Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2019959 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2019959
(54) Titre français: METHODE ET APPAREIL DE TRAITEMENT DE MELANGES DE MINERAIS BROYES
(54) Titre anglais: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESS FOR PROCESSING GROUND-UP MIXTURES OF MINERALS
Statut: Périmé
Données bibliographiques
(52) Classification canadienne des brevets (CCB):
  • 209/3
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • B03C 7/12 (2006.01)
  • B03C 7/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • SINGEWALD, ARNO (Allemagne)
  • GOTTE, JOST (Allemagne)
  • FRICKE, GUNTER (Allemagne)
  • KIRCHNER, SIEGFRIED (Allemagne)
(73) Titulaires :
  • KALI UND SALZ BETEILIGUNGS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (Allemagne)
(71) Demandeurs :
(74) Agent: GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 1996-09-10
(22) Date de dépôt: 1990-06-27
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 1990-12-28
Requête d'examen: 1990-11-19
Licence disponible: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
P 39 21 072.3 Allemagne 1989-06-28

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais






A process and a device is disclosed for the electrostatic separation of
mineral mixtures, especially raw potassium salts, in a free fall separator, into
a coarse fraction and a fine fraction, after the ground-up mixture has been
conditioned and electrostatically charged. Each of the fractions is separately
electrostatically processed and the fine fraction is fed to a free fall separator
where a vertical air flow is generated in the direction from the inlet to foot of
the separator. To generate the air flow, tubes or annular pipes made of
electrically non-conducting material, are arranged in the discharge ducts of the
free fall separator. These devices have nozzle openings oriented towards the
foot of the separator and they are connected to a device which generates a
negative pressure.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


- 9 -
CLAIMS

1 . Method for processing ground-up mixtures of minerals, particularly
potassium salts having substantial amounts of fines, said method comprising
the steps of:
chemical conditioning of the mineral mixture;
subsequently triboelectrically charging the mixture;
subsequently separating the mixture into a coarse fraction and a fine
fraction, each fraction having a defined size range;
electrostatically separating the coarse fraction in a free fall separator;
electrostatically separating the fine fraction in a free fall separator in an
electrostatic field on which is superimposed an air flow oriented
vertically from the inlet to the foot of the separator.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the separation in the coarse
fraction and a fine fraction is carried out in a separation particle size range of
from 0.04 to 0.315 mm.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the separation in a coarse fraction
and a fine fraction is carried out in a predetermined particle size range of 0.063
to 0.2 mm.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the flow rate of the vertical air
flow is less than 3 m/sec.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the flow rate is less than 1
m/sec.

6. Electrostatic free fall separator for processing ground-up mixtures
of minerals, especially raw potassium salts, having substantial amounts of
fines, said separator comprising, in combination:
(a) a generally vertical free fall shaft having an upper feeding end and a
lower end which communicates with a plurality of discharge ducts;
(b) said discharge ducts being provided with tubular members;




-10-
(c) each said tubular member being connected to a source of underpressure;
(d) said tubular members defining a plurality of nozzle openings directed in
a downward direction.

7. Electrostatic free fall separator for processing ground-up mixtures
of minerals, especially raw potassium salts, having substantial amounts of
fines, said separator comprising, in combination:
(a) a generally vertical free fall shaft having an upper feeding end and a
lower end which communicates with a plurality of discharge ducts;
(b) said discharge ducts being provided with generally horizontal tubes
disposed in each of said discharge ducts;
(c) said generally horizontal tubes being connected to a source of
underpressure;
(d) each said generally horizontal tube being provided with a plurality of
downwardly directed nozzle openings.

8. Electrostatic free fall separator for processing ground-up mixtures
of minerals, especially raw potassium salts, having substantial amounts of
fines, said separator comprising, in combination:
(a) a generally vertical free fall shaft having an upper feeding end and a
lower end which communicates with a plurality of discharge ducts;
(b) said discharge ducts being passages which are provided with generally
horizontal tubes made of an electrically non-conductive material and
disposed in each of said discharge ducts such that they only partly
obstruct the respective duct;
(c) said generally horizontal tubes being connected to a source of
underpressure;
(d) each said generally horizontal tube being provided with a plurality of
downwardly directed nozzle openings;
whereby the tubes transmit each to the respective passage an underpressure
when the source of underpressure is activated.

