly 12. The assembly 12 has a
cylindrical section 13 and three tubular outlets 14, 16 and
18 which are angled at 45° relative to the vertical
direction (longitudinal axis 15 of the cylindrical section
13) and skewed by 120° against each other as best shown in
Fig. 3. One of the outlets 14 is truncated to enable, in
operation, a distribution of a stream of foam close to the
longitudinal axis of the section 13 while the other outlets
direct their respective foam streams in an annular zone
which is wider than the zone covered by the stream of the
outlet 14 (a greater delivery angle). As shown in Fig. 2,
the distributor assembly is coupled to the barrrel 1.0 by
means of a loose-fit bearing which consists of a coupling 20
which is threaded onto the barrel 10 and retained thereon by
means of a set screw :?1 and has a flange 22 which engages a
lip 24 on the cylindrical section 13 of the distributor
assembly 12 in a manner to enable a rotation of the
distributor assembly 1?. relative to the barrel 10.
As seen in Fig. 3, the tubular outlets 14, 16 and
18 have upper sections 24 which adjoin each other at: the
upstream end where they are attached to the cylindrical
section 13. The space between and around the points of
contact of the upper sections i.s filled, e.g. by brazing.
certain portions 26 of the cross-sectional areas of the
tubular outlets 14, :L6, 18 extend beyond the periphery of
the tubular section :L3 and may optionally be closed. This
is, however, not necessary as it does not impair the
operation of the nozzle if the portions 26 are left open.
4

~~3_L:1~9
In operation, a CAF foam stream is delivered through a
stationary piping system through the stationary barrel 10 and
through the three angled outlets. The skewed arrangement of
the outlets causes a turbine action of the distributor
assembly which is facilitated by the loose-fit bearing. The
force exerted by the foam exiting the nozzle causes the
distributor assembly to spin (clockwise in the arrangement of
Fig. 3). The three rotating streams form a solid cone which
distributes the foam uniformly over a broad area (typically
7m2 when the nozzle is located near the ceiling of a typical
room). Two of these distributors direct foam into the outer
area and the third is truncated to fill the inner area.
Because the foam stream is only redirected, the bubble
structure is not damaged and much of the forward momentum is
preserved.
It is the gentle redirection of the foam and its rotary
action which makes this nozzle unique. It has been tested as
part of a fixed piping fire suppression system in single and
2o multiple head configurations and proven effective on Class B
liquid fuel fires and Class A combustible fires.
The following is a list of the design limitations of the
nozzle:
A) The combined cross sectional areas of the outlets
should not be less than the cross sectional area of the foam
delivery tube nor should it be larger than 2 times the cross
sectional area of the delivery tube.
B) The number of foam outlets can be as few as 2 but
no greater than 4. A single outlet would still function,
however the vibration stresses from the imbalance are
undesirable. Outlet numbers greater than 4 can rob the
system of rotational power and can make the nozzle
5

~~.~:~~~9
unreliable. Two or three outlets provide reliable
operation and can produce a uniform coverage (3 outlets) to
protect floor areas or a wide hollow coverage (2 outlets) to
protect walls.
C) For the three-outlet nozzle the delivery angle of
two outlets is 45 degrees from vertical. The third outlet
delivers foam from 0 to 45 degrees. This produces a solid
90 degree cone of foam. Delivery angles significantly
greater than 45 degrees would function but the uniform
distribution would suffer. Delivery angles significantly
less than 45 degrees would rob rotational power and make the
nozzle unreliable. For these reasons a l0 degree tolerance
should be considered to be maximum.
D) For a 2 outlet nozzle any delivery angle from 45 to
90 degrees will function since the area of coverage is
intentionally hollow. A 90 degree angle, from vertical,
will deliver foam horizontally to cover the upper portion
of the surrounding walls. The foam will then flow under
gravity down the surface to protect the lower portion.
Delivery angles significantly less than 45 degrees would rob
rotational power and make the nozzle unreliable.
E) The foam outlet skew angle of 120 degrees on the
three-outlet nozzle can not be physically greater than 120
degrees and angles less than 110 degrees will reduce the
rotational power and affect the reliability of operation.
F) A 2 outlet nozzle can have a skew angle up to 180
degrees.
6