-11-
9. Electrostatic free fall separator for processing ground-up mixtures
of minerals, especially raw potassium salts, having substantial amounts of
fines, said separator comprising, in combination:
(a) a generally vertical free fall shaft having an upper feeding end and a
lower end which communicates with a plurality of discharge ducts;
(b) said discharge ducts being provided with generally horizontal tubes
disposed in each of said discharge ducts;
(c) said generally horizontal tubes defining a generally horizontal annular
chamber connected to a source of underpressure;
(d) each said annular chamber communicating with the respective discharge
duct via a plurality of downwardly directed nozzle openings;
whereby the tubes transmit each to the respective passage an underpressure
when the source of underpressure is activated.

10. Electrostatic free fall separator for processing ground-up mixtures
of minerals, especially raw potassium salts, having substantial amounts of
fines, said separator comprising, in combination:
(a) a generally vertical free fall shaft having an upper feeding end and a
lower end which communicates with a plurality of discharge ducts;
(b) said discharge ducts being passages which are provided with generally
horizontal tubes of annular cross-section made of an electrically non-
conductive material and disposed in each of said discharge ducts such
that they only partly obstruct the respective duct;
(c) said generally horizontal tubes being connected to a source of
underpressure;
(d) each said generally horizontal tube being provided with a plurality of
downwardly directed nozzle openings;
whereby the tubes transmit each to the respective passage an underpressure
when the source of underpressure is activated.

11. A device according to one of claims 7, 8, 9 or 10 wherein:
(a) said free fall shaft has the general shape of an upright rectangular
chamber including two opposed side walls and two downwardly
convergent, opposed bottom walls defining a straight, elongated lower

-12-
wedge-shaped portion at which the chamber merges with said discharge
ducts;
(b) said horizontal tubes being generally parallel with the elongation of the
wedge-shaped portion.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


-2- 2019959
It is well known that mixtures of minerals, and in particular raw
potassium salts, can be broken down into their component fractions by
electrostatic means. To accomplish this, the raw potassium salts are ground
until the intergrowths are destroyed, then the fraction having a grain size of up
5 to 2 mm is separated out of the ground material. This fraction of the raw
potassium salts is then mixed with small amounts of chemical conditioners
which facilitate the transfer of charge between the particles of the mixture
during the subsequent step when the mixture is triboelectrically charged under
defined conditions of relative humidity and temperature in the ambient air. The
10 triboelectrically charged mixture is then fed to electrostatic free fall separators
where it is separated into a product fraction, middlings and residue. This
method of processing potassium salts is described in detail by Singewald et al.
in the journal "Chem.-lng.-Techn." 55 (1983), pp. 30 to 45.
However, it is also a known fact that extremely fine fractions having
15 grain sizes of less than 0.1 mm, which may be present in substantial quantities
in the ground mixtures of potassium salts, exert a highly disruptive influence
on the electrostatic processing of these mixtures. Therefore, German Patents
12 59 803 and 12 79 572 reveal processes by means of which these
disrupting influences can be largely avoided. According to these processes,
20 the ground-up mixture of raw potassium salts can be broken down in a first
electrostatic stage into a "fines" fraction, comprising the extremely fine-sizedfractions, a residue, a pre-concentrated product fraction and possibly a
middlings fraction. In both cases, it si necessary by means of a wet process
to further treat the separated fines fraction before a saleable product can be
25 produced from it. The considerably amounts (up to 20%) of fine-sized materialpresent in ground-up raw potassium salts can cause serious disruptions when
the material is then further processes by wet means.
This gave rise to the need to find ways by which even the fine-sized
fractions of ground mixtures of minerals, and in particular raw potassium salts,30 can be processed electrostatically, i.e. using dry methods.
In general terms, the present invention provides, in one aspect thereof,
a process for processing ground-up mixtures of minerals, especially raw
potassium slats, having substantial amounts of fines, by means of electrostatic
separation in free fall separators following conditioning and triboelectric
r
D

_ ~3~ 2019~59
charging wherein, following conditioning and triboelectric charging, the mineralmixture is separated in a defined separation size range into a coarse fraction
and a fine fraction, and the coarse fraction is then electrostatically processedin free fall separators, while the fine fraction is separately fed to an
electrostatic free fall separator in which the fine fraction is exposed to an
electric filed on which is superimposed an air flow oriented vertically from theinlet to the foot of the separator.
In another aspect, the invention provides apparatus for carrying out the
above method, wherein tubes or annular pipes made of electrically non-
conducting materials are arranged in the discharge ducts of the free fall
separator, said pipes or tubes being provided with a number of nozzle openings
directed towards the foot of the separator and being connected with a device
which produces a negative pressure.
The separation size range in question here is between 0.04 and 0.315
mm. The preferred size range for this process is between 0.063 and 0.2 mm.
The flow rate of the vertical air flow is advantageously less than 3 m/sec
and preferentially less than 1 m/sec.
The invention is described below on the basis of the processing of raw
potassium salt. In order to implement the process according to the invention,
the raw potassium slat is ground to sizes below 2 mm and conditioned using
known chemical conditions; it is then triboelectrically charged by setting the
individual salt particles in vigorous motion, for example in a fluidized bed, in a
suitably warmed carrier air flow having a predetermined relative humidity. The
fine fractions of the salt mixture are carried out of the fluidized bed in the
carrier air flow and then separated from the carrier air, for example in a cyclone
or another suitable fines separating device.
The separated fine fraction containing particle sizes of less than 0.1 mm
is then fed into an electrostatic tube, belt or roll separator, preferably a tube
or belt separator.
Particularly good separating results can be achieved in separators n
which an air flow is generated and maintained from the feed chute to the
bottom end of the separator. The flow rate of this air flow should be less than
3 m/sec, and preferentially less than 1 m/sec.
D

~ -4 2019gS9
The air flow in the direction of fall through the free fall shaft is almost
totally free of swirling and this considerably improves the deflection of the
charged salt particles, particularly the finest low-weight sizes, towards the
oppositely charged electrode.
An air flow of this type can advantageously be generated by means of
tubes made of electrically non-conducting material whose walls contain a large
number of nozzle-like openings pointing towards the foot of the separator and
connected via a control device to a system for generating negative pressure.
These tubes are arranged in the particles discharge ducts of the separator; theyrun parallel to its horizontal axis or lower edge and they extend over almost the
entire length of the separating ducts.
The present invention will be described by way of examples, with
reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of an apparatus according to
1 5 the present invention;
Figure 2 is a diagrammatic representation of the separator of Figure 1,
showing a detail thereof;
Figure 3 is a diagrammatic representation of a method according to
German Patent 12 59 803; and
Figure 4 is a diagrammatic representation similar to that of Figure 3 but
showing the method of the present invention.
Turning now to Figures 1 and 2, a device is depicted by way of example
in diagrammatic form in Figures 1 and 2.
The apparatus is shown as comprising an upright rectangular chamber
or free fall shaft 2. The free fall shaft 2 displays two side walls which are
generally upright and each of which merges with a downwardly and inwards
inclined bottom wall, so that the bottom walls form a hopper-like downwardly
narrowing generally wedge shaped configuration which extends parallel with
obtuse angled corners between the side walls and the bottom walls.
Below the free fall shaft 2, which is bounded by the belt electrodes 1,
one at each side wall of the chamber 2, generally horizontal tubes 7 are
arranged each in one of particle discharge ducts 4 to 6. As shown, the tubes
7 only partly obstruct the passage through the respective discharge duct 4 -