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : Périmé (brevet - nouvelle loi) 2014-08-30
Requête visant le maintien en état reçue 2013-06-04
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2012-11-26
Inactive : Acc. récept. de corrections art.8 Loi 2012-11-20
Inactive : Correction selon art.8 Loi demandée 2009-01-20
Inactive : TME en retard traitée 2008-10-22
Lettre envoyée 2008-09-02
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : TME en retard traitée 2005-10-28
Lettre envoyée 2005-08-30
Accordé par délivrance 2002-11-12
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2002-11-11
Préoctroi 2002-07-08
Inactive : Taxe finale reçue 2002-07-08
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2002-02-11
Lettre envoyée 2002-02-11
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2002-02-11
Inactive : Approuvée aux fins d'acceptation (AFA) 2002-01-22
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2002-01-15
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2001-11-07
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2001-09-19
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2001-09-19
Exigences relatives à la révocation de la nomination d'un agent - jugée conforme 2001-09-19
Demande visant la révocation de la nomination d'un agent 2001-07-30
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2001-07-23
Lettre envoyée 2000-10-11
Exigences de rétablissement - réputé conforme pour tous les motifs d'abandon 2000-09-29
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 2000-08-30
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 1999-12-10
Inactive : Correspondance - Poursuite 1999-09-21
Inactive : Renseign. sur l'état - Complets dès date d'ent. journ. 1999-08-31
Lettre envoyée 1999-08-31
Inactive : Dem. traitée sur TS dès date d'ent. journal 1999-08-31
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 1999-08-11
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 1999-08-11
Lettre envoyée 1998-10-02
Exigences de rétablissement - réputé conforme pour tous les motifs d'abandon 1998-09-24
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 1998-08-31
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1996-03-01

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
2000-08-30
1998-08-31

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2002-07-25

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
GEORGE P. CRAMPTON
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Page couverture 1996-04-22 1 13
Abrégé 1996-03-01 1 14
Description 1996-03-01 6 241
Revendications 1996-03-01 1 22
Dessins 1996-03-01 3 48
Revendications 1999-12-10 1 31
Description 2001-11-07 6 237
Dessins 2001-11-07 3 33
Page couverture 2002-10-09 1 31
Revendications 2002-01-15 2 72
Dessin représentatif 2002-01-23 1 6
Dessin représentatif 1997-12-12 1 6
Page couverture 2012-11-20 2 66
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 1998-09-28 1 184
Avis de retablissement 1998-10-02 1 170
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 1999-08-31 1 193
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 2000-09-27 1 184
Avis de retablissement 2000-10-11 1 171
Avis du commissaire - Demande jugée acceptable 2002-02-11 1 164
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2005-10-25 1 173
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2005-10-25 1 173
Quittance d'un paiement en retard 2005-11-07 1 166
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2008-10-14 1 171
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2008-10-14 1 171
Quittance d'un paiement en retard 2008-11-06 1 164
Taxes 2003-08-27 1 24
Correspondance 2001-07-30 2 83
Correspondance 2002-07-08 2 71
Taxes 1998-09-24 1 39
Taxes 2000-09-29 1 29
Taxes 2002-07-25 1 40
Correspondance 2001-09-19 1 19
Correspondance 2001-09-19 1 17
Taxes 2001-08-24 1 31
Taxes 1997-08-07 3 110
Taxes 1999-06-30 1 30
Taxes 1998-09-28 2 165
Taxes 2004-08-16 1 24
Taxes 2005-10-28 1 27
Taxes 2006-08-21 1 23
Taxes 2007-08-07 1 23
Correspondance 2008-10-22 1 30
Taxes 2009-06-30 1 30
Taxes 2010-07-15 1 30
Taxes 2011-07-19 1 27
Taxes 2012-06-26 1 30
Correspondance 2009-01-20 3 108
Taxes 2013-06-04 1 29
Taxes 1996-08-27 3 92