~5~ 2019959
6. The tubes 7 are connected to the device for generating negative pressure,
for instance a vacuum pump.
Fig. 2 depicts, in diagrammatic form, a part section through such a tube
7, showing the openings 8 oriented towards the bottom of the discharge duct.
5 It is, of course, possible to provide a large number of such tubes 7 in a free fall
shaft.
It is also, however, possible to fit in the discharge ducts of the separator
on or more horizontally arranged annular pipes (not shown in the diagrammatic
drawings) made of electrically non-conducting material which would define
10 horizontally elongated annular chamber having in their outer walls downwardlyoriented nozzles or nozzle openings. With these annular pipes it is also possible
to achieve the desired air flow if the annular chambers are connected via
suitable control devices to a device for generating negative pressure.
The air flowing through the nozzle-like openings 8 into the tubes 7 or the
15 annular chamber creates a slight negative pressure in the upper part 9 of theparticle discharge ducts, and in turn this negative pressure creates, in the free
fall shaft 2, a vertically directed downward air flow running from the inlet to
the bottom of the separator.
As already mentioned, when they are separated from the coarse
20 fractions and further processed by wet means, the fines fraction (up to 20%)
contained in the ground-up raw potassium salts can considerably disrupt the
dissolving process and drastically increase the amounts of process liquor used.
These disadvantage are avoided by the process according tot he invention and
are replaced by the advantages of being able to fully process the raw
25 potassium salts by the dry electrostatic separating procedure.
In the following examples, a ground-up raw potassium salt is used as the
mineral mixture.
This raw potassium salt has a K20 content of 18.2%. Apart from very
small amounts of kieserite and anhydrite, the remainder consists of rock salt.
30 The raw potassium salt is conditioned using 150 g/t salicylic acid and then fed
to the fluidized bed device where it is treated and triboelectrically charged byair having 10% relative humidity and a temperature of 60C.
The coarse and fine fractions separated in the fluidized bed device have
the following screen analyses:
D
i

-6- ` 2019959
Coarse Fraction Fines Fraction
Grain Size (mm) Content wt.% Grain Size (mm) Content wt.%
>0.5 29.2 >0.1 11.1
0.2 to 0.5 47.5 0.063 to 0.1 33.3
0.16 to 0.2 8.7 0.04 to 0.063 31.7
0.1 to 0.16 12.1 >0.04 23.9
>0.1 2.5

In each case 10 t of the raw potassium salt pretreated in the manner
described are used in the following examples.
10 ExamPle 1 (comparison, as per German Patent 12 59 803)
This example follows the process flow chart illustrated in Fig.3. The following
separating results are obtained:

Amount K20 Content K20 Yield
(t) (%) (%)
Product pre-concentrate 2.98 44.1 72.2
Fines fraction 0.76 38.7 16.1
Residue 6.26 3.4 11.7

Mixing the product pre-concentratethe fines fraction gives a concentrate
having 43.0 wt.% K20 in a yield of 88.3 wt.% K20. The residue contains a
mean K20 content of 3.4 wt%, namely 2.3 wt.% in the >0.1 mm screen
fraction and 8.2 wt.% in the <0.1 mm screen fraction.
20 Example 2 (comparison, as per diagram in Figure 4, but without air flow)
Following the triboelectric charging process, the fine and coarse fractions are
fed to separate electrostatic free fall separators. The following separating
results are obtained:




D

7 2019959



K20
Quantity Content K2O Yield
Relative to Relative to
Separator Overall Process
(t) (%) (%) (%)
Coarse
Concentrate 2.88 46.7 92.7 73.9
Coarse Residue 5.32 2.0 7.3 5.9
Fine Concentrate0.83 35.5 80.2 16.2
Fine Residue 0.97 7.5 19.8 4.0

Mixing the coarse and fine concentrates gives a concentrate having a
44.2 wt.% K2O content in a yield of 90.1 wt.% K2O. This corresponds to an
increase of 1.8% in the K2O yield compared with the results obtained in
Example 1.
10 ExamPle 3 (according to the invention, separate processing of the fines fraction
by means of an air flow in the free fall shaft, as per the diagram in Fig. 4)

The following separating results are obtained:



K20
QuantityContentK2O Yield
Relative to Relative to
Separator Overall Process
(t) (%) (%) (%)
Coarse
Concentrate 2.88 46.7 92.7 74.0
Coarse Residue 5.32 2.0 7.3 5.9
Fine Concentrate0.86 39.6 92.8 18.7
Fine Residue 0.94 2.8 7.2 1.4

'l
D

-8- 201~S9
Mixing the coarse and fine concentrates give a concentrate having a
45.1 wt.% K20 content in a yield of 92.7 wt.% K20. Compared with the
results according to Examples 1 and 2, this is where the highest values are
obtained. A comparison of the separating results further shows that the fines
5 separating efficiency of the separator is considerably improved by the vertical
air flow.
D

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , États administratifs , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

États administratifs

Titre Date
Date de délivrance prévu 1996-09-10
(22) Dépôt 1990-06-27
Requête d'examen 1990-11-19
(41) Mise à la disponibilité du public 1990-12-28
(45) Délivré 1996-09-10
Expiré 2010-06-27

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Historique des paiements

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Montant payé Date payée
Le dépôt d'une demande de brevet 0,00 $ 1990-06-27
Enregistrement de documents 0,00 $ 1991-02-13
Taxe de maintien en état - Demande - nouvelle loi 2 1992-06-29 100,00 $ 1992-06-12
Taxe de maintien en état - Demande - nouvelle loi 3 1993-06-28 100,00 $ 1993-06-02
Taxe de maintien en état - Demande - nouvelle loi 4 1994-06-27 100,00 $ 1994-06-13
Taxe de maintien en état - Demande - nouvelle loi 5 1995-06-27 150,00 $ 1995-05-10
Taxe de maintien en état - Demande - nouvelle loi 6 1996-06-27 150,00 $ 1996-06-04
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 7 1997-06-27 150,00 $ 1997-05-13
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 8 1998-06-29 150,00 $ 1998-05-26
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 9 1999-06-28 150,00 $ 1999-06-10
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 10 2000-06-27 200,00 $ 2000-05-30
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 11 2001-06-27 200,00 $ 2001-06-13
Enregistrement de documents 0,00 $ 2001-10-18
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 12 2002-06-27 200,00 $ 2002-06-04
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 13 2003-06-27 200,00 $ 2003-06-13
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 14 2004-06-28 250,00 $ 2004-06-11
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 15 2005-06-27 450,00 $ 2005-05-09
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 16 2006-06-27 450,00 $ 2006-05-05
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 17 2007-06-27 450,00 $ 2007-05-07
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 18 2008-06-27 450,00 $ 2008-05-12
Taxe de maintien en état - brevet - nouvelle loi 19 2009-06-29 450,00 $ 2009-05-14
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
KALI UND SALZ BETEILIGUNGS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
FRICKE, GUNTER
GOTTE, JOST
KALI UND SALZ AG
KIRCHNER, SIEGFRIED
SINGEWALD, ARNO
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Dessins représentatifs 1999-07-29 1 10
Revendications 1993-10-08 1 48
Abrégé 1993-10-08 1 24
Page couverture 1993-10-08 1 22
Dessins 1993-10-08 4 55
Description 1993-10-08 7 305
Page couverture 1996-09-10 1 20
Abrégé 1996-09-10 1 21
Description 1996-09-10 7 274
Revendications 1996-09-10 4 128
Dessins 1996-09-10 4 45
Taxes 2003-06-13 1 31
Taxes 1999-06-10 1 28
Taxes 1998-05-26 1 25
Taxes 2001-06-13 1 28
Taxes 2002-06-04 1 34
Taxes 2000-05-30 1 35
Taxes 2004-06-11 1 32
Lettre du bureau 1990-09-14 1 37
Correspondance reliée au PCT 1996-07-08 1 31
Lettre du bureau 1991-03-12 1 20
Correspondance reliée au PCT 1993-03-30 1 34
Correspondance de la poursuite 1990-11-19 1 33
Correspondance de la poursuite 1996-04-12 2 54
Demande d'examen 1995-10-20 1 47
Demande d'examen 1992-11-23 1 56
Demande d'examen 1994-09-24 2 75
Correspondance de la poursuite 1995-01-13 3 126
Correspondance de la poursuite 1991-01-03 1 31
Taxes 1997-05-13 1 35
Taxes 1996-06-04 1 32
Taxes 1995-05-10 1 41
Taxes 1994-06-13 1 47
Taxes 1993-06-02 1 34
Taxes 1992-06-12 1 34